Neowin's Official World Cup 2006 Thread



Recommended Posts

Germans could not win against Argentina. (could at the penalties, but not during the gameplay)

And if you think that with this kind of game you can beat BR, germans must be dreaming.

that is if brasil will get to finals :p

if germany would play like they played in the second half then brasil wont stand a chance :)

okay... here's the deal... for someone who loves soccer from the other side of the ocean... (Quebec, Canada), I was hoping for Germany to win. But that was before the game...

It is clear to me, and I have seen a lot of referree in my life in different sport, to tell that this game was WITHOUT a doubt favored and pushed by the referee towards Germany.

A good exemple that change the game completely was at the 79' minutes if I remember right... an argentinian player was near the German corner line when a German player made him trip. It is CLEAR on the video replay that he made him trip... guess what, the Argentinian player got the yellow card.

This game was in my neutral mind (I have no connection with any of these two country whatsoever and was actually for Germany at the start of the game) complete bull****.

It is evident that the referee are helping with all their might to push Germany to the final. Well, basically it is done now. For me, on paper, Italy as no chance of beating Germany in semi-final, so basically they are qualified for the final. I really hope this kind of "arbitrage" won't happen again.

I am, personnally ashame today of what happen from the officials. Also, I am a person who is trying to publicise this game here in Quebec, but even to total neophyte like my friends who were watching the game today, they also saw the game and video replay which clearly show the "game" that the referee were playing.

my 2 cents

It was not a fantastic game, but it had it's moments. Congratulations to Germany on the pen's though. It is natural for England fan's to hate both Germany and Argentina due to history, shame the both could not lose :p.

Anyone got a video of that "fight" (or whatever happened), as ITV sort of didnt show it...

1-0

Goodbye Germany

Brazil x Portugal

Italy x Argentina

FINAL

Brazil x Argentina

Europeans out on the way...

Well that just went out the window didnt it :whistle:?

okay... here's the deal... for someone who loves soccer from the other side of the ocean... (Quebec, Canada), I was hoping for Germany to win. But that was before the game...

It is clear to me, and I have seen a lot of referree in my life in different sport, to tell that this game was WITHOUT a doubt favored and pushed by the referee towards Germany.

A good exemple that change the game completely was at the 79' minutes if I remember right... an argentinian player was near the German corner line when a German player made him trip. It is CLEAR on the video replay that he made him trip... guess what, the Argentinian player got the yellow card.

This game was in my neutral mind (I have no connection with any of these two country whatsoever and was actually for Germany at the start of the game) complete bull****.

It is evident that the referee are helping with all their might to push Germany to the final. Well, basically it is done now. For me, on paper, Italy as no chance of beating Germany in semi-final, so basically they are qualified for the final. I really hope this kind of "arbitrage" won't happen again.

I am, personnally ashame today of what happen from the officials. Also, I am a person who is trying to publicise this game here in Quebec, but even to total neophyte like my friends who were watching the game today, they also saw the game and video replay which clearly show the "game" that the referee were playing.

my 2 cents

I agree with you, and I'm glad this comes from someone who had no prior sympathy for any team.

Here we noticed that some things that could be fouls against argentina players were NOT replayed. Not only the ref was favouring germany there, but the viewers did not get the chance to see several replays of doubious plays. I feel ripped off.

Argentina, however, didn't loose against germany. After those additional 30 minutes, I didnt care who won, it was a lottery!

that is if brasil will get to finals :p

if germany would play like they played in the second half then brasil wont stand a chance :)

I dont see Germany in the final neither.

But dont worry....we will make your pain very short.

Just like in 2002.

:woot:

Psh--you're too critical. What do you want me to say? Props to Germany for sticking through with that last 10-minute goal? :shiftyninja:

There are quite a few ways you can say it, one being, Props to Germany for sticking through with that late goal ;)

Ok Sorry.. but common say Germany will win because a BORING penalty decision can be only a England frustrated fans reaction.

No... It just means that we want Germany to win against Argentina? Just like I will be rooting for France to beat Brazil. Does that mean that I'm a fustrated English fan? Probably does judging by what you're posting.

Also that game might have been boring for you. But I'd like to think that game was extremely nerve racking for both Germany and Argentinan fans alike.

Also that game might have been boring for you. But I'd like to think that game was extremely nerve racking for both Germany and Argentinan fans alike.

I must agree. I know I was dying of nervousness in the Portugal - Netherlands game :cry:

Also that game might have been boring for you. But I'd like to think that game was extremely nerve racking for both Germany and Argentinan fans alike.

yeah it was nerveracking! i almost died when argentina scored. And then second goal made me cry the tears of happiness :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!