Problem in burning 4.5GB backup DVD in Windows ME


Recommended Posts

Subject:

Problem found in burning 4.5GB Data backup DVD in Windows ME (Millennium Edition)

----------------

Hi, Friends:

I used my Windows ME/Millennium Edition (FAT32) to burn the backup data DVD's with the NERO Burning ROM v6.6 at the speed of 8X. - The contents of backups include my old documents, softwares or mp3's etc. whose individual file sizes may range from 1 k-byte to no more than 500 MB each and yet the total file size in a backup DVD sums up approximately 4.2~ 4.4 GB as a whole. Here I found one thing dodgy/incorrect after making the backup DVD's and I am asking for your kind help or suggestions:

I have burnt four data DVD's so far (actually they are in two sets/twosomes, - please see the list below). Each of the DVD burning processes of the backups were all successfully completed. And I used the handy feature of NERO which varifies all the data immediately after the burning process in order for double checking between the burned data on DVD and the original data in the hard disc to see if both data meet identically. I do love this feature of NERO's though! - The file varifications were successfully done respectively without a single error found! That's good! And that literally means all the 4.2~ 4.4 GB files on the hard disc are exactly located on the data backup DVDs.

I also used the other of my DVD burner to double check contents between the completed data backups on DVD's and the original data files in my hard disc manually, folder by folder and file by file. Everything is OK and not a single error or missing file is found at all.

However, when it comes to the completed backup data DVD's 'property' tag displayed in the Windows File Mamager or the Windows Commander (another handy file admin app), I found one thing wrong, -- The size of the DVD disc actually displays 2,147,450,880 bytes and 1.99GB in the Windows File Mamager and 2,097,120 K-bytes in the Windows Commander respectively.

I wonder, since 'ALL' of the files (which sum up totally approx. 4.2 ~4.4 GB) are successfully burnt into the DVD discs and was double checked by NERO app or manually by myself without an error or missing file found in the end, the 'property' tag of the completed backup DVD discs are supposed to be 4.2 ~4.4 GB rather than approx. 2.0 GB, aren't they?

Meanwhile, I burnt each set/twosome of the data backups using my PIONEER DVR 109 and NEC 4550 DVD burner respectively. I also used the PIONEER DVR 109 to double check the disc burnt by NEC 4550A, and vice versa I checked the disc burnt by PIONEER using NEC 4550 in order to secure the best compatibility of DVD reading. All of the checking results were error-free without a missing file found at all, however, when we look into the 'property' tags of the drive/disc size (of the backup DVD's) shown in the Windows File Manager or the Windows Commander, they still 'display' the incorrect and identical values (see the list below) despite the fact that each has got actually 4.2 ~4.4 GB contents inside!

Here I make a list of the four data backup DVD's that I've made so far, as follows:

1.

Item ID: 01P

- data backup DVD burnt on 8X media, by PIONEER DVR 109 at the speed 8X

- contents: my software backup and old docs,

which sums up approx. 4.4 GB as a whole in my hard disc (FAT32) D:\

- NO error found, NO missing file during/after burning.

except the wrong DVD-disc file property tag, which displays

2,147,450,880 bytes and 1.99GB in the Windows File Mamager

and 2,097,120 K-bytes in the Windows Commander.

2.

Item ID: 01N

- data backup DVD burnt on 8X media, by NEC 4550A at the speed 8X

- contents: my software backup and old docs,

which sums up approx. 4.4 GB as a whole in my hard disc (FAT32) D:\

- NO error found, NO missing file during/after burning.

except the wrong DVD-disc file property tag, which displays

2,147,450,880 bytes and 1.99GB in the Windows File Mamager

and 2,097,120 K-bytes in the Windows Commander.

3.

Item ID: 02P

- data backup DVD burnt on 8X media, by PIONEER DVR 109 at the speed 8X

- contents: my mp3 backup and photo/drawings,

which sums up approx. 4.2 GB as a whole in my hard disc (FAT32) E:\

- NO error found, NO missing file during/after burning.

except the wrong DVD-disc file property tag, which displays

2,147,450,880 bytes and 1.99GB in the Windows File Mamager

and 2,097,120 K-bytes in the Windows Commander.

4.

Item ID: 02N

- data backup DVD burnt on 8X media, by NEC 4550A at the speed 8X

- contents: my mp3 backup and photo/drawings,

which sums up approx. 4.2 GB as a whole in my hard disc (FAT32) E:\

- NO error found, NO missing file during/after burning.

except the wrong DVD-disc file property tag, which displays

2,147,450,880 bytes and 1.99GB in the Windows File Mamager

and 2,097,120 K-bytes in the Windows Commander.

Now that both sets/twosomes of the data backups (one 4.4 GB and the other 4.2 GB) have got actually more than Four Giga Bytes in the contents, and NO error or missing file were found at all through the application NERO's file varification function or through my manually double checking file by file or folder by folder, and on top of that, the burning sessions of the mentioned 2 sets (4 DVD's in total) were approximately 10~13 minutes, which definitely meets the criteria or common experiences of burning a 4.4 ~ 4.2 GB data backup DVD's using 8X speed, HOW COME the disc/drive property tags end up displaying approximately 2 GB instead of 4.2~ 4.4 GB then?? (Please see the above list for precise file sizes.)

I searched online for answers, but so far I can only be certain that it's most likely something to do with the FAT32 or FAT issues. Isn't it?

Another interesting task that I may try later on is placing the above two sets/twosomes of my data backup DVD's (namely, all my four DATA backup DVD's: 01P, 01N, 02P and 02N mentioned above) into a computer which has got Windows XP/2000 installed, and see: (1) what the disc size 'property' tag is shown in Windows XP/2000 - 2 GB or 4 GB? (2) If all the 4.4~4.2 GB files inside the DVD's can be retrieved without fail? (I think, theoretically, all the files in the DATA DVD should be OK and usable/workable no matter what the Operation System is installed, isn't it?)

I am writing to seek any computer expert's comment to see if I can keep on backing up the 4.2 ~ 4.4 GB data DVD's like the way I mentioned above and did with the current Operation System Windows ME (Millennium Edition) and simply neglect the abnormal disc/file size property tag shown in the file admin Windows applications mentioned above? Another important thing is, I wonder if such data backup DVD's can still be used/read when I upgrade my OS to Windows XP or 2000 later on? Are they still workable or readable in Windows 2000/XP?

Thanks!

SUIKUI

I found one thing wrong, -- The size of the DVD disc actually displays 2,147,450,880 bytes and 1.99GB in the Windows File Mamager and 2,097,120 K-bytes in the Windows Commander respectively.

I haven't got the time to read all of your post but that sounds like WinME and FAT32 only being able to address up to 2GB. I might have got the wrong end of the stick, though... perhaps you could condense it down a bit?

08. Under "My Computer", DVD disc capacity is reading as 1.99 GB using Windows ME or Windows 98, but if you "Select All" to calculate the total capacity within the DVD disc itself, then everything is fine.

Answer: It is due to the Windows ME and Windows 98 limitations, whereas Windows 2000 or Windows XP do not have such problem.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!