"Windows 98 + ME *still* alive" campaign


Recommended Posts

I have a basic rule - this may sound stupid

if a computer has 32mb of ram or less, i'll put win me onto it - because anyone using a computer that old will not need the latest and greatest, and although slower than win 98, it will be faster than 2000, and have better hardware support than 98

anything > that, i'll use 2000 or xp

I have a basic rule - this may sound stupid

if a computer has 32mb of ram or less, i'll put win me onto it - because anyone using a computer that old will not need the latest and greatest, and although slower than win 98, it will be faster than 2000, and have better hardware support than 98

anything > that, i'll use 2000 or xp

I thought WinME had less hardware support because lots of drivers weren't properly tested. And I think just about anyone would recommed Win2000 over WinME.

The 9x line is dead, let it rest in piece.

But, if you have to use it (e.g. legacy programs) or hate the stability the NT code base offers (or can't afford it), then fine, use it, just don't complain about the rest of the world moving on.

Edited by The_Decryptor

I thought WinME had less hardware support because lots of drivers weren't properly tested. And I think just about anyone would recommed Win2000 over WinME.

Yes, but theres two reasons why i use ME over 98 and 2000...

If you plug a USB memory stick into 98... what do you get

Plug it into ME, and it works

Also ME has more drivers than 98 IMO - like the VGA drivers for a win95 laptop, which 98 didnt have.

I only use ME however in systems with less than 64 mb of ram. Although win2k on 32mb would be possible, it wouldnt be pretty. And although ME isnt exactly fast, its usable.

Oh sheesh, this thread is still alive? Why?

I wish a mod would come and lock this thread, seeing as campaigns and petitions are useless in this situation. MS had made the wish come true for 98/ME users once back in 2004; what's the point of them supporting it like forever (after July 2006)?

I personally believe this should have been done a long time ago, like Rudy said. Period. I don't even give a rat's ass if 50 million PCs are running Win 98 and ME. 50 million PCs may run Win98/ME, but they are just not working anymore. My mom tossed her old computer (Win 98 SE) out the window when she got her Dell computer with Win XP, and that makes it 49,999,999 PCs. Whee!

As cited from MS on both the 98 and ME sites, "Effective July 11, 2006, Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition, and Windows Me (and their related components) will transition to a non-supported status. After this date, Microsoft will no longer provide any incident support options or security updates. Microsoft is not offering a custom support agreement for these products."

Case closed.

There are still new working Windows 98 udates for IE6 SP1

Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer KB918899 for Windows 98/ME

Anyone have any comments on this unofficial update for IE6SP1? Seems to me that if someone was successfully porting IE Security Updates to Windows 98/ME, it would be of some interests to users of those operating systems. Anyone know anything about the author, or have checked out that it does work?

Oh sheesh, this thread is still alive? Why?

I wish a mod would come and lock this thread, seeing as campaigns and petitions are useless in this situation. MS had made the wish come true for 98/ME users once back in 2004; what's the point of them supporting it like forever (after July 2006)?

I personally believe this should have been done a long time ago, like Rudy said. Period. I don't even give a rat's ass if 50 million PCs are running Win 98 and ME. 50 million PCs may run Win98/ME, but they are just not working anymore. My mom tossed her old computer (Win 98 SE) out the window when she got her Dell computer with Win XP, and that makes it 49,999,999 PCs. Whee!

As cited from MS on both the 98 and ME sites, "Effective July 11, 2006, Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition, and Windows Me (and their related components) will transition to a non-supported status. After this date, Microsoft will no longer provide any incident support options or security updates. Microsoft is not offering a custom support agreement for these products."

Case closed.

I've got to agree. As much as I hate the idea of MS telling people they *have* to upgrade I think it is needed. 98se was ok back in the day but now with XP and even things like Ubuntu Linux 6.06 it is way too outdated. ME was never good and was just plain terrible if you ask me. XP was a huge upgrade and if most people tried it and could afford it I don't think they would reject it (unless it didn't run well on their hardware in which case I would suggest the latest version of Ubuntu).

I have to agree. It's not just about Microsoft making money. Some of the fundamental code in the 9x kernel is outdated and nearly impossible to update to protect the OS against the latest security threats, etc. It would cost Microsoft a lot of resources to update their legacy code and drive up costs of future products. It could result in a viscious downward spiral.

I've got to agree. As much as I hate the idea of MS telling people they *have* to upgrade I think it is needed. 98se was ok back in the day but now with XP and even things like Ubuntu Linux 6.06 it is way too outdated. ME was never good and was just plain terrible if you ask me. XP was a huge upgrade and if most people tried it and could afford it I don't think they would reject it (unless it didn't run well on their hardware in which case I would suggest the latest version of Ubuntu).

But the thing is, it's not like Microsoft is pushing WinXP through updates or forcing you to upgrade. If it works fine for you, then that's great. They are just ending all support for it.

I thought WinME had less hardware support because lots of drivers weren't properly tested. And I think just about anyone would recommed Win2000 over WinME.

I'd have to agree on this point. My old IBM Aptiva PC, the 2168-A50, had its Mwave card drivers (imagine that, a PCMCIA card with sound, graphics, AND a modem all merged into one. Nowadays we'd consider them onboard components, but this PC's motherboard had none of them) that failed to work in Windows ME. It was probably using some ancient archaic driver model that made it work under Windows 95 and 98, but not ME. A good quarter of the OEM programs on that PC ran in DOS (heh, the good old days of games with cheesy graphics and no 3D card requirement! Although Descent 1 was a kick ass game that came on that PC), so trying a cheap ass trick to shove DOS support under the carpet was more or less a kick in the teeth for me back then.

Add that to the fact that my PC just met the minimum requirements - ME ran like a slow dog. That PC probably wouldn't fare too well with Windows 2000 either. But hey, it's now sitting there right in the closet, hoping for a day that I'll just yank it out for the sake of enjoying those old games and apps once more. ;)

That PC probably wouldn't fare too well with Windows 2000 either.

You should try Win2000 instead of WinME. Since it's NT based, it's almost WinXP w/o the eye candy and some plug-and-play functionality.

Oh sheesh, this thread is still alive? Why?

I personally believe this should have been done a long time ago, like Rudy said. Period. I don't even give a rat's ass if 50 million PCs are running Win 98 and ME. 50 million PCs may run Win98/ME, but they are just not working anymore. My mom tossed her old computer (Win 98 SE) out the window when she got her Dell computer with Win XP, and that makes it 49,999,999 PCs. Whee!

Case closed.

Because of the other 49,999,999 98/ME users . =)

Yes, but theres two reasons why i use ME over 98 and 2000...

If you plug a USB memory stick into 98... what do you get

Plug it into ME, and it works

Also ME has more drivers than 98 IMO - like the VGA drivers for a win95 laptop, which 98 didnt have.

I only use ME however in systems with less than 64 mb of ram. Although win2k on 32mb would be possible, it wouldnt be pretty. And although ME isnt exactly fast, its usable.

If thats the problem you could use Native USB Drivers like these

or from the Upgrade Pack (the last link from my posting).

But I think everybody should use the OS that one likes to use.

Anyone have any comments on this unofficial update for IE6SP1? Seems to me that if someone was successfully porting IE Security Updates to Windows 98/ME, it would be of some interests to users of those operating systems. Anyone know anything about the author, or have checked out that it does work?

I checked and it worked.

But I have to tell that the url changed and is now to this :

Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer KB918899 for Windows 98/ME

I found the Download link on this site :

http://www.w98upg.net.tf

The site is basically about "Windows 98 Upgrade Pack" but there other downloads links too.

So the author should be the one from that site maybe. :)

Edited by win 98 fan

Thought I'd get my two cents into this

Most of these people saying that 98/ME is dead are mostly IT nerds that feel the need to always have the most up-to-date hardware or software. They waste money on constantly keeping anything they own updated. Buying new cell phones every few months, getting new laptops or desktops every single time a new series of a system comes out. They have the money to blow on all this or work in places where it's all free or pay pennies for it all.

They're not thinking about how in that 70 million, a lot of those are small businesses and school systems that simply can't afford to buy hundreds or even thousands of new computers every couple years or buy what's needed to keep them up-to-date. Some places just can't do it, plain and simple.

I get really sick of all these computer nerds, and that's what they are, hardcore computer nerds/jerks. That are only thinking about the cool new technology and they think everyone has to have it because they have it. That's what's getting old, not people who still run Windows 98/ME.

The high school I went to didn't have a computer lab until late 1996. They just now got new computers running Windows XP for the school year that just started this past Thursday. 10 years...TEN YEARS....before they had enough just to get new computers running Windows XP. You can see how bad that is when Windows Vista is pretty close to being released. Windows Blackcomb/Vienna will be out by the time they have computers running Vista.

And about the whole "Windows ME is the worst OS ever created". Funny how I've had it running on a computer since it was released and I rarely have issues with it, works perfectly fine for me. Anyone who jumps on the bandwagon of people saying its the worse OS ever created has most likely never even used it once. They just hear all these others talking about how bad it is and feel the need to join them simply because people like me, who don't care what anyone else has to say or thinks, will come out saying they like it and never have issues with it. Then the next thing you know, the nerds show up to talk their trash simply because you use or have used Windows ME. It's all completely ridiculous and that's what's getting old these days. All the idiot computer freaks out there that have nothing better to do and don't think about all the real-world issues.

The stuff is just too expensive for some people, plain and simple. Not every person, school or company has the money to spend on upgrading constantly.

That's what you all need to get over

And about the whole "Windows ME is the worst OS ever created". Funny how I've had it running on a computer since it was released and I rarely have issues with it, works perfectly fine for me. Anyone who jumps on the bandwagon of people saying its the worse OS ever created has most likely never even used it once. They just hear all these others talking about how bad it is and feel the need to join them simply because people like me, who don't care what anyone else has to say or thinks, will come out saying they like it and never have issues with it. Then the next thing you know, the nerds show up to talk their trash simply because you use or have used Windows ME. It's all completely ridiculous and that's what's getting old these days. All the idiot computer freaks out there that have nothing better to do and don't think about all the real-world issues.

I do agree with you here. If WinME has worked fine for you, that's great. But, however, it is a proven fact that compared to Win98, there were a lot of untested drivers and applications, causing WinME to overall be less stable than Win98 was.

seems this turned in to "keep this thread alive" campian.....

Windows 98 is old if you want to contune using it, go in a windows 98 basied chat room gather some other geeks and forum your own little world in the middle of nowhere and call it "MSDOS"

seems this turned in to "keep this thread alive" campian.....

Windows 98 is old if you want to contune using it, go in a windows 98 basied chat room gather some other geeks and forum your own little world in the middle of nowhere and call it "MSDOS"

Wow. Seems some tech dudes need an attitude checking :rolleyes:

This thread is not about asking MS to keep support but about creating an user-based community to mantain this OS that is still widely used and not just because lack of money for an upgrade, something that a "tech dude" must know.

Wow. Seems some tech dudes need an attitude checking :rolleyes:

This thread is not about asking MS to keep support but about creating an user-based community to mantain this OS that is still widely used and not just because lack of money for an upgrade, something that a "tech dude" must know.

um.... ok :|

I'm gonna change my user name. my friend set it up for me and i hate it,so he got it :shiftyninja: only thing is I dont know what to change it to so till then its stays "tech dude" :x

and my attidude was fine, unless ur psychic and it some how mess up :blink:

seems this turned in to "keep this thread alive" campian.....

Windows 98 is old if you want to contune using it, go in a windows 98 basied chat room gather some other geeks and forum your own little world in the middle of nowhere and call it "MSDOS"

That's utter bull****. The majority of small businesses use windows 98, most institutions that only use DTP never upgrade their machines and still run NT, 98 and ME because they see no need to upgrade. The NHS are still in the process of a rolling upgrade of machines. Last year our surgery got updated, we were still running windows 98 on machines that are both connected to the internet and connected to the national patient database. While we've been upgraded to xp, i'm positive that there are still many small hospices and gp surgerys which haven't, which accounts, along with small businesses and allmost all small LEDC businesses for a massive pre-windows 2000 userbase.

Using 95/98/98SE/ME is find for old computer just kicking around but I would strongly recommend anyone to upgrade if it were their full-time computer. Honestly, manufacturers don't care about anything pre-2000 and I don't blame them, because it really is an archaic OS when there' so much better out there.

With someone using these old OSs, this is the only time I would recommend a person get a computer from Wal-mart, no matter what they want. It's a real shame when I see people use computers stuck in 1998.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Signal accuses UK government of using child safety as cover for mass surveillance by David Uzondu Recently, the UK's Home Office announced a sweeping set of proposals to make Britain the "first country in the world" where children cannot share or view nude photos on their smart devices, an initiative that authorities claim will protect children from online predators and combat pornography. In response, Signal believes that while the government must keep children "safe" and "protected," it should do so through social services and education, not by "surveillance, funding cuts, and cover-ups." The company called the plan "dystopian" and warned that it violates everyone's fundamental right to privacy, arguing that scanning on the presumption of nudity will only strengthen the market dominance and data control of giant corporations like Apple and Google. The statement continues by accusing the government of hiding its true intentions under the guise of child safety. Signal argues that the Home Office is building an invisible surveillance infrastructure that remains ripe for exploitation by future administrations and authoritarian regimes. According to the company, this aggressive approach completely ignores the actual needs of young people, such as properly funded schools and mental health services. Tech companies like Apple and Google have a three-month window to implement these mandatory device-level filters across the United Kingdom. If these tech firms refuse to comply with the mandate, the government will pass emergency legislation to force them to comply, threatening massive fines and even going after the CEOs of these companies with criminal charges. The technology will work by blocking explicit images directly on the operating system of all smartphones and tablets by default. This system monitors the device camera and third-party apps to intercept nudity before anyone can upload or send the image. Adults can still view explicit content, but only after completing a strict age verification check to unlock their devices. Several bodies like the NSPCC and Barnardo's praised the Home Office's decision, arguing that device-level intervention stops the cycle of grooming before it starts. The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) also supported the policy, claiming that tech companies can implement on-device checks "without threatening privacy or collecting any data."
    • Did you watch the keynote? It is way beyond what is described in this article. Looks interesting. Now it is time for them to deliver unlike what happened in 24.
    • It pretty much has to be compatible with MS Office or it is going nowhere. The rest of the world runs office including Europe. If it is not compatible it will not survive.
    • Incredible deal gets you free NVMe 512GB SSD with AMD AM5 B850 motherboard for only $150 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week we covered the story of an interesting PC case wherein you can build two full-size computers inside it as in it can house and run an AMD and an Intel system simultaneously. Speaking of building PCs, these are hard times to make one for sure as prices are often very high except during flash sales or discounts. If you are in the market for a 1080p gaming PC then Nvidia's 8GB RTX 5060 Ti is currently on sale for just $330 and you get the latest James Bond game too, for free. Speaking of which, right now there is another incredible sale going on as we can get a free 512 GB NVMe SSD from TeamGroup in the form of the G50 alongside the purchase of an AMD B850 socket AM5 motherboard for only $150 (purchase link under the specs table down below). Getting an AM5 motherboard now in 2026 will be a wise investment for sure, especially since AMD confirmed its commitment to support the socket till at least 2029. The MSI PRO B850M-P WIFI is a micro-ATX motherboard that is compatible with AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors. Since it is AM5, the motherboard works with DDR5 memory and includes MSI’s Memory Boost technology, along with EXPO and XMP support. Connectivity features include built-in Wi-Fi 7 paired with a 5G LAN solution. The board offers a PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot with MSI’s EZ M.2 Shield Frozr II thermal solution, that is said to help maintain SSD performance by providing ample cooling against overheating. The technical specifications of the MSI PRO B850M-P WIFI motherboard are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor Micro-ATX (mATX), 243.84 × 243.84 mm Chipset AMD B850 Socket AM5 Supported Processors AMD Ryzen 9000, 8000, and 7000 Series Desktop Processors Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Max Memory 256 GB Memory Speed DDR5 8200–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Display Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 (up to 4K 60Hz) 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 (up to 4K 60Hz) PCIe Slots 1 × PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) 3 × PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) Audio Codec Realtek ALC897 Audio Channels 7.1-Channel High Definition Audio M.2 Slots 3 × M.2 slots M.2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU) M.2_2: PCIe 4.0 x4 (CPU) M.2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset) M.2 Device Sizes M.2_1: 2280/2260 M.2_2: 2280/2260 M.2_3: 2280 SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support SATA: RAID 0, 1, 10 NVMe: RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 2 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126VB 5Gb Ethernet Wireless Networking Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Tri-band 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz MU-MIMO, MLO, 4KQAM Up to 2.9Gbps Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4 Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 1 × CPU Power 1 × PCIe Power (8-pin) Cooling Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan/Pump 3 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable RGB Gen2 (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Additional Internal Headers 2 × Front Panel (JFP) 1 × Chassis Intrusion (JCI) 1 × Front Audio (JAUD) 1 × COM Port (JCOM) 1 × JDASH Tuning Controller 1 × TPM 2.0 Header The free TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe SSD is a PCIe Gen4 and as such it promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 5,000 MB/s, helping accelerate game loading, file transfers, and everyday computing tasks. The SSD features an InnoGrit controller and SLC caching technology to support consistent performance. An ultra-thin, patented graphene heatsink is included to aid in heat dissipation. The NAND flash is based on TLC which means it has plenty of endurance up its sleeve. The random performance may not be as amazing as other drives with DRAM though. Still it should be very good since it can access system memory via HMB to use it as its DRAM cache. The technical specifications of the TeamGroup 512GB G50 NVMe SSD are given in the table below: Specification Value Model / Part Number TM8FFE512G0C129 Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen4x4 with NVMe Sequential Read Speed Up to 5,000 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 2,500 MB/s Endurance (TBW) 325 TBW DRAM Cache No Cache Technology SLC Cache Controller InnoGrit Controller Solution Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Weight 7 g Dimensions 80.0 × 22.0 × 3.7 mm Vibration Resistance 80 Hz ~ 2,000 Hz / 20G Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5 ms MTBF 3,000,000 hours Get it at the link below: MSI PRO B850M-P WIFI AM5 AMD motherboard + Team Group T-FORCE G50 TM8FFE512G0C129 512GB SSD (free gift): $149.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) This Newegg deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • RapidRAW 1.5.7 by Razvan Serea RapidRAW is a beautiful, non-destructive, GPU‑accelerated RAW image editor designed for speed and simplicity. It uses a lightweight (~30 MB), efficient code base built with Rust, React and Tauri. Ideal for Lightroom workflows, it offers rich editing tools—exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, whites/blacks, tone curves, HSL mixer, dehaze, vignetting, film grain, sharpening, clarity and noise reduction—processed in real-time on the GPU. Features include intuitive masking (brush, linear, radial, AI-powered subject and foreground detection), generative edit layers (via ComfyUI), 32‑bit precision, and full RAW format support through rawler. RapidRAW also provides library management (folder navigation, ratings, metadata, EXIF viewer), batch operations, export presets (JPEG/PNG/TIFF), sidecar editing (.rrdata), undo/redo history, customizable UI themes, smooth animations, resizable panels, and preset copy/paste. A modern high-performance Lightroom alternative with polished UX and creative tools, RapidRAW brings powerful photo editing to photographers seeking speed, responsive GPU feedback, and streamlined workflows. RapidRAW v1.5.7 release notes: This update serves as a direct follow-up to the core architectural migration introduced in v1.5.6. While the transition to a more modular state management system marked a significant step forward for RapidRAW's stability and long-term maintainability, it also introduced several edge cases and regressions within the library and editing workflows. This release focuses on addressing those issues, with a particular emphasis on a complete overhaul of library performance to ensure smooth and responsive browsing following the refactoring. It also resolves inconsistencies in the copy-and-paste workflow and expands RapidRAW's accessibility by adding support for eight additional languages. [full changelog] Download: RapidRAW 1.5.7 | ARM64 | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) View: RapidRAW Home Page | Screenshot | Other operating systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      223
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      80
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!