Recommended Posts

Can any expert here recommend from personal experience an ergonomic dark-background skin for WindowBlinds?

I am looking for a color scheme that has been scientifically designed with consideration for color theory and the visual mechanism (e.g. visual purple physiology).

Such a skin should be clear and restful, with highly legible text, and usable over long periods without tiring the eyes.

As a developer I spend extended periods in front of the monitor reading text. Of course, one can adjust at least the color scheme of individual programs - for example by using billw in Xemacs - but this does not address the overall ergonomics of the whole 'desktop'. Many programs default to a blinding white background which I find intolerable.

I think that the black-on-white schemes have more to do with fashion and a misguided search for 'modernity' than with ergonomics.

I suspect that a good color theme would be based upon a black background with muted green text - like the old vdus . (Since buying WindowBlinds a few days ago I've been using its Noire skin.)

Edited by _pF_

For starters, my suggestion would be to open the Windowblinds Configuration menu, pick a graphically pleasing skin, and then click on the "Change skin color" in the skin's view (in the example of a skin's window). The menu that comes up should give you enough color/grayscale/gamma alternatives with which to experiment. If this doesn't work out, your next move would probably be to get a copy of SkinStudio which would permit you to be a little more specific in your changes.

Good luck,

Art

Can any expert here recommend from personal experience an ergonomic dark-background skin for WindowBlinds?

I am looking for a color scheme that has been scientifically designed with consideration for color theory and the visual mechanism

As a devoper I spend extended periods in front of the monitor reading text.

Uhmm I see... I see. I know your feelings. I strongly recommend thisAquatone skin.

Use that skin, you will never regret!

I use Royale Five Color Mod set on black, while I don't think it was designed with ergonomics in mind, it definitely works. Text is always very easily legible, the gradients used are never high contrast and I always end up going back to it. I have been using it for a long time now, simply because others seem harder to use, and the colours on this one are very easy to get used to. It also looks really nice.

It's Uxtheme.dll, not sure if it would work with Window Blinds, but you could just use the UXtheme patcher.

I use Royale Five Color Mod set on black, while I don't think it was designed with ergonomics in mind, it definitely works. Text is always very easily legible, the gradients used are never high contrast and I always end up going back to it. I have been using it for a long time now, simply because others seem harder to use, and the colours on this one are very easy to get used to. It also looks really nice.

It's Uxtheme.dll, not sure if it would work with Window Blinds, but you could just use the UXtheme patcher.

All you need to do is import it into SkinStudio and it'll automatically convert it to WB for you. http://www.stardock.com/products/skinstudio/downloads.asp

Have you given any thought to <a href="http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/16694839/">Antimatter</a>? It's not green on black, it's white on black, but it's a fairly pleasing minimalist skin that's easy on the eyes. I'd definately recommend the Tahoma font substyle, however, as the fonts he includes aren't the most legible.

I don't think many people have done much with scientifically designing skins, as it's a more artistic process generally.

Thank you for the suggestions, all interesting skins.

On a cursory trial I found Aquatone to be too fussy with its patterned backgrounds, but generally clear apart from the control buttons. I very much liked Antimatter Tahoma in theory, but had trouble with some of the tiny fonts that didn't resize. I'll certainly examine this skin more closely.

I'm currently using Royale Five Color Mod Tahoma (also set on black), which has exceptionally clean text against all backgrounds; a lucid skin that feels snappy in performance for some reason. I like it a lot.

(Whilst on the subject of ergonomics I'd recommend a mono spaced programmers' font, HVRaster.)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      558
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!