"Windows 98 + ME *still* alive" campaign


Recommended Posts

I have a basic rule - this may sound stupid

if a computer has 32mb of ram or less, i'll put win me onto it - because anyone using a computer that old will not need the latest and greatest, and although slower than win 98, it will be faster than 2000, and have better hardware support than 98

anything > that, i'll use 2000 or xp

I have a basic rule - this may sound stupid

if a computer has 32mb of ram or less, i'll put win me onto it - because anyone using a computer that old will not need the latest and greatest, and although slower than win 98, it will be faster than 2000, and have better hardware support than 98

anything > that, i'll use 2000 or xp

I thought WinME had less hardware support because lots of drivers weren't properly tested. And I think just about anyone would recommed Win2000 over WinME.

The 9x line is dead, let it rest in piece.

But, if you have to use it (e.g. legacy programs) or hate the stability the NT code base offers (or can't afford it), then fine, use it, just don't complain about the rest of the world moving on.

Edited by The_Decryptor

I thought WinME had less hardware support because lots of drivers weren't properly tested. And I think just about anyone would recommed Win2000 over WinME.

Yes, but theres two reasons why i use ME over 98 and 2000...

If you plug a USB memory stick into 98... what do you get

Plug it into ME, and it works

Also ME has more drivers than 98 IMO - like the VGA drivers for a win95 laptop, which 98 didnt have.

I only use ME however in systems with less than 64 mb of ram. Although win2k on 32mb would be possible, it wouldnt be pretty. And although ME isnt exactly fast, its usable.

Oh sheesh, this thread is still alive? Why?

I wish a mod would come and lock this thread, seeing as campaigns and petitions are useless in this situation. MS had made the wish come true for 98/ME users once back in 2004; what's the point of them supporting it like forever (after July 2006)?

I personally believe this should have been done a long time ago, like Rudy said. Period. I don't even give a rat's ass if 50 million PCs are running Win 98 and ME. 50 million PCs may run Win98/ME, but they are just not working anymore. My mom tossed her old computer (Win 98 SE) out the window when she got her Dell computer with Win XP, and that makes it 49,999,999 PCs. Whee!

As cited from MS on both the 98 and ME sites, "Effective July 11, 2006, Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition, and Windows Me (and their related components) will transition to a non-supported status. After this date, Microsoft will no longer provide any incident support options or security updates. Microsoft is not offering a custom support agreement for these products."

Case closed.

There are still new working Windows 98 udates for IE6 SP1

Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer KB918899 for Windows 98/ME

Anyone have any comments on this unofficial update for IE6SP1? Seems to me that if someone was successfully porting IE Security Updates to Windows 98/ME, it would be of some interests to users of those operating systems. Anyone know anything about the author, or have checked out that it does work?

Oh sheesh, this thread is still alive? Why?

I wish a mod would come and lock this thread, seeing as campaigns and petitions are useless in this situation. MS had made the wish come true for 98/ME users once back in 2004; what's the point of them supporting it like forever (after July 2006)?

I personally believe this should have been done a long time ago, like Rudy said. Period. I don't even give a rat's ass if 50 million PCs are running Win 98 and ME. 50 million PCs may run Win98/ME, but they are just not working anymore. My mom tossed her old computer (Win 98 SE) out the window when she got her Dell computer with Win XP, and that makes it 49,999,999 PCs. Whee!

As cited from MS on both the 98 and ME sites, "Effective July 11, 2006, Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition, and Windows Me (and their related components) will transition to a non-supported status. After this date, Microsoft will no longer provide any incident support options or security updates. Microsoft is not offering a custom support agreement for these products."

Case closed.

I've got to agree. As much as I hate the idea of MS telling people they *have* to upgrade I think it is needed. 98se was ok back in the day but now with XP and even things like Ubuntu Linux 6.06 it is way too outdated. ME was never good and was just plain terrible if you ask me. XP was a huge upgrade and if most people tried it and could afford it I don't think they would reject it (unless it didn't run well on their hardware in which case I would suggest the latest version of Ubuntu).

I have to agree. It's not just about Microsoft making money. Some of the fundamental code in the 9x kernel is outdated and nearly impossible to update to protect the OS against the latest security threats, etc. It would cost Microsoft a lot of resources to update their legacy code and drive up costs of future products. It could result in a viscious downward spiral.

I've got to agree. As much as I hate the idea of MS telling people they *have* to upgrade I think it is needed. 98se was ok back in the day but now with XP and even things like Ubuntu Linux 6.06 it is way too outdated. ME was never good and was just plain terrible if you ask me. XP was a huge upgrade and if most people tried it and could afford it I don't think they would reject it (unless it didn't run well on their hardware in which case I would suggest the latest version of Ubuntu).

But the thing is, it's not like Microsoft is pushing WinXP through updates or forcing you to upgrade. If it works fine for you, then that's great. They are just ending all support for it.

I thought WinME had less hardware support because lots of drivers weren't properly tested. And I think just about anyone would recommed Win2000 over WinME.

I'd have to agree on this point. My old IBM Aptiva PC, the 2168-A50, had its Mwave card drivers (imagine that, a PCMCIA card with sound, graphics, AND a modem all merged into one. Nowadays we'd consider them onboard components, but this PC's motherboard had none of them) that failed to work in Windows ME. It was probably using some ancient archaic driver model that made it work under Windows 95 and 98, but not ME. A good quarter of the OEM programs on that PC ran in DOS (heh, the good old days of games with cheesy graphics and no 3D card requirement! Although Descent 1 was a kick ass game that came on that PC), so trying a cheap ass trick to shove DOS support under the carpet was more or less a kick in the teeth for me back then.

Add that to the fact that my PC just met the minimum requirements - ME ran like a slow dog. That PC probably wouldn't fare too well with Windows 2000 either. But hey, it's now sitting there right in the closet, hoping for a day that I'll just yank it out for the sake of enjoying those old games and apps once more. ;)

That PC probably wouldn't fare too well with Windows 2000 either.

You should try Win2000 instead of WinME. Since it's NT based, it's almost WinXP w/o the eye candy and some plug-and-play functionality.

Oh sheesh, this thread is still alive? Why?

I personally believe this should have been done a long time ago, like Rudy said. Period. I don't even give a rat's ass if 50 million PCs are running Win 98 and ME. 50 million PCs may run Win98/ME, but they are just not working anymore. My mom tossed her old computer (Win 98 SE) out the window when she got her Dell computer with Win XP, and that makes it 49,999,999 PCs. Whee!

Case closed.

Because of the other 49,999,999 98/ME users . =)

Yes, but theres two reasons why i use ME over 98 and 2000...

If you plug a USB memory stick into 98... what do you get

Plug it into ME, and it works

Also ME has more drivers than 98 IMO - like the VGA drivers for a win95 laptop, which 98 didnt have.

I only use ME however in systems with less than 64 mb of ram. Although win2k on 32mb would be possible, it wouldnt be pretty. And although ME isnt exactly fast, its usable.

If thats the problem you could use Native USB Drivers like these

or from the Upgrade Pack (the last link from my posting).

But I think everybody should use the OS that one likes to use.

Anyone have any comments on this unofficial update for IE6SP1? Seems to me that if someone was successfully porting IE Security Updates to Windows 98/ME, it would be of some interests to users of those operating systems. Anyone know anything about the author, or have checked out that it does work?

I checked and it worked.

But I have to tell that the url changed and is now to this :

Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer KB918899 for Windows 98/ME

I found the Download link on this site :

http://www.w98upg.net.tf

The site is basically about "Windows 98 Upgrade Pack" but there other downloads links too.

So the author should be the one from that site maybe. :)

Edited by win 98 fan

Thought I'd get my two cents into this

Most of these people saying that 98/ME is dead are mostly IT nerds that feel the need to always have the most up-to-date hardware or software. They waste money on constantly keeping anything they own updated. Buying new cell phones every few months, getting new laptops or desktops every single time a new series of a system comes out. They have the money to blow on all this or work in places where it's all free or pay pennies for it all.

They're not thinking about how in that 70 million, a lot of those are small businesses and school systems that simply can't afford to buy hundreds or even thousands of new computers every couple years or buy what's needed to keep them up-to-date. Some places just can't do it, plain and simple.

I get really sick of all these computer nerds, and that's what they are, hardcore computer nerds/jerks. That are only thinking about the cool new technology and they think everyone has to have it because they have it. That's what's getting old, not people who still run Windows 98/ME.

The high school I went to didn't have a computer lab until late 1996. They just now got new computers running Windows XP for the school year that just started this past Thursday. 10 years...TEN YEARS....before they had enough just to get new computers running Windows XP. You can see how bad that is when Windows Vista is pretty close to being released. Windows Blackcomb/Vienna will be out by the time they have computers running Vista.

And about the whole "Windows ME is the worst OS ever created". Funny how I've had it running on a computer since it was released and I rarely have issues with it, works perfectly fine for me. Anyone who jumps on the bandwagon of people saying its the worse OS ever created has most likely never even used it once. They just hear all these others talking about how bad it is and feel the need to join them simply because people like me, who don't care what anyone else has to say or thinks, will come out saying they like it and never have issues with it. Then the next thing you know, the nerds show up to talk their trash simply because you use or have used Windows ME. It's all completely ridiculous and that's what's getting old these days. All the idiot computer freaks out there that have nothing better to do and don't think about all the real-world issues.

The stuff is just too expensive for some people, plain and simple. Not every person, school or company has the money to spend on upgrading constantly.

That's what you all need to get over

And about the whole "Windows ME is the worst OS ever created". Funny how I've had it running on a computer since it was released and I rarely have issues with it, works perfectly fine for me. Anyone who jumps on the bandwagon of people saying its the worse OS ever created has most likely never even used it once. They just hear all these others talking about how bad it is and feel the need to join them simply because people like me, who don't care what anyone else has to say or thinks, will come out saying they like it and never have issues with it. Then the next thing you know, the nerds show up to talk their trash simply because you use or have used Windows ME. It's all completely ridiculous and that's what's getting old these days. All the idiot computer freaks out there that have nothing better to do and don't think about all the real-world issues.

I do agree with you here. If WinME has worked fine for you, that's great. But, however, it is a proven fact that compared to Win98, there were a lot of untested drivers and applications, causing WinME to overall be less stable than Win98 was.

seems this turned in to "keep this thread alive" campian.....

Windows 98 is old if you want to contune using it, go in a windows 98 basied chat room gather some other geeks and forum your own little world in the middle of nowhere and call it "MSDOS"

seems this turned in to "keep this thread alive" campian.....

Windows 98 is old if you want to contune using it, go in a windows 98 basied chat room gather some other geeks and forum your own little world in the middle of nowhere and call it "MSDOS"

Wow. Seems some tech dudes need an attitude checking :rolleyes:

This thread is not about asking MS to keep support but about creating an user-based community to mantain this OS that is still widely used and not just because lack of money for an upgrade, something that a "tech dude" must know.

Wow. Seems some tech dudes need an attitude checking :rolleyes:

This thread is not about asking MS to keep support but about creating an user-based community to mantain this OS that is still widely used and not just because lack of money for an upgrade, something that a "tech dude" must know.

um.... ok :|

I'm gonna change my user name. my friend set it up for me and i hate it,so he got it :shiftyninja: only thing is I dont know what to change it to so till then its stays "tech dude" :x

and my attidude was fine, unless ur psychic and it some how mess up :blink:

seems this turned in to "keep this thread alive" campian.....

Windows 98 is old if you want to contune using it, go in a windows 98 basied chat room gather some other geeks and forum your own little world in the middle of nowhere and call it "MSDOS"

That's utter bull****. The majority of small businesses use windows 98, most institutions that only use DTP never upgrade their machines and still run NT, 98 and ME because they see no need to upgrade. The NHS are still in the process of a rolling upgrade of machines. Last year our surgery got updated, we were still running windows 98 on machines that are both connected to the internet and connected to the national patient database. While we've been upgraded to xp, i'm positive that there are still many small hospices and gp surgerys which haven't, which accounts, along with small businesses and allmost all small LEDC businesses for a massive pre-windows 2000 userbase.

Using 95/98/98SE/ME is find for old computer just kicking around but I would strongly recommend anyone to upgrade if it were their full-time computer. Honestly, manufacturers don't care about anything pre-2000 and I don't blame them, because it really is an archaic OS when there' so much better out there.

With someone using these old OSs, this is the only time I would recommend a person get a computer from Wal-mart, no matter what they want. It's a real shame when I see people use computers stuck in 1998.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
    • Is your Apple Watch supported? Check the watchOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari Apple kicked off WWDC 2026 with a ton of announcements, mostly centered around Apple Intelligence improvements, the Siri AI, and Liquid Glass updates. However, there is a lot of other stuff that couldn't catch the limelight. Let's talk about watchOS 27 and which models are supported by the newest operating system. According to the Cupertino giant, watchOS 27 will be supported on the following Apple Watch models when it arrives later this year: Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple Watch Series 11 Apple Watch SE 3 Apple Watch Series 10 Apple Watch Ultra 2 It's a stark contrast with last year's watchOS 26 update, which had almost a dozen Apple Watch models in its list of supported devices. Apple supported models all the way back to Apple Watch Series 6. That said, if you own one of the five models, you'll need an iPhone 11 (or later) with iOS 27 to install the latest update. Yes, Apple has shown some extra love to the iPhone 11, and it old horse supports the iOS 27 update. watchOS 27 beta 1 is now available for developers and interested power users through the Apple Developer Program. So, if you're among those who like to play with fire, you can download it to your supported Apple Watch. Otherwise, the public beta for watchOS 27 will be available next month. The freshly baked Apple Watch update comes with Siri AI - an advanced, fully conversational version of Siri powered by Apple Intelligence due for later this year. A new dynamic app grid features icons for five Siri-suggested apps. You can use a new tap gesture to open a widget in the Smart Stack, and a new Find My app finally clears the mess of Find Devices, Find Items, and Find People on Apple Watch. Workout Buddy can run without an iPhone nearby and offers new insights based on data, including your progress for pace, distance, and workout duration. Apple improved its motion tracking algorithms to measure the distance of indoor treadmill runs and walks more precisely. Speaking of other changes, the music playback on watchOS 27 starts faster and you can create custom passes for any membership or card that uses a QR code or barcode, then easily access them in the Wallet app or pin in the Smart Stack.
    • "and pull old flight details from your email during back-and-forth conversations" The Siri I've become to know and trust. I've always wanted to pull info on old flights. /s
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!