Problem regarding imaging and netbios name


Recommended Posts

hello gang,

i have a new problem which seems to have stumped me. I recently updated an already created image (Ghost), created a new image of that system then rolled it out to approx 30 client computers. the procedure i use is this:

1 Install O/S and apps

2 Configure (using a specifically created admin account) profile to copy to default user

3 run sysprep (with the option left on to regenerate sids)

4 and whilst the computer is DOWN (as in before it boots to create new sids and follow my sysprep.inf answer file) i ghost that image.

So theorectically i can rollout fresh images that havent finshed initializing or joined domains yet, to ensure these are REALLY individual images. sysprep then continues and domain attachment is automated via sysprep.inf so i end up with computers ready to rock and roll.

My problem now stems from the fact that on my LAST set of images, the netbios name seems to have been copied across to every image. Now this is peculiar as when i look at each computer in the my computer properties, computer name, more, netbios name, it actually says the computer unique name. As expected ofcourse. But when i ping a recently imaged computer from another computer with the command "ping -a NEWIMAGE1" i recieve a reply from the correct ip adress, but of the netbios name of the host image computer before sysprep was run on it.

Let me say that bit again, the host image (the computer my image was created from) had a computer name of 'Image010306Builda', and such a netbios name of the same up 2 15 characters ofcourse. Sysprep was run on this computer to regerate sids and the like. When this computer shutdown after sysprep i imaged it. My new images all got new computer names (during the sysprep procedure). But now when i interogate these computers they have the same netbios name as the originaal host computer, whilst their own netbios name configuration IS their own (correct) dns computer name.

i cant seem to find the cause of this. I had a WINs server in operation but removed it for clarity sake, it did not have any records regarding my issue anyway.

Any help please, especially from S.O.E admins or anyone really. Thanks alot guys.

Hi amfony,

This may sound strange but we had exactly the same issue at our DR site recently.

You'll find all the machines are pinging via WINS instead of DNS i.e. WKS001 instead of WKS001.domain.co.uk)

Anyway, the fix the engineering team implemented was to script in an "ipconfig /release" and "ipconfig /release" upon the final boot (after our image was rolled and had at least once booted into windows).

Try that on one machine and then try pinging...you should be able to via DNS and resolve name correctly.

What I couldn't understand was a reboot was NOT resolving the issue...it required a forced ipconfig release and renew. Very strange indeed.

Please post an update here whatever the outcome.

Many thanks

i tried but no dice. under every circumstance i get the same reply. i even ran sysprep again on a image client machine, removed ut from domain, uninstalled the nic, rebooted, searched registry, i disabled netbios expliocilty from the nic, (its disabled by dhcp by default) and no dice. i am at a loss

Where are you resolving these names from? Your machine? Every other machine on the network? Where?

Sounds like you have a cached entry or lmhost/host entry in where ever your trying to access these machines from.. What does a nbtstat -A IPADDRESS of the machine in question show?

What does your cache show on the machine your doing these queries from? nbtstat -c

What does the machine in question show for nbtstat -n show?

Sorry for the late reply guys! but i am back now

Sorry budman i should have been more specific, from the newly created image (lets name it CLTIMG) when i ping it self, i get returned its proper "dns" fqdn (and proper address), when i type the command "ping -a IPADDRESS OF SELF" i get the CORRECT DNS name relpy again. Now this is what i expect as i have disabled netbios via DHCP options.

When i ping from ANOTHER (any other) computer to the CLTIMG via its proper name, i get a correct and legitmate dns response (my ddns is working fine and all records are correct for the new images), from anyother computer when i type "ping -a IPADDRESSOFCLTIMG" i get resolved back "ORIGINALIMG" (being the image i copied to rollout to client machines) and the ip address of the CLTIMG box.

Sorry if i am not very clear, but when resolving from it self, the CLTIMG thinks everything is ok. When resolving netbios from another computer it gives me the wrong computername.

I did go through pretty much nbtstat had to aoffer me budman and to confuse me even further when i typed "nbtstat -a CLTIMGIPADDRESS" i get the CORRECT netbios name returned to me.

in the cache if the CLTIMG i get nothing the domain name (which is wierd as i shudnt have any entries here is my netbios is disabled) and nbtstat -n gives me once again my correct computer name.

Interesting no?

I am thinkning along the lines that sysprep itself didnt quite work as supposed to rather then any configuration errors. What is your line of thniking budman? and others ofcourse?

Thanks guys and sorry again about the late reply

I've built plenty of machines and joined them to a domain for tweaking before ghosting, BUT I always remove them from the domain and remove the comp account in AD prior to actually making the image. I havent seen any odd issues form doing so and usually use sysprep to have them prompt for a new name prior to joining the domain on first boot after applying the image...

The problem as it sounds to me is more of a DNS issue than a workstation issue... Maybe try removing the DNS entry for the particular machine that your pinging then renew the IP of that machine and have a new DNS record created. Then of course ping it from somethign else... OR, maybe remove the problem machine from the domain, remove the comp account in AD, rename it and rejoin the domain... Either of these will basically allow DHCP to update DNS with a new record for that machine, and hopefully resolve your problem.

ok that could be the problem, the fact that i DONT remove the computer from the domain b4 sysprep-ing. I was under the assumption that a reseal on sysprep was the equivalent of "making the system ready to be used by end users", and therefore assumed all naming and domain membership was revoke and nullified before sysprep was finshed its job. As well as re-sid-ing.

Now ill have to test this tomorrow, but just a thought. I too, have built plenty of computers, it seems in error with my mistake regarding the domain. But i have now in a prodcution environemnt 95% of my images running well. As in NOT WITH THIS PROBLEM. i dont feel that my procedure this time was any different from the other systems i have built then imaged.

I called micro$oft, with a capital SOFT, and i explained my issue, as soon as i mentioned "3rd party deployment application" they washed theirs hands of the problem and said "we cant guarentee anything with 3rd party products".

As for UnaBonger, the records i have delted and to no avail, the first post actually refers to new ip lease and that was no dice either.

Im back wit the results, I did create a new image with removing the domain, this didnt seem to fix it.

I have recoursed back to creating a brand new installation of XP from my custom install CD. Customised, removed from domain as suggested in this thread and imaged. This works.

Unfortunatley i cannot pin point the problem, but a work around will do until i get more time to investigate. Thanks for all your help guys with this issue.

Sincerley

Amfony

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As such, about 30,000 government sector computers would be switching by 2027 or so. I have been there and done it though probably not with as many as 30,000 computers. i worked on a Bank of America conversion project and it was a mess, a complete mess. Computer system conversions are never as easy as they sound in the media or even the Corporate Boardroom or Government high-up offfices. One may ask, what MIcrosoft hardware and sofware the government of Denmark is using in addition to desktop computers and Office?. One thing for sure. We know that they aren't using Windows 10 Mobile.
    • WTF? I can't believe you are surprised it's not an option or it should be. 
    • Yes, if the PCs aren’t upgraded, they’ll lack features like TPM and remain vulnerable to driver and hardware-level exploits. That includes CPU flaws, RAM vulnerabilities, boot and BIOS attacks, and so on. Realistically, there should have been a steady programme of hardware refreshes rather than allowing systems to age well past their practical and secure lifespan. Are we seriously entertaining the idea of running Linux on machines that are over a decade old as a long-term solution instead of upgrading? Would you entrust your financial data or medical records to a box from the early 2000s, with Windows XP removed and Linux installed in its place? Performance degradation is not just an inconvenience. It affects productivity. Slow machines cost time, and time costs money. Security flaws do too. Hardware and software upgrades should be part of a rolling, responsible IT strategy. They should not be treated as an afterthought. This kind of complacency is precisely the issue we’ve seen before. Just look at how that played out in the UK. We readily replace construction tools such as drills, saws, and other equipment on a regular basis, and many of those cost more than a standard desktop PC. Yet when it comes to computers, we’re still stuck in the mindset of "if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it." Just because something powers on doesn’t mean it is fit for purpose. The horse and cart did the job at one point too, but that didn’t mean it was wise to stick with it when something better came along.
    • Freshly released Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is already discounted by Fiza Ali The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is already available at a discount, just two months after its debut, so you may want to check it out. The device is powered by the Samsung Exynos 1580 processor and equipped with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, which can be expanded by up to 1TB via microSD. It features a 10.9‑inch LCD display with a resolution of 2,304 x 1,440 pixels and a 90 Hz refresh rate. Photography and video calls are handled by a 13MP rear camera and a 12MP ultra‑wide front‑facing camera. The device further includes dual AKG‑tuned speakers for immersive audio. The Galaxy Tab S10 FE offers Sub‑6 5G, dual‑band Wi‑Fi 6 with Wi‑Fi Direct support, and Bluetooth 5.3 for low‑latency wireless connections. Moreover, it incorporates S Pen functionality with handwriting assist, a Circle to Search feature for instant Google look‑ups, and Math Solver for converting handwritten equations into editable text and step‑by‑step solutions. The tablet comes pre‑loaded with a suite of creative and productivity apps, including LumaFusion, GoodNotes, Clip Studio Paint, Noteshelf, Sketchbook and PicsArt. The Galaxy Tab S10 FE is water‑resistant, safeguarding against spills, splashes, and brief immersion, and includes a dedicated AI hot‑key on its keyboard for quick access to on‑device artificial intelligence tools. Finally, the tablet houses an 8,000 mAh lithium‑ion battery (29.95Wh) that is said to deliver up to 20 hours of continuous use and supports Super Fast Charging. Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE: $519.99 (Amazon US) 9% off This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Agree - and to that end, I’m not questioning a mods decision, as they didn’t perform an act of moderation on my posts - rather they seem to wish to keep creating drama where it doesn’t exist. However, point taken and will just use the Report functionality as you would any other user
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Case_f went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Conversation Starter
      Jamie Smith earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      NeoToad777 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      JoeV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      VAT Services in UAE earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      548
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      241
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      147
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      112
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!