Duplicate user profiles in Windows 2000


Recommended Posts

I seem to have a unique issue and i'm unsure of the cause or solution. A majority of our systems are on windows 2000 machines with Novell logins. A handful of the systems, after the user logs in to novell, comes up to a blank or generic windows 2000 desktop missing all their icons and files. After investigating in the documents and settings folder we discover a new profile has been created. If the users profile name is "user123" , the new profile is "user123.user123" . We end up copying the original profile "user123" into the newly created "user123.user123" profile as a work around and the user is able to access the data again. The funny thing is if you go into the users folder in computer management there is no user name "user123.user123" , but "user123" is listed as its supposed to be. Is this a security flaw, virus, or Novell issue? The computers are virus free to the best of our knowledge, but you can never be sure. Does anyone have any ideas as to what causes this to happen?

Thanks!!

What the issue could be, and what it sounds like is the duplicate user is being created due to the domain. Now, I'm not too familiar with Novell, but I have worked a little in Windows domains.

If I create a user "user123" and have documents BEFORE I have joined a domain, and then sign onto a domain with the same "user123" username, Windows will create a duplicate account, and it will only show the one username in Computer Management. Can you always be signed in with Novell? If you can, you can use that profile to have your documents. Or you could just have a shortcut on their Novell account to point to their old account. Windows is weird like that, and sometimes it just doesn't make your life easy.

This may not have been the insight you were looking for, but hopefully this helps to point you in the right direction.

Good luck!

Parts of the registry are not closing out correctly, which leads to the duplicate profile. What you need to do is install the User Hive Profile Cleaner from Microsoft. That will save a lot of headaches. My work uses Novell as well. I have run into the issue many times. Its part of our standard install for any client install.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And we think AI can take over lower level programmers jobs? Just search for the SHA hash for the "rogue" sound file and delete it.
    • Meta will use AI to summarize your WhatsApp messages by David Uzondu Recently, Meta announced that ads are coming to WhatsApp, appearing in Status and Channels. Now, another update is on its way, this time in the form of a new feature called "Message Summaries", that leverages Meta's AI to summarize your chats for you. For those moments when you are drowning in unread messages, you can choose to have the AI generate a quick summary to get the gist of a conversation. To address the immediate privacy alarms this sets off, Meta says that its "Private Processing technology" will be used. This supposedly ensures that neither Meta nor WhatsApp can see your original messages or the private summaries the AI generates. To prove its sincerity, Meta published a deep technical white paper that explains how this privacy is supposed to be maintained. In the technical documentation, Meta explains the way it works is built on "Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs)". These TEEs are essentially secure, isolated black boxes running on a server, powered by hardware like NVIDIA H100 GPUs. Your phone establishes a direct, encrypted connection to one of these TEEs, sends the message data for processing, and receives the summary. Meta's own administrators and other systems supposedly cannot peek inside this box. And when the job is done, no message is retained. The security of the entire system hinges on being able to trust that this TEE is what it claims to be. Meta's system uses a process called remote attestation. Before your phone sends any data, it demands proof from the server. This proof is a cryptographic report, signed by the hardware itself, verifying that the TEE is running the exact, unmodified software that Meta has publicly logged with a third party like Cloudflare. Only if that proof checks out does the connection proceed. Users will have control over this process. The feature is off by default, and a setting under "Advanced Chat Privacy" will let you specify which chats can be shared for AI features. Message Summaries is currently rolling out in English for users in the US, with Meta planning for a global expansion sometime next year.
    • It's never a good sign when the developer is gaslighting its customers.
    • Unpopular (or maybe popular?) opinion: I prefer Windows Vista's startup chime than W11.
    • Well I tried New Outlook a bit in the past, But was concerned on the privacy aspect with Gmail Imap and Comcast.net email going to Microsoft Servers. I've been using Outlook Classic since 1997 on my Personal systems, so for now think will stick with that, but i could get used to New Outlook i think fairly quickly if i forced to in the future. Anyhow who knows maybe it will be as good as Outlook Classic in the future, never know
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      solidox earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      blissa jayden earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      578
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      216
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      155
    5. 5
      Som
      151
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!