What do u expect/want in OS 10.3?


Recommended Posts

theres rumors around that apple is already working on OS 10.3 (aka cheetah) and there might be chance that it'll be another paid upgrade :(, it will probably be announced as early as MWSF '03 or as late as MWNY '03 probably...

so what do u expect/want to see on 10.3?

im hoping to see an apple created (since chimera creator david hyatt works for apple) internet browser since we can see that since microsoft and apple's 5 year contract expired, apple is slowly getting away from microsoft, imovie2 (or 3 or whatever), alot BETTER classic support (within osx) concidering no more os9 as of jan 1st, and hopefully seeing a better version of appleworks, appleworks 6 reminds me too much of appleworks 5...they need new features to work with...

what do u want to see (or expect) for OS 10.3?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/44084-what-do-u-expectwant-in-os-103/
Share on other sites

grr dont be trying to correct me, when i wrote that i was half asleep :(, not my fault i cant remember all the osx codenames :p

actually i post quite a bit on macrumors :p, n have bout 4 friends from there n one of them is telling me latest gossip of mac software right now lol...

as i was saying, wha would u like to see or expect to see on so 10.3 though?

Originally posted by Heinrich-X

i bet it'll be 10.5 not 10.3, and superfula is correct, its codename Panther not cheetah, cheetah was the codename of the original 10.0

Steve Jobs said OS X is the Operating System for the next 15 years. I am sure they are not going to blast thru version numbers so quickly.

Originally posted by superrcat

Steve Jobs said OS X is the Operating System for the next 15 years. I am sure they are not going to blast thru version numbers so quickly.

hmm in 2010 theres OS 10.6 ;) lol

but he may mean just the osx source code (darwin) n such for the next 15 years since classic lasted 15 years (without osx) so basically same ui, very few changes, etc till os 20 ;) lol jk..by then it'll all be 3D stuff that has a chip in your eye or something....

Originally posted by Silvorgold

all ive got to say bout that is wait a few months *cough opensource cough* ;)

uh huh, and the day that apple makes their operating system opensource is the day that flying monkeys come shrieking from bill gates ######.

Originally posted by Silvorgold

uh i never said apple will be involved :p, apple may "try" to sue the open source ppl but apple wont be able to do anything about it....

if someone takes the source code of their os, and releases it without their permission I hate to break your bubble but Apple would be able to do something about it.

Originally posted by Silvorgold

uh i never said apple will be involved :p, apple may "try" to sue the open source ppl but apple wont be able to do anything about it....

That's like saying open source zeealots could take Windows, decompile it to get the source code, recompile it for another platform, distribute it, and there not being any recourse from Microsoft about it.

--dave

Would you guys really want to see Darwin "linux-ized" like that? I mean, one of the most compelling features of OS X is Aqua, and the open source community has yet to come up with seriously decent GUI foundation (not meaning XFree86, I mean the windowmanagers). I wouldn't want to see it *******ized just so I could have in on a PC.

Originally posted by Silvorgold

meh i give up, i was just telling what i HEARD from a friend whos a big windows/unix buff and i give up, everyone just flames me even if i just give out rumor info :(...

just close this thread plz :(

Dude just because people disagree with you it doesn't mean that they're flaming you! lmao

All they're trying to say is that they highly disbalieve what you were trying to put out there. But I saw no flaming.

If you're goign to say something, at least know enough about what you're saying to be able to back it up....otherwise all you're doing is po0ping out your mouth.

jesse ;-)

1) 64 Bit processor support. This will be included rather easily since they just have to sink up with the FreeBSD tree anyways. Drool.... the Power4 IBM chips on OSX....drool....hope it happens.

2) More ported Unix apps included with the system.

3) Improve the developer apps and improve upon Unix cross platform portability.

BTW: You'll never see OS X on x86 anything unless Apple can make sure they can stop BIOS hacking and have anyone w/ an Intel/AMD hack into it and change their desktop system into a MAC.

Originally posted by DrunkenMaster

1) 64 Bit processor support. This will be included rather easily since they just have to sink up with the FreeBSD tree anyways. Drool.... the Power4 IBM chips on OSX....drool....hope it happens.

2) More ported Unix apps included with the system.

3) Improve the developer apps and improve upon Unix cross platform portability.

BTW: You'll never see OS X on x86 anything unless Apple can make sure they can stop BIOS hacking and have anyone w/ an Intel/AMD hack into it and change their desktop system into a MAC.

ok i heard more bout it, and i originally heard it as an open source (not created by apple) x86 version of apple, but its something actually sort of like vpc, but for linux and u can install system 7 - os 10.2 on it, that will still be a major breakthrough, but only ppl who know how to use linux will be able to run it i guess...lets get back on subject...

this is what i expect for os 10.3:

-ibrowse (or something with a similar name)

-imovie3

-better classic support for classic apps concidering os9 wont work after jan 1st

-possibly itunes4 with more rendezvous support if there is any yet

-FASTER even tho jaguar is fast ;)

Originally posted by Silvorgold

ok i heard more bout it, and i originally heard it as an open source (not created by apple) x86 version of apple, but its something actually sort of like vpc, but for linux and u can install system 7 - os 10.2 on it, that will still be a major breakthrough, but only ppl who know how to use linux will be able to run it i guess...lets get back on subject...

this is what i expect for os 10.3:

-ibrowse (or something with a similar name)

-imovie3

-better classic support for classic apps concidering os9 wont work after jan 1st

-possibly itunes4 with more rendezvous support if there is any yet

-FASTER even tho jaguar is fast ;)

Actually the version of x86 that is in development by apple is supposed to be ran on an x86 but (wait for it) the os is tied into the bios. :cool:

So for all you people that want osx on an x86, it looks like you are going to have to buy the mobo to run it from apple.

It's actually quite a good idea to tell the truth, you can run it on your precious pc yet apple still makes a profit

tieing the os into the bios ... sounds low if u ask me, if they did do that i wouldnt get the os out of principle.

As for 10.3 i would really like better old world suport. there is no way im going to install a version of osx that doesnt let u boot into classic because thatle make my pritner useless and the video in/out card

I think Jaguar is great, but the one part of the OS that is kind of sub standard, is the Finder.. I'd really like to see a more advanced one in future versions of OS X. For one, I'd like to be able to cut-and-paste a file (with apple-x), and not just rely on dragging to move a file. Windows' explorer has this, and I think it's a really nice feature. Also, there should be a view similar to the "tree view" in the Windows explorer.

I'd use SNAX instead of the Finder, but that'd leave me without a desktop picture and desktop icons.. :(

Originally posted by Wickedkitten

Actually the version of x86 that is in development by apple is supposed to be ran on an x86 but (wait for it) the os is tied into the bios. :cool:

So for all you people that want osx on an x86, it looks like you are going to have to buy the mobo to run it from apple.

It's actually quite a good idea to tell the truth, you can run it on your precious pc yet apple still makes a profit

whoa someone actually believed me for once :s lol...

ya i'dd suspect apple to switch back within 5 years (since the original macs ran on x86)

apple would get new switchers by the tonne...but the anti-x86 mac users wouldnt be too happy :s or else they wont care :s lol

Originally posted by xStainDx

oh you're talking about "Panther"

what do i expect, more of those applications witht the

"i" before its name :p

hopefully soon we'll see

Mac OSx86 :p

idd love to see osx on x86 in a way and not see it on x86 for some reason at the same time:

love to see it on x86:

-cheaper mac prices

-closed x86 *maybe* but if as wickedkitten said happens, normal pcs could run on it, but knowing apple they'dd probably want it so that windows cant be installed overtop of mac os (but there'll probably end up being ways to do it on a normal pc)

-hopefully amd processors and faster faster faster

-maybe more compatibility with non mac supported hardware

wouldnt like to see it on x86:

-the era of PPC would be gone

-this will bring mac users closer to windows..

-apple might start bringing activation (im guessing but its doubtful)

-it will need altivec optimization

theres rumors of the IBM Power4 processor being used for macs as early as a year from now.....are Power4 processors x86 or wha platform?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to train them to help sort Adobe's old spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better against Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!