[Shell Patcher] Tango Icons for Windows


Recommended Posts

Woo-oot.

using clearlooks 2.2 vs that icon looks 'smahed' a bit for Opera

(after adding paths to INI file)

i think its too transtaparent on the edjes, it should be redone to more solid

i dont think the screen is needed, you can check it out yourself

/Super%20Turbo%20Tango%20Patcher%20August%202006.exe 1155 1.41 gigabytes

/Tango_0pt7pt2c.exe 787 433 982.84 megabytes

/Tango_Emblemated.zip 396 24 21.69 megabytes

/Tango_StartMenuCategories.zip 362 24 21.94 megabytes

/Tango_MediaPlayers.zip 256 22 14.24 megabytes

/download/tango-icons-png.rar 156 37 358.70 megabytes

/Tango_0pt7pt2c+1.zip 115 5 3.72 megabytes

/Tangerine_StartMenuCategories.zip 59 8 3.31 megabytes

File|Hits|Incomplete Hits (if applicable)|Bandwidth

Sweet! Your shellpatcher is getting some serious attention ;)

Edited by bobp

/Super%20Turbo%20Tango%20Patcher%20August%202006.exe 1155 1.41 gigabytes

/Tango_0pt7pt2c.exe 787 433 982.84 megabytes

/Tango_Emblemated.zip 396 24 21.69 megabytes

/Tango_StartMenuCategories.zip 362 24 21.94 megabytes

/Tango_MediaPlayers.zip 256 22 14.24 megabytes

/download/tango-icons-png.rar 156 37 358.70 megabytes

/Tango_0pt7pt2c+1.zip 115 5 3.72 megabytes

/Tangerine_StartMenuCategories.zip 59 8 3.31 megabytes

File|Hits|Incomplete Hits (if applicable)|Bandwidth

Sweet! Your shellpatcher is getting some serious attention ;)

i dont understand you in the development now? :D

with vergo or whats that?

... so it's just one great big happy GPL lovefest.

lol... (Y) good one... still laughing!

Windows Media Connect is Microsofts own UPnP media server. Sounds like candy for customers and Microsoft tries to bring those PC's to the livingroom. It's clear, market domination wanted -> server included, for free ;)

HP included it even on the "Drivers and Tools DVD" delivered with my system. If I do a default install WMC will be installed along with the ethernet and wlan drivers, so it has to be of the same importance. Tiny little detail: XP hasn't any drivers included for my gigabit ethernet nor wireless lan cards... hehe... I see $$$ speaking...

Oh, I've got the installer... I just haven't gotten around to installing it. Lazy :p

Actually I was talking about sending you the iexplore.exe or the Internet Explorer folder so it's easier for you to know where you have to mess around in those exe and dll files. That way you wouldn't have to install IE7... ;) And I forgot: you would see some more german localized files... hehe... learning a language by reshacking files. LOL...

Edited by schaggo
The August release used 1.5 GB of BW and was d/led 1155 times. That's alot for a little shell patcher.

No the firewall icon is not Tango, its a custom jimmac.

Wow. I can believe it, since the new installer was something a lot of people were looking forward to... and the first month the patcher was out, I exceeded my 1GB/month cap on darkt.net. Supposedly, it's been Dugg. Well, I got an email from somebody who said so, at least.

Yeah, the firewall is from SLED's Yast, I got it through Jimmac's WIP page for NLD10's Yast (NLD10 became SLED AFAICT). I can't get Novell's site to let me download it using a download manager, so pulling stuff from SLED/NLD10 (which seems to be where the grey folders are coming from) is out for a while. Sometime when I've got some USB Mass Storage with me near a fast connection, I'll think about grabbing it. Supposedly it automagically installs the ATI drivers, so I kinda want to play with it anyways. Maybe I'll install it and never reinstall Windows :shiftyninja:

I've been playing with WLM in a VM. I'm shocked and confused... MSN Messenger/WLM doesn't replace Windows Messenger... so you guys pretty much have to have two seperate MSN clients installed? WTF?!

That is correct. WLM/MSN run along the crappy-as-hell Windows Messenger.

It is actually extremely hard to uninstall Windows Messenger, average Joe couldn't do it.

Regarding non-Fusion comctl32 bitmaps (if you look back I screenshotted the reshacker open dialog), are the bitmaps for reshackers open dialog %windir%\sys32\comctl32.dll or somewhere crazy (ie. c:\windows\winsxs\c43j45ok54u6546h45654\comctl32.dll)?

That is correct. WLM/MSN run along the crappy-as-hell Windows Messenger.

It is actually extremely hard to uninstall Windows Messenger, average Joe couldn't do it.

Regarding non-Fusion comctl32 bitmaps (if you look back I screenshotted the reshacker open dialog), are the bitmaps for reshackers open dialog %windir%\sys32\comctl32.dll or somewhere crazy (ie. c:\windows\winsxs\c43j45ok54u6546h45654\comctl32.dll)?

It's in system32 on XP, I think it's Fusion-managed on 2003.

This feature may be already implemented BUT:

I just wanted to make sure since I have deleted a lot of the files in system32 (fsquirt.exe) for instance that the Tango patcher isn't replacing files I don't use nor are there.

Is this true, and if not can it be impletmented?

TEMPNEGROQ :

If [file] doesn't exist, then the Tango patcher errors and goes to the next file. For instance, it will try and patch fsquirt, it will not patch (because the file doesn't exist) and it will move onto the next victim.

I know this because I always leave the nVidia Mixer option checked, and it works anyways (I don't have nVidia Mixer)

The erroring (if it happens :p) is completely transparent. But yes, it will work, and should not crash and leave your system in a half-Tango state (if it does it will be because of something else)

I've blogged about the Tango shell patcher and made my own screenshots : http://www.benpbrown.com/2006/08/15/tango-shell-patcher/

If you want to, you can point people to http://benpbrown.com/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=648 or just rip the images :)

Edited by bobp

Yep, it checks for the existence of a file before trying to modify it. Can't modify a file that isn't there. I've removed a few bits of stuff from my system using XPlite, so I suppose my own machine is a similar case... and I don't release stuff that doesn't work on at least my own machine.

Wow. I can believe it, since the new installer was something a lot of people were looking forward to... and the first month the patcher was out, I exceeded my 1GB/month cap on darkt.net. Supposedly, it's been Dugg. Well, I got an email from somebody who said so, at least.

http://digg.com/mods/Tango_On_Windows

don't worry, i think you're pretty safe (for the moment).

Hah, yeah, judging by the number of Diggs (which I'm guessing is the criteria for being on the front page, I don't visit Digg much), I think we're safe for the moment :p

did you submit any of your "custom" icons to the official Tango website so it can be used by others on other platforms?
Like I said, I dropped mine on the mailing list a while back. They were generally well received, but no response from any of the main devs, so I'd assume they weren't particularly interested. Edited by vertigosity

Would anybody be interested in a video-file icon if I had already inadvertently created one?

tpbqtcznq.pngkbywaxnjg.pngygldzcase.pngvllxhrojo.png

Regedit could do with some editing, especially in the folder icon section (about 1-2 mins of work)

Ahh... but it doesn't like full-color icons.

Edited by bobp
vertigosity, would it be helpful for me to go on a[n installer] screenshot rampage?

Also, do you have any plans.. for an oh... i386 patcher?

Would anybody be interested in a video-file icon if I had already inadvertently created one?

  • Not really. It's an installer. Who cares what it looks like, it's what it does that's interesting. That it's functional, reliable, and has enough checkboxes to give proper choices is all that matters. And that's why it's a good thing.
  • Not really. I never really saw the point of i386-patching for exotic-makeover shell packs. You either have to a. get the normal installer to repatch whenever you update Windows or the shell patcher, b. make a new CD anytime MS or me issues an update, or c. don't update. anything. ever. As it is now, it works well for... everybody, really. It might be an interesting exercise for Inexperience, though, since it makes as much sense there as XPize does. I have a pretty good idea how and where to start to try and make that kind of functionality, but I didn't get code for that from XPero. Tango's forked off of "XPize Lite."
  • Not really. At least, not until I have sheets of paper that play video. The Gnome HIG tells us not to use paper metaphors when we're dealing with things that have real-world counterparts that aren't pieces of paper. Now, Gnome itself has always very ignored that, and will continue to for Git2, but Tango obeys. Plus, that's now the multimedia category icon, and not the video filetype icon (they switched 'em for 0.7.2, the last release - Jimmac thought it made more sense that way, and I agree with him).

vertigosity, I think you missed a post of mine a while back.

if XN Resource editor can be scripted, you can use that to make a 64-bit friendly icon pack

http://www.wilsonc.demon.co.uk/d10resourceeditor.htm

AFAIK, it's the only resource hacker that can modify x64 compiled programs.

vertigosity, I think you missed a post of mine a while back.

if XN Resource editor can be scripted, you can use that to make a 64-bit friendly icon pack

http://www.wilsonc.demon.co.uk/d10resourceeditor.htm

AFAIK, it's the only resource hacker that can modify x64 compiled programs.

It's just my opinion, but I think we should hold off on making a 64-bit version. I only say this because I would like to see updates for the pack to be finished... then work on a 64-bit.

/.teh

vertigosity, I think you missed a post of mine a while back.

if XN Resource editor can be scripted, you can use that to make a 64-bit friendly icon pack

AFAIK, it's the only resource hacker that can modify x64 compiled programs.

Well, if it was scriptable as such, it wouldn't take much effort at all to do, aside from the fact that I can never test it. But as far as I can tell, it isn't. If it is, I certainly can't see how... and there's no documentation, and as far as I can tell it doesn't take any parameters other than a filename. The author has source available, including source for the resource-modifying portion, but that's an exercise for someone else. Someone who has a copy of Delphi.

k, so i've gotten the thin taskbar version done...for the most part.

there's a little issue with the start button, as you can see from the image below.

so either i modify this too, or try for a little bit thicker taskbar.....ideas?

and i fixed the green child window controls, that was my bad. i don't see them very often personally, which is why i didn't worry about it. my bad.

anyways, all i did was follow the instructions on (http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:Uu4ctUP6H_sJ:techconnect.info/forums/index.php%3Fshowtopic%3D1679+%22thin+taskbar%22+how+to+make&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=28) there, damn ie 7...heh

anyways, this is what i came up with. ideas/suggestions appreciated immensley.

more to come asap.

post-11176-1155786075.gif

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!