Neowin's Official World Cup 2006 Thread



Recommended Posts

the damn argentinian referee was obviously biased towards portugal. this whole damn thing was unfair :(

Yes, England always get screwed some how and some way. Euro 2004 all over again...

That ref needs an eye check, as usual just like any Spanish or Portugese speaking team they act like a bunch of cry babys and play dirty. Argentian referee was biased majorly typical I say I hope FIFA kick him out.

I feel sorry for any Portugese fans tonight as the English fans will proberly kill them.

To be perfectly honest, England SHOULD have won that. They were by far the better team. I think the ref was biased, and there are so many dirty cheating tards on that portugese team it's unbelieveable, especially Ronaldo *shudders*.

Yes mate we should of won that at least 1 goal and Ronaldo what a dick he is, ****ing retard player hope Brazil beats France then thrash Portugal 5 - 0 :angry: :angry: :angry:

And Ronaldo had it in for Wayne Rooney, wish Wayne Rooney kicked the **** out of GAY RONADLDO. ****ing child :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

I thought the booking was unfair, though Rooney was a prat for attacking another player. England played well for a man down, though it's not really a surprise that Portugal won. Still, Ronaldo should be chucked off a cliff for all his over-the-top overacting - he is a disgrace to the game.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

"by far the better team" :laugh:

... :huh: yes, by far the better team, i.e. they were the better team on that pitch.

The score doesn't matter jack in terms of how the team played. England were far better than Portugal in that match. Period.

How to sum that one up?

For 60 minutes no team dominated, there was some poor play by both sides, unfortunately as has been the primary highlight of this world cup, unfair play and poor refereeing decided the game.

Rooney was out of order, there was no question. You don't accidentally stamp on someones nuts. End of.

The disgrace that was C. Ronaldo took over from that point. I have never seen such a poor excuse for a man. I sincerely hope for his sake that he gets a transfer away from man utd and from english football. As a liverpool fan I cant stand Man U, but he really does not deserve to wear the shirt of one of the best teams in england (grudgingly said). To go down every time the wind blows is one thing, to actually run to the ref to try to get a club mate sent off is entirely another. Then to wink at the bench in a slight celebration is simply disgusting.

Congratulations to Portugal, well done for qualifying and for being better at penalties than England. We really never stood a chance when it went to pens, we never do, but thats our own fault.

However, If I was a portugal fan I would have a slighly bitter taste in my mouth at the way that certain members of the countries team performed. It is after all a sport.......much less could be said of some players.

England were crap. Simple fact.

4-5-1 is the worst tactic they can play and playing Rooney up front on his own is pure idiociy... roll on Steve McClaren...

no england wasnt worst. een with 10 men it was obviously better!

we're going home :'(

Rooney was out of order, there was no question. You don't accidentally stamp on someones nuts. End of.

He was sent off for pushing, which is a ****ing disgrace of a decision. Watch the replays and you will see. The stamp was out of order though.

... :huh: yes, by far the better team, i.e. they were the better team on that pitch.

The score doesn't matter jack in terms of how the team played. England were far better than Portugal in that match. Period.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

whatever floats your boat...

u guys r sore losers anyway... we beat u fairly...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!