Xbox 360 or PS3 (for a PC gamer)


Recommended Posts

Actually it's pretty safe to bet ATi will dominate the next generation as they will be in their second generation of Unified Shader Architecture when nVIDIA will be just starting. Also ATi is the only one at the moment that can support FSAA+HDR at the same time while nVIDIA can't. Also ATi has far better graphics quality, just look at the AF screens comparing nVIDIA and ATi.

The Xbox 360 GPU IS technically more advanced as it has more similarities with the next generation of PC GPUs tnan with current. Unified Shader Architecture and Embedded memory and special design for procedural graphics (Microsoft's patent) makes it far more powerfull, in theory at least than the GPUs offered in any game console the next years.

Also Sociopath nVIDIA is only "better" if you play benchmarking all day and not actualy games. With the latest PC GPUs ATi has at least got close to them.

go for an XBox 360, This console has better compatibility with PC's than the PS3,it all resumes in interaction between devices,Well and aditional the X350 gamplay is much better than the PS3

The 360 has better gameplay thant the PS3. Mind telling us when you played the PS3 to compare it to the 360? :| Or are you just trolling again. :yes:

If ATi is so much better than Nvidia(Spell it right people) then why does Nvidia outperform ATi and have the best graphics card out on the market at the current time

-Inferior AF

-Less Features

-Similar performance (reviews give the performance nod to ATI)

Yes, that sounds about the best graphic card on the market currently. :laugh:

and is currently about to release a better more powerful card the 7950GX2 which will have the most memory on a gpu in a long time coming.

1GB GDDR3? Already out.

I'm a Microsoft fanboy but I'm just saying get your facts straight.

The irony in that post is apalling. :whistle:

sorry, but you are wrong.

the PS3 will outperform anything you've ever seen before with the amazing new Cell processor technology, and the best GPU technology from Nvidia that will be able to deliver the amazing Unreal 3 engine at 1080p.

SOE makes me wonder but i think they will pick it up and go with it.

He is right but I would still wait till it comes out to compare. Who know what changes they will make between now and launch.

ONLY if the developers can properly code and optimize for the platform. With the cell being new tech I doubt if that will happen for some time.

Sorry, but you are wrong. You've totally fallen for marketing.

A fair few developers have stated that PS3 and Xbox 360 have roughly identical power, and that visual differences will only be noticed right at the end of the console's life...and that even then the differences will be marginal, with the PS3 having the slight edge. They also said that the PS3 is highly unlikely to output in 1080p on all of its games.

You've then got to consider factors such as MOOCHING OFF THE HOMELESS and Xbox Live.

how does it fell being shut up by Sony's Press Conference?

CHECK YOUR STATS!!!!!! :( ..... i have seen the specs for both the x-box 360 and the ps3 and if you know anything about computers(yes, a consol is still a computer) you would know what specs are. you just stated what kind of technology ps3 had but you probalbly just heard it off an advertisment. the three most important things when it come to gaming is the RAM the CPU and the vidoe card

1# RAM: It is idnetical in both systems each having twon sticks of 512mb of ram

... OH GOD I CANT TAKE IT ANYMORE

WTF? are you high? :rofl:

  • 3 weeks later...

simply depends on the games u like. if u like fps's then 360. quirky japanese stuff then ps3.

i really dont care what console will have slightly better graphics than the other. i like fps's, live, and the 360 controller so... thats my choice. i still have to yet buy one but i am pleased with the games out for it so far like elder scrolls and ghost recon AW, both games im dying to play. i also can't wait for gears of war. most of all though i cant wait for brothers in arms 3, which is also going to be released for ps3, but id much much rather play it using a 360 controller.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!