List Your Overclocks..


Recommended Posts

CPU: Athlon XP 2500+ (Barton Core 512KB L2 Cache) - Rated at 2800+ (2.09 GHz)

RAM: 512MB DDR PC2700 (Currently limiting my FSB overclocking)

GPU: MSI (I know but it was cheap :D) GeForec MX 5200 (Currently not O/C'd, dont see the point)

PSU: QTEC 550W Dual Fan Gold

HDDs: Primary: IBM Deskstar 60GB (Can't remeber specs but here's model number IC35L060AWA07-0)

Secondary: Maxtor Diamond Max 9 8MB Cache Version (should really be main but in process of setting up HDDs for a 2nd PC :p)

Case: iCute Case Purchased from Maplin Electronics

Lighting: Maplin Electronics 2 Cold Cathode Kit with UV tube replaced for a Red one (btw i work there so i get staff discount :p)

Cooling: The terrible fan the case came with, and Second Hand Akasa manual speed control fan with 4 blue LEDs (Speed thingy doesn't work too well, LEDs arent bright enough)

Planned Mods: HDD Window (risky but worth it), DVD-Rom window (not too interesting but easy), Water Cooling (one day, maybe, if i cba)

i overclocked my sisters athlon 1400 to 1500 and now it runs IDLE 65C and doesn't complete any cycles of prime95(even at idle) and when it runs seti @home for a long time it get to 78-80C and its got a stock heatsink with stock fan in a poorly ventalated case inside a cabinet. ill post screenshots laters, AMD's sure can take a beating

1700+ 1.47GHz @ 205FSB 2.46GHz ~3400+

205 * 12.0 Multiplier, 410DDR Memory

1.75volts, vcore voltage

Alpha 8045 80mm

50C Full Load Temp

Just look at my sig.

obscure detour

you don't have a 3400, but it is a hellafast cpu!!! :o

your 1700 is based on the palomino core and only has a 256kb cache and not 512 like the barton..so you cannot use the same PR rating.

unbelievable overclock though, notwithstanding. very impressive! ;)

Oc'd my p4 to 3.2 stable using bios AI overclocking featurebut that ran the memory at only 160Mhx

Oc'd my manual to 2964 fsb @ 228MHz (2.4-4-4-8) stable but backed off to 225Mhz/450DDR and 900QDR FSB speed for added stability, i plan to raise my cas to 3 and see if i can get a bit higher clock speed, i've read that with dual channel memory cas latency has much less impact.

1700+ 1.47GHz @ 205FSB 2.46GHz ~3400+

205 * 12.0 Multiplier, 410DDR Memory

1.75volts, vcore voltage

Alpha 8045 80mm

50C Full Load Temp

Just look at my sig.

obscure detour

you don't have a 3400, but it is a hellafast cpu!!! :o

your 1700 is based on the palomino core and only has a 256kb cache and not 512 like the barton..so you cannot use the same PR rating.

unbelievable overclock though, notwithstanding. very impressive! ;)

You are right, impressive, it should burn out and not boot someday soon...lol. ;)

ANYONE that wants a very ocable AMD should make sure they get a DLT3C JIUHB core. those are beasts! by the way, mine aint nothin much cause i am very limited by the Mobo. it is an AMD 2000+ runnin at 1.8 ghz(so a 2200+) and the mobo is a shuttle MK35N. it is bein cooled by a volcano 12 runnin 60 degrees under load and 54 idle(the fan is half way and the side of the case is off.

AMD Athlon 2600+ (2.08 Ghz; 166 MHz FSB) OC to 170 FSB ~2.1 GHz...yeah, i'm 1337. I could try and push it farther, the volcano 7 that I have on it is going at full speed all the time, so I think I might have some leeway.

Radeon 9700 PRO A-I-W 325MHz to 330MHz

AMD K6-2 550MHz to 600MHz

I vary my OC all the time with my 2.4C, it runs stable at 3 GHz with default voltages with my Coolermaster Aero 7+, however I got it running at stock speeds right now because I haven't had the chance to push it back up after a bizarre incident where I pushed it a little further and it completely failed to POST with a BIOS checksum error. Made a downright amusing beep as well, it went from a higher tone to a lower in a screechy style of a beep like an old tape player losing power.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers like me was eager to get. And that main feature that developers will love it`s the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!