Recommended Posts

Does this include feedback on your download mirror? I got hammered with pop-ups and pop-unders from the following adservers:

popunder.adsrevenue.net

ads.clicksor.com

I had previously disabled my pop-up blocker because it was interfering with some legitimate pop-ups on some websites (viewing product images on the website of a computer component manufacturer), and forgot to enable it again.

When I clicked on your link, I nearly had to perform a three finger salute to stop the furious non-stop barrage of pop-ups.

Even with a popup blocker such as the one in Firefox you still get 'em :no:

  • 2 weeks later...

@nw_raptor

v6 It's still more or less under developement. Actually QMUP uses the v6 engine

What v6 needs right now:

1. Logging

2. Mouse wheel support in the main selection list. This one is going to be a hard one to do...

3. General perfomance tweaks...

Are these the only major issues with AP 6.x at this time?

If so then I believe I could live without them if this ment we can get AP 6.x into regular use for AP :)

We can then start working on modules for AP 6 and finally give up on AP 5 module development!

The way things are at the moment is that we have two different (incompatible) versions of the AP "engine" and module formats in use.

I would really like to get things moving on AP 6.x and if these are the only issues then I don't see why this cannot be done sooner rather than later.

Is there a timescale for getting AP 6.x in to regular use for APXP, AP2000 and AP2003? :D

Kind Regards

Simon

Does this include feedback on your download mirror? I got hammered with pop-ups and pop-unders from the following adservers:

popunder.adsrevenue.net

ads.clicksor.com

I had previously disabled my pop-up blocker because it was interfering with some legitimate pop-ups on some websites (viewing product images on the website of a computer component manufacturer), and forgot to enable it again.

When I clicked on your link, I nearly had to perform a three finger salute to stop the furious non-stop barrage of pop-ups.

not to mention copying my original layout and hosting the files on rapidshare of all places! :no:

What is the switch support with the QMUP's?

Same as the full application or reduce?

I run a silent batch script at work for staff with laptops - is there going to be support for this with the QMUP to?

Its going to be hard enough to convince them to come back each month to update, let alone go through the steps.

Just the choice between the Full AP and the QMUP is going to be a nightmare.

Perhaps - the option to batch multiple QMUP's together might help this, but then there is the reboot at the end.

such as

June-QMUP.exe /unattend:t2 /noreboot

July-QMUP.exe /unattend:t2 /noreboot

shutdown /s /f /t 60 /c "Restarting after applying updates, please Save"

I was playing around with the batch file earlier - trying to build in a bit of *user* safetly work arounds.

There is only two batch files visible Full and Lite - Full = Autopatcher Lite = QMUP.

Currently the plan to have them chained seems like its going to fail as

/noeula

/noreboot

/unattend:t2

Failed in the batch file. Although I need to recheck that because I may have tried that before I fixed an error in the batch.

  • 2 weeks later...

@nw_raptor

Are these the only major issues with AP 6.x at this time?

If so then I believe I could live without them if this ment we can get AP 6.x into regular use for AP :)

We can then start working on modules for AP 6 and finally give up on AP 5 module development!

The way things are at the moment is that we have two different (incompatible) versions of the AP "engine" and module formats in use.

I would really like to get things moving on AP 6.x and if these are the only issues then I don't see why this cannot be done sooner rather than later.

Is there a timescale for getting AP 6.x in to regular use for APXP, AP2000 and AP2003? :D

Kind Regards

Simon

Be my guest :) Gandolas switched to v6 a long time ago. You'll notice that he only does v6 releases :)

What is the switch support with the QMUP's?

Same as the full application or reduce?

I run a silent batch script at work for staff with laptops - is there going to be support for this with the QMUP to?

Its going to be hard enough to convince them to come back each month to update, let alone go through the steps.

Just the choice between the Full AP and the QMUP is going to be a nightmare.

Perhaps - the option to batch multiple QMUP's together might help this, but then there is the reboot at the end.

such as

Here's what's planned for QMUP as far as features go:

- Add a third tab alongside with EULA tabs, called "Update List" or "Patch List"

This will list all the patches found, sorting them by month and showing descriptions. Hopefully this will help you when you're not sure if you've missed a month...

- If you're one of those people who read with their brain and not with their eyes, you probably noticed, i wrote that the list will be sorted by month... Thing brings us to the second feature. Instead of applying the patches on your computer, there will be an option to "add to qmup share". this way you can keep one qmup share which consists of several qmup releases. no need for huge batch files or running the qmups one by one. imagine this as combining several qmups into one...

- commandline stuff to make things work in batch files etc.

on a side note, here's how i see qmups useful:

each month you should download one small update pack, install it on your computer, then add it to your qmup share. this way, you always have an updated critical update share (if you need to update a computer without internet, or after a format, etc) without ever having to download 200mb, and without having to go through the qmups one by one.

:)

antonis

Ok - thanks for that info..

The way I am thinking of doing this - is to have two files..

Full and Lite [Lite being the QMUP's]

Full being the latest current AP Full Release

Lite being the last 2/3 months of QMUP's using silent installs.

Tell the staff to run the full every couple of months, lites on the months in between.

  • 4 weeks later...

@nw_raptor

Are these the only major issues with AP 6.x at this time?

If so then I believe I could live without them if this ment we can get AP 6.x into regular use for AP :)

We can then start working on modules for AP 6 and finally give up on AP 5 module development!

The way things are at the moment is that we have two different (incompatible) versions of the AP "engine" and module formats in use.

I would really like to get things moving on AP 6.x and if these are the only issues then I don't see why this cannot be done sooner rather than later.

Is there a timescale for getting AP 6.x in to regular use for APXP, AP2000 and AP2003? :D

Kind Regards

Simon

I would love to see version 6 in full swing as version 5.1 doesnt work on one of my computers, and its the computer I use the most (version 6 does however work!)

  • 2 weeks later...

I'll do some work on APv6 and APQMUP as soon as I finish my exams here (started September 1st, i finish on September 15th). Fortunately my birthday won't be an exam day (Monday, September 11th).

caledai suggested we replace Lites with QMUPs. does anyone else agree?

  • 2 weeks later...
caledai suggested we replace Lites with QMUPs. does anyone else agree?

Ooops..

I forgot about the lite versions - that was my terminology.

I was going to setup this via 2 scripts.

One the full kept up to date for people that handn't updated in months.

The is almost comparable to the light edition except I have used the full as a base - and removed the updates and tweaks I didn't want applied - and kept others that are not in the lite edition.

One a series of chained qmups that I called lite forgetting about the same name here. - that only had the latest updates.

Its not so much of an issue in that regard to chained updates and training staff as I got the go-ahead to setup a RIS/WSUS server - two things that will make my life so much easier.

I can't wait for WSUS3 to come out of beta - I am not going to install a beta into a production environment where I don't get enough time at the school to handle any hiccups.

nw_raptor

caledai suggested we replace Lites with QMUPs. does anyone else agree?

Personally as a dialup user , and a poor student :rolleyes: , I like the QMUPs .

1. I have a Full AP Dec. 05 & Lite April '06 ; plus may 06 'Updates' .

As I'm a 'poor' student I don't have unlimited disk space to install the latest full or lite versions , then apply the monthly update , then delete the full/lite version after applying the latest 'Update' , so the QMUPs are great for someone in my position. Running a 700Mhz P3 , XP pro sp2 , which is a struggle in itself , and sure would be great to upgrade, but unlikely to in the near future.

Once I've Patched with the Full , really I only need the monthly QMUPs . I used it once over the last

3 months , and it worked fantastically . Great idea !!!

2. Having a backup of a recent (6 Months previous) Full AP is one of the major reasons for me using AP , so as to have the security of not having to download MS Updates all week if I crash and have to re-install XP.

Just my 2 cents worth , I'm probably in the minority having a dinosaur P.C. and dialup connection , but probably a few of us around still ... :)

Whatever way you go with the setup of AutoPatcher thanks so much for making such a utility available ; it's a Godsend.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • How is everyone doing? My hobbies are gaming, sports (netball, tennis) and going to the gym. I also love cooking. Where are you guys from?
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!