Creating Big FAT32 partitions in Windows XP


Recommended Posts

Windows XP doesn't let you format a partition with FAT32 if it is bigger than 32GB. This is obviously to force you to use NTFS. But if, like me, you want a big partition that can be read by many OSes including Windows, Linux and OSX then you have to use FAT32.

To do this, first you must create your partition, it is probably best to use windows disk management to do this.

Right click on My Computer and select Manage. Then select Disk Management from the left. Now find some unallocated space on one of your disks. Right click on the unallocated space and select New Partition.

Press next, select primary partition. Press next, enter the size of your new partition, the number that's in there by default is the ammount of unallocated space on your disk and thus the maximum size for the partition. Press next, select a drive letter of your choice (it can be changed later). Press next, select do not format this partition. Then press next and then finish.

Now you have a new partition that is not yet formatted.

To format the big partition with FAT32 you have to use Linux mkdosfs for Windows NT/2K/XP. There might be other ways, but this is what I used and it worked perfectly. You can download mkdosfs from here: http://www.mager.org/mkdosfs/

Download mkdosfs.zip and extract it.

mkdosfs.exe is a command line program so when you extract it put it somewhere easy to access like C:. Now, press start then run and type cmd. Now, assuming you put mkdosfs.exe on C: type C:\mkdosfs

That should give you instruction on how to use the program. If it doesn't then you haven't typed in the path of the program correctly.

To format a partition you must type this into cmd:

C:\mkdosfs -F 32 -n <partition name> -v <drive letter>

Where <partition name> is a name of your choice for your new partition and <drive letter> is the drive letter of the partition you want to format. *Don't get the drive letter wrong!*

Once you have typed that in and pressed enter, the program should give you some information about your new partition like this:

mkdosfs 2.8 (28 Feb 2001)

Win32 port by Jens-Uwe Mager

\\.\<drive letter> has 255 heads and 63 sectors per track,

logical sector size is 512,

using 0xf8 media descriptor, with 390716865 sectors;

file system has 2 32-bit FATs and 8 sectors per cluster.

FAT size is 380816 sectors, and provides 48744400 clusters.

Volume ID is 4149e22c, volume label <partition name> .

It will be unresponsive while it formats the drive, but it only took about 30 seconds to format my 200GB partition.

Note the -F 32 part of the command. mkdosfs can format FAT12 and FAT16 partitions with the relevant command. If you don't include -F 32 then mkdosfs will use either FAT12 or FAT16 so make sure you do put that bit on.

So there you go, now you have a FAT32 partition bigger than 32GB that can be read and written to by many OSes and you didn't even have to leave Windows XP (Y)

Edited by BobMarley

Only during the setup portion.

Disk Management does not let you format a partition with FAT32 if it's bigger than 32GB.

but can that program work its wonders on serial ATA drives of 200GB, that would be lovely

Yes, it was a 200GB SATA drive that I used it on :)

None really. The only benefit is the cross platform support. If you only use windows, use NTFS.

Cross platform support?? Linux and OSX both can "READ" ntfs just fine..

I see no point in using FAT32 as a filesystem - unless your using a OS that does not support NTFS.. And who is stilling use 9x?

Cross platform -- then why not just ext2 or 3? XP can read/write to ext2/3

http://www.fs-driver.org/index.html

And so can OSX..

http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsx/

FAT32 is an antiquated file system used by antiquated OSs -- move forward people ;) And I agree with roadwarrior -- if your going to be using other OSs anyway -- why not just create the filesystem with one of them?

Cross platform support?? Linux and OSX both can "READ" ntfs just fine..

I see no point in using FAT32 as a filesystem - unless your using a OS that does not support NTFS.. And who is stilling use 9x?

Cross platform -- then why not just ext2 or 3? XP can read/write to ext2/3

http://www.fs-driver.org/index.html

And so can OSX..

http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsx/

FAT32 is an antiquated file system used by antiquated OSs -- move forward people ;) And I agree with roadwarrior -- if your going to be using other OSs anyway -- why not just create the filesystem with one of them?

Exactly!! :whistle:

Cross platform support?? Linux and OSX both can "READ" ntfs just fine..

But they can't write to NTFS, which is half the issue! Fat32 is still needed. Don't believe me? Get an ipod and try to use it on both Mac and windows with it formatted in anything other than fat32.

Cross platform support?? Linux and OSX both can "READ" ntfs just fine..

I see no point in using FAT32 as a filesystem - unless your using a OS that does not support NTFS.. And who is stilling use 9x?

Cross platform -- then why not just ext2 or 3? XP can read/write to ext2/3

http://www.fs-driver.org/index.html

...

FAT32 is an antiquated file system used by antiquated OSs -- move forward people ;) And I agree with roadwarrior -- if your going to be using other OSs anyway -- why not just create the filesystem with one of them?

First of all, those FS Drivers are poorly made, do not work too well, and cause issues when formatting drives / noticing drives. Secondly; what if the person formats with something such as ResierFS? Support is lacking even-moreso in that. FAT32 is just a known, well used standard is cross-platform. The having LInux and such write to it, is a plus aswell.

So, moving forward for those other OSes is not an option. :unsure:

Sure, it sucks; but it helps when running a server, or something old. I should know, I just started doing so and have found this to be a crux problem.

And I agree with roadwarrior -- if your going to be using other OSs anyway -- why not just create the filesystem with one of them?

Because you can format it with Windows XP fine like I have shown in this guide. I don't understand you people, I created this because I like to pass on information in the hope that it will be useful. What is the point of posting here about how bad FAT32 is or why you shouldn't do it?

To those that said thanks, you're welcome :)

  • 1 month later...

Hmm, didn't work out very well. Here's what happens:

C:\>mkdosfs -v -F 32 -n USB1 G:

mkdosfs 2.8 (28 Feb 2001)

Win32 port by Jens-Uwe Mager <[email protected]>

mkdosfs: unable to get length for '\\.\G:'

What might be wrong?

How did you make the partition G:? If the partition is already formatted then that might not work, I don't know since i've never tried it. Try deleting the partition using Windows Disk Management and then follow the guide to make another one.

To all those saying that FAT32 is really inefficient on big drives, Microsoft has really exagerated the facts. On my music partition I have 60GB of data that is about 10,000 1-10MB files. The extra data that the FAT32 innefiency has created is about 20MB. I'm not complaining at that.

The only real downside is the 4GB file size limit and lack of security features. Everything else has been exagerated by Microsoft.

Edited by BobMarley
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!