• 0

My 'Pro Google Talk' Rant


Question

Here I go again. Writing a long rant that Neowin's news section has deemed too long to post. I don't know why I get into these things, and I haven't even read it yet. I just kept on typing.

Well... enjoy.

boring. hardly worth front page news.

Hotmail has done this for year's. Thank's to 'Google Talk' we have gone back in time.

It's like buying a simple, no colour, no feature Nokia from 5 year's ago and using it today. In this day and age people like having Mobile TV, Mobile Music, Text Messaging, Games, Picture Messaging, Video Messaging, Emoticons. It let's them express themselves which Google Talk definately does not do.

I don't care for, or use any of those features you just mentioned on my phone. I really don't know anyone who does. My brother, for the longest time, had one of those simple, featureless Nokia phones with 'Snake' on it. Personally, I have a Samsung flip phone.

I don't use it to surf the web, it's too slow, too small, and too expensive. I don't IM people, I don't watch TV (slow, bad quality, expensive) , and I don't listen to music on it. I have an iPod for that. I use it to call people.

When my friends go on AIM, they don't constantly hit the 'Games' button. I don't know anyone with a webcam, or anyone who cares for AOL's streaming radio. When a friend signs on to AIM or MSN, or Yahoo, or ICQ or whatnot, they just want to IM people. They use Myspace or Blogger, so they have no need or interest in the integration with MSN Spaces or Xbox Live.

Now most of them aren't geeks. They're average computer users who bought a $700 HP back in 2002 and like to chat with their friends, surf the web, and play SimCity. They don't have a lot of RAM, and they don't know what to enable and disable when they're installing software. As a result, their taskbar is packed, they're dealing with IM windows that take up a quarter of the screen (@1024x768), and these 'modern' IM programs frequently freeze up their computer to draw the next massive window. Why they're so big, god only knows. AIM does it to look stylish, MSN does it so it can show really big buddy icons.

These ads and lack of focus is how GMail managed to get so far ahead of MSN Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail. No banner ads, clean interface, and essentially unlimited storage (with a working spam box!).

Google Talk got it right. No longer do I need to guide friends through setup of Gaim or Trillian, I can just show them Google Talk.

It launches at boot without a performance hit, allows them to IM and voice chat with people, automatically updates, and tells them when they have new email (as most of them have switched from hotmail by now). Everyone I've shown it to has refused to use AIM or MSN again (MSN is a minority usage in my area, I only know about four people who use it. About sixty that use AIM.)

People want simplicity. This is how Firefox caught on instead of Opera or Mozilla Suite, Google caught on instead of portal sites, and the reason that we don't all have videophones in our homes today, instead of the simple, reliable phone line.

Google Talk isn't a step back, it's a brilliant step forward and a focus on what most people actually need. And I commend Google for taking a risk like this in what has become a stagnant and boring market.

Edited by tapo
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/430698-my-pro-google-talk-rant/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I completely agree with everything you wrote :)

ICQ died back in those days because of all it's features.

I don't think MSN will die soon because it seems that people actually likes all that crap MSN has, but I think a large portion would switch if they where properly informed about the brilliant alternative GTalk ;)

  • 0

Yeah me too. I have nothing against an IM client if they could make it extensible.

Example:

Allow display pictures

Allow animated display pictures

Allow Handwritten messages

Allow Custom smileys

Allow personal message

Everything should be modules so you can completely prevent features you don't like from being loaded into memory.

I *think* (not sure though) that jabber allready allows for display pictures. GTalk should also have filetransfers and then maybe nothing more untill it's ready.

  • 0

I still hope that someone start an IM client that is so extremely modular that you could tear out any bad feature you don't like. Even the contact list should be a module.

I know it would take a long time to make such thing, but imagine an IM that only works the way you want it, and not how some few programmers want it to be.

Firefox is the most extensible browser yet, but i think an IM client (which is open all the time) should have much lesser memory useage. Kinda like utorrent can manage to be so small but still so big.

  • 0

BAN people replacing every other letter with a god damned picture.

I have a person that I talk to on MSN that does that, its soooo annoying, has forced me to turn off custom emoticons entirely.

I agree with this article 100% too. Display pics, nudges, winks, custom backgrounds and all that crap, is to me at least, crap.

Google Talk should maybe have a few, I said a few, emoticons, basic ones, and it needs file transfers badly cause I use that a lot in msn messenger. And thats all I need, and it would be perfect for me, if anyone I knew actually used it.

  • 0

Now that is annoying. It makes it sooooo hard to read the convo properly :angry:

Then avoid adding idiots who do that or block them.

I agree completely with everything said above. I use MSN mainly because all my friends are on it and I religiously use APatch to removed 3/4 of the crap from it.

Microsoft (and other companies) need to stop making IM clients for ****ing 13 year old pregnant girls who like backstreet boys etc etc and more awful crap. Make it for the simplistic user.

It is discusting Microsoft don't listen to their users about what they want in an IM client and they allow thousand of people to beta test their products effectively ruining them.

  • 0

Microsoft (and other companies) need to stop making IM clients for ****ing 13 year old pregnant girls who like backstreet boys etc etc and more awful crap. Make it for the simplistic user.

Ohh boy do I agree with that too. Almost every male that I know could care less about the crap and would switch to google talk in a minute too if I convinced them too, file transfers would definitely help. But almost every female I know would immediately reply with but it doesn't have emoticons and winks and etc etc insert crappy bloaty feature that chicks love here.

  • 0

Ohh boy do I agree with that too. Almost every male that I know could care less about the crap and would switch to google talk in a minute too if I convinced them too, file transfers would definitely help. But almost every female I know would immediately reply with but it doesn't have emoticons and winks and etc etc insert crappy bloaty feature that chicks love here.

Then Microsoft should make the crap IM client MSN Messenger and actually do something with Windows Messenger or give it a new name Windows Live Corporate Messenger which is a decent IM client for the intelligent people to use.

:-D, no Google Talk only allows you to send messages to users with a Gmail/GoogleMail account.

  • 0

well then i think that microsoft should make an IM service that's more simple, for the people who just want basic ****, but thtat'll never happen cos they want their money. ;p the "that's hot" sections and their other ****... guess i'll have to carry on removing excessive amounts of msn or wait for a better client.

  • 0

is you want a simple msn messenger from microsoft you use windows messenger.

Personally i use Portable Gaim 2, but i like google talk. I prefer skype over it for a few reasons though. skype is a standalone exe, is portable, meaning it can store is settings in the appdata folder in an xml file whereas google adds registry keys, skype has more features like conference video and buddy icons. One thing i would like changed with google talk is the gTalk logo removed or the ability to hide it in the gui.

  • 0

Yeah me too. I have nothing against an IM client if they could make it extensible.

Example:

Allow display pictures

Allow animated display pictures

Allow Handwritten messages

Allow Custom smileys

Allow personal message

Everything should be modules so you can completely prevent features you don't like from being loaded into memory.

I *think* (not sure though) that jabber allready allows for display pictures. GTalk should also have filetransfers and then maybe nothing more untill it's ready.

The way XMPP works (e.g. Jabber, or what GTalk uses) is fully extensible (being XML and all), they also have a preliminary spec for avatar's and file transfers (and anybody can write a new module if they want)

Now that is annoying. It makes it sooooo hard to read the convo properly :angry:

Oh god yeah, luckily my client doesn't yet support custom emoticons at all (Adium using libGaim)

Another "light" weight Jabber client is Psi, it's small, not bloated, and only supports the Jabber protocol (and a lot of it at that)

  • 0

I still hope that someone start an IM client that is so extremely modular that you could tear out any bad feature you don't like. Even the contact list should be a module.

I know it would take a long time to make such thing, but imagine an IM that only works the way you want it, and not how some few programmers want it to be.

Firefox is the most extensible browser yet, but i think an IM client (which is open all the time) should have much lesser memory useage. Kinda like utorrent can manage to be so small but still so big.

miranda

  • 0

Here I go again. Writing a long rant that Neowin's news section has deemed too long to post. I don't know why I get into these things, and I haven't even read it yet. I just kept on typing.

Well... enjoy.

I don't care for, or use any of those features you just mentioned on my phone. I really don't know anyone who does. My brother, for the longest time, had one of those simple, featureless Nokia phones with 'Snake' on it. Personally, I have a Samsung flip phone.

I don't use it to surf the web, it's too slow, too small, and too expensive. I don't IM people, I don't watch TV (slow, bad quality, expensive) , and I don't listen to music on it. I have an iPod for that. I use it to call people.

When my friends go on AIM, they don't constantly hit the 'Games' button. I don't know anyone with a webcam, or anyone who cares for AOL's streaming radio. When a friend signs on to AIM or MSN, or Yahoo, or ICQ or whatnot, they just want to IM people. They use Myspace or Blogger, so they have no need or interest in the integration with MSN Spaces or Xbox Live.

Now most of them aren't geeks. They're average computer users who bought a $700 HP back in 2002 and like to chat with their friends, surf the web, and play SimCity. They don't have a lot of RAM, and they don't know what to enable and disable when they're installing software. As a result, their taskbar is packed, they're dealing with IM windows that take up a quarter of the screen (@1024x768), and these 'modern' IM programs frequently freeze up their computer to draw the next massive window. Why they're so big, god only knows. AIM does it to look stylish, MSN does it so it can show really big buddy icons.

These ads and lack of focus is how GMail managed to get so far ahead of MSN Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail. No banner ads, clean interface, and essentially unlimited storage (with a working spam box!).

Google Talk got it right. No longer do I need to guide friends through setup of Gaim or Trillian, I can just show them Google Talk.

It launches at boot without a performance hit, allows them to IM and voice chat with people, automatically updates, and tells them when they have new email (as most of them have switched from hotmail by now). Everyone I've shown it to has refused to use AIM or MSN again (MSN is a minority usage in my area, I only know about four people who use it. About sixty that use AIM.)

People want simplicity. This is how Firefox caught on instead of Opera or Mozilla Suite, Google caught on instead of portal sites, and the reason that we don't all have videophones in our homes today, instead of the simple, reliable phone line.

Google Talk isn't a step back, it's a brilliant step forward and a focus on what most people actually need. And I commend Google for taking a risk like this in what has become a stagnant and boring market.

I agree 100%.

Too many goofy dumb features on all the other IM apps.

Nice post! :)

  • 0

I hate those people that use their every other letter as a picture or custom smiley. SO annoying. and display pictures are totally useless, 1/99999999999 people ACTUALLY put their picture as it. its mostly crap like "cool" pictures they drew in paint that took 3 seconds.

  • 0

I hate those people that use their every other letter as a picture or custom smiley. SO annoying. and display pictures are totally useless, 1/99999999999 people ACTUALLY put their picture as it. its mostly crap like "cool" pictures they drew in paint that took 3 seconds.

So your face is a caution sign? Stop your bitching.

  • 0

I too, have Google Talk but none of my friends use it. They are too lazy and stupid to figure out that if they have a Gmail account, they can still use their old email. They're all like "Oh no, I don't want to change my email for every single site I've registered to!"

Lazy bums.

  • 0

gtalk is good because its basic. its an effective tool to communicate with a developing team and the logs can be retrieved with gmail. with aim you have to direct connect to paste long lines of code and msn, well its pretty useless for sharing code with it.

Google Talk

Pseudo-tab like messaging

Retrieve logs remotely

Can paste many lines of text

seemless integration of VoIP

can sign on at multiple locations without logging one instance off

AIM (with dead aim)

Tabbed messaging

Logged conversations

Pasting code doesnt usually get messed up

File sharing is good

mainly used by friends who live in the US

MSN

Bloated feeling

File sharing is decent

Can't paste long lines of code into it

pasting code can result in emotes being displayed

Nudge does get your attention pretty well when you are AFK

used by pretty much everyone outside the US.

Generally people such as myself who have contacts that use many different clients, we find that using clients such as trilian, gaim, or miranda better suits our needs.

  • 0

Personally I dont like Gtalk too much... its way too plain, although I really like the feature that saves chat logs in your Gmail account. Its way too plain (once again) I like MSN, although 50% of the features are dumb, theyve been bloating it a bit:

- sharing folders (wtf?)

- nudges (so annoying - if people doesnt answer you, they wouldnt answer even after a nudge)

- CUSTOM EMOTICONS. People that replaces half their stuff with emoticons like LOL and HEY and every second letter with an animated letter is gay.

- handwriting (Who needs this)

- All the ads that no one clicks or looks at

- All the weird games

- Winks and all those weird stuff that occupies your whole window

etc etc

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Zen Browser 1.21b by Razvan Serea Zen Browser is a privacy-focused, open-source web browser built on Mozilla Firefox, offering users a secure and customizable browsing experience. It emphasizes privacy by blocking trackers, ads, and ensuring your data isn't collected. With Zen Mods, users can enhance their browser experience with various customization options, including features like split views and vertical tabs. The browser is designed for efficiency, providing fast browsing speeds and a lightweight interface. Zen Browser prioritizes user control over the browsing experience, offering a minimal yet powerful alternative to traditional web browsers while keeping your online activity private. Zen Browser’s DRM limitation Zen Browser currently lacks support for DRM-protected content, meaning streaming services like Netflix and HBO Max are inaccessible. This is due to the absence of a Widevine license, which requires significant costs and is financially unfeasible for the developer. Additionally, applying for this license would require Zen to be part of a larger company, similar to Mozilla or Brave. Therefore, DRM-protected media won't be supported in Zen Browser for the foreseeable future. Zen Browser offers features that improve user experience, privacy, and customization: Privacy-Focused: Blocks trackers and minimizes data collection. Automatic Updates: Keeps the browser updated with security patches. Zen Mods: Customizable themes and layouts. Workspaces: Organize tabs into different workspaces. Compact Mode: Maximizes screen space by minimizing UI elements. Zen Glance: Quick website previews. Split Views: View multiple tabs in the same window. Sidebar: Access bookmarks and tools quickly. Vertical Tabs: Manage tabs vertically. Container Tabs: Separate browsing sessions. Fast Profile Switcher: Switch between profiles easily. Tab Folders: Organize tabs into folders. Customizable UI: Personalize browser interface. Security Features: Inherits Firefox’s robust security. Fast Performance: Lightweight and optimized for speed. Zen Mods Customization: Deep customization with mods. Quick Access: Easy access to favorite websites. Open Source: Built on Mozilla Firefox with community collaboration. Community-Driven: Active development and feedback from users. GitHub Repository: Contribute and review the source code. Zen Browser 1.21b changelog: New Features Updated to Firefox 151.0.4 Added 'Space Routing', a new feature that allows you to route links to a specific Space. To get started, click on the three dots in your Space name and click on 'Space Routing Settings'. Fixes Fixed extension-opened tabs not being created with the correct container (#14100) Fixed a bug with the Boosts editor having the wrong theme colors (#14099) Improved overflowing space icons being inaccessible and improved the feeling when hovering over them (#13747) Other minor bug fixes and improvements Download: Zen Browser | 89.8 MB (Open Source) Download: Zen Browser ARM64 | Other Operating Systems View: Zen Browser Home Page | Screenshots 1 | 2 | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I am currently using a 4tb stick in combination with a 4tb 9100 Pro. It's only been six months since I bought them but the 990 has already dropped 1% health. Fingers crossed it doesn't go any lower.
    • But it opens the floodgates to anyone who gets a refund instead of a replacement (since refund will buy you a 1/3rd of the capacity it did years ago)
    • He has planned to file a lawsuit in small claims court so it'll only be a $1000 lesson assuming he wins. That's likely a fraction of what Samsung spends on toilet paper on a daily basis.
    • Windows Server gets DNS over HTTPS (DoH) support by Usama Jawad For the past few months, Microsoft has been previewing DNS over HTTPS (DoH) for Windows DNS Server, touting it as a foundational upgrade for zero-trust enterprise networks. It essentially introduces encrypted, authenticated DNS for the networks rather than transmitting DNS traffic in clear. Now, the company has introduced the general availability (GA) of this feature. The GA of DoH encourages organizations to deploy the solution in production environments without implementing a new client-to-resolver architecture. DoH helps improve the overall security of the network and reduces the risk of spoofing due to its zero-trust design. This is a significant change because pretty much every interaction with the network requires interfacing with DNS. DoH offers several advantages over standard DNS traffic, such as encryption using HTTPS, preventing unauthorized inspection, man-in-the-middle attacks, and traffic analysis. Since it leverages TLS certificates so that clients can verify the identity of the DNS server, it prevents spoofing through this authentication mechanism. Additionally, it's built on the DoH standard defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), which means that it should work with modern RFC 8484-compliant clients. Finally, it integrates into the existing network architecture seamlessly and can even run in parallel with standard DNS, so that customers can migrate to the new technology at their own pace. Microsoft says that in the past few months of preview, DoH has become more stable, and customers can confidently deploy it in production environments with proper guidance. Microsoft has emphasized that migrating to DoH is necessary for organizations that are moving toward zero-trust DNS solutions. Windows clients already support DoH, but the latest availability on Windows Server provides encrypted DNS to all endpoints. The company has also mentioned that "while this release focuses on encrypting client-to-resolver communication, support for encrypted communication between Windows DNS Server and upstream DNS resolvers is planned for a future update." You can follow Microsoft's guidance to deploy DoH here, but keep in mind that you need a Windows Server 2025 installation with the latest Patch Tuesday updates installed.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!