Need for Speed Carbon demo!


Recommended Posts

I checked out the screenies, and have a question. There is one screenshot with an icon in the upper left corner of the screen. then in another screenshot, there is a green arrow looking thing next to it. Is this some sort of meter for something? I was trying to get a handle on all of the items on the screen, and the thing in the upper left kinda got me scratching my head.

Wow, this really is the worst Need for Speed game to date.

I had high expectations after watching all of those gameplay videos they released a while ago.

This demo of the game is a complete disaster.

- The gameplay is exactly the same as Most Wanted.

- The new customization options are useless.

- Motion blur is far too blurry.

- Lower detailed levels.

This is another of EA's big rip-offs. Now I know why this game had such a short development period.

It's an amateuristic Most Wanted modification.

Ok there, what the hell was that...Most Wanted which is a YEAR older has better looking graphics at lower requirements. (I have an ATi Mobility X1400).

I can almost run Most Wanted on HIGH @ 1024*768 with no lag, and I set this game to LOW (everything) @ 1024*768 and it lags like a bitch and the graphics look terrible even at HIGH!

This is the worst NFS game to date as Vista just said in the above post, I'll stick with Most Wanted. Also, all NFS games have had the same development period if you don't know. There is an NFS game released almost EVERY October or November of a year. They usually start right after they release a new game.

This is Need for Speed Underground all over again...

EDIT: I should also add the racing in this game very much like Gran Turismo or something, the cars are too slow.

I will have to disagree with Vista on the gameplay part and agree with TheGriffin, it is nothing like Most Wanted as that was fast; action paced; adrenaline pumping, this is just slow and boring.

And yes it looks terrible even with all the settings maxed out, runs fine on my conroe though.

Oh and its freakin' dark, feels like I'm driving around in a doom3 level or something.

good question

I agree with you. After making us wait for so long, the gave us this crap. I am so happy I didn't order the game yet. After testing the DEMO, I will definatelly not buy this game at all. One of the worst NFS (if not the worst) series, definatelly. Shame on EA

Demo Review

Firstly I have to say Im v.impressed by the Demo. Previous games have lacked that X Factor and for me the last great NFS:U game was the original NSF:U itself. This however I really like and will now continue with the reasons as to why.

Physics wise the game is much much better. The game now has a much lighter feel to the car and its response on the road. Vehicles now lift off the ground and distort mid air as you apply steering. Something i found a little sluggish and un-responsive.

Worringly tho if all the vehicles handle this way then that might count against the release, however for me this is a plus point.

Gameplay wise things arent to different to previous games. With many modes much like there previous counterparts. Drift mode now seems a little more forgiving and has a much nicer feel to it due to the improved physics in the game. Tho some die hard fans may feel its a little too easy.

Canyon races are an interesting addition tho from previous games i would of expected a little more work here as they seem to be little more than a slightly more fleshed out version of the non-integral chase races in NFS:U2

Personally i wasnt too happy that should you fail the 2nd half of these theres no way to continue from the halfway point.

Lastly the autosculp feature is a very very nice addition with a much higher level of car customization available. Tho sadly I feel cheated that the previous games customization options have gone in favour of this.

But overall the game has nice well polished feel to it and does seem to be going back to its roots, be it at a loss of some of the features that made previous games good.

8.5/10

Wow, this really is the worst Need for Speed game to date.

I had high expectations after watching all of those gameplay videos they released a while ago.

This demo of the game is a complete disaster.

- The gameplay is exactly the same as Most Wanted.

- The new customization options are useless.

- Motion blur is far too blurry.

- Lower detailed levels.

This is another of EA's big rip-offs. Now I know why this game had such a short development period.

It's an amateuristic Most Wanted modification.

Ok there, what the hell was that...Most Wanted which is a YEAR older has better looking graphics at lower requirements. (I have an ATi Mobility X1400).

I can almost run Most Wanted on HIGH @ 1024*768 with no lag, and I set this game to LOW (everything) @ 1024*768 and it lags like a bitch and the graphics look terrible even at HIGH!

This is the worst NFS game to date as Vista just said in the above post, I'll stick with Most Wanted. Also, all NFS games have had the same development period if you don't know. There is an NFS game released almost EVERY October or November of a year. They usually start right after they release a new game.

This is Need for Speed Underground all over again...

EDIT: I should also add the racing in this game very much like Gran Turismo or something, the cars are too slow.

Agreed to both of your posts. This demo is utter crap compared to even Most Wanted's demo.

Graphics look pale and blotchy, at graphic settings identical to that of Most Wanted. Initially I thought it was because I had outdated ForceWare drivers (83.60, but these drivers work best for the games I play).

The first circuit race... bleh. Didn't seem as fast paced as races in MW. What's up with 'call crew member' anyway?

The drift was purely WTF when I tried it with the Gallardo. I turn a little bit and the car instantly flies to a 70? in no time, like as if the ground was slippery as hell - just likeUnderground>. :rolleyes::

Can't say much about the canyon race, although it took me nine tries before I switched to the Lancer Evolution... and won the race instantly. :huh:: The facial animation of that driver washorrible> - why couldn't they just render it using CGI video instead of using the in-game engine? They rendered a short 10 second video of the camera hovering over the mountain... couldn't they have just kept it that way? (Although one nice improvement is the racers are no longer the same generic brown-haired guy with a leather jacket behind the wheel.)

The menu system sucks, period. One, I can't adjust any controls until I enter the game. Two, no options to customize HUD (which looks like crap) or change from the imperial to metrical systems. Three... it just feels like a direct port from a console. Any previous NFS game demos before this had UIs appropriate for PC games. I'm hoping this UI is only like this because it's just a demo. And four, no options to shut off that damn soundtrack... yet.

I'll probably take running from cops over this "owning" of territories, thanks. This is as bad as having to dress up your car just to get anywhere in the Underground games.

edit: Come to think of it, even though I wasn't too fond of Underground 2 over Underground 1 because of its forced free roam mode and useless "media attraction" crap, the racing and detail levels were far improved in Underground 2, as well as the overall feel of the cars. I can't say the same for this when comparing it to MW.

Edited by rm20010

Agreed to both of your posts. This demo is utter crap compared to even Most Wanted's demo.

Graphics look pale and blotchy, at graphic settings identical to that of Most Wanted. Initially I thought it was because I had outdated ForceWare drivers (83.60, but these drivers work best for the games I play).

The first circuit race... bleh. Didn't seem as fast paced as races in MW. What's up with 'call crew member' anyway?

The drift was purely WTF when I tried it with the Gallardo. I turn a little bit and the car instantly flies to a 70? in no time, like as if the ground was slippery as hell - just likeUnderground>. :rolleyes::

Can't say much about the canyon race, although it took me nine tries before I switched to the Lancer Evolution... and won the race instantly. :huh:: The facial animation of that driver washorrible> - why couldn't they just render it using CGI video instead of using the in-game engine? They rendered a short 10 second video of the camera hovering over the mountain... couldn't they have just kept it that way? (Although one nice improvement is the racers are no longer the same generic brown-haired guy with a leather jacket behind the wheel.)

The menu system sucks, period. One, I can't adjust any controls until I enter the game. Two, no options to customize HUD (which looks like crap) or change from the imperial to metrical systems. Three... it just feels like a direct port from a console. Any previous NFS game demos before this had UIs appropriate for PC games. I'm hoping this UI is only like this because it's just a demo. And four, no options to shut off that damn soundtrack... yet.

I'll probably take running from cops over this "owning" of territories, thanks. This is as bad as having to dress up your car just to get anywhere in the Underground games.

edit: Come to think of it, even though I wasn't too fond of Underground 2 over Underground 1 because of its forced free roam mode and useless "media attraction" crap, the racing and detail levels were far improved in Underground 2, as well as the overall feel of the cars. I can't say the same for this when comparing it to MW.

you should read up more on Carbon.

what a disapointment :( just sad really. it is atually worse then most wanted. I cant tell from demo if its boring, but its nothing as fun as MW was with police mode, where you could play countless hours. here you just finish and be done with it :(

the drift mode is terrible! and also the new mode where you score points is lame, and very hard for some reason.

it feels very childish old scool game for some reason...scoring points. bah!!!!

graphicaly it was not bad, but then again i cant judge very well since its night :p and i guess full game wont have day maps.

anyway its not worst nfs...nfs7 was worse :D for you dumies its undeground :) so this is like a mod for already bad game :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
    • I don't believe them that anyone using threads, at least meaningfully. It's the same thing for Facebook, people just don't engage with Meta platforms like they are thinking. This isn't 2006.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!