Need for Speed Carbon demo!


Recommended Posts

I checked out the screenies, and have a question. There is one screenshot with an icon in the upper left corner of the screen. then in another screenshot, there is a green arrow looking thing next to it. Is this some sort of meter for something? I was trying to get a handle on all of the items on the screen, and the thing in the upper left kinda got me scratching my head.

Wow, this really is the worst Need for Speed game to date.

I had high expectations after watching all of those gameplay videos they released a while ago.

This demo of the game is a complete disaster.

- The gameplay is exactly the same as Most Wanted.

- The new customization options are useless.

- Motion blur is far too blurry.

- Lower detailed levels.

This is another of EA's big rip-offs. Now I know why this game had such a short development period.

It's an amateuristic Most Wanted modification.

Ok there, what the hell was that...Most Wanted which is a YEAR older has better looking graphics at lower requirements. (I have an ATi Mobility X1400).

I can almost run Most Wanted on HIGH @ 1024*768 with no lag, and I set this game to LOW (everything) @ 1024*768 and it lags like a bitch and the graphics look terrible even at HIGH!

This is the worst NFS game to date as Vista just said in the above post, I'll stick with Most Wanted. Also, all NFS games have had the same development period if you don't know. There is an NFS game released almost EVERY October or November of a year. They usually start right after they release a new game.

This is Need for Speed Underground all over again...

EDIT: I should also add the racing in this game very much like Gran Turismo or something, the cars are too slow.

I will have to disagree with Vista on the gameplay part and agree with TheGriffin, it is nothing like Most Wanted as that was fast; action paced; adrenaline pumping, this is just slow and boring.

And yes it looks terrible even with all the settings maxed out, runs fine on my conroe though.

Oh and its freakin' dark, feels like I'm driving around in a doom3 level or something.

good question

I agree with you. After making us wait for so long, the gave us this crap. I am so happy I didn't order the game yet. After testing the DEMO, I will definatelly not buy this game at all. One of the worst NFS (if not the worst) series, definatelly. Shame on EA

Demo Review

Firstly I have to say Im v.impressed by the Demo. Previous games have lacked that X Factor and for me the last great NFS:U game was the original NSF:U itself. This however I really like and will now continue with the reasons as to why.

Physics wise the game is much much better. The game now has a much lighter feel to the car and its response on the road. Vehicles now lift off the ground and distort mid air as you apply steering. Something i found a little sluggish and un-responsive.

Worringly tho if all the vehicles handle this way then that might count against the release, however for me this is a plus point.

Gameplay wise things arent to different to previous games. With many modes much like there previous counterparts. Drift mode now seems a little more forgiving and has a much nicer feel to it due to the improved physics in the game. Tho some die hard fans may feel its a little too easy.

Canyon races are an interesting addition tho from previous games i would of expected a little more work here as they seem to be little more than a slightly more fleshed out version of the non-integral chase races in NFS:U2

Personally i wasnt too happy that should you fail the 2nd half of these theres no way to continue from the halfway point.

Lastly the autosculp feature is a very very nice addition with a much higher level of car customization available. Tho sadly I feel cheated that the previous games customization options have gone in favour of this.

But overall the game has nice well polished feel to it and does seem to be going back to its roots, be it at a loss of some of the features that made previous games good.

8.5/10

Wow, this really is the worst Need for Speed game to date.

I had high expectations after watching all of those gameplay videos they released a while ago.

This demo of the game is a complete disaster.

- The gameplay is exactly the same as Most Wanted.

- The new customization options are useless.

- Motion blur is far too blurry.

- Lower detailed levels.

This is another of EA's big rip-offs. Now I know why this game had such a short development period.

It's an amateuristic Most Wanted modification.

Ok there, what the hell was that...Most Wanted which is a YEAR older has better looking graphics at lower requirements. (I have an ATi Mobility X1400).

I can almost run Most Wanted on HIGH @ 1024*768 with no lag, and I set this game to LOW (everything) @ 1024*768 and it lags like a bitch and the graphics look terrible even at HIGH!

This is the worst NFS game to date as Vista just said in the above post, I'll stick with Most Wanted. Also, all NFS games have had the same development period if you don't know. There is an NFS game released almost EVERY October or November of a year. They usually start right after they release a new game.

This is Need for Speed Underground all over again...

EDIT: I should also add the racing in this game very much like Gran Turismo or something, the cars are too slow.

Agreed to both of your posts. This demo is utter crap compared to even Most Wanted's demo.

Graphics look pale and blotchy, at graphic settings identical to that of Most Wanted. Initially I thought it was because I had outdated ForceWare drivers (83.60, but these drivers work best for the games I play).

The first circuit race... bleh. Didn't seem as fast paced as races in MW. What's up with 'call crew member' anyway?

The drift was purely WTF when I tried it with the Gallardo. I turn a little bit and the car instantly flies to a 70? in no time, like as if the ground was slippery as hell - just likeUnderground>. :rolleyes::

Can't say much about the canyon race, although it took me nine tries before I switched to the Lancer Evolution... and won the race instantly. :huh:: The facial animation of that driver washorrible> - why couldn't they just render it using CGI video instead of using the in-game engine? They rendered a short 10 second video of the camera hovering over the mountain... couldn't they have just kept it that way? (Although one nice improvement is the racers are no longer the same generic brown-haired guy with a leather jacket behind the wheel.)

The menu system sucks, period. One, I can't adjust any controls until I enter the game. Two, no options to customize HUD (which looks like crap) or change from the imperial to metrical systems. Three... it just feels like a direct port from a console. Any previous NFS game demos before this had UIs appropriate for PC games. I'm hoping this UI is only like this because it's just a demo. And four, no options to shut off that damn soundtrack... yet.

I'll probably take running from cops over this "owning" of territories, thanks. This is as bad as having to dress up your car just to get anywhere in the Underground games.

edit: Come to think of it, even though I wasn't too fond of Underground 2 over Underground 1 because of its forced free roam mode and useless "media attraction" crap, the racing and detail levels were far improved in Underground 2, as well as the overall feel of the cars. I can't say the same for this when comparing it to MW.

Edited by rm20010

Agreed to both of your posts. This demo is utter crap compared to even Most Wanted's demo.

Graphics look pale and blotchy, at graphic settings identical to that of Most Wanted. Initially I thought it was because I had outdated ForceWare drivers (83.60, but these drivers work best for the games I play).

The first circuit race... bleh. Didn't seem as fast paced as races in MW. What's up with 'call crew member' anyway?

The drift was purely WTF when I tried it with the Gallardo. I turn a little bit and the car instantly flies to a 70? in no time, like as if the ground was slippery as hell - just likeUnderground>. :rolleyes::

Can't say much about the canyon race, although it took me nine tries before I switched to the Lancer Evolution... and won the race instantly. :huh:: The facial animation of that driver washorrible> - why couldn't they just render it using CGI video instead of using the in-game engine? They rendered a short 10 second video of the camera hovering over the mountain... couldn't they have just kept it that way? (Although one nice improvement is the racers are no longer the same generic brown-haired guy with a leather jacket behind the wheel.)

The menu system sucks, period. One, I can't adjust any controls until I enter the game. Two, no options to customize HUD (which looks like crap) or change from the imperial to metrical systems. Three... it just feels like a direct port from a console. Any previous NFS game demos before this had UIs appropriate for PC games. I'm hoping this UI is only like this because it's just a demo. And four, no options to shut off that damn soundtrack... yet.

I'll probably take running from cops over this "owning" of territories, thanks. This is as bad as having to dress up your car just to get anywhere in the Underground games.

edit: Come to think of it, even though I wasn't too fond of Underground 2 over Underground 1 because of its forced free roam mode and useless "media attraction" crap, the racing and detail levels were far improved in Underground 2, as well as the overall feel of the cars. I can't say the same for this when comparing it to MW.

you should read up more on Carbon.

what a disapointment :( just sad really. it is atually worse then most wanted. I cant tell from demo if its boring, but its nothing as fun as MW was with police mode, where you could play countless hours. here you just finish and be done with it :(

the drift mode is terrible! and also the new mode where you score points is lame, and very hard for some reason.

it feels very childish old scool game for some reason...scoring points. bah!!!!

graphicaly it was not bad, but then again i cant judge very well since its night :p and i guess full game wont have day maps.

anyway its not worst nfs...nfs7 was worse :D for you dumies its undeground :) so this is like a mod for already bad game :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • PDF4QT 1.6.0.0 by Razvan Serea PDF4QT is a free and open-source application created to provide a complete solution for working with PDF documents in a simple, flexible, and effective way. It offers all the essential tools you need to handle your files: you can view PDFs with smooth navigation, edit content, annotate pages, and highlight key sections for better collaboration. It also allows you to compare two versions of a document, making it easy to spot changes. Built-in security features give you control over protecting sensitive information and managing access. Applications PDF4QT Viewer Profi: Advanced PDF browsing with encryption, digital signature verification, annotation editing, regex text search, page-to-image conversion, and plugin support. PDF4QT Viewer Lite: Lightweight viewer with essential, user-friendly PDF viewing functions. PDF4QT DocPage Organizer: Merge, split, move, clone, or add pages easily with an intuitive interface. PDF4QT DocDiff: Compare two PDFs, highlight differences page-to-page, and export results to XML. Key Features Multithreading Support for faster PDF processing Hardware Accelerated Rendering for smooth, high-quality display Encryption to secure documents Color Management to preserve accurate color profiles Optional Content Handling to control visibility of content Text Layout Analysis for better text extraction and editing Signature Validation for verifying digital signatures Annotations and Form Filling for interactivity Text-to-Speech Conversion to listen to PDFs Advanced Annotation Tools (images, text, etc.) File Attachments Management to view and save attachments Optimization to reduce file size without losing quality Command Line Tool for automation Audio Book Conversion from PDFs Internal Structure Inspector to explore PDF structure Compare Documents to detect differences Redaction to remove sensitive information Document Signing for digital authentication PDF4QT 1.6.0.0 release notes: PDF4QT 1.6.0.0 brings a major image compression and optimization update, especially for PageMaster and assembled output documents. Image compression is now integrated into the assembly/export workflow, backed by new optimizer infrastructure, UI controls, feedback fixes, and tests. This should make PageMaster much more useful for producing smaller output PDFs directly from assembled or reorganized documents. The release also contains a large PageMaster refresh with improved drag and drop, recent files, crop pages, save/restore functionality, rotation and size indicators, a reworked icon set, and faster output preview rendering. Viewer and Editor workflows were improved with wildcard Advanced Find, Enter-to-search behavior, better outline keyboard selection, startup settings, fullscreen support, side-to-side scrolling, smoother scrolling, text selection, snapping, and expanded annotation controls. Compatibility and platform behavior were improved as well, including fixes for embedded files, fonts, checkboxes, invisible text, menu colors, highlights, XMP metadata, Windows color management, AppImage packaging, MSIX generation, installer behavior, translations, and newer compiler/Qt warnings. The commit history also includes a new scan-and-edit plugin foundation and color management performance work. Changelog: Highlights Image compression for PageMaster / DocPage Organizer and assembled output documents (#92) Major PageMaster UX refresh, including drag and drop, recent files, crop pages, save/restore, icons, and output preview performance (#383, #18) Improved image optimization feedback, including final resolution and DPI updates (#384) Better Viewer and Editor navigation: fullscreen, side-to-side scrolling, smoother scrolling, text selection, snapping, and outline keyboard selection (#242, #368, #136, #321, #250, #373) Advanced Find wildcard mode and Enter-to-search behavior (#379, #378) PDF compatibility fixes for embedded files, fonts, checkboxes, invisible text, form content suppression, and Windows color management (#225, #356, #256, #230, #326, #224, #385, #388) Startup settings, custom settings directory support, Linux double-click viewer separation, and packaging/build fixes (#382, #380, #381) Scan-and-edit plugin foundation and broader translation updates from the 1.6.0.0 development cycle Resolved Issues Issue #389: Adding hyperlink to internal object in PDF Issue #388: Update Windows color management system Issue #385: PDFTextLayoutGenerator::isContentKindSuppressed(ContentKind kind) is missing ContentKind::Form Issue #384: In the "Optimize Images" dialog, the info on the final image resolution and final DPI does not update Issue #383: UX improvements for PDF4QT PageMaster tool (v1.5.3.1) (ex. DocPage Organizer) Issue #382: Startup Settings Issue #381: Separated apps for double-click viewer in Linux Issue #380: Ability to run app with custom settings directory - executable parameter with path Issue #379: Advanced Find - Wildcard Mode Issue #378: Advanced Find - Should start searching if Enter key is pressed Issue #376: Deleting a note jumps to Outline Issue #375: Not enough maximum compiled page cache Issue #373: Ctrl/Shift keyboard selection for Outline Issue #372: Option to not color images Issue #370: Extracting pages within a range Issue #369: Keeping redact box on Issue #368: Side-to-side scrolling Issue #357: Bulk delete/add/edit of page labels Issue #356: Compatibility issues - font problems Issue #354: Color blend mode for highlights Issue #352: Icon size of the sidebar Issue #349: Add inherit zoom to bookmark zoom options Issue #338: Editor toolbox higher than editor window Issue #334: Impossible to set French language Issue #326: Checkboxes don't render in PDF4QT Issue #324: Menu text not rendered with correct color Issue #321: Select text in Viewer Issue #291: Support for editing XMP metadata or exporting to PDF/UA format Issue #282: Editor outline view: always zooms to around 50% Issue #256: PDF4QT cannot show some specific fonts correctly Issue #253: Undo/redo doesn't work in "edit page content" mode Issue #250: Snapping Issue #242: Full screen Issue #234: Setting font, font size and area of text annotations Issue #230: Garbled characters when opening PDF files with PDF4QT Issue #225: PDF4QT cannot open PDF files with embedded files Issue #224: Option to remove invisible text Issue #194: Change page size Issue #160: Color | Custom (green/black) does not work Issue #136: Smooth scrolling of document with mouse middle wheel - flywheel Issue #92: Add image compression to PDF DocPage Organizer Issue #18: Performance optimization - OutputPreview Renderer Download: PDF4QT 1.6.0.0 | Portable | ~30.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PDF4QT MSIX | 29.4 MB Links: PDF4QT Home Page | PDF4QT @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Same here or that Opera Max was not a thing anymore. Nothing lost... Who the hell would be considering Opera or Samsung when needing a VPN? LOL
    • If you go to the game developer website you can see that indeed Cyril Paciullo is the game director and developer https://www.pluralys.ca/about-us/ and when clicking on his name it lists Messenger Plus! as part of his CV. In case you wondered what happened to Patchou
    • A difficult position to be in. Either they cater to us users or they cater to news curators to potentially increase traffic. Personally, I wasn't being sarcastic. Hosting a website isn't free, so without traffic this site stops existing, and if you want traffic you have to play the game. I legitimately thought the title was good. Not because I like it, but because it's the kind of title people will click on. This site needs that.
    • Wtf happened to Barron Trump!  
  • Recent Achievements

    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      120
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!