Here I go again. Writing a long rant that Neowin's news section has deemed too long to post. I don't know why I get into these things, and I haven't even read it yet. I just kept on typing.
Well... enjoy.
boring. hardly worth front page news.
Hotmail has done this for year's. Thank's to 'Google Talk' we have gone back in time.
It's like buying a simple, no colour, no feature Nokia from 5 year's ago and using it today. In this day and age people like having Mobile TV, Mobile Music, Text Messaging, Games, Picture Messaging, Video Messaging, Emoticons. It let's them express themselves which Google Talk definately does not do.
I don't care for, or use any of those features you just mentioned on my phone. I really don't know anyone who does. My brother, for the longest time, had one of those simple, featureless Nokia phones with 'Snake' on it. Personally, I have a Samsung flip phone.
I don't use it to surf the web, it's too slow, too small, and too expensive. I don't IM people, I don't watch TV (slow, bad quality, expensive) , and I don't listen to music on it. I have an iPod for that. I use it to call people.
When my friends go on AIM, they don't constantly hit the 'Games' button. I don't know anyone with a webcam, or anyone who cares for AOL's streaming radio. When a friend signs on to AIM or MSN, or Yahoo, or ICQ or whatnot, they just want to IM people. They use Myspace or Blogger, so they have no need or interest in the integration with MSN Spaces or Xbox Live.
Now most of them aren't geeks. They're average computer users who bought a $700 HP back in 2002 and like to chat with their friends, surf the web, and play SimCity. They don't have a lot of RAM, and they don't know what to enable and disable when they're installing software. As a result, their taskbar is packed, they're dealing with IM windows that take up a quarter of the screen (@1024x768), and these 'modern' IM programs frequently freeze up their computer to draw the next massive window. Why they're so big, god only knows. AIM does it to look stylish, MSN does it so it can show really big buddy icons.
These ads and lack of focus is how GMail managed to get so far ahead of MSN Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail. No banner ads, clean interface, and essentially unlimited storage (with a working spam box!).
Google Talk got it right. No longer do I need to guide friends through setup of Gaim or Trillian, I can just show them Google Talk.
It launches at boot without a performance hit, allows them to IM and voice chat with people, automatically updates, and tells them when they have new email (as most of them have switched from hotmail by now). Everyone I've shown it to has refused to use AIM or MSN again (MSN is a minority usage in my area, I only know about four people who use it. About sixty that use AIM.)
People want simplicity. This is how Firefox caught on instead of Opera or Mozilla Suite, Google caught on instead of portal sites, and the reason that we don't all have videophones in our homes today, instead of the simple, reliable phone line.
Google Talk isn't a step back, it's a brilliant step forward and a focus on what most people actually need. And I commend Google for taking a risk like this in what has become a stagnant and boring market.
It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing.
Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example.
A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch.
Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
It depends: heat soak is a thing.
Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress.
Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
Question
tapo
Here I go again. Writing a long rant that Neowin's news section has deemed too long to post. I don't know why I get into these things, and I haven't even read it yet. I just kept on typing.
Well... enjoy.
I don't care for, or use any of those features you just mentioned on my phone. I really don't know anyone who does. My brother, for the longest time, had one of those simple, featureless Nokia phones with 'Snake' on it. Personally, I have a Samsung flip phone.
I don't use it to surf the web, it's too slow, too small, and too expensive. I don't IM people, I don't watch TV (slow, bad quality, expensive) , and I don't listen to music on it. I have an iPod for that. I use it to call people.
When my friends go on AIM, they don't constantly hit the 'Games' button. I don't know anyone with a webcam, or anyone who cares for AOL's streaming radio. When a friend signs on to AIM or MSN, or Yahoo, or ICQ or whatnot, they just want to IM people. They use Myspace or Blogger, so they have no need or interest in the integration with MSN Spaces or Xbox Live.
Now most of them aren't geeks. They're average computer users who bought a $700 HP back in 2002 and like to chat with their friends, surf the web, and play SimCity. They don't have a lot of RAM, and they don't know what to enable and disable when they're installing software. As a result, their taskbar is packed, they're dealing with IM windows that take up a quarter of the screen (@1024x768), and these 'modern' IM programs frequently freeze up their computer to draw the next massive window. Why they're so big, god only knows. AIM does it to look stylish, MSN does it so it can show really big buddy icons.
These ads and lack of focus is how GMail managed to get so far ahead of MSN Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail. No banner ads, clean interface, and essentially unlimited storage (with a working spam box!).
Google Talk got it right. No longer do I need to guide friends through setup of Gaim or Trillian, I can just show them Google Talk.
It launches at boot without a performance hit, allows them to IM and voice chat with people, automatically updates, and tells them when they have new email (as most of them have switched from hotmail by now). Everyone I've shown it to has refused to use AIM or MSN again (MSN is a minority usage in my area, I only know about four people who use it. About sixty that use AIM.)
People want simplicity. This is how Firefox caught on instead of Opera or Mozilla Suite, Google caught on instead of portal sites, and the reason that we don't all have videophones in our homes today, instead of the simple, reliable phone line.
Google Talk isn't a step back, it's a brilliant step forward and a focus on what most people actually need. And I commend Google for taking a risk like this in what has become a stagnant and boring market.
Edited by tapoLink to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/430698-my-pro-google-talk-rant/Share on other sites
29 answers to this question
Recommended Posts