• 0

My 'Pro Google Talk' Rant


Question

Here I go again. Writing a long rant that Neowin's news section has deemed too long to post. I don't know why I get into these things, and I haven't even read it yet. I just kept on typing.

Well... enjoy.

boring. hardly worth front page news.

Hotmail has done this for year's. Thank's to 'Google Talk' we have gone back in time.

It's like buying a simple, no colour, no feature Nokia from 5 year's ago and using it today. In this day and age people like having Mobile TV, Mobile Music, Text Messaging, Games, Picture Messaging, Video Messaging, Emoticons. It let's them express themselves which Google Talk definately does not do.

I don't care for, or use any of those features you just mentioned on my phone. I really don't know anyone who does. My brother, for the longest time, had one of those simple, featureless Nokia phones with 'Snake' on it. Personally, I have a Samsung flip phone.

I don't use it to surf the web, it's too slow, too small, and too expensive. I don't IM people, I don't watch TV (slow, bad quality, expensive) , and I don't listen to music on it. I have an iPod for that. I use it to call people.

When my friends go on AIM, they don't constantly hit the 'Games' button. I don't know anyone with a webcam, or anyone who cares for AOL's streaming radio. When a friend signs on to AIM or MSN, or Yahoo, or ICQ or whatnot, they just want to IM people. They use Myspace or Blogger, so they have no need or interest in the integration with MSN Spaces or Xbox Live.

Now most of them aren't geeks. They're average computer users who bought a $700 HP back in 2002 and like to chat with their friends, surf the web, and play SimCity. They don't have a lot of RAM, and they don't know what to enable and disable when they're installing software. As a result, their taskbar is packed, they're dealing with IM windows that take up a quarter of the screen (@1024x768), and these 'modern' IM programs frequently freeze up their computer to draw the next massive window. Why they're so big, god only knows. AIM does it to look stylish, MSN does it so it can show really big buddy icons.

These ads and lack of focus is how GMail managed to get so far ahead of MSN Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail. No banner ads, clean interface, and essentially unlimited storage (with a working spam box!).

Google Talk got it right. No longer do I need to guide friends through setup of Gaim or Trillian, I can just show them Google Talk.

It launches at boot without a performance hit, allows them to IM and voice chat with people, automatically updates, and tells them when they have new email (as most of them have switched from hotmail by now). Everyone I've shown it to has refused to use AIM or MSN again (MSN is a minority usage in my area, I only know about four people who use it. About sixty that use AIM.)

People want simplicity. This is how Firefox caught on instead of Opera or Mozilla Suite, Google caught on instead of portal sites, and the reason that we don't all have videophones in our homes today, instead of the simple, reliable phone line.

Google Talk isn't a step back, it's a brilliant step forward and a focus on what most people actually need. And I commend Google for taking a risk like this in what has become a stagnant and boring market.

Edited by tapo
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/430698-my-pro-google-talk-rant/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I completely agree with everything you wrote :)

ICQ died back in those days because of all it's features.

I don't think MSN will die soon because it seems that people actually likes all that crap MSN has, but I think a large portion would switch if they where properly informed about the brilliant alternative GTalk ;)

  • 0

Yeah me too. I have nothing against an IM client if they could make it extensible.

Example:

Allow display pictures

Allow animated display pictures

Allow Handwritten messages

Allow Custom smileys

Allow personal message

Everything should be modules so you can completely prevent features you don't like from being loaded into memory.

I *think* (not sure though) that jabber allready allows for display pictures. GTalk should also have filetransfers and then maybe nothing more untill it's ready.

  • 0

I still hope that someone start an IM client that is so extremely modular that you could tear out any bad feature you don't like. Even the contact list should be a module.

I know it would take a long time to make such thing, but imagine an IM that only works the way you want it, and not how some few programmers want it to be.

Firefox is the most extensible browser yet, but i think an IM client (which is open all the time) should have much lesser memory useage. Kinda like utorrent can manage to be so small but still so big.

  • 0

BAN people replacing every other letter with a god damned picture.

I have a person that I talk to on MSN that does that, its soooo annoying, has forced me to turn off custom emoticons entirely.

I agree with this article 100% too. Display pics, nudges, winks, custom backgrounds and all that crap, is to me at least, crap.

Google Talk should maybe have a few, I said a few, emoticons, basic ones, and it needs file transfers badly cause I use that a lot in msn messenger. And thats all I need, and it would be perfect for me, if anyone I knew actually used it.

  • 0

Now that is annoying. It makes it sooooo hard to read the convo properly :angry:

Then avoid adding idiots who do that or block them.

I agree completely with everything said above. I use MSN mainly because all my friends are on it and I religiously use APatch to removed 3/4 of the crap from it.

Microsoft (and other companies) need to stop making IM clients for ****ing 13 year old pregnant girls who like backstreet boys etc etc and more awful crap. Make it for the simplistic user.

It is discusting Microsoft don't listen to their users about what they want in an IM client and they allow thousand of people to beta test their products effectively ruining them.

  • 0

Microsoft (and other companies) need to stop making IM clients for ****ing 13 year old pregnant girls who like backstreet boys etc etc and more awful crap. Make it for the simplistic user.

Ohh boy do I agree with that too. Almost every male that I know could care less about the crap and would switch to google talk in a minute too if I convinced them too, file transfers would definitely help. But almost every female I know would immediately reply with but it doesn't have emoticons and winks and etc etc insert crappy bloaty feature that chicks love here.

  • 0

Ohh boy do I agree with that too. Almost every male that I know could care less about the crap and would switch to google talk in a minute too if I convinced them too, file transfers would definitely help. But almost every female I know would immediately reply with but it doesn't have emoticons and winks and etc etc insert crappy bloaty feature that chicks love here.

Then Microsoft should make the crap IM client MSN Messenger and actually do something with Windows Messenger or give it a new name Windows Live Corporate Messenger which is a decent IM client for the intelligent people to use.

:-D, no Google Talk only allows you to send messages to users with a Gmail/GoogleMail account.

  • 0

well then i think that microsoft should make an IM service that's more simple, for the people who just want basic ****, but thtat'll never happen cos they want their money. ;p the "that's hot" sections and their other ****... guess i'll have to carry on removing excessive amounts of msn or wait for a better client.

  • 0

is you want a simple msn messenger from microsoft you use windows messenger.

Personally i use Portable Gaim 2, but i like google talk. I prefer skype over it for a few reasons though. skype is a standalone exe, is portable, meaning it can store is settings in the appdata folder in an xml file whereas google adds registry keys, skype has more features like conference video and buddy icons. One thing i would like changed with google talk is the gTalk logo removed or the ability to hide it in the gui.

  • 0

Yeah me too. I have nothing against an IM client if they could make it extensible.

Example:

Allow display pictures

Allow animated display pictures

Allow Handwritten messages

Allow Custom smileys

Allow personal message

Everything should be modules so you can completely prevent features you don't like from being loaded into memory.

I *think* (not sure though) that jabber allready allows for display pictures. GTalk should also have filetransfers and then maybe nothing more untill it's ready.

The way XMPP works (e.g. Jabber, or what GTalk uses) is fully extensible (being XML and all), they also have a preliminary spec for avatar's and file transfers (and anybody can write a new module if they want)

Now that is annoying. It makes it sooooo hard to read the convo properly :angry:

Oh god yeah, luckily my client doesn't yet support custom emoticons at all (Adium using libGaim)

Another "light" weight Jabber client is Psi, it's small, not bloated, and only supports the Jabber protocol (and a lot of it at that)

  • 0

I still hope that someone start an IM client that is so extremely modular that you could tear out any bad feature you don't like. Even the contact list should be a module.

I know it would take a long time to make such thing, but imagine an IM that only works the way you want it, and not how some few programmers want it to be.

Firefox is the most extensible browser yet, but i think an IM client (which is open all the time) should have much lesser memory useage. Kinda like utorrent can manage to be so small but still so big.

miranda

  • 0

Here I go again. Writing a long rant that Neowin's news section has deemed too long to post. I don't know why I get into these things, and I haven't even read it yet. I just kept on typing.

Well... enjoy.

I don't care for, or use any of those features you just mentioned on my phone. I really don't know anyone who does. My brother, for the longest time, had one of those simple, featureless Nokia phones with 'Snake' on it. Personally, I have a Samsung flip phone.

I don't use it to surf the web, it's too slow, too small, and too expensive. I don't IM people, I don't watch TV (slow, bad quality, expensive) , and I don't listen to music on it. I have an iPod for that. I use it to call people.

When my friends go on AIM, they don't constantly hit the 'Games' button. I don't know anyone with a webcam, or anyone who cares for AOL's streaming radio. When a friend signs on to AIM or MSN, or Yahoo, or ICQ or whatnot, they just want to IM people. They use Myspace or Blogger, so they have no need or interest in the integration with MSN Spaces or Xbox Live.

Now most of them aren't geeks. They're average computer users who bought a $700 HP back in 2002 and like to chat with their friends, surf the web, and play SimCity. They don't have a lot of RAM, and they don't know what to enable and disable when they're installing software. As a result, their taskbar is packed, they're dealing with IM windows that take up a quarter of the screen (@1024x768), and these 'modern' IM programs frequently freeze up their computer to draw the next massive window. Why they're so big, god only knows. AIM does it to look stylish, MSN does it so it can show really big buddy icons.

These ads and lack of focus is how GMail managed to get so far ahead of MSN Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail. No banner ads, clean interface, and essentially unlimited storage (with a working spam box!).

Google Talk got it right. No longer do I need to guide friends through setup of Gaim or Trillian, I can just show them Google Talk.

It launches at boot without a performance hit, allows them to IM and voice chat with people, automatically updates, and tells them when they have new email (as most of them have switched from hotmail by now). Everyone I've shown it to has refused to use AIM or MSN again (MSN is a minority usage in my area, I only know about four people who use it. About sixty that use AIM.)

People want simplicity. This is how Firefox caught on instead of Opera or Mozilla Suite, Google caught on instead of portal sites, and the reason that we don't all have videophones in our homes today, instead of the simple, reliable phone line.

Google Talk isn't a step back, it's a brilliant step forward and a focus on what most people actually need. And I commend Google for taking a risk like this in what has become a stagnant and boring market.

I agree 100%.

Too many goofy dumb features on all the other IM apps.

Nice post! :)

  • 0

I hate those people that use their every other letter as a picture or custom smiley. SO annoying. and display pictures are totally useless, 1/99999999999 people ACTUALLY put their picture as it. its mostly crap like "cool" pictures they drew in paint that took 3 seconds.

  • 0

I hate those people that use their every other letter as a picture or custom smiley. SO annoying. and display pictures are totally useless, 1/99999999999 people ACTUALLY put their picture as it. its mostly crap like "cool" pictures they drew in paint that took 3 seconds.

So your face is a caution sign? Stop your bitching.

  • 0

I too, have Google Talk but none of my friends use it. They are too lazy and stupid to figure out that if they have a Gmail account, they can still use their old email. They're all like "Oh no, I don't want to change my email for every single site I've registered to!"

Lazy bums.

  • 0

gtalk is good because its basic. its an effective tool to communicate with a developing team and the logs can be retrieved with gmail. with aim you have to direct connect to paste long lines of code and msn, well its pretty useless for sharing code with it.

Google Talk

Pseudo-tab like messaging

Retrieve logs remotely

Can paste many lines of text

seemless integration of VoIP

can sign on at multiple locations without logging one instance off

AIM (with dead aim)

Tabbed messaging

Logged conversations

Pasting code doesnt usually get messed up

File sharing is good

mainly used by friends who live in the US

MSN

Bloated feeling

File sharing is decent

Can't paste long lines of code into it

pasting code can result in emotes being displayed

Nudge does get your attention pretty well when you are AFK

used by pretty much everyone outside the US.

Generally people such as myself who have contacts that use many different clients, we find that using clients such as trilian, gaim, or miranda better suits our needs.

  • 0

Personally I dont like Gtalk too much... its way too plain, although I really like the feature that saves chat logs in your Gmail account. Its way too plain (once again) I like MSN, although 50% of the features are dumb, theyve been bloating it a bit:

- sharing folders (wtf?)

- nudges (so annoying - if people doesnt answer you, they wouldnt answer even after a nudge)

- CUSTOM EMOTICONS. People that replaces half their stuff with emoticons like LOL and HEY and every second letter with an animated letter is gay.

- handwriting (Who needs this)

- All the ads that no one clicks or looks at

- All the weird games

- Winks and all those weird stuff that occupies your whole window

etc etc

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I recently tried edge. It seems a lot better. A lot of the junk in it is gone. It seems less bloated and snappy.
    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      174
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!