What size Samsung LCD to buy based on bang/buck?


Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I will be purchasing an LCD HDTV probably within the next month or so and I have been wondering what size panel should I get based on the following two.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16889102046

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16889102044

Since I am a Best Buy employee, I get a discount on them and the price difference between the two is roughly $250. This TV is for a pretty small room (my room) and I will be using it for basically the PS3 and watching TV. The TV will be roughly 7 feet away from me when viewing it.

Based on that, what do you guys recommend? :)

The 26" is probably going to be more than enough. You have to realize, they look really small in the store and can, perceptively, almost double in size when you bring them home. Your store has the LNS2651? Damn, you're lucky. Mine doesn't.

Ditto on the perception thing. While a 30" TV may not look big in the store (especially when surrounded by 40-50 inch screens), it certainly looks bigger once it's home in your room.

Also, if you check out the 'viewing distance' calculators online and punch in a 26" LCD, you get an ideal viewing distance of 6.5', as opposed to 8' for a 32" screen. So mathematically speaking, you're better off with a 26" screen. :)

The 26" is probably going to be more than enough. You have to realize, they look really small in the store and can, perceptively, almost double in size when you bring them home. Your store has the LNS2651? Damn, you're lucky. Mine doesn't.

We don't have it, but the store up the highway does ;)

What I did notice in the store was that the 26" TV's look really small, but that could also be because its surrounded by 50" TV's and it makes it look like a 15" monitor next to a 22 inch one. Nonetheless, I think I will go with the 26" since those extra $250 can be put into something else, considering I will not be viewing the TV from too far away.

Now, what else do I need to buy, Chris? Besides the PSP, obviously :p

We don't have it, but the store up the highway does ;)

What I did notice in the store was that the 26" TV's look really small, but that could also be because its surrounded by 50" TV's and it makes it look like a 15" monitor next to a 22 inch one. Nonetheless, I think I will go with the 26" since those extra $250 can be put into something else, considering I will not be viewing the TV from too far away.

Now, what else do I need to buy, Chris? Besides the PSP, obviously :p

Well, get the HD box from your service provider and pick up an HDMI cable. Also, get the Monster Screen Cleaner. That thing is sick on cleaning LCD screens.

A 32" set has a 51.9% larger viewing area based on 16:9 material.

http://www.cavecreations.com/tv2.cgi

The 26" is also 16:9 :p

Well, get the HD box from your service provider and pick up an HDMI cable. Also, get the Monster Screen Cleaner. That thing is sick on cleaning LCD screens.

Mind pointing out which cable is good for the price?

  • 4 weeks later...

You have something set up wrong then, because it's a beautiful set.

Its a possiblity. The colors dont look right. The quality is great. I keep it on DiscoveryHD JUST to see the picture quality. But it seems as if the color is a little off.

So fool around with the image settings a bit. Get a calibration disc if it really bothers you.

It doesnt really bother me. Im not one of those "OMG THE PICTURE SUXXXX!!!!" type people. Im good with regular Coax. connection to be honest. But I figured HD would be MUCH MUCH better. Imma play with it a bit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!