What do u expect/want in OS 10.3?


Recommended Posts

theres rumors around that apple is already working on OS 10.3 (aka cheetah) and there might be chance that it'll be another paid upgrade :(, it will probably be announced as early as MWSF '03 or as late as MWNY '03 probably...

so what do u expect/want to see on 10.3?

im hoping to see an apple created (since chimera creator david hyatt works for apple) internet browser since we can see that since microsoft and apple's 5 year contract expired, apple is slowly getting away from microsoft, imovie2 (or 3 or whatever), alot BETTER classic support (within osx) concidering no more os9 as of jan 1st, and hopefully seeing a better version of appleworks, appleworks 6 reminds me too much of appleworks 5...they need new features to work with...

what do u want to see (or expect) for OS 10.3?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/44084-what-do-u-expectwant-in-os-103/
Share on other sites

grr dont be trying to correct me, when i wrote that i was half asleep :(, not my fault i cant remember all the osx codenames :p

actually i post quite a bit on macrumors :p, n have bout 4 friends from there n one of them is telling me latest gossip of mac software right now lol...

as i was saying, wha would u like to see or expect to see on so 10.3 though?

Originally posted by Heinrich-X

i bet it'll be 10.5 not 10.3, and superfula is correct, its codename Panther not cheetah, cheetah was the codename of the original 10.0

Steve Jobs said OS X is the Operating System for the next 15 years. I am sure they are not going to blast thru version numbers so quickly.

Originally posted by superrcat

Steve Jobs said OS X is the Operating System for the next 15 years. I am sure they are not going to blast thru version numbers so quickly.

hmm in 2010 theres OS 10.6 ;) lol

but he may mean just the osx source code (darwin) n such for the next 15 years since classic lasted 15 years (without osx) so basically same ui, very few changes, etc till os 20 ;) lol jk..by then it'll all be 3D stuff that has a chip in your eye or something....

Originally posted by Silvorgold

all ive got to say bout that is wait a few months *cough opensource cough* ;)

uh huh, and the day that apple makes their operating system opensource is the day that flying monkeys come shrieking from bill gates ######.

Originally posted by Silvorgold

uh i never said apple will be involved :p, apple may "try" to sue the open source ppl but apple wont be able to do anything about it....

if someone takes the source code of their os, and releases it without their permission I hate to break your bubble but Apple would be able to do something about it.

Originally posted by Silvorgold

uh i never said apple will be involved :p, apple may "try" to sue the open source ppl but apple wont be able to do anything about it....

That's like saying open source zeealots could take Windows, decompile it to get the source code, recompile it for another platform, distribute it, and there not being any recourse from Microsoft about it.

--dave

Would you guys really want to see Darwin "linux-ized" like that? I mean, one of the most compelling features of OS X is Aqua, and the open source community has yet to come up with seriously decent GUI foundation (not meaning XFree86, I mean the windowmanagers). I wouldn't want to see it *******ized just so I could have in on a PC.

Originally posted by Silvorgold

meh i give up, i was just telling what i HEARD from a friend whos a big windows/unix buff and i give up, everyone just flames me even if i just give out rumor info :(...

just close this thread plz :(

Dude just because people disagree with you it doesn't mean that they're flaming you! lmao

All they're trying to say is that they highly disbalieve what you were trying to put out there. But I saw no flaming.

If you're goign to say something, at least know enough about what you're saying to be able to back it up....otherwise all you're doing is po0ping out your mouth.

jesse ;-)

1) 64 Bit processor support. This will be included rather easily since they just have to sink up with the FreeBSD tree anyways. Drool.... the Power4 IBM chips on OSX....drool....hope it happens.

2) More ported Unix apps included with the system.

3) Improve the developer apps and improve upon Unix cross platform portability.

BTW: You'll never see OS X on x86 anything unless Apple can make sure they can stop BIOS hacking and have anyone w/ an Intel/AMD hack into it and change their desktop system into a MAC.

Originally posted by DrunkenMaster

1) 64 Bit processor support. This will be included rather easily since they just have to sink up with the FreeBSD tree anyways. Drool.... the Power4 IBM chips on OSX....drool....hope it happens.

2) More ported Unix apps included with the system.

3) Improve the developer apps and improve upon Unix cross platform portability.

BTW: You'll never see OS X on x86 anything unless Apple can make sure they can stop BIOS hacking and have anyone w/ an Intel/AMD hack into it and change their desktop system into a MAC.

ok i heard more bout it, and i originally heard it as an open source (not created by apple) x86 version of apple, but its something actually sort of like vpc, but for linux and u can install system 7 - os 10.2 on it, that will still be a major breakthrough, but only ppl who know how to use linux will be able to run it i guess...lets get back on subject...

this is what i expect for os 10.3:

-ibrowse (or something with a similar name)

-imovie3

-better classic support for classic apps concidering os9 wont work after jan 1st

-possibly itunes4 with more rendezvous support if there is any yet

-FASTER even tho jaguar is fast ;)

Originally posted by Silvorgold

ok i heard more bout it, and i originally heard it as an open source (not created by apple) x86 version of apple, but its something actually sort of like vpc, but for linux and u can install system 7 - os 10.2 on it, that will still be a major breakthrough, but only ppl who know how to use linux will be able to run it i guess...lets get back on subject...

this is what i expect for os 10.3:

-ibrowse (or something with a similar name)

-imovie3

-better classic support for classic apps concidering os9 wont work after jan 1st

-possibly itunes4 with more rendezvous support if there is any yet

-FASTER even tho jaguar is fast ;)

Actually the version of x86 that is in development by apple is supposed to be ran on an x86 but (wait for it) the os is tied into the bios. :cool:

So for all you people that want osx on an x86, it looks like you are going to have to buy the mobo to run it from apple.

It's actually quite a good idea to tell the truth, you can run it on your precious pc yet apple still makes a profit

tieing the os into the bios ... sounds low if u ask me, if they did do that i wouldnt get the os out of principle.

As for 10.3 i would really like better old world suport. there is no way im going to install a version of osx that doesnt let u boot into classic because thatle make my pritner useless and the video in/out card

I think Jaguar is great, but the one part of the OS that is kind of sub standard, is the Finder.. I'd really like to see a more advanced one in future versions of OS X. For one, I'd like to be able to cut-and-paste a file (with apple-x), and not just rely on dragging to move a file. Windows' explorer has this, and I think it's a really nice feature. Also, there should be a view similar to the "tree view" in the Windows explorer.

I'd use SNAX instead of the Finder, but that'd leave me without a desktop picture and desktop icons.. :(

Originally posted by Wickedkitten

Actually the version of x86 that is in development by apple is supposed to be ran on an x86 but (wait for it) the os is tied into the bios. :cool:

So for all you people that want osx on an x86, it looks like you are going to have to buy the mobo to run it from apple.

It's actually quite a good idea to tell the truth, you can run it on your precious pc yet apple still makes a profit

whoa someone actually believed me for once :s lol...

ya i'dd suspect apple to switch back within 5 years (since the original macs ran on x86)

apple would get new switchers by the tonne...but the anti-x86 mac users wouldnt be too happy :s or else they wont care :s lol

Originally posted by xStainDx

oh you're talking about "Panther"

what do i expect, more of those applications witht the

"i" before its name :p

hopefully soon we'll see

Mac OSx86 :p

idd love to see osx on x86 in a way and not see it on x86 for some reason at the same time:

love to see it on x86:

-cheaper mac prices

-closed x86 *maybe* but if as wickedkitten said happens, normal pcs could run on it, but knowing apple they'dd probably want it so that windows cant be installed overtop of mac os (but there'll probably end up being ways to do it on a normal pc)

-hopefully amd processors and faster faster faster

-maybe more compatibility with non mac supported hardware

wouldnt like to see it on x86:

-the era of PPC would be gone

-this will bring mac users closer to windows..

-apple might start bringing activation (im guessing but its doubtful)

-it will need altivec optimization

theres rumors of the IBM Power4 processor being used for macs as early as a year from now.....are Power4 processors x86 or wha platform?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!