Need for Speed Carbon demo!


Recommended Posts

I checked out the screenies, and have a question. There is one screenshot with an icon in the upper left corner of the screen. then in another screenshot, there is a green arrow looking thing next to it. Is this some sort of meter for something? I was trying to get a handle on all of the items on the screen, and the thing in the upper left kinda got me scratching my head.

Wow, this really is the worst Need for Speed game to date.

I had high expectations after watching all of those gameplay videos they released a while ago.

This demo of the game is a complete disaster.

- The gameplay is exactly the same as Most Wanted.

- The new customization options are useless.

- Motion blur is far too blurry.

- Lower detailed levels.

This is another of EA's big rip-offs. Now I know why this game had such a short development period.

It's an amateuristic Most Wanted modification.

Ok there, what the hell was that...Most Wanted which is a YEAR older has better looking graphics at lower requirements. (I have an ATi Mobility X1400).

I can almost run Most Wanted on HIGH @ 1024*768 with no lag, and I set this game to LOW (everything) @ 1024*768 and it lags like a bitch and the graphics look terrible even at HIGH!

This is the worst NFS game to date as Vista just said in the above post, I'll stick with Most Wanted. Also, all NFS games have had the same development period if you don't know. There is an NFS game released almost EVERY October or November of a year. They usually start right after they release a new game.

This is Need for Speed Underground all over again...

EDIT: I should also add the racing in this game very much like Gran Turismo or something, the cars are too slow.

I will have to disagree with Vista on the gameplay part and agree with TheGriffin, it is nothing like Most Wanted as that was fast; action paced; adrenaline pumping, this is just slow and boring.

And yes it looks terrible even with all the settings maxed out, runs fine on my conroe though.

Oh and its freakin' dark, feels like I'm driving around in a doom3 level or something.

good question

I agree with you. After making us wait for so long, the gave us this crap. I am so happy I didn't order the game yet. After testing the DEMO, I will definatelly not buy this game at all. One of the worst NFS (if not the worst) series, definatelly. Shame on EA

Demo Review

Firstly I have to say Im v.impressed by the Demo. Previous games have lacked that X Factor and for me the last great NFS:U game was the original NSF:U itself. This however I really like and will now continue with the reasons as to why.

Physics wise the game is much much better. The game now has a much lighter feel to the car and its response on the road. Vehicles now lift off the ground and distort mid air as you apply steering. Something i found a little sluggish and un-responsive.

Worringly tho if all the vehicles handle this way then that might count against the release, however for me this is a plus point.

Gameplay wise things arent to different to previous games. With many modes much like there previous counterparts. Drift mode now seems a little more forgiving and has a much nicer feel to it due to the improved physics in the game. Tho some die hard fans may feel its a little too easy.

Canyon races are an interesting addition tho from previous games i would of expected a little more work here as they seem to be little more than a slightly more fleshed out version of the non-integral chase races in NFS:U2

Personally i wasnt too happy that should you fail the 2nd half of these theres no way to continue from the halfway point.

Lastly the autosculp feature is a very very nice addition with a much higher level of car customization available. Tho sadly I feel cheated that the previous games customization options have gone in favour of this.

But overall the game has nice well polished feel to it and does seem to be going back to its roots, be it at a loss of some of the features that made previous games good.

8.5/10

Wow, this really is the worst Need for Speed game to date.

I had high expectations after watching all of those gameplay videos they released a while ago.

This demo of the game is a complete disaster.

- The gameplay is exactly the same as Most Wanted.

- The new customization options are useless.

- Motion blur is far too blurry.

- Lower detailed levels.

This is another of EA's big rip-offs. Now I know why this game had such a short development period.

It's an amateuristic Most Wanted modification.

Ok there, what the hell was that...Most Wanted which is a YEAR older has better looking graphics at lower requirements. (I have an ATi Mobility X1400).

I can almost run Most Wanted on HIGH @ 1024*768 with no lag, and I set this game to LOW (everything) @ 1024*768 and it lags like a bitch and the graphics look terrible even at HIGH!

This is the worst NFS game to date as Vista just said in the above post, I'll stick with Most Wanted. Also, all NFS games have had the same development period if you don't know. There is an NFS game released almost EVERY October or November of a year. They usually start right after they release a new game.

This is Need for Speed Underground all over again...

EDIT: I should also add the racing in this game very much like Gran Turismo or something, the cars are too slow.

Agreed to both of your posts. This demo is utter crap compared to even Most Wanted's demo.

Graphics look pale and blotchy, at graphic settings identical to that of Most Wanted. Initially I thought it was because I had outdated ForceWare drivers (83.60, but these drivers work best for the games I play).

The first circuit race... bleh. Didn't seem as fast paced as races in MW. What's up with 'call crew member' anyway?

The drift was purely WTF when I tried it with the Gallardo. I turn a little bit and the car instantly flies to a 70? in no time, like as if the ground was slippery as hell - just likeUnderground>. :rolleyes::

Can't say much about the canyon race, although it took me nine tries before I switched to the Lancer Evolution... and won the race instantly. :huh:: The facial animation of that driver washorrible> - why couldn't they just render it using CGI video instead of using the in-game engine? They rendered a short 10 second video of the camera hovering over the mountain... couldn't they have just kept it that way? (Although one nice improvement is the racers are no longer the same generic brown-haired guy with a leather jacket behind the wheel.)

The menu system sucks, period. One, I can't adjust any controls until I enter the game. Two, no options to customize HUD (which looks like crap) or change from the imperial to metrical systems. Three... it just feels like a direct port from a console. Any previous NFS game demos before this had UIs appropriate for PC games. I'm hoping this UI is only like this because it's just a demo. And four, no options to shut off that damn soundtrack... yet.

I'll probably take running from cops over this "owning" of territories, thanks. This is as bad as having to dress up your car just to get anywhere in the Underground games.

edit: Come to think of it, even though I wasn't too fond of Underground 2 over Underground 1 because of its forced free roam mode and useless "media attraction" crap, the racing and detail levels were far improved in Underground 2, as well as the overall feel of the cars. I can't say the same for this when comparing it to MW.

Edited by rm20010

Agreed to both of your posts. This demo is utter crap compared to even Most Wanted's demo.

Graphics look pale and blotchy, at graphic settings identical to that of Most Wanted. Initially I thought it was because I had outdated ForceWare drivers (83.60, but these drivers work best for the games I play).

The first circuit race... bleh. Didn't seem as fast paced as races in MW. What's up with 'call crew member' anyway?

The drift was purely WTF when I tried it with the Gallardo. I turn a little bit and the car instantly flies to a 70? in no time, like as if the ground was slippery as hell - just likeUnderground>. :rolleyes::

Can't say much about the canyon race, although it took me nine tries before I switched to the Lancer Evolution... and won the race instantly. :huh:: The facial animation of that driver washorrible> - why couldn't they just render it using CGI video instead of using the in-game engine? They rendered a short 10 second video of the camera hovering over the mountain... couldn't they have just kept it that way? (Although one nice improvement is the racers are no longer the same generic brown-haired guy with a leather jacket behind the wheel.)

The menu system sucks, period. One, I can't adjust any controls until I enter the game. Two, no options to customize HUD (which looks like crap) or change from the imperial to metrical systems. Three... it just feels like a direct port from a console. Any previous NFS game demos before this had UIs appropriate for PC games. I'm hoping this UI is only like this because it's just a demo. And four, no options to shut off that damn soundtrack... yet.

I'll probably take running from cops over this "owning" of territories, thanks. This is as bad as having to dress up your car just to get anywhere in the Underground games.

edit: Come to think of it, even though I wasn't too fond of Underground 2 over Underground 1 because of its forced free roam mode and useless "media attraction" crap, the racing and detail levels were far improved in Underground 2, as well as the overall feel of the cars. I can't say the same for this when comparing it to MW.

you should read up more on Carbon.

what a disapointment :( just sad really. it is atually worse then most wanted. I cant tell from demo if its boring, but its nothing as fun as MW was with police mode, where you could play countless hours. here you just finish and be done with it :(

the drift mode is terrible! and also the new mode where you score points is lame, and very hard for some reason.

it feels very childish old scool game for some reason...scoring points. bah!!!!

graphicaly it was not bad, but then again i cant judge very well since its night :p and i guess full game wont have day maps.

anyway its not worst nfs...nfs7 was worse :D for you dumies its undeground :) so this is like a mod for already bad game :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!