Recommended Posts

so i moved into an apartment a few days ago, need to change the settings of my linksys access point but i dont know what IP address was assigned to the AP. at home on my parents network i had it default to 192.168.1.245, but here it was assigned a new one. is there a utility or something that can tell me the IP address from a client computer? i already looked around linksys site but couldnt really find anything. any help would be appreciated. thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/490058-find-ip-of-linksys-ap/
Share on other sites

so i moved into an apartment a few days ago, need to change the settings of my linksys access point but i dont know what IP address was assigned to the AP. at home on my parents network i had it default to 192.168.1.245, but here it was assigned a new one. is there a utility or something that can tell me the IP address from a client computer? i already looked around linksys site but couldnt really find anything. any help would be appreciated. thanks.

Start --> Run --> IPconfig

:)

It its getting its IP from dhcp of your router, just look in the dhcp client list on the router.

A simple broadcast ping to your network if your plugged into it, ie 192.168.1.255 should make it show up in your arp table..

you can view that with arp -a

If it does not, unplug it from your router and try again - so that it will be the only other host to respond to the broadcast ping. Or you could use any port scanner will allow you to sweep the whole network range. https://www.foundstone.com/resources/proddesc/superscan.htm comes to mind - FREE, small easy to use, etc..

edit: The accesspoint would not be the default gateway, the router would -- so no ipconfig will not give me the LAN ip of the access point.

my problem here is i dont have access to the router.. the apartment complex manages the network.

I gave you 2 different ways to find the accesspoint without access to dhcp client list, ie router.. either do a broadcast ping - or scan -- with a link to a FREE easy to use, very small scanner..

Its an ACCESSPOINT - not a router, it will NOT be the default gateway!

Even if there are hundreds of IPs active on the network, from looking at your arp table and matching up the MAC of what your wireless client tells you, you can quite easy find the IP of the accesspoint.

Its an ACCESSPOINT - not a router, it will NOT be the default gateway!

Even if there are hundreds of IPs active on the network, from looking at your arp table and matching up the MAC of what your wireless client tells you, you can quite easy find the IP of the accesspoint.

both times correct

an access point is somewhat like a brige

the MAC address of incoming packets will be the precedent node of the network, which is the access point

do a reverse ARP and you'll get the IP

Hmmm, no not quite..

Here I did a broadcast ping 192.168.2.255 -- this found my access point (.253), and I also pinged my kids laptop (.97)

Now I can take a look at my arp cache.

arp -a

Interface: 192.168.2.90 --- 0x4

Internet Address Physical Address Type

192.168.2.1 00-00-e8-ef-e1-86 dynamic

192.168.2.97 00-12-f0-0c-7a-06 dynamic

192.168.2.253 00-13-10-fe-84-08 dynamic

From looking at my arp table -- its quite clear different macs are listed for different IPs. The mac of incoming packets will not be the access point..

here is a dump of some traffic, and you can see an AP does not replace a clients mac with its own.

14:29:46.776301 00:12:f0:0c:7a:06 > 00:00:e8:ef:e1:86, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 74: IP 192.168.2.97 > 192.168.1.100: icmp 40: echo reply seq 37377

This is a reply to my ping from my desktop machine 1.100 see the mac of the .97 (00:12:f0:0c:7a:06 ) going to to the interface of the router (00:00:e8:ef:e1:86)

Now here is a response from the accesspoint

14:29:50.982620 00:13:10:fe:84:08 > 00:00:e8:ef:e1:86, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 74: IP 192.168.2.253 > 192.168.1.100: icmp 40: echo reply seq 37889

Macs are different, but you can find its mac and therefore its IP by looking at your wireless connection..

post-14624-1156707586.gif

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
    • Does anyone remember the time when VSCode was a lightweight solution, just shy of 40 MB? No?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      404
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!