A list of applications reviewed by migo


Recommended Posts

This isn't quite the same as slimy and CrisCr0ss, I'm doing less apps and more detail. I hope you find this useful as well.

I'll add more software as I go, I'll try to do one category at a time.

Decompression Software

I only use archive software for decompression, so I won't be reviewing compression capabilities

(besides, maximumcompression.com does a better job than I ever could).

I mainly deal with .zip and .rar, although .7z does occasionally show up, so I'm only focusing

on programs that handle all 3 formats.

WinRAR 3.51

WinRAR will extract archives from within Explorer, just right click the archive and select "Extract

Here" or "Extract To", this is quite handy and what I do most of the time. The interface is also

good, it has a ".." directory for going up, which is handy especially when you're dealing with

archives within archives. It is a bit of a pain having to type in the whole directory each time,

especially from a temp directory when I open an archive from the 'net instead of downloading it.

WinRAR can be set up to use a virus scanner if you have one, which is handy, especially if your scanner can't scan within archives.

It does its job well, but it is trialware, and I don't see the point in paying for it just for its decompression capabilities.

PowerArchiver 2006 9.50

PowerArchiver has much the same capabilities as WinRAR, but is better in several areas. First, when you're extracting from the interface it defaults to the last used directory, which is most often what I want anyway, and is never the temp directory. With temp archives, PowerArchiver offers to save the archive permenantly when you close, most of the time I don't use this option but it does beat having to redownload the archive if you decide you wanted to save it after all. PowerArchiver also has the option to automatically run certain setup files in an archive upon opening.

PowerArchiver has a couple features I haven't seen in other programs, so it is actually worth paying for if those features are important to you (autorun setup files and offering to save temp archives).

TugZip 3.4

TugZip is free, which is a bonus, and although it does its job it is slow in loading, every other program opens the archive right away, while TugZip takes at least 5 seconds for me, even with a 4kB archive. It has the same context menu extraction options as WinRAR, and from the interface it extracts to the last used directory, like PowerArchiver, it also has several interface options, the 3 pane option allows it to work practically as an Explorer replacement. I never got around to checking if it haz virus scanner support.

It's free, and it does its job, but the delays in opening were more of a pain than WinRAR's defaulting to the temp directory for extracting temp archives.

7-Zip 4.32

7-Zip is free, small and quick. The contextual menu options are in a submenu, which is an option (though not the default) with WinRAR, I like it because it keeps the menu relatively uncluttered, there are enough programs adding stuff to the menu that I don't need 6 more, only one of which I regularly use in the main menu. The interface isn't quite as intuitive as the other programs, I wouldn't have guessed that the "-" was extract, but I also removed text labels so I got what I deserved there. 7-Zip doesn't set the default directory to the last used directory, which is a little inconvenient, but not as annoying as WinRAR's default. 7-Zip does not appear to have virus scanner support.

Overall, I'd recommend 7-Zip, simply because it's small, fast and does its job well, took me a little while longer (ie, 30 seconds) to figure out the interface but it is just as good as the other ones, just a bit different.

ZipZag 1.73

I actually haven't used this program in ages, it's trialware. It worked well and supports almost every format out there, so if you need to extract a large variety of archives it's worth looking into.

Edited by migo
  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks!

Filesharing Software

Some of these programs I use all the features, some I use only the basic features, so I might be missing some more advanced things from certain programs.

uTorrent

Since trying uTorrent I haven't found anything better, feature wise it beats out every other torrent client that I've tried, and it uses much less resources. It's an all-in-one type torrent program like Azureus and BitComet (as opposed to BitTorrent and BitTornado), which I personally prefer since I just have to launch the program when I restart and it will continue all the torrents where it left off. It has a wide range of settings, you can schedule bandwidth throttling, both upstream and downstream at certain times. You can control maximum up or down speed on a per torrent basis, you can have a maximum number of seeding or leeching torrents, you can set torrents to stop after a certain point, and more. It's not quite as good as BitComet in the port department, since you can only set one port instead of setting a port range, but I haven't had any problems with only setting one port. uTorrent also has the feature originally in BitComet of letting you select which files in a torrent to download and which ones to leave out. Unfortunately it doesn't adjust the full torrent size according to what you have selected, but that's a minor gripe, and will probably be fixed eventually. uTorrent will test if your ports are open, and will also give you a straight link to DSL reports which will tell you your upload and download bandwidth. By the time you're reading this review, there's probably more features in uTorrent in the newest update.

I definitely recommend it, it's a great little program and does more while using less.

BitComet and Azureus are OK, but both (especially Azureus) are huge resource hogs, and neither offers any features that uTorrent doesn't offer so I'm not bothering with them.

DC++ 0.674

That's actually not the newest version but I haven't found a need to upgrade. DC++ is pretty much the only Direct Connect client you can use, and a lot of places 0.674 is the earliest version of it you can still use. Every other client is banned on a lot of hubs, so if you want to get any use out of Direct Connect, DC++ is your only option. It works by connecting to hubs where you can browse other users' file lists or just do searches for a file you're looking for. You download the files 1 to 1, which sometimes makes things quicker (they're only uploading to you, not to 100 people) and sometimes slower (you're only downloading from one person, not 100 people). I've had uploads as high as 600kB/s although unfortunately I haven't had downloads that quickly, but obviously someone else was getting a 600kB/s download. It has active and passive connection options, active is better, but some ISPs make it difficult or impossible (for example, mine), so often you'll have to settle with passive. If you're passive you can't connect to other passive users. It opperates a lot like IRC except it's filesharing oriented instead of chat oriented. DC++ is hard to figure out to use for new users, some people I've reccomended it to just couldn't figure it out, so obviously it's not too intuitive, and took me a while to figure out. If you can figure it out and take a little time with it, you'll get good results, especially if you're looking for niche downloads. DC++ doesn't let you throttle upload or download speeds, which can be a bit of a problem, and requires you to use a 3rd party program like NetPeeker to do it.

I recommend it, but overall Torrents are better just in terms of being able to find what you want as well as being easier to use. I use both, but if you want just one then uTorrent wins out slightly.

eMule 0.47a

Emule has both a server based network as well as a distributed network, Wikipedia's entry on eMule explains it well so I won't bother going into detail. It has a lot in common with Napster or KaZaA in how you find files (enter the search string and it brings back results, with certain results being more or less likely on certain servers) but has advantages of Torrents like being able to upload parts of partially downloaded files. eMule also has a great balance in finding rare files as well as fast downloads. If something is really rare, eMule will probably find it but it'll be quite slow. If you have a popular file it will download quite quickly, matching Torrent speeds in some cases. I've also used MorphXT 8.1, but haven't found any additional features it has to be of use so the basic eMule client is fine. I've given eMule Plus a shot as well, but eMule minus is really a better name for it.

Emule is really good for mainstream downloads, niche downloads are better from hubs (DC++) or trackers (uTorrent), but it's still worth keeping on your computer, it's one of the better ones for just music specifically as well.

Soulseek 1.57-Test 8

Soulseek is specifically designed for music, especially indy music and you can browse various chat rooms based on genre and browse other users' music files. It's actually quite good for finding music, but recently downloading is the pits. I haven't been able to download anything I want off it for a long time. Users can set it so only friends can download from them, but their search results still turn up, so the majority of the results returned just won't work. Some also have a download que, so you've gotta wait in line for another 100 or more users to download from that user before you get your shot at downloading. A lot of them also have rules that you actually have to browse their files to find, often about only downloading one file from them at a time, so if you want to download an entire album you'll get banned from that user for breaking their rules which you never knew about.

I still have it on my computer, and use it as a last resort if I can't find anything on my other programs, but until they fix things up I don't see it being hugely useful to anyone.

KCEasy 0.16

KCEasy is a multinetwork program, and is the windows frontend for giFT which is a plugin based system that allows different networks to be added or removed according to your liking. Ultimately it just accesses the different networks (Ares, FastTrack, Gnutella 1 and OpenFT - it's own network) seperately, it doesn't integrate them. So while you'll sometimes get 4 users of the same file, they'll each be on a differrent network and you still can only download from one user since none of the networks are based around hashing. It's a bit of a pity but otherwise it works really well, and cuts down on resources. It's not programmed in Java or Python so it's not a huge RAM or CPU hog. It sometimes doesn't connect to all the networks, or takes a while to connect to them, but once it's fully connected you can get as high as 150 million gigabytes that you have access to. It's not terribly fast, but again that's based on the networks more than the program. The ares network you need a seperate plugin for, the other 3 networks come supported by default. Other networks are also being worked on but they're not fully supported yet.

For both Ares and FastTrack it's the best option, Ares has an annoying 15 download max limit and you can't control which downloads go first properly if you have more than 15 downloads in que, KCEasy doesn't have this problem. KaZaA has spyware, and so far KCEasy is the only legal windows program I've found that supports FastTrack (K-Lite etc. is illegal because it reverse engineers KaZaA). It's the only program to support OpenFT (which isn't a huge deal but it is getting more users, and some stuff I'm starting to only find on OpenFT so it is valuable). Unfortunately it only supports Gnutella 1, and not Gnutella 2, so for both Gnutella networks another program might be more viable. Overall I reccommend KCEasy, but it comes second last on my list of reccomendations, only ahead of Soulseek.

Edited by migo

thanks.

Might be worth putting in red and green at the end a final rating or at least recomendation like the other guys have. Since your reviewing alot I dont personally wana read reviews to the ones that arent very good so it might be a good way to find at a glance what you like best.

Keep up the effort mate

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!