Neowin.net Xbox Community Leaderboards


Recommended Posts

oh yeah he does say that...well anyway, it's up to PabUK to make the determination i suppose, this is his invention here. so what will it be?

i can live with 3 month inactivity, but then again this would have to be an ongoing process, weekly or so. it may take some work!

Are people suggesting we manually check the last time all 250 users logged on every time we want to add new people to the list? That would be extremely time-consuming. I'm all for removing inactive users (say after 6 months of inactivity) from time to time, but I don't think it would be workable as a regular way of allowing new members in.

My idea requires a lot less effort. New member posts their gamertag, their gamerscore is checked against that of position #240 on the list and if it's higher they take the place of the person who is #250. The same rules would allow previous members back onto the list; if they later improve their score to above that of position #240, they also post here and then take the place of #250. The reason for using #240 would be to prevent micro-managing members, whereby people are constantly in and out of the list. Even so, it would not be much of a challenge for someone to keep or earn a position, as the gamerscores at the lower end of the list are likely to remain quite low.

Are people suggesting we manually check the last time all 250 users logged on every time we want to add new people to the list? That would be extremely time-consuming. I'm all for removing inactive users (say after 6 months of inactivity) from time to time, but I don't think it would be workable as a regular way of allowing new members in.

No, that would not be practical at all on a day to day basis but that could be used for a one-of-a-time crop of the current inactive players out of the leaderboard.

If you need to, I can help. I can scan the leaderboard for the inactive players and give you the list of players who have not played for a time limit of your choice.

In the end, you're the head-hocho of the leaderboard: you will be the guy who will remove the members so that's your choice.

once monthly? tri-monthly?

heck, i say leave the whole thing alone, but i do acknowledge that then we're running the risk of stagnation. so my vote is inactivity for over three months, checked every couple of months.

we can't do it based on gamerscore i think. it's too harsh. what if someone with 100K wants to join? so we kick out number 250. why not kick out number 249 or number 23? 100K will be more than all of them combined!

we can't do it based on gamerscore i think. it's too harsh. what if someone with 100K wants to join? so we kick out number 250. why not kick out number 249 or number 23? 100K will be more than all of them combined!

Because it's a top 250 leaderboard. The 250 Neowin members with the highest gamerscore. So someone with a greater gamerscore than the bottom of the list is obviously going to take that place, as the lowest person no longer has a top 250 score. You are treating it like it's not a leaderboard, but simply a collection of members who play Xbox 360. The Gamers Index better suits that purpose.

As a compromise, I say we should first remove the inactive members. Anyone who hasn't been active for the past 6 months goes. After that, if there's still members who want in, it changes to the system outlined in my previous post. This continues for 3-6 months whereby we repeat the inactivity cull. Best of both worlds; we remain a top 250 leaderboard but consist only of active Neowin gamers.

So, who wants to go through the entire list looking for inactive members? :p

<silence in reply to that last question>

OK, agree with your compromise. sounds fair enough. never thought of it as a truly competitive ranking, you're right about that. i mean, what if 100 new people want to join within a month, and all have over 50K? so, let's go with your suggestion. now to find a patsy!

It is done. I've removed the four longest inactive members based on the list Vykranth sent me, which is those that haven't played for over 6 months and haven't signed in to Xbox.com. Those removed may rejoin like anyone else if they become active again.

Thanks to the removals, I've been able to add the following people to the list:

Timan25

danisflying527

Omnicoder

LonelyCooler

So welcome to those four. If I missed anyone, please post again in this thread of PM me with your gamertag so I can add you.

For future signups I'll go back to Vykranth's lists and check who is still inactive. Thanks again to Vykranth for putting in the effort to find the inactive members, it was a big help. :) (Y)

Glad you guys worked it all out as well as have a list to faster check who is inactive more.

I was going to add when I got a chance (now) that either the person that wants to get added to the leaderboard could scan themselves if they really would like to be added. Then provide those or one inactive.

Also (not sure if MGC does this at all) but for the leaderboards and accounts no longer a gamertag get removed and not just inactivity. I like the inactivity rule myself who have not played in over 6 months, heck even 3 months might be suitable. Especially if like that person is inactive a lot but that info would need to be written down to even be remembered, checked every so often and probably just a waste of time.

thanks a lot Vyk and Pab - looks like we have a working solution. You did good, i really appreciate the effort and time spent. hope there's an achievement in there for you...50G min.

and welcome to the new recruits, let's hope they do better than the cannon fodder they're replacing...

Thanks for the thanks, I appreciate that.

For a little behind the scene DVD bonus, it took me roughly two hours to go through the leaderboard and look for inactive players. What surprised me is that the leaderboard is far more lively one would think, I expected that there were many more inactive players. The great majority of the players plays once every week, sometimes every day.

Now back to hunting scary thingies in F.E.A.R. 2

If anyone here owns GTA IV (or not) and is looking to purchase the new GTA IV DLC The Lost and Damned for 1600 MS points. I can say you should not be disappointed with it at all (heads up on space as it is 1.78GB). Minus aside the very easy 250 achievement points it adds, I very much enjoyed it and think others will too. It took me around 5 hours? Without checking at stats.

The final mission (won't spoil) I thought was very awesome (almost as awesome but not better than the Bank Job in Niko's story), there were a few other missions I enjoyed too and some will be familiar if you played through the original GTA IV storyline.

This puts me at 87,000 GS. Making my way up to 100,000 GS as soon as possible. :)

hope you're feeling better jonny. what is glandular fever btw?

and can't wait to play the new GTAIV stuff...it's been days since i gamed and not sure when the next time will be.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infectious_mononucleosis

I'm in the process of finishing GTA IV so I can buy the DLC. Can't believe I stopped playing this game, it's so good.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do; get an innate understanding of the night sky or a "quicker" path to astrophotography end results. I put "quicker" in quotes because with my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions, half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, spending a few hours shooting, merging photo sessions, etc. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!