Hi-res Crysis DirectX 10 screenshots


Recommended Posts

Meh. Am I the only one that isn't impressed with the "next gens" graphics? So far from what I've seen of DX10, XB360, and PS3 don't really impress me. They don't seem like THAT much of an improvement. I don't know, I guess I was just expecting more. Probably Nintendo is right and graphics have evolved as far as they can for the time being.

:blink:

Did you watch the video? It looked amazing to me, personally... biggest leap in graphics technology I've seen in a while.

Meh. Am I the only one that isn't impressed with the "next gens" graphics? So far from what I've seen of DX10, XB360, and PS3 don't really impress me. They don't seem like THAT much of an improvement. I don't know, I guess I was just expecting more. Probably Nintendo is right and graphics have evolved as far as they can for the time being.

you're kidding right? you haven't seen a difference?? have you seen call of duty 2 or ghost recon: advanced warfighter on the 360? They look absolutely stunning. Perhaps because they are starting to look more lifelike, you are seeing less and less of the "flash" factor .. but they are definitely improving.

So how will this particular first person shooter revolutionize and jump-start the genre in terms of new and awe-inspiring gameplay, a breathe of fresh air to let out the foul smell of the continually rehashed, dull cookie-cutter fps games continually coming out of the 'EA' mill?

I'm not interested in shelling out $600.00 Canadian to be tricked into believing such a game but instead being offered a chance to view the new 'six million shader model' over last years 'five million shader model'.

So how will this particular first person shooter revolutionize and jump-start the genre in terms of new and awe-inspiring gameplay, a breathe of fresh air to let out the foul smell of the continually rehashed, dull cookie-cutter fps games continually coming out of the 'EA' mill?

Well to me Far Cry was the most underrated FPS in years. I think it was better from a game play POV than either FEAR or HL2 (they had better stories mind you). I duno, there was just some element that it had, the fun factor of sneaking in pretty much open ended environments. Both Fear and HL2 were just a tad linear, certainly good, just a different style of design. Also the open ended nature of Far Cry allows you to play the game at your pace where those other games tend to set the pace for you. We'll see, but if this is anything like Far Cry then I'm sure it will be a stunning game.

Also I doubt it matters that EA is involved. Crytec are developing it not them so hopefully they do the right thing. So far it seems they have the tech right.

BTW is this just a modified Crytek engine as seen in far cry or is it something new? It looks so far and beyond the old engine although something tells me it's more likely to be a heavily modified one as opposed to something completly new.

So how will this particular first person shooter revolutionize and jump-start the genre in terms of new and awe-inspiring gameplay, a breathe of fresh air to let out the foul smell of the continually rehashed, dull cookie-cutter fps games continually coming out of the 'EA' mill?

I'm not interested in shelling out $600.00 Canadian to be tricked into believing such a game but instead being offered a chance to view the new 'six million shader model' over last years 'five million shader model'.

EA is just the publisher. CryTek is just a small german company here, with the first title being FarCry. EA offered money and they took it. I don't blame them.

I only will blame EA if they publish the game in a too early stage when it is still full of bugs.

I believe to a slight degree that the good graphics will help the genre. New engines offer new possibilities. Take a look at the flora for instance. I'm thinking of Hide & Seek, tracks, sound the leaves make when you move.

The engine in this game is offering a possibility to render a nice outdoor setting instead of the sometimes dull & boring interiors portrayed in eg FEAR.

These pics looks really amazing, There's any card supporting DX10 out there?

nope ther isant untill maby end of the year the nvidia G80 and ATI R600 cards

I wonder if they will release a demo out soon...

it will be poinjtless cause ther be no Dx10 cards out and from what i understand ther be no DX9 mode for thsi game and if ther is ther is no way it look that dang good

Well to me Far Cry was the most underrated FPS in years. I think it was better from a game play POV than either FEAR or HL2 (they had better stories mind you). I duno, there was just some element that it had, the fun factor of sneaking in pretty much open ended environments. Both Fear and HL2 were just a tad linear, certainly good, just a different style of design. Also the open ended nature of Far Cry allows you to play the game at your pace where those other games tend to set the pace for you. We'll see, but if this is anything like Far Cry then I'm sure it will be a stunning game.

Summed it up perfectly, exactly how i wanted to say it.

it will be poinjtless cause ther be no Dx10 cards out and from what i understand ther be no DX9 mode for thsi game and if ther is ther is no way it look that dang good

Sure it can if done right, just in DX9 mode it wouldnt look so nice. Like playing HL2 on DX7 cards. I know HL2 isnt all that nowdays but a few years ago we were drooling over that. Infact it would be suicide for them not to support DX9 unless they plan on delaying the game. With no sign of any DX10 cards until later in the year, if this game is released with the cards then very very few people will be able to ever play it and by the time people have hardware that can play it something better would be out.

Anyway, what reason is there not to offer backwards compatability? Other games and engines have been doing this for 15 years and just limiting the graphics on the older hardware...theres no reason why you couldnt here as far as I know.

The engine in this game is offering a possibility to render a nice outdoor setting instead of the sometimes dull & boring interiors portrayed in eg FEAR.
Not only that but in games like FarCry the environment is a major factor in the gameplay as you are able to use stealth tactics and use the environment as cover. I know everyone always says gameplay > graphics, which is true but that statement kinda ignores the fact that graphics has a major bearing on the gameplay and potentially break an otherwise good game if done wrong.

you're kidding right? you haven't seen a difference?? have you seen call of duty 2 or ghost recon: advanced warfighter on the 360? They look absolutely stunning. Perhaps because they are starting to look more lifelike, you are seeing less and less of the "flash" factor .. but they are definitely improving.

Yeah, seen them and played Xbox360. I dunno, I guess I'm just still waiting for the 'Toy Story" graphics that Sony promised with the PS2. And I'm not saying there isn't an improvement, just not what I was expecting. I was expecing to finally have the "Toy Story" graphics, but probably that's still a few gens away.

I'd say we exceeded toy story already. Yeah everything in the films were crisper, but the backgrounds and environments in those movies are so basic compared to some of the complex architecture in games and texturing. The area where toy story may win would be Modelling, but even then I'd say there are games out there that challenge it.

I think that those screenshots look alot nicer than toy story did. Also its a tad hard to compare the 2 when one is a film and the other a 3d environment.

my 2 cents anyway.

I'd say we exceeded toy story already. Yeah everything in the films were crisper, but the backgrounds and environments in those movies are so basic compared to some of the complex architecture in games and texturing. The area where toy story may win would be Modelling, but even then I'd say there are games out there that challenge it.

I think that those screenshots look alot nicer than toy story did. Also its a tad hard to compare the 2 when one is a film and the other a 3d environment.

my 2 cents anyway.

When was the last time you saw Toy Story? I saw it about a week ago with my nephew. There is no comparison. Toy Story looks waaaaaay better than what we have now. Even with AA, there are still plenty of jaggies. Toy Story is silky smooth.

So how will this particular first person shooter revolutionize and jump-start the genre in terms of new and awe-inspiring gameplay, a breathe of fresh air to let out the foul smell of the continually rehashed, dull cookie-cutter fps games continually coming out of the 'EA' mill?

I'm not interested in shelling out $600.00 Canadian to be tricked into believing such a game but instead being offered a chance to view the new 'six million shader model' over last years 'five million shader model'.

I take it someone never played Far Cry. To say it was all graphics is silly if you ask me, but to each his own... I have no reason to see Crysis as anything different.

And how can people always keep blaming EA when they're not always the ones making the game... sometimes it's their in-game studios, sometimes it's not.

the reason why they may not make it backwards compatable is the fact that microsoft is doing it with DX10 breakign away from backwards compatabilty from DX9 and lower to gain more eprformance and alot of otehr things. and really ther is nothing wrong with that at all.

ffs why do these screenshots of upcoming games/tech never use FSAA, and always generally look terrible? Oh well. The video seems to do it justice.

Soft shadowing looks nice. And the forest density is impressive. But nothing much else to say really. In the end, regardless of tech, it all comes down to how good the artists are.

The blur-effect realy makes the forrest look life-like.

actually no, it makes it look like a movie, NOT like YOU are in the jungle, or do you often go around in the real world seeing everythign blurred ? in that case you may need glasses :)

as for wether the engine is completely new, or a rewritten FarCry engine.

Nothing is ever new, even if they started completely from scratch, the programmers would bring in code segments and classes and whatnot from the old engine code. the majority of the engine code is stuff that if they rewrote it would be exactly the same as int he last engine.

How can you be sure? It could be on Vista rendering using the DirectX 10 Reference Rasterizer.

AFAIK, the reference rasterizer would not be able to run DX10 in realtime. These screenshots came from a realtime gameplay video. I also don't see any DX10 effects in these shots, if you do, can you point them out?

Crytek has said that minimum specs will be DX9 and shader model 2.0 and shader model 3.0 being mid-range. That means NV 6x and 7x series cards will be able to run it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!