Cannot boot Windows server 2003


Recommended Posts

I use to have XP SP1 on my old machine, I thought id put Windows Server 2003 onto it and link it up to my new computer. I wiped the hard drive using Drive Scrubber. Then I inserted the Windows server 2003 SP1 disk into the drive and select boot from CD-ROM in the bios settings. It begins pre-installation and for some weird reason XP SP2 Boot screen appears, after that it goes into the Windows Server set up, command prompt opens and "Factory-PE.exe" runs. Then command prompt remains open and nothing happens. Please not this is a OEM CD :(

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/451954-cannot-boot-windows-server-2003/
Share on other sites

  bobbba said:

Why not just go back to XP?

I dont have clue how to reformat the drive. When it stays on Command Prompt it says:

"X:\I386\system32>factory -winpe"

"X:\I386\system32>"

The reason I wanted Windows Server onto it was just to mess around since I am hoping to get a job in IT later in life. :o

Get through to the partitioning stage of Win 2003 setup cd-rom. Select the partition you want to install to and press d. Follow the instructions until you have got rid of the partition and got "Unallocated Space". Select the large amount of allocated space and press enter, then choose NTFS Quick. hopefully it will then work

  simsie said:

Get through to the partitioning stage of Win 2003 setup cd-rom. Select the partition you want to install to and press d. Follow the instructions until you have got rid of the partition and got "Unallocated Space". Select the large amount of allocated space and press enter, then choose NTFS Quick. hopefully it will then work

The installation doesnt get that far. Here is the order and what happens:

1. Bios boots

2. Press any key to boot from CD-ROM

3. Pre-installation of Windows environment

4. XP Boot screen

5. Command prompt opens

6. "X:\I386\system32>factory -winpe" automatically runs

6. Factory -winpe finishes and command prompt remains open

7. "X:\I386\system32>" stays on the command prompt

That is all what happens.

where did you get this CD? Is it some kind of trial CD? Are you sure there is not another CD in your machine in another CD/DVD drive?

I can tell you this - No 2k3 server CD from MS boots with "Factory -winpe" anything..

Either your not booting what you think your booting.. ie some other CD or some kind of recovery partition on the hard drive.. Or that is not a CD from MS.

  Viper101 said:

The installation doesnt get that far. Here is the order and what happens:

1. Bios boots

2. Press any key to boot from CD-ROM

3. Pre-installation of Windows environment

4. XP Boot screen

5. Command prompt opens

6. "X:\I386\system32>factory -winpe" automatically runs

6. Factory -winpe finishes and command prompt remains open

7. "X:\I386\system32>" stays on the command prompt

That is all what happens.

it sounds like you have an OEM version of Windows 2003.

OEM companies add stuff to the Windows CDs to better fit their needs and their customers needs.

sounds like this OEM CD that you have is using other parameters and scripts that the OEM company has put in place. These scripts and parameters are designed for specific hardware. If you are not using the original OEM computer/server with this OEM CD, then it will most likely fail.

At my organization, I have created an "OEM" windows xp dvd that is designed to work only with our hardware.

OEM Companies (like Dell, IBM, etc), use their own OEM CDs (even for Windows 2003 server) that work with certain hardware configurations. The CDs look official but are designed only for their computer systems.

hope this isnt too confusing.

  metalguy90 said:

it sounds like you have an OEM version of Windows 2003.

OEM companies add stuff to the Windows CDs to better fit their needs and their customers needs.

sounds like this OEM CD that you have is using other parameters and scripts that the OEM company has put in place. These scripts and parameters are designed for specific hardware. If you are not using the original OEM computer/server with this OEM CD, then it will most likely fail.

At my organization, I have created an "OEM" windows xp dvd that is designed to work only with our hardware.

OEM Companies (like Dell, IBM, etc), use their own OEM CDs (even for Windows 2003 server) that work with certain hardware configurations. The CDs look official but are designed only for their computer systems.

hope this isnt too confusing.

Thanks for making it a lot clearer. It is a OEM disk. Came in a seal Microsoft box with security seals.

It worked fine on VMWare. Ive digged out an old 98 recovery disk and restored the Boot record and partition table. Im going try to format the hard drive and see if that makes any different.

Cheers

  Viper101 said:

Thanks for making it a lot clearer. It is a OEM disk. Came in a seal Microsoft box with security seals.

that sounds odd?

most OEMs CDs dont have much Microsoft branding on it, but their own.

ie. Dell would make the OEM CD look like a Dell CD.

the last company i worked for bought Dell servers and all their disks were blue & white.

the company i work for now uses IBM servers, and their disks are white & black; even though both OEM CDs are Microsoft Windows 2003 server, they both looked like IBM or Dell CDs

hmmm reading your post after mine reminded me of a problem i once had installing server 2003 on a client machine. If the 2003 is booting ok but its not loading the files or appears to be stuck it indicates a hardware problem. In my case i solved it by replacing the cd drive and the PATA cable but it also could be due to faulty ram. Download microsoft memory tester from another pc and save it to floppy and run the floppy disk. If the ram is fine then more than likely its the cd drive or the hard drive. You just have to elimante each component until you find the problem. :) also as mentioned already it could be because its an oem cd. Try downloading the 120 day trial from Microsoft and burn it to a cd and see if that installs.

  andy2004 said:

hmmm reading your post after mine reminded me of a problem i once had installing server 2003 on a client machine. If the 2003 is booting ok but its not loading the files or appears to be stuck it indicates a hardware problem. In my case i solved it by replacing the cd drive and the PATA cable but it also could be due to faulty ram. Download microsoft memory tester from another pc and save it to floppy and run the floppy disk. If the ram is fine then more than likely its the cd drive or the hard drive. You just have to elimante each component until you find the problem. :) also as mentioned already it could be because its an oem cd. Try downloading the 120 day trial from Microsoft and burn it to a cd and see if that installs.

I downloaded the trial version of Windows Server 2003. I burned it onto a CD-ROM, inserted it into the CD-ROM drive and error messege occured "Invalid System Disk". I dont think that RAM is damaged as XP was working fine before. The only thing I can think of is the Hard drive. I think im going buy a 80GB hard drive, to see if that will work. Il let you know how it goes.

Cheers

  Viper101 said:

I brought a new 80GB Hard drive, fitted it and tried installing Server 2003, however still no luck. This is just one big headache! :blink:

Yeah cuz installing a OS is just so hard.. How does a CD not booting point you to a hard drive issue? The CDrom could boot without a Hard Drive in the system..

When you say you burned the trial download to a CD? I'm guessing you have a CD with trial2003.iso on it - and can not figure out why id doesn't boot ;)

If you can not figure out how to burn a ISO.. have them send you a trial..

  • 2 weeks later...

:cool:

He's not using a real Microsoft WIN 2003 disk. I've installed many OS's and W2K3 never acts like that...

I've heard of some of these "so-called good deal" disks and most simply do not work...

Recommend he get his money back...if he can!

Ozz~ :alien:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • PornHub commits to age checks for UK users by 25 July by Paul Hill Ofcom, the UK’s digital regulator, has announced that PornHub and several other porn sites have agreed to put robust age checks in place by the deadline next month on 25 July. The confirmations to Ofcom will likely be used by the regulator against the companies if they fail to comply by the deadline as justification for a fine. The companies that have publicly stated they’re going to have safeguards in place by the deadline are PornHub, BoyfriendTV, Cam4, FrolicMe, inxxx, Jerkmate, LiveHDCams, MyDirtyHobby, RedTube, Streamate, Stripchat, Tube8, and YouPorn. There may be other companies that are preparing, these are just the ones that were happy to be named. Ofcom has been given the task of making sure porn sites comply with age check rules. If companies don’t follow the rules, Ofcom has the power to impose fines and even apply for a court order to ban websites or apps from being available in the UK. These rules are part of the wider Online Safety Act, which aims, in part, to keep children safe online. So far, it has launched investigations into four porn providers for failing to comply with its requests. Oliver Griffiths, Ofcom Group Director of Online Safety said: “Society has long protected youngsters from products that aren’t suitable for them, from alcohol to smoking or gambling. But for too long children have been only a click away from harmful pornography online. “Now, change is happening. These age checks will bring pornography into line with how we treat adult services in the real world, without compromising access and privacy for over-18s.” The new age verification methods come in various shapes and sizes (pun intended) including credit card checks, open banking, and facial age estimation. While these may not keep all kids from accessing porn, they’ll act as a significant hurdle. For adults concerned about handing over information to access porn sites, Ofcom said that the measures do not harm your privacy. All of the age assurance methods are subject to the requirements of UK privacy laws, including on processing personal data. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is overseeing this area to ensure companies comply. Ofcom’s own studies have found that 3% of 8-9 year-olds have been exposed to online pornography at some point. This highlights how easy it is to find this content and clearly something has to be done. It’ll be interesting to see how these measures actually play out when they get rolled out.
    • Looks like MS is officially extending Windows 10 support while stopping just short of officially changing the end date. I teased in the last article that the process for gaining free support was a little invasive, but this is basically just giving it out for free, so I guess I'm taking back those words.
    • Microsoft shares Windows 10 ESU key guide for office PCs that don't support Windows 11 by Sayan Sen Recently, the Indian government issued a caution about the upcoming end of support for Windows 10 which is about four months away. Interestingly, on that very day, Microsoft made a major announcement regarding this as the tech giant debuted free enrollment options wherein support would be extended for another year at no extra cost. Microsoft is also trying to make it easy to set up Extended Security Updates (ESU) with a new tool. You can see in the image below: New ESU enroll wizard Following that, today, the company has shared a new guide on how to activate ESU via Intune in the case of Windows 10 office PCs that are not supported on Windows 11. First up, Microsoft has reminded users of the prerequisites of Windows 10 ESU: The system needs to be on Windows 10 22H2 with KB5046613 (November 2024 Patch Tuesday) or newer. The device needs access to the network endpoints required for client activation. The process that is used for activation needs administrative privileges on the device. The guide contains several PowerShell scripts and are meant for IT admins and system admins. One of those is a validation script "Check-Win10ESUPrereq.ps1" that Microsoft has published to help "verify a device has the required version and patch level for Windows and it can communicate to the required network endpoints." Essentially, it checks if the aforementioned requirements are satisfied and can be used for troubleshooting against those prerequisites. After the "validation," Microsoft says there are two ways to proceed with the ESU key activation. First. it can be done by either Remediation through: Detection Script (Win10ESUActivation-detect.ps1) and Remediation Script (Win10ESUActivation-remediate.ps1). And second, by Win32 Application with Win32 Install Script (Win10ESU-install.ps1) and Win32 Detection Script (Win10ESU-detection.ps1). In the case of Remediations, Microsoft mentions "some licensing considerations" due to which "some smaller companies may not have that option." Finally, Microsoft has also shared some Activation IDs for manual verification via Slmgr VB script for obtaining volume activation information: Win10 ESU Year1: f520e45e-7413-4a34-a497-d2765967d094 Win10 ESU Year2: 1043add5-23b1-4afb-9a0f-64343c8f3f8d Win10 ESU Year3: 83d49986-add3-41d7-ba33-87c7bfb5c0fb You can check the full guide and the details here on Microsoft's official Tech Community website.
    • It blows me away how overpriced Synology is. $600+ for a 3+ year old SATA NAS with only gigabit networking!! Even for 2022 that is pretty low-end hardware. Yes, the Synology software is fantastic, but if we say this hardware is worth $300 max (and that is even giving a generous premium to the fact that it is made by a respected OEM), their software is NOT worth an additional $300, especially considering it is locked to the hardware it shipped on and you have to pay that premium again for your next device. Important correction to the specs table above. Saying Disk Capacity is 72TB and even going further to detail that is 4x18, strongly implies it comes with those disks, which it does not. I would rather see it say "Max Capacity: 72TB (disks not included)."
    • well again if w11 adoption its so high there's no reason why they try to explain us why is "better" to move to w11. If they are so right about their downgraded UI, why they add some of their UI elements back things like never combine and now small icons. Last time i check majority is still on 10 over 11 so yeah millions of users that did not upgrade to w11
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Kavin25 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      Leonard grant earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pcdoctorsnet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rising Star
      Phillip0web went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      529
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      207
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      169
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      149
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      123
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!