Recommended Posts

Chelsea have unveiled Germany captain Michael Ballack as their first signing of the summer.

The 29-year-old midfielder has arrived on a free transfer following the expiry of his contract with Bayern Munich.

Ballack, who helped the German club to three league titles during his four years at the club, has signed a three-year deal with the Blues.

He was also coveted by Manchester United but instead chose to move to Stamford Bridge.

Ballack also asked the advice of his fellow countrymen who play in the Premiership before making his decision to move to England.

"I am happy to be here and to sign the contract," said Ballack.

Source = http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/t...sea/4769763.stm

My question would have to be why??

Why apart from money would any sane footballer want to join Chelsea. Look at their summer signings from last year, 40+million was spent on players who spent half of the season or more sitting on the bench doing sod all.

No one is guaranteed a game ever but the depth of the squad is amazing, there are so many players who are either world class or close to world class so why would you sign knowing you may not get a game? If, as most footballers claim, all they want to do is play why then sign for a club where there is only a possibliity of playing?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/461303-ballack-joins-chelsea/
Share on other sites

According to him, it was time for a change.

But I think he did it for the money. The Chelsea deal will make him the highest paid footballer, if I recall correctly. He'll be practically minting money at the Bridge.

Methinks he'll get a rude wake-up call when he finds himself on the bench all to often next season.

According to him, it was time for a change.

But I think he did it for the money. The Chelsea deal will make him the highest paid footballer, if I recall correctly. He'll be practically minting money at the Bridge.

Methinks he'll get a rude wake-up call when he finds himself on the bench all to often next season.

...which would serve him right if that's his analogy ;)

But I think he did it for the money. The Chelsea deal will make him the highest paid footballer, if I recall correctly. He'll be practically minting money at the Bridge.

?130,000 a week. Just imagine how much you could buy each day and still be making money. :wacko::

?130,000 a week. Just imagine how much you could buy each day and still be making money. :wacko::

?130K a week for kicking a ball, fecking disgusting and just goes to show how moronic the football world is becoming

let's put this into perspective , Doctors/Surgeons who work long hours and save peoples lives get paid about the same in a year as this nancy-boy-f****t does in a week.(he will probably moan about the number of games he has to play as well)

Pathetic pathetic

what the f*ck is the world coming to !

They, the F.A., F.I.F.A., & U.E.F.A. have go to sort out this crap.

If a club at the end of the season spends more than it gets from sponsership, gate receipts, shirt sales other merchandise and prize money, is less than their outgoings they should be dropped a division.

It's just turning football into a rich mans game and taking it away from it's working class roots.

I can't afford to watch a game at (ex) Highbury anymore, cost be the thick end of ?250 to take my family there including travel.

They're should be a wage cap also. A win/draw bonus should also be removed.

It's making a mockery of the game.

he'll regret it, the midfield spot is covered by Lampard who will never be dropped and Makelele who CANNOT be dropped coz he is too important. unless mourinho gives him a role behind the striker which is not his strongest role he will only get a handful of starts like Robben, Crespo, Essien, SWP, Duff and other talents.

Anyone else think Ballack is a tad overrated? I don't follow football as much as I'd like, especially during hockey season but watching him at Eurocup, some Bayern games and UEFA, I thought he was good, but really overrated. I mean, half the games I watched, he was barely visible. He wasn't doing much. Seems like this guy is a floater and only shows up to play when he wants to.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!