[NFL] Raider are stuck in the past


Recommended Posts

The Raiders are stuck in the past By Paul Attner - SportingNews

paul_attner.jpgsportingnews_lo_70x24_2.gif

You look at the Raiders and see a wretched team with sullen players. You see coaches who are overmatched. You see a front office that is outclassed. The organization is stumbling through its fourth straight season of humiliation and you see no reason the ineptness will change anytime soon. All that is left is for Al Davis to fire himself.

It's almost inconceivable it has come to this, that the Raiders finally have lost every bit of the edge once associated with their name -- the physicality, the arrogance, the rogue players who won a lot and flirted constantly with improper decorum. They had an aura of invincibility, of being the rowdy guys at the end of the bar. This current crew should be drinking tea and eating crumpets. Bars should scare them.

The franchise courted its outlandish image, massaged it constantly. Davis never cared whether anyone in the NFL liked him. He was the guy in the old movies with the handlebar mustache you knew you had to boo the moment he appeared on screen. It was part of the edge he was seeking. He never fit in, and he didn't care whether he did. It was just about the Raiders and winning and self-serving proclamations of greatness. Take your pick: The club is the "team of the decades," and "the greatness of the Raiders will continue in its future." That's what Oakland's media guide says about the franchise, as if nothing has changed. But of course it has because Davis, 77, has changed.

He is old and frail, and his once masterly feel for personnel has betrayed him. He had that touch -- with trades, with quality draft picks, with the ability to bring in a veteran near the end of his career who could produce one last sterling effort. Now Davis has a roster that is barely competitive. It's embarrassing to watch these impostors. The old Raiders beat up teams on defense and threw over the top of them on offense. In the offseason, these Raiders settled for Aaron Brooks to solve their quarterback woes. Did they watch Brooks in New Orleans the past few years? If they had, they would have seen an inconsistent, undisciplined, pressure-challenged player who lacks the requisite skills to play the vertical offense Davis relishes. It made no sense at all: replace Kerry Collins, who had a decent 2005 (20 touchdowns and 12 interceptions), with someone who had 13 touchdowns and 17 interceptions.

But that is the Raider arrogance. Put Brooks in Silver and Black and somehow that will transform him into something he isn't, which is an efficient downfield passer. That is how it once was, so many times. Not anymore.

The Raiders are stuck in the past because there is no future. Jon Gruden was the team's future, but he left for Tampa after the Raiders' 2001 playoff run. Gruden wasn't good enough; he wasn't a Raider, a Davis guy. So now the answer is Art Shell, who couldn't keep his job the first time despite three playoff appearances in six seasons.

Shell, who lately had been an executive with the NFL, came in unprepared to hire a staff. His offensive coordinator, Tom Walsh, was a college football analyst on radio the past seven years. Oh yes, he also was a Raiders assistant from 1982 to 1994. That is the only pedigree he needed to return.

Once, players wanted to be Raiders. Now, Jerry Porter wants out, yet the club seems unable to figure out what to do with him. Phillip Buchanon was going to be the next great Raiders cornerback. Marques Tuiasosopo was going to be the next great Raiders quarterback. Neither happened. The team has high draft picks starting and can't compete. The record says it: Since playing in the Super Bowl after the 2002 season, the Raiders have gone 4-12, 5-11, 4-12, 0-3.

Davis was the reason for all the success. Now he is the reason for the collapse. He still meddles in the draft, still oversees the front office and the coaching staff and everything important that happens within the paranoidal walls of the organization. But it's not working anymore.

Yet he has no successor, at least not one he has identified. Davis owns 51 percent of the club. Who takes over when he can't continue? There is no NFL team more vulnerable to prolonged incompetence.

But don't expect the Raiders to understand this. It's hard to be humble when you still are the greatest.

Senior writer Paul Attner covers the NFL for Sporting News. E-mail him at [email protected].

Source: Sports.yahoo.com

Edited by ripgut
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/500587-nfl-raider-are-stuck-in-the-past/
Share on other sites

Marques Tuiasosopo

Jerry Porter

("the next big things")(porter and tuiasopo where going to be the raider in 5-10 yearrs after gannon,rice, and brown left )(gannon was going to teach Tuiasosopo to be "like him" a good QB)(porter is mad we got moss, the raiders said he will be the #1 guy, but when the raiders got moss, porter was the #2 guy)

Robert Gallery

(he was also the next big thing)(gallery was going to make the O line better, witch it seems this year he is bad pick)

Phillip Buchanon

(was going to be the next charles woodson)(he will get pick on because he was young for his 1st 2 years)(the raiders didnt want to wait so they trade him to the Texans

Charles Woodson

(the best pick from the raiders)(well the best pick in years)(was going to be the greatest raider CB of all time)(but yet his time as a raider is over :( )

Aaron Brooks

Kerry Collins

(the raiders got brooks and collins witch they hoped that they will be the next gannon)(both are not a field general like gannon, they dont led a team)

there are 2 other reasons, or maybe the real problems.

the 1st on is bad offseasons, AL Davis is suck in the past, he thinks one draft pick or one big name will fix the raiders. he thinks the raiders will pull trough with greatness, just because there the raiders.

the 2nd is the players think they have there jobs, the raiders think they dont need to try to win, they think they will win.

look at moss, he walks up and down the game, walking routs. jerry porter did the same thing he doesnt attack the ball. sapp hasnt played good football with the raiders. his best season is this year in the raiders. the raiders D are doing good, im mean they are trying and its looking good. i see the WRs (not moss or jerry) trying, i see a young QB that is will to play, i see a bad online. i think the raiders need to get a better oline next year, im not talking about a quick fix but they have porter, witch isnt playing they could trade him for a o line man, trade even moss for a o line man. and tell the o line there is a battle for there jobs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!