Xbox 360 or PS3 (for a PC gamer)


Recommended Posts

You're wrong...PS3 will have the ability to outperform X360, whether or or the s/w written for it will take it to that level is a different question altogether...parallelizing for 9 assymmetrical cores is mighty horrendous.

No software can run better than what they were designed for. XBOX games run beter on X360 bcoz XBOX 360 uses is higher horsepower to do AA which wasn't possible on XBOX.

Wrong again the PS3 processor is only useful for calculations so things like A.I. will perform better while the Xbox 360 is more suited towards graphics processing.

^ I thought it was the other way around?

Anyway - if you use your pc for pc style games (FPS/RPG/RTS)

I'd say get a WII for the whole sitting about playing games with mates thing... I'm probably gonna get one, if anything the 42" T.V. that comes with the house I'm living in next year isn't HD.

neither, or both.

Wait a year, then decide. In my eyes no game is worth $550. I do have a 360 though but PS3 looks to be more promising than the 360. So far the games are mediocre and available on other platforms with just about equal graphics for much less (with the exception of FF and oblivian)

When the PS3 launches the 360 will take a price cut to undermine sony - probably along with more tricks up their sleeves for free online gameplay like sony will be having. For the most part their live service is a sham - $60 a year and still having to pay for arcade games that are just as good as you'd find on a java gamesite don't appeal to me, the 20GB HDD is too small consideirng 7GB of that is cut for game buffer, and not being able to write to USB devices like flashsticks seems like a dumb idea if you ask me. The heat and noise the console creates isn't too fun either - the power brick causing the most problems (whining, noisy, huge, heavy, awkward, problematic)

The 360 has potential, but nothing has been unleashed yet. They are going to make them cheaper (smaller cpu dies) so unless you have got big bucks enjoy your PC until it cant run anything else. The PS3 has a lot of potential, but for the first year of a consoles life nothing extradonary happens - the developers just want to get their R&D costs recouperated by any means possible. Once the system is paid for and more knowledge of development is known expect some great things from both platforms.

For now though, if you REALLY need something a 360 is the only way to go. I suggest saving up for the PS3 - its going to be huge if sony ever gets the kinks worked out.

seems like no one on neowin had an inidividual preference/opinion. instead, we rely on "going with the crowd" these days. do we need to decide whether you should eat vanilla or chocolate ice cream, too?

besides, how will anyone know which console to recommend to you if the ps3 hasn't even been released yet? slow your horses, buddy. wait, play them both, and then make an educated decision of which console you like more. it's sad that people have to actually use 100% of their brain just to know what they like these days. :no:

  • 2 weeks later...

Look, im a huge gamer, and as such i own all the consoles i can afford, with that said im also a huge PC gamer, i play Counter-Strike every friday, and some MMOs...

Id rather play games on my computer than any console if i have the chance, but i gotta be honest the Xbox 360 looks amazing, and some of the demos i have downloaded for it are just mind blowing(Lost Planet for example), as of now im more excited about the 360 than the Ps3

I tend to make lists of the games i might be buying in the future and i already have around 10 games that i want for 360 and only 3 for PS3, i will be buying a PS3 at launch, but if you cant buy both id say you check out the games released and announced for both consoles and look at the genres that you like, you dont need to wait for launch, and remember to buy the console for its games, not its graphics...

This thread is sad. At the end of the day, you should choose the one(s) you think you'll have the best experience with - by playing with them yourself; not going on what other people have to say. If you always go to the flow, there's no originality or uniqueness whatsoever in your actions.

Just remember, XNA = Windows + Xbox 360 development at the same time (meaning more cross-platform games) coming your way. So either one you'll chose you will be able to play most games. Of course, there will be exclusives for each platform. Then don't forget that an Xbox 360 is a one time thing in terms of price, while a PC will need relatively frequent (expensive) upgrades. PS3 is a different story since it's a one time (expensive) thing in terms of price but won't have as many PC games/PC-Xbox360-cross-platform types of games as the PC/Xbox 360 will have.

sorry, but you are wrong.

the PS3 will outperform anything you've ever seen before with the amazing new Cell processor technology, and the best GPU technology from Nvidia that will be able to deliver the amazing Unreal 3 engine at 1080p.

Ken "Kookoo" Katuragi is that you?

Bhahahaha. Someone swallowed Sony's BS hook, line, and sinker. :rofl:

sorry, but you are wrong.

the PS3 will outperform anything you've ever seen before with the amazing new Cell processor technology, and the best GPU technology from Nvidia that will be able to deliver the amazing Unreal 3 engine at 1080p.

SOE makes me wonder but i think they will pick it up and go with it.

I personally own a Xbox360 and its a huge waste of money. and i would wait for the PS3 and get it. I have it pre-ordered and i cant freakin wait to break that beast open.

No, they will look better. If you compare the original Xbox games running on the xbox to running on the xbox360. just running it on a better system makes it look better. it may not be overwhelming but i know that in Halo 2 there is a pretty big difference between the two.

Not many, few have. Valve software and Gabe Newell has many horror stories of trying to port his compaie's creations to the xbox/xbox360 platform. It resulted in almost completely re-writing the code for Half-Life 2 to the Xbox platform. Even if your claim is correct with id software, Quake 4 is horrid on the xbox360, and much much better on the PC.

The Xbox 360 really is not the option to go with, having one myself. I would not buy an Xbox 360 the PS3 will be much more worthwile, yes more expensive but a much better system.

CHECK YOUR STATS!!!!!! :( ..... i have seen the specs for both the x-box 360 and the ps3 and if you know anything about computers(yes, a consol is still a computer) you would know what specs are. you just stated what kind of technology ps3 had but you probalbly just heard it off an advertisment. the three most important things when it come to gaming is the RAM the CPU and the vidoe card

1# RAM: It is idnetical in both systems each having twon sticks of 512mb of ram

2#CPU: The xbox 360 has a 7-core CPU and is made by athlon. the ps3 has 1 core and is made by intell.

7 cores highly increases a consules ability. This shines in consulses becuase it allow each core to concentrate on a task. This is amazing for multiplayer gaming because unlike a computer multiplaying is usully done ojn ONE consul. 1 super-core limits the ps3's speed. it is good for quick saves and laods but lacks in the gaming category.

3#Video card: specs not available but i know that xbox 360 has a costum ATI video card and ps3 has a custom Invidia gamecard. ATI video cards have been clearly better than Invidia(they should stick to thier awesome mother boards)

sorry, but rumors are false about the ps3 being better than the x-box 360. Most consul gamers are misinformed. It takes a comp gamer to show them the light lol. :sleep:

probalbly a shock but x-box 360 IS BETTER THAN THE PS3 performance wise.

2#CPU: The xbox 360 has a 7-core CPU and is made by athlon. the ps3 has 1 core and is made by intell.

7 cores highly increases a consules ability. This shines in consulses becuase it allow each core to concentrate on a task. This is amazing for multiplayer gaming because unlike a computer multiplaying is usully done ojn ONE consul. 1 super-core limits the ps3's speed. it is good for quick saves and laods but lacks in the gaming category.

How can anyone get the stats that wrong? :blink:

"consulses" :rofl:

PS3 will almost have identical performance to the 360, although probably far more expensive. Many western developers such as id have started focusing their development on Xbox 360 and from there they port it to PC/PS3... unless Sony will modify the PS3 gamepad they've shown us the 360 controller is far better suited for first person shooters and racing game than any current Sony's offerings. Analog triggers and properly positioned analog joysticks are crucial.

I say if you are fan of western gameplay, as I assume by the titles you mentioned you should go for the Xbox 360, if you are into the japanese games with anime styles and fancy colors go for PS3.

Cross platform games will look identical...

thats true lol,

"PC like games"

PC games as a hold have been alot better then console games.(mostly RPGs)

fallout over FF

sorry, but you are wrong.

the PS3 will outperform anything you've ever seen before with the amazing new Cell processor technology, and the best GPU technology from Nvidia that will be able to deliver the amazing Unreal 3 engine at 1080p.

3#Video card: specs not available but i know that xbox 360 has a costum ATI video card and ps3 has a custom Invidia gamecard. ATI video cards have been clearly better than Invidia(they should stick to thier awesome mother boards)

thats true about the video cards

sorry, but you are wrong.

the PS3 will outperform anything you've ever seen before with the amazing new Cell processor technology,

2#CPU: The xbox 360 has a 7-core CPU and is made by athlon. the ps3 has 1 core and is made by intell.

7 cores highly increases a consules ability. This shines in consulses becuase it allow each core to concentrate on a task. This is amazing for multiplayer gaming because unlike a computer multiplaying is usully done ojn ONE consul. 1 super-core limits the ps3's speed. it is good for quick saves and laods but lacks in the gaming category.

he is right about more is better then one but its 3 core, homie and the PS3 is process faster but not 3 things at the same time so their will both be fast. and cell is new so you know new technology will have issues but knowone knows what.

Console like game......................................................................PC like game

wii...........PS3........................xbox360........................................PC (ironic)

a table of console like games and PC like games

its simple you might like more console like games because you have an PC or like more PC like game.

but the 360 thing about the games is that. many NEW PC will use directX 10 witch you will need vista to use and not all PC games will be on 360.installing games suck about pc

1# RAM: It is idnetical in both systems each having twon sticks of 512mb of ram

2#CPU: The xbox 360 has a 7-core CPU and is made by athlon. the ps3 has 1 core and is made by intell.

7 cores highly increases a consules ability.

3#Video card: ATI video cards have been clearly better than Invidia.

1# RAM: Its not identical in both first off the Xbox 360 has 512MB GDDR3 @ 700MHz system memory with 10MB Embedded DRAM, and the PS3 has 256MB XDR @ 3.2GHz system memory and 256MB GDDR3 @ 700MHz video memory!

2# CPU: The Xbox 360 has a 3-core CPU and is made by IBM (Power PC). The PS3 has 1 core and 7 spe's made jointly by IBM, Sony and Toshiba (Cell)!

3# Video Card: Why do you say ATI cards are clearly better, are the clearly better just because you say so?

If ATi is so much better than Nvidia(Spell it right people) then why does Nvidia outperform ATi and have the best graphics card out on the market at the current time, and is currently about to release a better more powerful card the 7950GX2 which will have the most memory on a gpu in a long time coming. I'm a Microsoft fanboy but I'm just saying get your facts straight.

I don't know the exact difference between the CPUs of the Xbox 360's 3 cores compare to the PS3's Cell processors, nor do I know the differences between ATI performances in the Xbox 360 versus the nVidia one in the PS3, but all I know is from what I see and played at E3 last week.

I was disappointed with the PS3 overall from the games they showed at this year's E3. I didn't see any gameplay for MGS4 or KillZone, all I saw was another MGS4 trailer. Gran Turismo on the PS3 does look better in HD, but not mind blowing. But thats my view of the PS3, it just a bit better than the PS2, but in HD. I mean, I saw God of War 2 at E3 and it look pretty damn good for a PS2 title, its just not in HD.

Now for the Xbox 360, we already seen some good titles from it over the years and know its powers. Although Gears of war gameplay video look damn impressive, better than any other gameplay videos for the PS3. And the Halo 3 trailer, if thats game play, then its really impressive.

Overall, so far the Xbox 360 looks more impressive.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. What???
    • What part of "you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever" is not clear enough?
    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!