Recommended Posts

REVISION 4

History_of_Microsoft_Windows.doc

And a PDF version

History_of_Microsoft_Windows.pdf

Erm, what did I change? I can't really remember. Added a Sources list, the Xbox OS, altered Windows FLP around (now that more info is here) and other things.

Very interesting and handy, thanks for posting and taking the time to create this. One suggestion though, I would integrate the screenshots into the document itself ( not sure if this can be done with wordpad though) stuff on the web can easily change URLs etc.

Very interesting and handy, thanks for posting and taking the time to create this. One suggestion though, I would integrate the screenshots into the document itself ( not sure if this can be done with wordpad though) stuff on the web can easily change URLs etc.

No can do. Neowin's attatchment limit is exceeded when I do that.

rather interesting! i'd like to see this develop further. i grew up w/ windows 3.1, but i never knew that much about windows history... or DOS for that matter. in fact, i only used windows 95 for 2 weeks until windows 98 came out :laugh: i basically went straight from 3.1 to 98 :|

  • 1 month later...

Taking advice from some posters, I seeked out an external host. I am now using RapidShare, and am only uploading in PDF format, to keep it nice.

REVISION 5

What did I do? I added in the screenshots (as requested), and added logos, altered a few bits, added a Windows CE screenshot, and Xbox Dashboard screenshots. I also added in some information about Windows: Codename "Vienna"'s successor, which has been confirmed. More info inside.

Where does it go from here? I can definetly see room for improvement. Things all feel a bit cluttered to me, and I'm trying to think of a way to split the lines apart, so you have:

  • Main Windows
  • Windows Successor
  • Windows CE
  • Unreleased
  • Experimental
  • Xbox

But, all in due time. I hope you understand this isn't top priority for me, so I don't know when I'll get around to it.

EDIT: Dang, I just checked the view count. 2114 :|

Why the hell does everyone use Rapidshare when its crap?

Use http://www.megaupload.com

This is great for something that I need to do and Id like to download it.

It just got recommended by a poster

Here it is on Megaupload:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=MDRNQ9MQ

IMO, grouping NT based OSes with the consumer versions is incorrect. Windows NT (retrospectively called NT3.1) has it's roots in OS/2 (which you have omitted in it's entirity), which was originally sold as both an IBM and a Microsoft OS, in fact NT still contained a lot of the original OS/2 code, which was removed in NT3.5 (hence 3.5's smaller footprint).

Also, the difference between NT3.51 and NT4 is a lot smaller than the difference between Windows 3.1 and 95. The main difference between the two is the GUI - the GUI with the 'Start' button and so on was actually issued to MSDN subscribers and partners as a preview for 3.51. A lot of Microsoft (and other) applications were actually coded not to run on NT3.51 to force the upgrade to NT4, when without this check, they would have ran perfectly.

NT was also not originally intended to run on x86 hardware, it was originally designed for the i860, which had the codename N-10, or NT, with NT being retrospectively redesignated as 'New Technology' - which explains the strange "Designed for NT Technology" message in 2000 (New Technology Technology doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?)

IMO, grouping NT based OSes with the consumer versions is incorrect. Windows NT (retrospectively called NT3.1) has it's roots in OS/2 (which you have omitted in it's entirity), which was originally sold as both an IBM and a Microsoft OS, in fact NT still contained a lot of the original OS/2 code, which was removed in NT3.5 (hence 3.5's smaller footprint).

Also, the difference between NT3.51 and NT4 is a lot smaller than the difference between Windows 3.1 and 95. The main difference between the two is the GUI - the GUI with the 'Start' button and so on was actually issued to MSDN subscribers and partners as a preview for 3.51. A lot of Microsoft (and other) applications were actually coded not to run on NT3.51 to force the upgrade to NT4, when without this check, they would have ran perfectly.

NT was also not originally intended to run on x86 hardware, it was originally designed for the i860, which had the codename N-10, or NT, with NT being retrospectively redesignated as 'New Technology' - which explains the strange "Designed for NT Technology" message in 2000 (New Technology Technology doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?)

Thanks, I will take all of that into account, and work in the OS/2 line of OS as well :)

However, I'm sticking with the New Technology explanation, for 2 reasons

  1. Bill Gates said it himself
  2. Windows 2000 was released much later than the first NT - and I'm sure it says "with/using" and not "for"

Nice work. Maybe you could include the various PLUS! addon packs that added functionality to windows (didn't IE1 first appear in 95's PLUS! edition?) I only suggest this because you added the XBOX info. Also MSBOB even though it wasn't a windows version (for the same same reason as above). Any rate, nice work!

Thanks, I will take all of that into account, and work in the OS/2 line of OS as well :)

However, I'm sticking with the New Technology explanation, for 2 reasons

  1. Bill Gates said it himself
  2. Windows 2000 was released much later than the first NT - and I'm sure it says "with/using" and not "for"

Windows 2000 Pro was Built on NT Technology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft_Windows

  • 3 weeks later...

REVISION 6

Rapidshare

http://rapidshare.com/files/5995239/Histor...dows_3.pdf.html

Megaupload

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=CB7VVOXU

I'm happy with this one. Put in a Contents page, improved picture quality, inserted some more screenshots, worked in the OS/2, MS-DOS, QDOS and CP/M systems into it (with detailed explanations). Also added prices at time of release in USD!

Enjoy :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to train them to help sort Adobe's old spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better against Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!