Server 2003 as Wireless Access Point / Router


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

[in Brief]

Currently I have a wireless router in the living room with a laptop connected to it, the laptop has a 160gb network share on it.

My question is this, can I just scrap the wireless router, connect my cable modem direct to my laptop, add a USB wireless dongle, install Windows 2003 server and somehow make a PC based Wireless Access Point / Router??

It seems a bit pointless to have 2 items drawing umpteen amount of watt-age when 1 could do....

Ideas?

A guide to perform this would be much appreciated!

Thanks,

SilverB.

It is possible, I've been doing it for the last six months. It's not really worth it IMO. You will have to run special hardware and software for it to work. I use this card and run a program named "Marvell 802.11g SoftAP Configuration" on my rig. It works well enough on a stable pc but the range isn't quite as good an actual wireless router. I'm saving up now to buy me a decent router.

  • 3 weeks later...

It is possible, I've been doing it for the last six months. It's not really worth it IMO. You will have to run special hardware and software for it to work. I use this card and run a program named "Marvell 802.11g SoftAP Configuration" on my rig. It works well enough on a stable pc but the range isn't quite as good an actual wireless router. I'm saving up now to buy me a decent router.

I have the same card under a different label. Mine is an Encore ENLWI-G. Any chance you could point me to a source for that "Marvell 802.11g SoftAP Configuration" utility? I haven't found it anywhere but the Marvell website, which looks like it requires some kind of company affiliation or something to get the files (I didn't bother trying to obtain a copy from them - I'm an individual, not w/ a company).

This SoftAP utility wasn't included with Encore's driver CD either. :(

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

It seems a bit pointless to have 2 items drawing umpteen amount of watt-age when 1 could do....

So the point of this is to save money on your power bill? Have you calculated how much power a wireless router uses?? Your talking pennies!!

From a quick search, looks like a linksys wrt54g uses less than 6 watts

http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54GS

total power is always arround 5.3 W

Using this calc

http://www.csgnetwork.com/elecenergycalcs.html

the lowest they have 6 watts, but even running that for 720 hours in a month your looking $0.44 in your being charged the national average of $0.10120 per KWH)

Figure out what the power consumption of your router is -- and do the math.. But its PENNIES!!

So you want to run a wireless Card in your server.. This card will draw power as well! Really about the only thing drawing power in the router is the wireless card.. Open one up.. pretty much a wireless card with some added circuitry.. So where is the cost savings?

Can a computer with a wireless card be used as a wireless router/bridge -- sure with the correct hardware and software.. But to do such a thing when you have perfectly good router as a cost saving measure is just, well crazy! ;)

BTW - if you do find software that runs on 2k3 and a wireless card.. There's a good chance its not going to be FREE, nor would I think it would support all the bells and whistles of a dedicated wireless router, or one running some 3rd party firmware..

Edited by BudMan

Not to mention that routers have NAT, firewall, dhcp and mac filtering in a very easy to use format. You don't have to worry about updates, AV and the likes. There is also less chance of the device being hacked.

Look at the newer routers. You can have NAS, usb sharing (ie printers), web servers, ftp servers and even a bittorrent client/server. All for less than the cost of a set of hard drives and wi-fi card.

There are also a lot better solutions to Server. Look at ZoneCD or Zero-Shell for that "wi-fi hotspot" setup.

Ummmm, I'm just lookin' for a utility that's compatible with my wifi card (Marvell 8335 chipset). I'm well aware of the plethora of routers which are plenty capable of being both very useful, and efficient on power consumption.

If anyone can help me out, great! If not, oh well. Thus far, two replies and no help.

Ummmm, I'm just lookin' for a utility that's compatible with my wifi card (Marvell 8335 chipset). I'm well aware of the plethora of routers which are plenty capable of being both very useful, and efficient on power consumption.

If anyone can help me out, great! If not, oh well. Thus far, two replies and no help.

So you try an hijack a thread, and then complain when nobody helps you ;)

What chipset is that card? Marvell W8300 ? If so - thats the same as the WL-138g, is it not? Which they provide the softap in their driver download

WL-138g

ftp://dlsvr03.asus.com/pub/ASUS/wireless/...8g/Eng_2265.zip

Description The ASUS WL-138g WLAN PCI Card utility release note and utility progrm in English, version 2.2.6.5.

a. The ASUS WL-138g WLAN PCI Card utility progrm in English.

b. Utility release note(2.2.6.5)

1. Update: SoftAP Driver v.2.5.0.6.

Which should work -- I would assume.. here some info on setting it up from a search for WL-138g softap

http://www.nat32.com/nat32e/htm/asus.htm

Yeah, I'm apparently hijacking a thread. Sorry. :D

Chipset is Marvell 8335 - identical NIC to the person who posted post #2 in this thread. His post is the main reason I'm posting in this thread - he claims to have a utility which I require, and the only difference between his card and mine is the sticker over the metal shielding.

The Asus drivers won't work (been there, done that, no go). I've tried drivers from a lot of places, some with SoftAP, some without, and with few drivers working (the Marvell generic drivers seem to be best, providing WAP2 capability, where the manufacturer's drivers don't). Aparently the SoftAP utility is embedded with the Asus driver/config utility, as it will not run - it says "hey, I don't see an Asus card, I'm exiting," because I don't have an Asus card.

I'm hoping "Mr. Dick C. Normous" might still have a copy of this utility approximately 3 weeks after his post in this thread.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
    • On my music making (non internet) PC Sony Acid Pro 7.0 Adobe Audition 2015 Korg Legacy Collection Windows 7 SP1
    • Anyway to download these versions without being on the Experimental builds?
    • Nothing is stopping you from continuing with your testing cadence. If updates are released every 2 weeks instead of 4, and you test once every 4 weeks, the exact same amount of patches will still be available for you in those 4 weeks. For example: Before 4th week - patch 1, 2, 3, 4 After 2nd week - patch 1 and 2 4th week - patch 3 and 4 Still the same amount after 4.
    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!