• 0

VB6 Compiler


Question

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Faster. I'm not exactly fussed since i can program in both VB and C++ but yeah this was just a thought

The VB Compiler seems to be using a generic set of instructions which is slower then what say c++ would do for the same task

IE. Adding 5 to a number a million times is alot slower to do in VB then it is in C++

however its the same task why can't the compiler optimize it a bit more? vb/c++ code don't "look" that different

long temp = 0;

temp++;

-------------------

Dim temp as long

temp = temp + 1

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/479567-vb6-compiler/#findComment-587713972
Share on other sites

  • 0

i'm not sure if this would speed up your example, but this makes vb6 programs smaller and somewhat faster, still nowhere near the speeds of c++ though.

Take compiler (cl.exe) and linker (link.exe) (and their configuration files) from Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003

Backup cl.exe and LINK.exe in you're vb6 directory

Overwrite them with the one's from c++

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/479567-vb6-compiler/#findComment-587714474
Share on other sites

  • 0
  cx323 said:

i'm not sure if this would speed up your example, but this makes vb6 programs smaller and somewhat faster, still nowhere near the speeds of c++ though.

Take compiler (cl.exe) and linker (link.exe) (and their configuration files) from Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003

Backup cl.exe and LINK.exe in you're vb6 directory

Overwrite them with the one's from c++

Can you explain this a bit more? You tried this? Any more detailed instructions how to do it?! Thanx!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/479567-vb6-compiler/#findComment-587715079
Share on other sites

  • 0
  Quote

I would focus on making your code faster rather than using compiler optimizations to enhance slow code. That will get you the best results possible without switching to another language (like c++).

I aim in creating highly efficient code just i feel that for code i use in vb thats almost exactly the same in c++ should be if not the same speed since its not any easier then c++

  Rudy said:

unfortunatly C++ will pretty much always be faster at doing the same task as VB. VB is meant to be easy at the expense of efficiency

as i said if they are doing virtually the same task i feel the compiler should compile them the same way

  Quote

i'm not sure if this would speed up your example, but this makes vb6 programs smaller and somewhat faster, still nowhere near the speeds of c++ though.

Take compiler (cl.exe) and linker (link.exe) (and their configuration files) from Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003

Backup cl.exe and LINK.exe in you're vb6 directory

Overwrite them with the one's from c++

This could be interesting i'll try it out ^_^

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/479567-vb6-compiler/#findComment-587715507
Share on other sites

  • 0
  DDStriker said:

I aim in creating highly efficient code just i feel that for code i use in vb thats almost exactly the same in c++ should be if not the same speed since its not any easier then c++

as i said if they are doing virtually the same task i feel the compiler should compile them the same way

Unfortunately, you have to live with the language's shortcomings as much as its strengths. I can whine and complain that my car doesn't have 600 HP and go 0-60 in 3 seconds, but that won't change anything. The simple fact is that my car can't do that, and never will.

If you want the fastest app possible, write all your code in assembly (Y) Guaranteed to be as fast or faster (if you know what you're doing and can impliment all of the optimizations used by compilers of other languages) than any other language.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/479567-vb6-compiler/#findComment-587715540
Share on other sites

  • 0
  John said:

Unfortunately, you have to live with the language's shortcomings as much as its strengths. I can whine and complain that my car doesn't have 600 HP and go 0-60 in 3 seconds, but that won't change anything. The simple fact is that my car can't do that, and never will.

If you want the fastest app possible, write all your code in assembly (Y) Guaranteed to be as fast or faster (if you know what you're doing and can impliment all of the optimizations used by compilers of other languages) than any other language.

Sounds good :D

sort of off topic here but im just wondering if i implement MMX functions in my code for an Intel Processor..what happens when its executed on a processor without MMX Support? can i have a statement that checks if its supported and if not use different code?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/479567-vb6-compiler/#findComment-587715555
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Scientists explain how bigger does not mean better for electric vehicles during colds by Sayan Sen Image by Blomst via Pixabay A new study by Cornell University researchers, working with Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit (TCAT), has found that electric buses use a lot more energy in cold weather, especially in places like Ithaca, where the roads are hilly and winters can be harsh. TCAT started testing seven battery-electric buses (BEBs) in 2021 as part of a pilot program funded by a federal grant. Over two years, the buses ran on 41 different routes in Tompkins County.However,t the buses had issues during colder months, with lower driving range and performance. To understand why, researchers looked at real-world data and developed what they called “Optimal Temperature Zone” (OTZ) models—these models show how much energy the buses would have used in ideal temperatures between 16°C and 30°C. When temperatures dropped to between −4°C and 0°C, the buses used about 48.0% more energy, including both power used to drive and energy regenerated through braking, compared to OTZ predictions. Even in the wider range of −12°C to 10°C, energy use still jumped by 28.6%. Half of this extra energy went into heating the batteries themselves. These bus batteries work best at about 24°C, so when it’s cold, they need extra power to warm up before the bus can even get moving. The other major factor was the cabin’s heating system, especially on urban routes where doors open and close often, letting in cold air. “With an all-electric vehicle, the battery is the only onboard energy source,” said Max Zhang, senior author of the study and a professor at Cornell. “Everything has to come from it.” The study also found that regenerative braking—the process that lets the battery recharge a bit while the bus slows down—didn’t work as well in cold conditions. One reason is that these bus batteries are huge, about eight times bigger than typical electric car batteries, and it’s harder to keep the temperature even across all the battery cells. To improve the buses' performance in winter, the researchers suggested a few short-term fixes: parking them indoors to keep them warmer, charging batteries while they’re still warm, and reducing the length of time the doors stay open during stops. On a bigger scale, cities might need to rethink their transit infrastructure. That includes checking how many charging stations they have, whether buses can be kept in heated garages, and how to adjust routes and schedules. “You have to try to optimize the schedule of all of the buses and to consider the capability of your infrastructure – how many charging stations you have, and if you have your own garage,” said lead author and PhD student Jintao Gu. The team found that rural routes, which have fewer stops, use less extra energy in cold weather than urban ones. That could help transit agencies decide which routes are better for electric buses during colder months. “One of the lessons we’ve learned is that these buses should be designed for the whole country, including states with colder climates,” said Zhang. “But any lessons are good lessons. This helps us learn as a society and do better.” Source: Cornell University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • Appears to be 150W PSU (Core Ultra 9) so most power delivery ports wouldn't even support it.
    • I wasn't implying people should be forced to use a single launcher. I prefer user choice. If Windows includes a decent game launcher, great, people might choose to use it if they want to. If it sucks, no one will use it. I would be completely against anyone being forced in that direction, just like I am against being forced to use 3rd party launchers if I choose to use Steam.
    • Sounds good, but that'd require Microsoft to develop and API of some sort and then get all the developers to support it... but everyone knows that while others will support Microsoft, Microsoft won't support itself and will kill off the feature... again. Microsoft has tried this trick in Windows 9x era, they tried it with the games library in Vista, they tried a big push for Games for Windows Live, and then again in Windows 8 with the WPA apps via their mobile/windows phone eco system. Now they're trying it again, and it's lets not forget that this isn't a push to make PC gaming better. It's not. To do that they need to provide at least the same level of quality and feature set of Steam, otherwise why else are gamers going to not use Steam. Right now Xbox app and everything Microsoft centric around the PC gaming front is exclusively for their new Xbox brand push to make everything an Xbox. Your Toaster, your cat, your PC, your VR headset, everything is a Xbox and that'll last for this generation of Xbox now probably. Then, like Microsoft always has done and will do, they'll drop it like a hot potato and everyone will be left crying. Point in case, bringing Xbox games to the ROG handheld, their entire point of this... They're marketing it as if it's an Xbox console in a handheld, yet, it's not. There are going to be Xbox gamers who think, they'll be able to pickup their Xbox one games and play them on a handheld like Nintendo and Steam Deck users... except they're going to quickly find out that their Xbox game library is almost entirely missing or games they've already purchased on the Xbox need to be purchased again on the 'this is an Xbox' handheld.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tesla maxwell earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      Camlann earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      fredss earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      fabioc earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      GoForma earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      637
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      224
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      219
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      142
    5. 5
      Xenon
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!