Programming vs Networking


Programming vs Networking  

45 members have voted

  1. 1. which career field do you think has the brigtest future in America?

    • Programming (C++, Java, Web Development)
      25
    • Networking (MCSA/MCSE, CCNA/CCNP)
      20


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Over the last 5-6 months I've been debating which career field I should try to pursue and am having a little trouble making up my mind. I've been told to stay away from programming, that all (or at least the big majority) of the programming jobs are being outsourced to India. I've also been told that getting a decent networking job is no easy task, that most employers these days require at least a Bachelor's degree, 3-5 years experience, and a plethora of certs (A+, Net+, MCSE, CCNA, Etc..). Even seeing past the catch 22 of "how do I get experience if they won't hire me without experience", as well as the dwindling economy, it would seem that (good) jobs in IT are becoming harder and harder to land. I've even considered changing my major to something easier like Accounting, simply because there are so many job openings for them and the pay is still decent (40-50k). Anyway, what is your personal outlook on the IT field and what do you think the best career path would be if I decide to stick with an IT major?

Thanks,

Grunt

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/426395-programming-vs-networking/
Share on other sites

I voted programming, but if those jobs really are being outsourced to India (I only know of Microsoft doing this) then go for networking.

Someone in India wouldn't be able to set up and maintain a network for an American company. If you can troubleshoot well, you will always be in demand.

I am studying Comptuer Systems Engineering + Computer Science and i am overloading in some communications engineering units

personally i think (and i am studying to work in) the feild of portable and integrated computing is the way to go, this would require new networking technologies, however with those network technologies comes the programming of the packet structures and the protocols with which to access the networks.

if you are talking about network set-up and maintainance i believe programming is growing at a faster rate.

But if those jobs are going to other countries (I am just going by what he said) then it is hopeless. I can't argue with you though as I don't know enough about it.

I do know however that every business in the western world needs computers, networks and people to set up and run them.

Networking in my opinion isn't as important as programming. In most cases networking is simply knowing how to use some programs to do what you want. Programming allows you to build networking tools and much more.

Also, you don't need to go into a pure software company to do programming. There are a lot of non technical companies that need software automation.

Finally, networking is just as suseptible to "outsourcing." Instead of a person in india taking your job, a more robust computer program will allow a company to hire a much less qualified person with less pay to manage the program.

the portable and integrated computing i was talking about is like the development of the 'smart phone' which has grown rather quickly in recent years, also the networks required to communicate between smart phones and increase the bandwidth throughput capable with wireless radio networks (CDMA GSM '3G & 4G' networks)

programming jobs are being outsourced to india and the likes because of lower cost per programmer, however another reason is around the clock development cycles, cram the most man hours into one day.

given that the programming and pure computer science workforce is flooded with applicants (computer science is one of the most popular individual degrees) of average skills, unless you stand out from the crowd it would be hard to find a decent job. for that reason i suggest doing what i have done and taking a double degree, it may take a year or two longer, however in the end the job you will get will be a higher pay and there will be more oppertunities in the market for you

Thanks for the replies, guys. Really appreciate it. Perhaps I should just keep studying programming and spend a year or two longer in school and take some networking certificate classes (mcse, ccna). That way I'd have both bases covered. I'll just have to get over the fact that I hate this town and can't wait to get out of it :cry: Hopefully it will be worth it in the end.

I went for Networking, like you said its hard to start out in a networking position without experiance. I would research your area and see what they are hiring for as entry level positions and focus on that. Keep your education broad to don't be to specific because if you have knowledge in one thing and not another you are limiting your job search. Also you could always look into enter the market in a support position, like a help desk or somthing and then work your way up to something bigger.

Programming is fun and exciting, get to create new things and actually make something worthwhile.

Networking is dull and boring, oo lets connect a few cables together, badda bing badda boom. BOOOOORING.

So i choose programming.. :)

I would have to say "To each their own" on this one. I find programing boring and I have tons of fun with networking. You can run into some big challanges with networking and it is not just simply plugging cables in. Ever try configuring a Cisco Router? But like I said, it is a "To each there own" on this one.

I would have to say "To each their own" on this one. I find programing boring and I have tons of fun with networking. You can run into some big challanges with networking and it is not just simply plugging cables in. Ever try configuring a Cisco Router? But like I said, it is a "To each there own" on this one.

I agree with what you say, its just i'm not a fan of networking, it just doesn't interest me. :p

Coding grunts will always be needed. I don't mean grunts in an insulting way at all. :) I'm just saying that you sit there and grunt it out, coding everyday. I started out a CS major, then quickly changed. There's no WAY I was going to code 8 hours a day. I'm in networking. It's a versatie, changing environment, especially with VoIP on the rise. (Speaking of which, I may want to get certified for that! :)) However, both will be equally needed, but more coders are needed than network engineers, so it's a difficult question to answer. If you were to answer it by how many are needed, then programming wins. I null voted.

Surly that suggests that there is more of a future in programming as 'not as many' people can do it well?

No. He's saying that, since not as many people can do it as well, they are in high demand. However, like I said in my previous post, these points are...beside the point. (That sounded a little redundant of me.) BOTH are needed. What's the use of having good programs if they can't work with other machines? What's the use of having programs to function across networks if there's no functional network?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello mysterious lamborghiniv10, I was in Australia and... now I'm in the Netherlands. 
    • EU says Meta must restore rival chatbots' access to WhatsApp by Hamid Ganji The European Commission has ordered Meta to restore third-party AI chatbots’ access to WhatsApp after the tech giant decided to block them from operating on the popular messaging platform. After Meta banned rival AI chatbots from operating on WhatsApp, the European Commission launched an antitrust investigation to determine whether the company had abused its market dominance. As a result of Meta’s decision, third-party AI chatbots, including Microsoft’s Copilot and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, were prevented from operating on WhatsApp. At the time, Meta said it wanted to reserve the WhatsApp Business API for other types of businesses and did not allow rival chatbots to use it. This effectively prevented the WhatsApp ecosystem from being used to distribute rival chatbot services. However, the European Commission has now announced an interim measures decision requiring Meta to restore access to WhatsApp for rival general-purpose AI assistants on the same terms and conditions as before October 15, 2025. The Commission has also asked Meta to maintain that access until the antitrust investigation is concluded. The Commission argues that Meta has used its dominant market position to prevent rival AI chatbots from accessing the WhatsApp Business API. While Meta allowed rival services to return to WhatsApp by paying a fee, the European Commission still considers that arrangement to be a de facto access ban. According to EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera, the fees introduced by Meta are so high that using WhatsApp is no longer economically sustainable for competitors. “It seems that Meta expects to leverage the vast reach and likely dominance of WhatsApp to benefit its own AI assistant and to foreclose rivals,” Ribera said. “We cannot let large digital incumbents leverage their dominance of the past to dictate who in Europe gets to compete and who gets to innovate in AI.”
    • A few years ago walmart had the 512 models on clearance for $35. I bought 3 of them. I should have purchased more.
    • I'm fine with a little reasonable promotion of Edge, but the degree which they do it right now I consider extremely unreasonable. 
    • Microsoft AI boss no longer believes that AI will replace human workers by David Uzondu Mustafa Suleyman, the head of Microsoft AI, recently took back his statements concerning white-collar jobs that he gave to the Financial Times in an interview made back in February, where he claimed that AI would replace office workers within 12 to 18 months. On Monday's episode of The Verge's Decoder, Suleyman recast the technology as more like a helpmate than a tool designed to take over your job. He explained that smaller office duties will "increasingly become digitized, automated" as people generate more digital materials. During the discussion, Suleyman emphasized a "very important distinction" between "tasks" and "jobs" to clarify his previous claims. He argued that his earlier comments only referred to individual actions that people perform at their desks. Suleyman used to work for DeepMind, the research lab he co-founded in 2010 alongside Demis Hassabis and Shane Legg, before he left in 2022 to establish Inflection AI and build an empathetic digital assistant. Microsoft hired him in March 2024 to lead its newly formed "Microsoft AI" division, placing him in charge of consumer products like Copilot, Bing, and Edge. His February comments also detailed plans for Microsoft to achieve self-sufficiency with a $140 billion infrastructure budget to train frontier models, predicting that creating a customized AI will soon feel like creating a podcast or a new blog: The 41-year-old is not the only AI executive who's softened his "AI will replace you" stance. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, last month used X to push back against employment panic by arguing that his startup builds tools to assist humans rather than build replacements. He had previously garnered backlash by suggesting that many modern office roles that AI might replace did not qualify as "real work" in the first place, at least when you compare desk jobs to physical, historical labor like farming.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!