Recommended Posts

Does this include feedback on your download mirror? I got hammered with pop-ups and pop-unders from the following adservers:

popunder.adsrevenue.net

ads.clicksor.com

I had previously disabled my pop-up blocker because it was interfering with some legitimate pop-ups on some websites (viewing product images on the website of a computer component manufacturer), and forgot to enable it again.

When I clicked on your link, I nearly had to perform a three finger salute to stop the furious non-stop barrage of pop-ups.

Even with a popup blocker such as the one in Firefox you still get 'em :no:

  • 2 weeks later...

@nw_raptor

v6 It's still more or less under developement. Actually QMUP uses the v6 engine

What v6 needs right now:

1. Logging

2. Mouse wheel support in the main selection list. This one is going to be a hard one to do...

3. General perfomance tweaks...

Are these the only major issues with AP 6.x at this time?

If so then I believe I could live without them if this ment we can get AP 6.x into regular use for AP :)

We can then start working on modules for AP 6 and finally give up on AP 5 module development!

The way things are at the moment is that we have two different (incompatible) versions of the AP "engine" and module formats in use.

I would really like to get things moving on AP 6.x and if these are the only issues then I don't see why this cannot be done sooner rather than later.

Is there a timescale for getting AP 6.x in to regular use for APXP, AP2000 and AP2003? :D

Kind Regards

Simon

Does this include feedback on your download mirror? I got hammered with pop-ups and pop-unders from the following adservers:

popunder.adsrevenue.net

ads.clicksor.com

I had previously disabled my pop-up blocker because it was interfering with some legitimate pop-ups on some websites (viewing product images on the website of a computer component manufacturer), and forgot to enable it again.

When I clicked on your link, I nearly had to perform a three finger salute to stop the furious non-stop barrage of pop-ups.

not to mention copying my original layout and hosting the files on rapidshare of all places! :no:

What is the switch support with the QMUP's?

Same as the full application or reduce?

I run a silent batch script at work for staff with laptops - is there going to be support for this with the QMUP to?

Its going to be hard enough to convince them to come back each month to update, let alone go through the steps.

Just the choice between the Full AP and the QMUP is going to be a nightmare.

Perhaps - the option to batch multiple QMUP's together might help this, but then there is the reboot at the end.

such as

June-QMUP.exe /unattend:t2 /noreboot

July-QMUP.exe /unattend:t2 /noreboot

shutdown /s /f /t 60 /c "Restarting after applying updates, please Save"

I was playing around with the batch file earlier - trying to build in a bit of *user* safetly work arounds.

There is only two batch files visible Full and Lite - Full = Autopatcher Lite = QMUP.

Currently the plan to have them chained seems like its going to fail as

/noeula

/noreboot

/unattend:t2

Failed in the batch file. Although I need to recheck that because I may have tried that before I fixed an error in the batch.

  • 2 weeks later...

@nw_raptor

Are these the only major issues with AP 6.x at this time?

If so then I believe I could live without them if this ment we can get AP 6.x into regular use for AP :)

We can then start working on modules for AP 6 and finally give up on AP 5 module development!

The way things are at the moment is that we have two different (incompatible) versions of the AP "engine" and module formats in use.

I would really like to get things moving on AP 6.x and if these are the only issues then I don't see why this cannot be done sooner rather than later.

Is there a timescale for getting AP 6.x in to regular use for APXP, AP2000 and AP2003? :D

Kind Regards

Simon

Be my guest :) Gandolas switched to v6 a long time ago. You'll notice that he only does v6 releases :)

What is the switch support with the QMUP's?

Same as the full application or reduce?

I run a silent batch script at work for staff with laptops - is there going to be support for this with the QMUP to?

Its going to be hard enough to convince them to come back each month to update, let alone go through the steps.

Just the choice between the Full AP and the QMUP is going to be a nightmare.

Perhaps - the option to batch multiple QMUP's together might help this, but then there is the reboot at the end.

such as

Here's what's planned for QMUP as far as features go:

- Add a third tab alongside with EULA tabs, called "Update List" or "Patch List"

This will list all the patches found, sorting them by month and showing descriptions. Hopefully this will help you when you're not sure if you've missed a month...

- If you're one of those people who read with their brain and not with their eyes, you probably noticed, i wrote that the list will be sorted by month... Thing brings us to the second feature. Instead of applying the patches on your computer, there will be an option to "add to qmup share". this way you can keep one qmup share which consists of several qmup releases. no need for huge batch files or running the qmups one by one. imagine this as combining several qmups into one...

- commandline stuff to make things work in batch files etc.

on a side note, here's how i see qmups useful:

each month you should download one small update pack, install it on your computer, then add it to your qmup share. this way, you always have an updated critical update share (if you need to update a computer without internet, or after a format, etc) without ever having to download 200mb, and without having to go through the qmups one by one.

:)

antonis

Ok - thanks for that info..

The way I am thinking of doing this - is to have two files..

Full and Lite [Lite being the QMUP's]

Full being the latest current AP Full Release

Lite being the last 2/3 months of QMUP's using silent installs.

Tell the staff to run the full every couple of months, lites on the months in between.

  • 4 weeks later...

@nw_raptor

Are these the only major issues with AP 6.x at this time?

If so then I believe I could live without them if this ment we can get AP 6.x into regular use for AP :)

We can then start working on modules for AP 6 and finally give up on AP 5 module development!

The way things are at the moment is that we have two different (incompatible) versions of the AP "engine" and module formats in use.

I would really like to get things moving on AP 6.x and if these are the only issues then I don't see why this cannot be done sooner rather than later.

Is there a timescale for getting AP 6.x in to regular use for APXP, AP2000 and AP2003? :D

Kind Regards

Simon

I would love to see version 6 in full swing as version 5.1 doesnt work on one of my computers, and its the computer I use the most (version 6 does however work!)

  • 2 weeks later...

I'll do some work on APv6 and APQMUP as soon as I finish my exams here (started September 1st, i finish on September 15th). Fortunately my birthday won't be an exam day (Monday, September 11th).

caledai suggested we replace Lites with QMUPs. does anyone else agree?

  • 2 weeks later...
caledai suggested we replace Lites with QMUPs. does anyone else agree?

Ooops..

I forgot about the lite versions - that was my terminology.

I was going to setup this via 2 scripts.

One the full kept up to date for people that handn't updated in months.

The is almost comparable to the light edition except I have used the full as a base - and removed the updates and tweaks I didn't want applied - and kept others that are not in the lite edition.

One a series of chained qmups that I called lite forgetting about the same name here. - that only had the latest updates.

Its not so much of an issue in that regard to chained updates and training staff as I got the go-ahead to setup a RIS/WSUS server - two things that will make my life so much easier.

I can't wait for WSUS3 to come out of beta - I am not going to install a beta into a production environment where I don't get enough time at the school to handle any hiccups.

nw_raptor

caledai suggested we replace Lites with QMUPs. does anyone else agree?

Personally as a dialup user , and a poor student :rolleyes: , I like the QMUPs .

1. I have a Full AP Dec. 05 & Lite April '06 ; plus may 06 'Updates' .

As I'm a 'poor' student I don't have unlimited disk space to install the latest full or lite versions , then apply the monthly update , then delete the full/lite version after applying the latest 'Update' , so the QMUPs are great for someone in my position. Running a 700Mhz P3 , XP pro sp2 , which is a struggle in itself , and sure would be great to upgrade, but unlikely to in the near future.

Once I've Patched with the Full , really I only need the monthly QMUPs . I used it once over the last

3 months , and it worked fantastically . Great idea !!!

2. Having a backup of a recent (6 Months previous) Full AP is one of the major reasons for me using AP , so as to have the security of not having to download MS Updates all week if I crash and have to re-install XP.

Just my 2 cents worth , I'm probably in the minority having a dinosaur P.C. and dialup connection , but probably a few of us around still ... :)

Whatever way you go with the setup of AutoPatcher thanks so much for making such a utility available ; it's a Godsend.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!