• 0

My 'Microsoft Never Invents' rant


Question

For context, this was supposed to be part of the IE 7 public preview released thread. It seems this is too big for that section, so I'll post it here.

And for the record, Xbox Live was a good idea. I'm not a blind troll or anything.

Apple did not invent Desktop Search. In fact I remember I read about desktop search first time in Longhorn features back in 2003.

Yeah, Microsoft intended to make search faster by overhauling the filesystem by adding another layer. "WinFS", which ran on top of NTFS (Which is an actual filesystem) was intended to make searches easier.

Of course, it was never implemented, so it doesn't really count. If you think unimplemented things count, it used used Apple's concept of 'stacks', saved searches that behave as folders. They patented it in the mid 90's. WinFS was designed to use stacks all around the filesystem, not just for quick search.

When it comes to desktop search, I honestly don't know (probably a Windows shareware vendor), but Google's attempt at Google Desktop Search, was to create an index beforehand, so searches didn't take so long. It also searched inside files so you didn't need to know the file's name. MSN Desktop Search, aside from copying the name "Desktop Search", was a direct ripoff. Apple's "Spotlight" search, was jumping into the game. Bringing back stacks, and adding the same type of quick searches GDS was well known for.

Windows media works, real media certainly doesn't

Back in its heyday, RealAudio/RealPlayer was actually pretty good. Quicktime had been out for a number of years, for Mac OS as well as Windows. What is now known as Windows Media Player used to be "Video for Windows", and used the avi container. Video for Windows was essentially a copy of Quicktime. When streaming video became more popular than local video, Microsoft rebranded it.

And Windows media only 'works' if you're running a Windows-based PC. Whereas Real has good software for the Mac and Linux, Microsoft did a horrible job on the Mac player, eventually contracting an outside company to turn it into a quicktime plugin. They don't support Linux at all.

Vista's GUI has nothing to do with OSX GUI.

What? Are you kidding me? Microsoft has always copied Apple when it comes to user interfaces, and it became really blatant when they were working on Windows 3.0, when they even hired Susan Kare (designer of the Mac OS icons) to do the Windows 3.0 icons as well. Windows 95 is also a copy (move the start menu to the top of the screen, make the cursor black, and the icons to the right hand side rather then the left).

They also only started codenaming their user interfaces starting with Windows XP, which is the only time they changed it in years (and was right after OS X came out). OS X's UI, codenamed Aqua, was suddenly met by OS XP's UI, codenamed Luna.

And hell, if you still don't believe me, there's even a video showing how much of a ripoff the Vista UI is.

IE works, netscape doesn't

Actually, they were both pretty terrible (Anyone remember Netscape's <blink> tag?) but Microsoft had, and continues to have, a fear that if something is used worldwide and open, then Microsoft's dominance will begin to slip. Remember, they only made a clone of CP/M, and got to where they are today though no-good business tactics (as well as illegal) and being in the right place at the right time.

Netscape, being very popular and available for Mac, Windows, and Unix systems, is seen as a threat. So, after licensing the original Mosaic code from Spyglass, they build IE. Of course, they never paid Spyglass a dime, but that's another story.

So they take IE, mold it into Windows as much as possible, then force it on their users in Windows 98, saying it cannot be removed (though it could, and Microsoft got burned for that).

The hope is, if everyone's running IE and viewing ActiveX websites, instead of Netscape and Java, then nobody could use another OS if they wanted to use the web.

ActiveX didn't catch on as well as they hoped, since Java was popular for the language, as well as applets. So they make their own JVM (Java Virtual Machine) which is shipped with Windows. The Microsoft JVM is incompatible and does not follow the specifications that Sun licensed them the technology under, meaning MSJVM applets wouldn't run on other JVMs for other platforms. When that failed (Sun sued and won), Microsoft makes a clone. C# and .Net CLR to replace Java and the JVM.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why I do not like Microsoft.

Edited by tapo
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/427349-my-microsoft-never-invents-rant/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

WinFS? :rolleyes: Too bad you wont be seeing it anytime soon. OS X has incredible indexing ability that is FAST and USEFUL. Desktop search is a joke. A lame ripoff.

Use a mac for a month and you will grow to love the logical design (and stability) of the OS.

Albeit Apple is writing for select hardware their OS is still more logical than Windows any day of the week and if you disagree you have never given it a fair chance (or are a dev for .Net)

1. WinFS is implemented in the client form in Vista. The much larger/complex version that spans networks and the internet will not be its full form until Vista server is released or after.

2. Macs are not always more stable than Windows machines. I have seen a powerbook crash more times in the past year than my computer has since I've had it( almost 3 years). OS X didn't just close some apps, it showed a mac BSOD and had to be shut off by holding the power button

3. more logical? do you have any specific examples? sure it seems logical to you, you're a mac user. Stuff on Windows seems logical to me because I use Windows. I have lived with right click for over 10 years. Steve Jobs doesn't think Mac users need a right mouse button. Is option+click really logical?

  • 0

What a pointless post. As a consumer, Who cares if Microsoft's business tactics suck, or if they copy some things that have been done before. I have never heard of someone not buying something from a company because they were "meanies". And seriously, people who try to compare OSs are just wasting their time. They're all different, and people have their own preferences. I can't wait till OSs all have the same options regarding the GUI and file operations etc. Then you can feel free to compare them.

  • 0

I think this thread needs to be locked and or deleted before some huge flame war breaks out in here because sir you are doing nothing more than setting yourself up to one.

however before it does get locked I will say this, no company or person ever has an original thought or idea it is always based on something when you get down to it. Apple's GUI idea came from Xerox, Xerox's idea came from paper, paper came from egyptians using papyrus, using papyrus idea came from wall or cave paintings, etc.

OMG we ripped off our GUI's from cave men! But who did they rip off?

Owned! Don't forget that Apple stole the mouse from Xerox too! :whistle:

This thread does need to be locked!

  • 0

The inherent problem with Mac users is that they're nearly all fanboys. (The non-fanboy mac users probably aren't on Neowin.)

I have a friend who bought an iBook, and on his flickr there's pictures of him sitting NEXT TO HIS IBOOK BOX giving it a hug, OPENING IT, AND HOLDING HIS IBOOK. Then there's pictures of him starting it up, and so on...

My first impression of that was "wtf? Are you serious?"

  • 0

Holy dying! This flame war's gotta stop, y'all! But to find proof on why Microsoft and Apple end up copying each other, may I recommend the film "Pirates of Silicon Valley"!

But yes, I do agree that in this capitalistic society, inventors are always at a disadvantage if they lack the marketing power or the willingness to use it. Look at all the major brands you notice with virtually any product. Chances are 90% of those products were not invented by them, but rather by small entrepreneurial groups. It's just that the big guys were able to effectively steal the ideas, rebrand them as their own, and get away with murder! So thus, enough said! :p

  • 0

The inherent problem with Mac users is that they're nearly all fanboys. (The non-fanboy mac users probably aren't on Neowin.)

I have a friend who bought an iBook, and on his flickr there's pictures of him sitting NEXT TO HIS IBOOK BOX giving it a hug, OPENING IT, AND HOLDING HIS IBOOK. Then there's pictures of him starting it up, and so on...

My first impression of that was "wtf? Are you serious?"

I'm an Apple fan but I don't consider myself a fanboy. I like Mac's, I like Apple as a company, and on that note, I also like Microsoft. But I agree with what you said - a lot of Apple users definitely seem to take things a bit more personally. Personally I find it embarrassing, because a lot of people (yourself, for example) assume that all Mac users are like that. Let me assure you, we're not all insane.

Returning to the topic, I don't care that Microsoft borrow or "steal" ideas from other companies. It's true that every company does it; Microsoft just seems to get flamed more because it's a much larger company. To be fair, Apple have copied quite a lot of things from other companies - the GUI, for example. And Windows XP had fast user switching before OS X did. The thing that bothers me is the way Microsoft market new features - they call features "revolutionary" and "things you have yet to imagine", but those features have already been around for years. Microsoft act as if they invented certain features, which they didn't. I don't care if how many things Microsoft "steal", but I do wish they would stop taking all the credit for features they didn't invent nor implement first.

  • 0

Holy dying! This flame war's gotta stop, y'all! But to find proof on why Microsoft and Apple end up copying each other, may I recommend the film "Pirates of Silicon Valley"!

This board isn't ready for such intelligent movie making .

Goes to show (history wise) that Apple really wouldn't be around without Microsoft...

  • 0

A few things to mention:

I haven't read everyone's replies to what I have said so far, and I'm probably not going to check this thread again. It's late, and I can see the early stages of a flame war brewing. So if you're interested in a lively debate or have any questions, feel free to send me an email.

1. This thread is *NOT* about Windows. This thread is about what I personally think of Microsoft as a company. I don't care if you use Windows. Hell, I use Windows. As such, this is not a stupid operating system bash. Use what you like.

(To go briefly off-topic, I hate those people who block IE for no good reason othen than it being IE. I'd understand if you don't want to test under it or something, but software zealotry has no place in a website. Sorry about randomly mentioning this, but I just came to one of those pages.)

2. Though by reading it again I seem to mention Apple a lot, this is NOT a pro-Apple thread, nor was it intended to be. And if I care about anything, It's what Microsoft did to Java (or Spyglass, or General Magic, or BeOS, or VisiON...I'll put in the whole 'Deception about making MSN Messenger open' too.)

But don't worry, I'll always hate Apple for Sherlock 3 too.

3. I have a secret love for Microsoft Bob. But hey, I was a kid! Windows 3.1 was ugly, and Bob had GeoSafari! What was I to do?

4. Xerox recieved Apple stock in exchange for Apple using the GUI concept. A lot of things were changed from the Alto machine to the Apple Lisa (Overlapping windows, for example.)

My problem with the Windows interface is, that it is almost never inventive, and always copying Apple. You can create an operating system without copying Apple! I mean, look at Nextstep, look at BeOS, SkyOS, the Enlightenment window manager, Project Looking Glass, Croquet.

They don't have to be radical changes. I'd just like someone at Microsoft to sit down one day, and find out what would make life on their computer easier. Something as simple but as brilliant as Expose or Growl.

  • 0

My problem with the Windows interface is, that it is almost never inventive, and always copying Apple. You can create an operating system without copying Apple! I mean, look at Nextstep, look at BeOS, SkyOS, the Enlightenment window manager, Project Looking Glass, Croquet.

They don't have to be radical changes. I'd just like someone at Microsoft to sit down one day, and find out what would make life on their computer easier. Something as simple but as brilliant as Expose or Growl.

Windows and Mac OS X are both radically different from each other.

Mac OS X relies on the "dock" (which is nice until you get a lot of programs) and the Program folder (which admittedly is a bit clunky) for starting programs.

Windows relies on the Start Menu for starting programs.

The Finder bar in Mac OS X serves as the menubar for all programs; in Windows, a windowborder is drawn with the menu an option to be displayed by the individual program.

I still don't know where Windows has copied Mac OS X on the user interface. Really. Windows has been copying itself, and the layout of the UI has been like this back before OS X came out.

  • 0

I'm an Apple fan but I don't consider myself a fanboy. I like Mac's, I like Apple as a company, and on that note, I also like Microsoft. But I agree with what you said - a lot of Apple users definitely seem to take things a bit more personally. Personally I find it embarrassing, because a lot of people (yourself, for example) assume that all Mac users are like that. Let me assure you, we're not all insane.

Returning to the topic, I don't care that Microsoft borrow or "steal" ideas from other companies. It's true that every company does it; Microsoft just seems to get flamed more because it's a much larger company. To be fair, Apple have copied quite a lot of things from other companies - the GUI, for example. And Windows XP had fast user switching before OS X did. The thing that bothers me is the way Microsoft market new features - they call features "revolutionary" and "things you have yet to imagine", but those features have already been around for years. Microsoft act as if they invented certain features, which they didn't. I don't care if how many things Microsoft "steal", but I do wish they would stop taking all the credit for features they didn't invent nor implement first.

It is revolutionary for most people.

Most people only need one operating system.

  • 0
I'm an Apple fan but I don't consider myself a fanboy. I like Mac's, I like Apple as a company, and on that note, I also like Microsoft. But I agree with what you said - a lot of Apple users definitely seem to take things a bit more personally. Personally I find it embarrassing, because a lot of people (yourself, for example) assume that all Mac users are like that. Let me assure you, we're not all insane.

Returning to the topic, I don't care that Microsoft borrow or "steal" ideas from other companies. It's true that every company does it; Microsoft just seems to get flamed more because it's a much larger company. To be fair, Apple have copied quite a lot of things from other companies - the GUI, for example. And Windows XP had fast user switching before OS X did. The thing that bothers me is the way Microsoft market new features - they call features "revolutionary" and "things you have yet to imagine", but those features have already been around for years. Microsoft act as if they invented certain features, which they didn't. I don't care if how many things Microsoft "steal", but I do wish they would stop taking all the credit for features they didn't invent nor implement first.

of course MS would market stuff the add in as revolutionary... you even used the word MARKET yourself, what do you think marketing is... do you expect them to say something like, " well this is a entirely new feature we just added to the OS, but it's actually nothing new at all since everyone else has it." any idea how idiotic that sounds?

and it's not like apple isn't doing the same, how 'bout dashboard, they pretty much say they invented the idea of widgets in one of steve's keynotes. spotlight, which they marketed as another revolutionary product when msn desktop search was out before them.

  • 0

please... for every thing you can say MS ripped from Apple, I can some up with a thing Apple stole from MS...

Take for example, memory managed by the operating system... been around since windows 3.1, but apple released osx and suddenly it was a huge feature! how about x86 support... oh well, windows has been doing that forever, and now Apple is doing it and suddely it's awesome. Also, Apple often gets credit for being this revolutionary mp3 player maker. the ipod sucks, it wasn't the first, and I'm quite sure that if it wasnt for that little overhyped trinket that Apple would still be in the financial troubles they were in years ago.

I've said it before and I'll say it again... if you don't like Microsoft to the point where you need to rant about it, then don't use microsoft products, even the ones made for the apple operating system. if all the people who disliked MS for their practices stopped using them and came up with alternatives, then MS would be forced to do things differently. not saying you would like what they would do, but it would be different.

Oh and for the record, I don't dislike Apple... I don't like Steve Jobs, but I don't mind apple as a company... hell, I'm using a Mac to type this. I just don't like people getting all up in arms and getting so mad at one company or another. the fact of the matter is, they are going to do what they are going to do and the only way you can show a company that you don't like their business practices is to not buy the products. this is why i don't have an ipod ;)

  • 0

1.) All companies borrow from each other. Everyone knows that. It's nothing new. Microsoft just happens to be blamed more for it than any other company. People need to get over that.

2.) Microsoft first talked about WinFS in the early 90's. It wasn't until 2003 that they started putting it in Longhorn. They worked on it off and on up til then.

3.) Microsoft first talked about widgets back in the late 90's. DesktopX was actually the first program to create the idea of them

4.) The people saying Apple is original are really getting on my nerves. It's well known that they got the UI and the MOUSE from Xerox

5.) "It's better to be a PIRATE than to join the Navy" who said that? oh yeah STEVE JOBS

6.) The creator of this thread is an obvious fanboy who just wanted to get some people flaming each other. He knew that would happen when he was creating the thread.

7.) I think most will agree that these threads are getting old and are pointless because the ones who create them only accept their opinion and nobody elses.

  • 0

1. WinFS is implemented in the client form in Vista. The much larger/complex version that spans networks and the internet will not be its full form until Vista server is released or after.

2. Macs are not always more stable than Windows machines. I have seen a powerbook crash more times in the past year than my computer has since I've had it( almost 3 years). OS X didn't just close some apps, it showed a mac BSOD and had to be shut off by holding the power button

3. more logical? do you have any specific examples? sure it seems logical to you, you're a mac user. Stuff on Windows seems logical to me because I use Windows. I have lived with right click for over 10 years. Steve Jobs doesn't think Mac users need a right mouse button. Is option+click really logical?

1. WinFS's ****** child of the same name is implemented. They didn't really touch on their original idea of a NEW filesystem (which I had been excited about)

2. True not always. but more often than not. Also if an app is freezing and their is nothing wrong with your base install of OSX than usually you can killl the app without hurting stability on you machine (I have only once had to reboot from a crash on my former Powerbook.

3. Logical like when Im moving a file around I can hold it over an icon and it will open that folder, and than navagate while holding a file to move. Logical like the file structure being based on BSD. Programs all in one spot, user layout is better. It just feels cleaner imo. But I know some who will disagree. You mean ctrl-click, and it was logical for back in the day. Ever try explaining right click to a n00b. Anyways they have a 2 button standard mouse now (that I dont like but thats another matter) and I was using a 2 button mouse on my PB so its not an issue really.

Also Im on a PC now (like the games loathe the interface) after being on a mac for 6 months PC just felt 'dirty'. Windows just had an incomplete feel to it.

You also didnt address how MS hasn't really innovated with anything since 95. The added an integrated (and insecure) web browser in 98 and 2000 was a good move to a more solid core. But the interface only got a skin and a most freq. used programs panel in the start bar.

OSX Got Dashboard (f12; bam: notes, weather, stocks, scores) expose is nice for finding the window you want when you have 6,7, or 14 windows open.

AS for software take another look nowadays and you will be surprised at the QUALITY offering of alot of software. Games are about the only shortcoming on a mac but I would trade back if I could.

Ahh shut the fuk up

Why did you even click *oldschool styles*

post reported

  • 0

I'm not a fan of OSX because, quite frankly, I'm not into all those new features or graphical ****. However, OSX is way far ahead of WinXP and the new version of windows that is suppost to match the OSX qualities isn't even out yet. Microsoft copies and lags behind.

  • 0

To the author:

I wouldn't agree with the other people here accusing you of fanboyism, but I do find your post very ill-informed. Microsoft is being very innovative. I seperate your post into four parts: Desktop Search, Media, Vista's UI, and IE.

Desktop Search

Yeah, Microsoft intended to make search faster by overhauling the filesystem by adding another layer. "WinFS", which ran on top of NTFS (Which is an actual filesystem) was intended to make searches easier.

Of course, it was never implemented, so it doesn't really count. If you think unimplemented things count, it used used Apple's concept of 'stacks', saved searches that behave as folders. They patented it in the mid 90's. WinFS was designed to use stacks all around the filesystem, not just for quick search.

When it comes to desktop search, I honestly don't know (probably a Windows shareware vendor), but Google's attempt at Google Desktop Search, was to create an index beforehand, so searches didn't take so long. It also searched inside files so you didn't need to know the file's name. MSN Desktop Search, aside from copying the name "Desktop Search", was a direct ripoff. Apple's "Spotlight" search, was jumping into the game. Bringing back stacks, and adding the same type of quick searches GDS was well known for.

Actually, WinFS has a lot to do with search, but not in the way you're thinking of. WinFS is a relational database system, based around metadata, and also has unified data types. Basically, with the WinFS technologies, you'd be able to tell the system: "show me all the documents from John that were edited by Andy, but were not edited after the 21st October". WinFS would then use the Contact unified type to determine what you mean by John and Andy, and filter by relationships between data. It extends dramatically what you can do with searches on your computer - searching by metadata and relationships, not by filename. That's what WinFS affects. The only reason its very fast with lots of data is because its built on SQL Server 2005 "Yukon". So it searches fast, but that's not the main thing with WinFS.

Also, you talk about Virtual Folders (not "stacks", which are data visualisation - part of the Shell) as being copied from Apple. Firstly, you have to understand that a Virtual Folder under WinFS is a group of items with similar metadata. So, basically, I'd have a virtual folder that says "this VF contains all the pictures on the computer taken in May". When you open it, WinFS's database (which is based on metadata), would filter the picture items by their metadata and display that in a folder. WinFS is far beyond anything Apple have, and is without a doubt the most innovative peice of software in the world. But WinFS doesn't have any idea of the file/folder heirarchy that common filesystems have, so it sorts out information by using these virtual folders. Remember back in the day when Microsoft were saying that there would be a paradigm shift from folders? Well this is what they were talking about. They just thought the market weren't ready, so added file/folder emulation in WinFS.

Also, as regards MSN Desktop Search: accusing them of copying the name "Desktop Seach" is ridiculous - what on Earth were they supposed to call it? "MSN Monkey Brains"? They had near-instant searching with the indexing service since Windows 2000, and MSN DS just optimised it a bit without copying at all from Apple, Google, Copernicus, or anyone else. Microsoft didn't "bring back" stacks, nor did they copy Google/Apple with Desktop Search.

Media

Back in its heyday, RealAudio/RealPlayer was actually pretty good. Quicktime had been out for a number of years, for Mac OS as well as Windows. What is now known as Windows Media Player used to be "Video for Windows", and used the avi container. Video for Windows was essentially a copy of Quicktime. When streaming video became more popular than local video, Microsoft rebranded it.

And Windows media only 'works' if you're running a Windows-based PC. Whereas Real has good software for the Mac and Linux, Microsoft did a horrible job on the Mac player, eventually contracting an outside company to turn it into a quicktime plugin. They don't support Linux at all.

Saying that back when RP was good, it used to be good, is sort of obvious. VfW was a set of technologies (not a single player), and didn't copy QuickTime at all. Microsoft had to make a competitive peice of software, and if mac OS could do it, Windows could do. The important thing is that the technologies are completley seperate (share no code), and have different features. They weren't as inventive here, it's true, but they quickly patched up the gap, and today the platforms are, by the strictest judges, at least equal.

Oh, and Microsoft have realised WMP for mac didn't work, and discontinued it. They didn't really care too much about that peice of software, and it was always optional. Real's software is riddled with internet registrations and a bloated UI. I wouldn't advise my enemies to use it. With WMP, at least you just set it up and play. At the end of the day, Microsoft is a corporation, and the mac platform wasn't making them any money for WMP (it was free), so the shareholders cut it. Linux would be the same story - charging for use would be unfavourable to the linux community, and lack of profits unfavourable to the MS shaeholders.

Vista's UI

What? Are you kidding me? Microsoft has always copied Apple when it comes to user interfaces, and it became really blatant when they were working on Windows 3.0, when they even hired Susan Kare (designer of the Mac OS icons) to do the Windows 3.0 icons as well. Windows 95 is also a copy (move the start menu to the top of the screen, make the cursor black, and the icons to the right hand side rather then the left).

They also only started codenaming their user interfaces starting with Windows XP, which is the only time they changed it in years (and was right after OS X came out). OS X's UI, codenamed Aqua, was suddenly met by OS XP's UI, codenamed Luna.

And hell, if you still don't believe me, there's even a video showing how much of a ripoff the Vista UI is.

You aren't actually talking about Vista there. I'm not gong to comment on Win 3.0 or 95, because their UIs were terrible. Even for the time. Apple had Microsoft there.

Codenaming a UI happens when the UI is a major feature of the product - as all major features should have a name/codename. Microsoft took the UI seriously in XP, so called it "Luna", and with Vista, they're taking it even more seriously - "Aero".

You're right, I still don't believe you. You've presented no evidence, and that video is the worst thing in history for convincing people. It doesn't show any sort of similar features between Microsoft and Apple. Ooh, so they both have some sort of widgets, and both a FOX widget! That doesn't show anything - widgets have been around before Tiger, and the FOX widget is made by a third party. They are implemented in very different ways on the two platforms, and that video is so terrible that it just emphasies this. The beggingin part with the finder makes no sense, and the alt-tab experiences are not even similar. Vista offers you live previews of the windows INSIDE the glassy alt-tab box (OSX doesn't, as the video shows), and it doesn't sort them like Expose - it uses DWM to to Flip3D. OSX doesn't do anything like it. That video itself proves you wrong.

Internet Explorer

Actually, they were both pretty terrible (Anyone remember Netscape's <blink> tag?) but Microsoft had, and continues to have, a fear that if something is used worldwide and open, then Microsoft's dominance will begin to slip. Remember, they only made a clone of CP/M, and got to where they are today though no-good business tactics (as well as illegal) and being in the right place at the right time.

Netscape, being very popular and available for Mac, Windows, and Unix systems, is seen as a threat. So, after licensing the original Mosaic code from Spyglass, they build IE. Of course, they never paid Spyglass a dime, but that's another story.

So they take IE, mold it into Windows as much as possible, then force it on their users in Windows 98, saying it cannot be removed (though it could, and Microsoft got burned for that).

The hope is, if everyone's running IE and viewing ActiveX websites, instead of Netscape and Java, then nobody could use another OS if they wanted to use the web.

ActiveX didn't catch on as well as they hoped, since Java was popular for the language, as well as applets. So they make their own JVM (Java Virtual Machine) which is shipped with Windows. The Microsoft JVM is incompatible and does not follow the specifications that Sun licensed them the technology under, meaning MSJVM applets wouldn't run on other JVMs for other platforms. When that failed (Sun sued and won), Microsoft makes a clone. C# and .Net CLR to replace Java and the JVM.

Actually, the thing that burns me up the most is the last paragraph. OK, Microsoft's JVM was bad, but .NET is not a Java clone. It is obvious you are not a .NET coder, or you would know that they are noway the same. And with .NET 2.0 and 3.0, .NET is even further in front. Java is slow and very unwise for desktop applications, whereas .NET works well on the desktop and the web. .NET uses JIT compiling, and includes VB.NET and you can add .NET lanugages - it's not limited to C#. It's not a clone, it was a replacement for COM (it was in desperate need). Microsoft took a few ideas, OK, but on the whole, it's miles ahead of Java.

You are forgetting the many innovations Microsoft are making. Look across alll of their product lines - esoecially the Windows client. You can see massive innovation. I'm too tired to go into them, but I have many times before. Just get the facts: Microsoft are indeed innovating.

  • 0
of course MS would market stuff the add in as revolutionary... you even used the word MARKET yourself, what do you think marketing is... do you expect them to say something like, " well this is a entirely new feature we just added to the OS, but it's actually nothing new at all since everyone else has it." any idea how idiotic that sounds?

Yes, that what I think they should say. Just not in those words. How about "a revolutionary new feature for Windows" - they way, people know it's a revolutionary new feature for Windows, but Microsoft aren't making it sound like they invented the idea. What's wrong with that?

and it's not like apple isn't doing the same, how 'bout dashboard, they pretty much say they invented the idea of widgets in one of steve's keynotes. spotlight, which they marketed as another revolutionary product when msn desktop search was out before them.

They may not have invented widgets, but they invented the concept of integrating widgets into an operating system, and (as far as I know - correct me if I'm wrong) they also invented the concept of having a separate layer in which the widgets live, so widgets don't clutter your desktop and take up space; they're out of your way when you don't need them, and only a split second away when you do.

And it's impossible to compare Spotlight to MSN Desktop Search because both are very different. Spotlight is a component of the operating system - MSN Desktop Search is an application sitting on top of an operating system. Can you integrate MSN Search technology into applications like you can with Spotlight? No. Can you create Smart Folders, Smart Mailboxes and Smart Groups with MSN Search? No. And for the record, Spotlight was announced before MSN Desktop Search was.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft releases major feature updates for stock Windows 11 apps by Taras Buria In addition to releasing new Windows 11 preview builds, Microsoft announced that inbox Windows apps now have dedicated release notes in the official documentation. At long last, users have access to all the release notes for each app, with changes listed in chronological order. Microsoft used to announce feature updates for stock apps with each build. Now, with Windows Insider release notes hosted on the Microsoft Learn website, each app has a dedicated space for its changelog, which is very useful for those who want to track new features and improvements. Alongside that, Microsoft dropped massive feature updates for six stock apps: Clock, Media Player, Calculator, Voice Recorder, Photos, and Paint. Each app packs quite a lot of changes and new capabilities, so here are the release notes. Here are quick notes so that you can jump to the app you are interested in the most: Calculator Camera Clock Media Player Paint Photos Sound Recorder Here is what is new for the Calculator in version 11.2605.9.0: More accurate square-root results — Fixed rare cases where a calculation that should equal zero (like sqrt(2.25) - 1.5) returned a tiny leftover value instead. Readable text in High Contrast themes — Settings text now shows the correct colors in the High Contrast Aquatic and Desert themes. Fixed layout for right-to-left languages — For languages like Arabic and Hebrew, the graph, number pad, equation fields, and scroll buttons now appear correctly oriented. Reliable launch after upgrading — Fixed an issue where upgrading from much older versions could leave outdated settings that stopped the app from opening. Here is what is new for the Camera app (version 2026.2605.7.0): Zoom slider works on more cameras — The zoom slider now works on the latest cameras, respects your system zoom settings, and updates instantly when you change those settings. Full range of zoom levels — Fixed an issue where the zoom slider only showed three steps on some devices that zoom in finer increments. Front camera works on more devices — Resolved a problem that blocked the front-facing camera on certain wide-angle devices. More video resolution choices — You can now pick video resolutions that were previously hidden; the app shows a heads-up warning instead of removing them. QR links you can still use — When a scanned QR code points to something with no matching app, the link is now copied to your clipboard (with a notification) while still offering a Store search. Smarter default settings — When you haven't set a preference, the app now follows your system settings by default. The Clock app has a massive changelog with the following improvements in version 11.2605.9.0: Timers keep counting after they hit zero — When a timer runs out, it now keeps counting up (for example, -00:27:31) so you can see how far past the time you've gone. You can turn off the daily goal — Focus Sessions now include an "Off" option so you can skip setting a daily goal entirely. New 15-minute snooze option — Alarms now offer a 15-minute snooze interval. Run up to 3 countdowns at once — The Countdown Widget now supports three simultaneous countdowns, up from two. Timer Widget notifications now appear — Fixed an issue where the "timer finished" notification didn't show when the timer was started from the widget. Less clutter in Focus Sessions — Tasks you've already completed no longer show up in the Focus Session task list. More accurate focus progress — Fixed a rounding issue that could show your daily focus progress as a minute short (for example, 49 minutes instead of 50). Smoother World Clock comparisons — The World Clock compare page now loads dates as you scroll, so it feels more responsive. Up-to-date World Clock locations — Refreshed country and city names to match their current names. Correct sun and moon icons during midnight sun — Fixed an icon that wrongly showed a moon during all-day daylight in polar regions. Fixed back-button behavior in clock comparisons — Pressing back once now takes you back as expected, instead of jumping the date to 1926. Corrected the Newfoundland time zone — Newfoundland now uses the right time zone (St. John's). Disabled alarms stay looking disabled — Editing a turned-off alarm no longer makes it appear turned on. Cleaner timer cards — The expand button is now turned off on timer cards that have no time set, preventing actions that wouldn't do anything. Clearer theme setting — Updated the wording to "Choose your preferred app theme." Smoother Settings links — The "About" links in Settings no longer trigger an unexpected "switch apps" prompt. Fixed spacing in Spotify settings — Corrected uneven spacing in the Spotify settings card. Better focus visibility in High Contrast — The focus highlight in World Clock is now clearly visible in the High Contrast Aquatic and Desert themes. No more double announcements — Screen readers no longer read the timer value twice. Countdown names read correctly — Screen readers now properly announce the name of each countdown. Keyboard focus stays put — Focus no longer disappears after you press the Timer Reset button. Clearer alarm toggle for screen readers — Tidied up how the alarm on/off switch is announced. The Media Player app received plenty of changes as well (version 11.2605.14.0): Custom captions — You can now personalize how closed captions appear, with caption styling tied to your Windows caption settings, plus a quick link to open those settings directly. "Indexing" banner in the play queue — When your media library is still being scanned, a banner now explains why some items may not appear yet. Fixed the look of selected items — Corrected a layout glitch with selected items in lists. Fewer playback failures — Improved how the app recognizes supported file types, so more files play without issues. Playlists need a name — You can no longer accidentally save a playlist with a blank name. Cleaner look for empty playlists — Improved how a playlist appears when it has no items yet. More stable play queue edits — Fixed a crash that could happen when changing the play queue while the app was switching between sessions. Clearer "missing codec" message — Improved the dialog that appears when a file needs a codec you don't have, with clearer guidance on what to do. A big update is also available for Paint in version 11.2605.61.0: Adjustable eraser transparency — You can now control how transparent the eraser is. Cleaner stamp brush strokes — Fixed visible color shifts and artifacts when using stamp-style brushes. JPEG photos save in place — Opening a rotated JPEG and pressing Save now overwrites the original instead of unexpectedly prompting "Save As." No more crash on bad image files — Opening a damaged or invalid image, from within the app, by double click, or commandline, now shows a clear error message instead of closing the app. Classic selection behavior restored — The selection outline now hides while you move, resize, or rotate a selection, just like in classic Paint. Tidier AI image panel — Fixed missing spacing at the bottom of the AI image generation panel for a cleaner layout. Visible button hover in light theme — Toolbar split buttons now show a clear hover highlight in the light theme. Snappier toolbar — Streamlined how the ribbon lays out, giving a small speed boost at startup. Fewer background crashes — Fixed a crash that could happen while background tasks were finishing up. Stable app shutdown — Prevented rare crashes when closing the app. Fixed layer removal glitch — Deleting the active layer no longer leaves the layers list in an inconsistent state. Here is what is new in the Photos app (version 2026.11060.2004.0): AI watermarking — AI-generated or edited images can now carry a visible Copilot watermark. You choose Never, Always, or Ask Every Time in Settings, with a confirmation when saving. The watermarking is off by default in settings. Better viewing of small images and pixel art — Tiny images (like 16×16 pixel art) now zoom in far more to fill the screen and stay crisp instead of looking blurry. Select scanned text with the keyboard — When text is detected in an image, you can now navigate and select it using the arrow keys, Shift+Arrow, Home/End, and Ctrl+A, with a clear focus highlight. Fixed a crash in text recognition — Resolved a crash that could close Photos while detecting text in images; the app now recovers gracefully. Easier keyboard navigation — Tabbing through the navigation bar no longer stops on hidden controls, so it takes a single Tab to move past it instead of three. And finally, here is the Sound Recorder (version 11.2605.1.0): Waveform shows with Bluetooth mics — The live waveform now displays correctly when you record using a Bluetooth audio device. No more stray scrollbar — A non-working horizontal scrollbar no longer appears at the bottom of the waveform unless you've zoomed in. Mark button ready right away — The Mark button no longer looks grayed out until you hover over it after opening the app. Markers hidden for WAV files — Markers are now turned off for WAV recordings, since that format can't store them — so they're no longer lost silently. Smoother deleting — Quickly pressing Delete and Enter to remove several recordings in a row no longer triggers a "file doesn't exist" error. Fixed a memory issue — Resolved a memory leak that occurred each time a recording started. You can find all these changelogs in the official documentation here.
    • again, an article about Microsoft Edge and ridicules hater's comments
    • From this very same article: "For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option."
    • Or every other browser, because they all behave the same, at least the mainstream ones. Firefox does exactly the same: background updates, restart to install them. Haters gotta hate, I guess.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      494
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      166
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      162
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!