Resistance Fall of Man Downgraded to 720p


Recommended Posts

?Native 1080p (versus 720p scaled to 1080p) uses much more VRAM than 720p. When we finished up a few of our bigger levels at the very end of the development process we realized that we would have had to steal VRAM from some of our characters and environments to run in native 1080p. Anyway, we felt it was best to stay at 720p and that, at least while 1080p televisions are still relatively scarce, we should focus on implementing 1080p for our future games.? - Ted Price

http://www.gamecaption.com/2006/10/20/resi...man-downgraded/


oooooooook! :rolleyes:

now that this game is supposed to run at 720p insteed of 1080p are they still using the 22gb of the BD and 300mb per level? :rolleyes: :shifty: :whistle:

I want to hear all the new excuses for this... :p

A game that was never 1080p.

http://www.gamepro.com/news.cfm?article_id=80048 :shifty:

The Hi Definition era starts when they say it does eh :p

Most people aren't going to notice a difference anyway. I don't see why it's a big deal.

Because Sony was being childish making up names for resolutions (ie "Full HD" which is very misleading as 720p is also FullHD as is 1080i), because they thought the Xbox 360 couldnt do 1080p native, now they have fallen flat on their ass and i, for one, am very happy, they need to be brought down a peg or two.

Edited by Sheppard
lol, what about those TVs a while back with 1080p True HD written on them, im sure one of them was playing RFOM... another overestimation?
Just because the TV says 1080p (which it can do) doesn't mean it won't display lesser resolutions. It's very possible it was running at 720p
Most people aren't going to notice a difference anyway. I don't see why it's a big deal.

I agree, but a lot of people said that 1080p was the only way HiDef should be seen because Sony said so... They made a big deal about it before when they thought the 360 wouldn't have it, so it's a big deal now that the truth comes out. The dirty Sony marketing machine... :no:

Just because the TV says 1080p (which it can do) doesn't mean it won't display lesser resolutions. It's very possible it was running at 720p

I agree, but a lot of people said that 1080p was the only way HiDef should be seen because Sony said so... They made a big deal about it before when they thought the 360 wouldn't have it, so it's a big deal now that the truth comes out. The dirty Sony marketing machine... :no:

the reason for putting them lables on was to show that the game was running in 1080p, Sony were showcasing thier ps3s at the time and not thier TVs...

I doubt the 256MB of VRAM was really the limitation they ran into. They're just trying to simplify things since it's a lot more complicated to explain that the PS3 lacks anywhere near enough memory bandwidth to do 1080p in any real-world scenarios. The RSX has the same memory bandwidth as a Geforce 6800 (and not a GT or Ultra). The hardware was simply never designed to be used at the resolution (whereas the 360 with its eDRAM backbuffer and tiling architecture is much more adaptable to such a use).

Edited by Brandon Live

If the game still looks and plays like the videos shown you cant take away the fact it will be a stellar game :yes:

However all the 1080p talk is frustrating. We dont want ridge racer to be the ONLY game to be able to run at it. :no: :laugh:

next 64 player multiplayer will be downgraded to 16 player.. When I heard in 1up that Resistance has 1080p with 64 player online, I could smell the bs.

No idea where you got that... the developers have been saying 40 player for months now.

Hah. Kinda funny.

Maybe Sony should have unified the memory? Oops.

There are two reasons things ended up the way they did:

1) Sony waited til the last minute (in their design process) to decide to even use a GPU, when they realized that Cell wasn't all it was cracked up to be and that their original PS2-style everything-in-software approach didn't work (graphically speaking) against the original Xbox and GameCube and that it was going to get them destroyed when they went up against the simplicity of designing for the 360 and Wii.

-The result of this was a GPU that was bolted onto the architecture (leading to the segregated memory and other goofs) and the use of what is essentially a PC part, not one designed for a console.

2) Sony spent way too much money on everything else to afford a decent GPU and fast memory for it. So they had Nvidia license them a PC part on the cheap. It's basically a customized Geforce 6800 (in the same way that the original Xbox chip was a customized NV20 / Geforce 3).

It has the same memory bandwidth as a plain "vanilla" Geforce 6800. It will largely be bound to the same resolution, FSAA, and HDR capabilities of that card. It certainly has advantages over the 6800 in raw pixel-pushing and shader capabilities. But those aren't going to get you 1080p.

However all the 1080p talk is frustrating. We dont want ridge racer to be the ONLY game to be able to run at it. :no: :laugh:

The way things are going for Sony recently you might not have to worry about that, 1080p could end up pulled from Ridge Racer too :p

The way things are going for Sony recently you might not have to worry about that, 1080p could end up pulled from Ridge Racer too :p

:laugh: The PS3: Sony's Vista.

All this development time, and by the time either comes out, people will be like, "That's it?" It's a good thing the PS2 has a strong game library, as I really don't want a x360 or Wii, as none of the games really interest me on those systems, and I still am a bit jaded over the PSP.

There are two reasons things ended up the way they did:

1) Sony waited til the last minute (in their design process) to decide to even use a GPU, when they realized that Cell wasn't all it was cracked up to be and that their original PS2-style everything-in-software approach didn't work (graphically speaking) against the original Xbox and GameCube and that it was going to get them destroyed when they went up against the simplicity of designing for the 360 and Wii.

-The result of this was a GPU that was bolted onto the architecture (leading to the segregated memory and other goofs) and the use of what is essentially a PC part, not one designed for a console.

2) Sony spent way too much money on everything else to afford a decent GPU and fast memory for it. So they had Nvidia license them a PC part on the cheap. It's basically a customized Geforce 6800 (in the same way that the original Xbox chip was a customized NV20 / Geforce 3).

It has the same memory bandwidth as a plain "vanilla" Geforce 6800. It will largely be bound to the same resolution, FSAA, and HDR capabilities of that card. It certainly has advantages over the 6800 in raw pixel-pushing and shader capabilities. But those aren't going to get you 1080p.

blah blah blah, what are u some sort of Micro$oft stooge/goon? ... oh wait a sec... :yes:

So what he works for Microsoft, that doesn't make him any less qualified to know what hes talking about or to voice his opinion. Everyone including Sony were making a big hoot about the fact the PS3 will do its "Full HD" named 1080p, now all the games are either being downgraded to 720p and/or downgraded in quality to fit 1080p and now all the Sony fanboys have either gone quiet or saying "oh you wont notice the difference" i think its quite funny, now go back to the Wii forum and wait for your glorified gamecube.

Oh the irony that the PS3s' biggest shooter is running in 720p where as stuff like Lost Planet and Halo 3 on the 360 is going to offer 1080p.

Can you imagine the wacking Sony is going to get if the 360 ends up getting MORE titles offering 1080p in the next year than the PS3?

It's amost as if MS baited Sony to make a big deal over 1080p and then BAM!

I just wish they would both stick to 720p anyway. MS was right. 720p is the sweet spot for this generation and these types of games would look better in 720p without having to worry about supporting 1080p for the 1% of people who have TVs that support it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!