Recommended Posts

Well... wad' to say besides GREAT!? :) I have been running Bluuna and was looking around for something more "clear" that has an edge to it and this skin kinda just fell onto my lap. I like it alot! It has a very professional feel to it.

Funny how ppl are so bad at reading OP that they go through all teh trouble of screenshooting and posting a bug here... which OP already mentioned :} *giggles*.

I hate to be the Simon Cowel of visual styles, but b0se, this isn't your best work. I like the overall style, but it has it's roughness. I'm glad to see you switching it up a little, but it should be a little more refined. Hopefully we'll see some improvements in the next version.

+1

I couldn't agree more... I know it is a beta, but the fact is we have no idea what will change in the final and what will stay. Perhaps we're all a little spoiled by the first mockup/teaser that was shown, but that looked a lot smoother IMHO. Maybe some of the other colours will change my mind though. :)

"It's a beta" isn't an excuse, it's a fact.

i think everybody is aware of the fact that its a beta, but you(plural) don't have to shove it into somebody's face everytime a criticism is made.

Criticisms should be more important than praises and I as being a small time programmer welcome critcisms as it allows me to excel further in what I do.

i think everybody is aware of the fact that its a beta, but you(plural) don't have to shove it into somebody's face everytime a criticism is made.

Criticisms should be more important than praises and I as being a small time programmer welcome critcisms as it allows me to excel further in what I do.

Then make criticisms. All anyone is doing so far is complaining. Be specific -- what precisely don't you like and why?

Thought id take a peek into whats going on in windows themeing again (been using suse for last few months)...i always rem bose as one of the top designers,but this beta left me disappointed...i could look past the beta bugs (and there many) but the overall design just didn't seem to come togeather...perhaps bose is just testing some ideas with this one (interesting task bar widgets) so ill hope for better things to come,till then ill have to pass...

+1

I couldn't agree more... I know it is a beta, but the fact is we have no idea what will change in the final and what will stay. Perhaps we're all a little spoiled by the first mockup/teaser that was shown, but that looked a lot smoother IMHO. Maybe some of the other colours will change my mind though. :)

Always good to see a Boards Of Canada fan.

nice work as always b0se, been waiting for your work since XPMC RC3 was released last summer. I have to admit that codename opus 3.0 is my favorite theme ever, even now that I use windows blinds 5. Codename Opus 3.0 and Dreamland must be my favorite skins ever along with some classics from bant.

I was honestly hoping that maybe we would sometime see an updated transparent version of Codename Opus 3.0 for WB5 but this will have to do for now :yes:

Who cares, when the VS is done it'll be practically bugless, cos b0se is good like that. That's all that really matters. If you don't like an element either mod it yourself or find another VS to use.

I disagree. Because b0se is pressed for time, and based on history, he tends to leave a lot of bugs in themes.

I disagree. Because b0se is pressed for time, and based on history, he tends to leave a lot of bugs in themes.

Lot of bugs?? I have been using OPUS for a while as my main theme and I love it...and I dont really see any bugs at all...infact, non comes to mind..

Gotta realize that this is a BETA and he is doing this for FREE

anytime I try to download the GuiAirB1.zip file from the original post it is always corrupted. Is it just me or is the file just bad?

looking forward to testing this...

Are you using firefox,cause i have the same problem too,

switch to IE and the file arrive just fine :D just a thought.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft: Windows 11 KB5094126, KB5093998 finally stops trusting a critical system threat by Sayan Sen This week Microsoft released the Patch Tuesday updates for June 2026 with KB5094126 on Windows 11 25H2, 24H2, and KB5093998 on Windows 11 23H2. On Windows 10 22H2 it's under KB5094127. Alongside the announced release notes for the new builds, Microsoft has revealed another change that is coming to Windows with these new releases. It has been confirmed that custom folders are getting a significant change with the June 2026 updates as such folders or folder names defined by desktop.ini will no longer appear after this update is successfully installed. While you may inititally think this is a bug with the new release, Microsoft has stated that this is in fact "expected behaviour" in its new support article regarding this which Neowin spotted today while browsing. Essentially it's a security hardening measure such that custom folder presentations are treated as potentially unsafe whenever Windows is not sure about their origin and whether that desktop.ini folder can be trusted or not. Here is list of such untrusted files and folders: Files downloaded from the internet that carry Mark-of-the-Web (MOTW). Files copied from certain remote locations, such as some WebDAV or HTTP-based locations. Files on network paths that are not classified as intranet or trusted by zone policy. For those who may not be familiar, Desktop.ini is a special configuration file used by Windows to customize the appearance and behavior of individual folders. Basically Windows can read specific instructions stored in Desktop.ini instead of displaying every folder with the same default settings. This can be used to apply custom icons, thumbnail images, localized folder names, and such informational tooltips (infotip). The file can also influence certain folder-specific behaviors and properties. It is typically stored as a hidden system file within a folder that has been designated to support Desktop.ini customization. However, because Windows Shell automatically reads and applies these attributes whenever a customized folder is opened, they have historically (since the Windows XP days) presented an attack surface as a result of an unchecked buffer in the Shell component responsible for extracting custom attributes from Desktop.ini files. As such an attacker could create a specially crafted Desktop.ini containing a malicious or corrupted attributes and place it on a network share. So if a user were to browse that folder, Windows would automatically process the file, potentially triggering a buffer overflow. This could allow arbitrary code to run with the same permissions as the logged-in user. Hence a seemingly harmless folder could become a security risk when their contents are not properly validated. For admins and users alike looking to manage this behaviour, Microsoft has shared a few ways. One of them is to assign a trusted mark on the folder in case you are sure of its source. Secondly a policy can be used to revert back to the previous state. Finally, the MOTW can be removed too to indicate to Windows that this is a safe file. The company explains: Option 1: Add the source to Trusted Sites (Recommended) If the affected content is stored on a known internal or managed source, add that source to the Trusted Sites list. Once the source is treated as trusted, Windows processes desktop.ini from that source normally. This keeps the protection in place for other locations and is the lower-risk option. Option 2: Use policy to restore previous behavior Organizations that need broader compatibility can enable the policy Allow the use of remote paths in file shortcut icons.Enabling this policy restores the pre-June 2026 behavior for affected remote or untrusted scenarios. Option 3: Check for and remove the Mark of the Web (MotW) If the desktop.ini file has a Mark of the Web (MotW), Windows may treat it as coming from an untrusted source and block customization. Verify whether MotW is present and, if appropriate, remove it from the desktop.ini file. This can restore expected behavior, but should only be done for trusted content, as it removes the associated security protection. To remove the MotW tag, open PowerShell and run one of the following commands: For a single desktop.ini file: Unblock-File "C:\Your\Folder\Path\desktop.ini" For all desktop.ini files in a folder: Get-ChildItem "C:\Your\Folder\Path" -Recurse -Filter desktop.ini -Force | Unblock-File Microsoft has warned though against using a broad opt-out using the provided policy as it reduces protection against potentially malicious remote folder-customization content. As such the tech giant recommends trusting only controlled internal sources and keeping trust settings as strict as possible. You can check out the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • LAV Filters 0.82.0 by Razvan Serea LAVFSplitter is a multi-format media splitter that uses libavformat (the demuxing library from ffmpeg) to demux all sorts of media files. LAV Splitter is a Souce Filter/Splitter required to demux the files into their separate elementary streams. LAV Audio and Video Decoder are powerful decoders with a focus on quality and performance, without any compromises. Supported Formats: MKV/WebM, AVI, MP4/MOV, MPEG-TS/PS (including basic EVO support), FLV, OGG, and many more that are supported by ffmpeg! LAV Filters are based on ffmpeg and libbluray and is aimed to offer a all-around solution to perfect playback of file-based Media as well as Blu-rays. LAV Filters 0.82.0 changelog: LAV Splitter NEW: Support for demuxing Dolby Vision Enhancement Layer streams NEW: Support for Animated WebP images Changed: When demuxing Blu-ray discs, Dolby Vision metadata is available on the primary video stream LAV Video NEW: Support for Animated WebP images Changed: Hardware decoding support for DVDs has been removed Download: LAV Filters 0.82.0 | 15.5 MB (Open Source) View: LAV Filters Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • For some reason when EU forced Microsoft to allow users to change the default browser and search provider in Windows (also no ads for Office and the likes) - it was good. But when it comes to Apple - then it's bad. BTW, Apple would have gone out of business if Microsoft wasn't pressed by US government several decades ago. 😉
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      207
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!