Recommended Posts

REVISION 4

History_of_Microsoft_Windows.doc

And a PDF version

History_of_Microsoft_Windows.pdf

Erm, what did I change? I can't really remember. Added a Sources list, the Xbox OS, altered Windows FLP around (now that more info is here) and other things.

Very interesting and handy, thanks for posting and taking the time to create this. One suggestion though, I would integrate the screenshots into the document itself ( not sure if this can be done with wordpad though) stuff on the web can easily change URLs etc.

Very interesting and handy, thanks for posting and taking the time to create this. One suggestion though, I would integrate the screenshots into the document itself ( not sure if this can be done with wordpad though) stuff on the web can easily change URLs etc.

No can do. Neowin's attatchment limit is exceeded when I do that.

rather interesting! i'd like to see this develop further. i grew up w/ windows 3.1, but i never knew that much about windows history... or DOS for that matter. in fact, i only used windows 95 for 2 weeks until windows 98 came out :laugh: i basically went straight from 3.1 to 98 :|

  • 1 month later...

Taking advice from some posters, I seeked out an external host. I am now using RapidShare, and am only uploading in PDF format, to keep it nice.

REVISION 5

What did I do? I added in the screenshots (as requested), and added logos, altered a few bits, added a Windows CE screenshot, and Xbox Dashboard screenshots. I also added in some information about Windows: Codename "Vienna"'s successor, which has been confirmed. More info inside.

Where does it go from here? I can definetly see room for improvement. Things all feel a bit cluttered to me, and I'm trying to think of a way to split the lines apart, so you have:

  • Main Windows
  • Windows Successor
  • Windows CE
  • Unreleased
  • Experimental
  • Xbox

But, all in due time. I hope you understand this isn't top priority for me, so I don't know when I'll get around to it.

EDIT: Dang, I just checked the view count. 2114 :|

Why the hell does everyone use Rapidshare when its crap?

Use http://www.megaupload.com

This is great for something that I need to do and Id like to download it.

It just got recommended by a poster

Here it is on Megaupload:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=MDRNQ9MQ

IMO, grouping NT based OSes with the consumer versions is incorrect. Windows NT (retrospectively called NT3.1) has it's roots in OS/2 (which you have omitted in it's entirity), which was originally sold as both an IBM and a Microsoft OS, in fact NT still contained a lot of the original OS/2 code, which was removed in NT3.5 (hence 3.5's smaller footprint).

Also, the difference between NT3.51 and NT4 is a lot smaller than the difference between Windows 3.1 and 95. The main difference between the two is the GUI - the GUI with the 'Start' button and so on was actually issued to MSDN subscribers and partners as a preview for 3.51. A lot of Microsoft (and other) applications were actually coded not to run on NT3.51 to force the upgrade to NT4, when without this check, they would have ran perfectly.

NT was also not originally intended to run on x86 hardware, it was originally designed for the i860, which had the codename N-10, or NT, with NT being retrospectively redesignated as 'New Technology' - which explains the strange "Designed for NT Technology" message in 2000 (New Technology Technology doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?)

IMO, grouping NT based OSes with the consumer versions is incorrect. Windows NT (retrospectively called NT3.1) has it's roots in OS/2 (which you have omitted in it's entirity), which was originally sold as both an IBM and a Microsoft OS, in fact NT still contained a lot of the original OS/2 code, which was removed in NT3.5 (hence 3.5's smaller footprint).

Also, the difference between NT3.51 and NT4 is a lot smaller than the difference between Windows 3.1 and 95. The main difference between the two is the GUI - the GUI with the 'Start' button and so on was actually issued to MSDN subscribers and partners as a preview for 3.51. A lot of Microsoft (and other) applications were actually coded not to run on NT3.51 to force the upgrade to NT4, when without this check, they would have ran perfectly.

NT was also not originally intended to run on x86 hardware, it was originally designed for the i860, which had the codename N-10, or NT, with NT being retrospectively redesignated as 'New Technology' - which explains the strange "Designed for NT Technology" message in 2000 (New Technology Technology doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?)

Thanks, I will take all of that into account, and work in the OS/2 line of OS as well :)

However, I'm sticking with the New Technology explanation, for 2 reasons

  1. Bill Gates said it himself
  2. Windows 2000 was released much later than the first NT - and I'm sure it says "with/using" and not "for"

Nice work. Maybe you could include the various PLUS! addon packs that added functionality to windows (didn't IE1 first appear in 95's PLUS! edition?) I only suggest this because you added the XBOX info. Also MSBOB even though it wasn't a windows version (for the same same reason as above). Any rate, nice work!

Thanks, I will take all of that into account, and work in the OS/2 line of OS as well :)

However, I'm sticking with the New Technology explanation, for 2 reasons

  1. Bill Gates said it himself
  2. Windows 2000 was released much later than the first NT - and I'm sure it says "with/using" and not "for"

Windows 2000 Pro was Built on NT Technology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft_Windows

  • 3 weeks later...

REVISION 6

Rapidshare

http://rapidshare.com/files/5995239/Histor...dows_3.pdf.html

Megaupload

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=CB7VVOXU

I'm happy with this one. Put in a Contents page, improved picture quality, inserted some more screenshots, worked in the OS/2, MS-DOS, QDOS and CP/M systems into it (with detailed explanations). Also added prices at time of release in USD!

Enjoy :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple CEO Tim Cook confirms looming price hikes due to memory shortages by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple Memory and chip shortages have led to significant price increases for electronics over the past year, and it seems that more hikes are on the way for upcoming smartphones and computers. Apple CEO Tim Cook has confirmed that the company is planning to increase the prices of some of its products due to the ongoing memory and storage shortages. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Cook confirmed the looming price hikes for Apple’s future products, adding that “Unfortunately, price increases are unavoidable.” He also said the company is doing its best to “mitigate the huge increases that are being passed to us, and we’ve been trying to shield our customers from the increases, but the situation has become unsustainable.” The Apple CEO also noted that the allocation of a large portion of memory chips to AI companies has contributed to shortages in the market, resulting in lower supply at a time when demand for devices remains high. “We definitely need memory pricing and supply to return to reasonable levels for consumer products. That’s the bottom line,” Cook said. Cook also added that Apple is ready to use its vast cash reserves to help boost supply in the market because additional production capacity is needed. While he declined to specify how Apple plans to do that, he said the company will not build its own memory and storage factories despite its financial resources and silicon expertise. Cook did not provide further details on the scale of the price increases or which Apple products would be affected, though iPads and Macs could see higher prices sooner than other products. Apple’s next product launch event is scheduled for September, when the company is expected to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and its first foldable iPhone. It remains unclear whether the upcoming iPhones will be affected by the price increases, but given the current memory shortage, higher prices seem increasingly likely. There is currently no clear timeline for the end of the memory shortage. Samsung, one of the world’s three largest memory chip manufacturers, recently said the shortage could persist for several more years.
    • Downloads does not equal actual usage, even less when the app is pre-installed in some Galaxy phones.
    • +1000 to this, don't understand why they added that margin around the top bar, even the close button is a PITA to click without aiming. Ofc, this is just preview and hopefully they will revert such odd UX decision before hitting final version.
    • so the people who bought this will get a refund?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      167
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!