Need for Speed Carbon demo!


Recommended Posts

it should work under vista just by doing this:

To do this Right Click on the Need for Speed Carbon Demo shortcut on your desktop and

select PROPERTIES. In the PROPERTIES window select the COMPATIBILITY tab. Under PRIVILEGE

LEVEL select RUN THIS PROGRAM AS AN ADMINISTRATOR, and then click OK.

this is proof that this game is gonna suck.

why should i have to run this with admin privileges? this is poor coding on ea's part, and isn't it in like the guidelines that the programmer shouldn't assume that the user will be able to do this?

argh!! and to think all i was worried about was them making the interface game controller friendly (which they seem to have done) but god did they have to botch the rest of it?

Edited by ikyouCrow

I read the forums over at EA after Most Wanted came out, and saw what people were complaining about with it. Most of the complaints were centered around the PC version was a port of a console version and performance sucked big time on the PC. All kinds of crashes and choppiness (which I experienced myself). Also, Many complaints were made about handling of the cars, and also the "rubber-band" effect.

So what about these issues? Does the game still stutter like the MW did? Do the AI cars catch up to you so quickly that the game feels unfair again?

NFS:MW was definitely a lot more intensive than the two Underground games, but overall on this PC, the stuttering isn't too bad. It's quite minimal, and only noticeable when driving long distances. (On my older PC, yes it stuttered somewhat frequently because of the graphic detail.)

Now for NFS:C, it's a HELL of a lot worse than Most Wanted. If MW ran like crap on your PC, be prepared for the worst in Carbon if EA doesn't do something about this before it hits the stores.

As for the motion blur, is it closer to what is was like with Underground 1? I thought the motion blur was too heavy in that game. I felt that they hit it just right with MW.

Yes, the blur returned to the blurry messiness like it was in Underground 1. Underground 2's blur and MW's blur were just right.

edit: What about drag racing? I haven't seen any info about it. Have they finally just killed it off completely because they were dumb enough to put traffic in a drag race in the other games?

Not sure. There's no drag in the demo, but there might and probably will be drag races in the full game.

Drag races in MW were probably one of the worst parts of that game: too much damn traffic blocking your way. There's a 1 in 5 chance you'd win a race on the first try.

i guess i am one of the few that thought the demo was decent. the sensitivity in the drift race was outrageous at first but i soon got the hang of it. same with the circut and mountain chase races. the game ran perfectly fine on my pc at max settings. no stuttering at all. i do have to complain about the menues. they could have worked on that a little more.

I cant get it to run on vista, even running in compatibility mode. Says game stops responding after the EA logo

For everyone bitching about it not working right in Vista.............................IT'S NOT EVEN FINAL YET!!!! :angry:

Edit: Pardon my irritability....

For everyone bitching about it not working right in Vista.............................IT'S NOT EVEN FINAL YET!!!! :angry:

Edit: Pardon my irritability....

:laugh: . I'm still downloading on my part so I can found out for myself what NFS: Carbon is all about.

Scirwode

I've finished the demo, the drifting is interesting, harder but easier to score points once you get the gist of it, the canyon race is weird, I won it with a muscle car even though it has lots of turns and a tuner is the best for canyon?

Autosculpt feature is good :)

Graphics, not as impressive as Most Wanted, and I agree with other people how it's too much blur, like you can't even admire the city because of all the blur let alone know where you're going without looking at the minimap.

The steering is weird on these cars, I can't go around the corners etc like I can in Most Wanted and the handbrake is really sensitive so I can't drift around it. The HUB is weird, I liked NFSU and NFS MW hubs better. Otherwise darker atmosphere, less traffic? and yeah not really worth the 650 MB download IMO.

Otherwise overall I'd give this a 6 - 7 / 10, it don't live up to it's name.

For everyone bitching about it not working right in Vista.............................IT'S NOT EVEN FINAL YET!!!! :angry:

Edit: Pardon my irritability....

It's also EA. Experience tells us if bugs exist they don't get fixed.

Unless you're talking about Vista itself. In which case who cares if it isn't final, it's coming out in 3 months or so and the procedures to get a game running in it are pretty known - it should work, there's no excuse not to have it working.

Vista peeps. Keep in mind your running a still BETA OS. Even if NFS:C was programmed with Vista in mind theres no gurantee it will work.

Theres hundreds of reasons it wont. If your running a non-final version of an OS these kind of things are to be expected thats why its still BETA

I've just finished playing NFS:Carbon demo and I was quite impressed with a few things, although there were a few negatives. Considering it is a demo, I'm suprised by how quick people were criticising the game, considering that NFS:MW when the demo came out was also buggy and keep crashing to my desktop.

The first thing, let's hear the negatives of the game. I believe a lot of people were correct in saying that the graphics somehow took a step back from NFS:MW. The car geometry details were very much improved but somehow the world details lack... detail in that it was too blurry to see the whole world while racing. It also made frequent trips to my desktop but since this is an EA game, what can I say? The menu, especially the display menu was a bit too messy, similar to NFS:U2 so that was a bit stupid on EA's part.

Now the positives, and there are quite a lot despite what people here are saying. The best thing in this game was the drifting, seriously. Sure, a lot of people were saying that they were spinning cartwheels but then they got the whole thing wrong. Drifting is so fun once you get the hang of it, believe me :yes: . I've tried all three classes and I found that each car handled differently, like EA said it would.

Muscle is more on straightline speed and accelaration while Exotic focused more on top speed. Tuner on the other hand had better handling. Each of the three cars have their own way of drifting so you have to adjust yourself accordingly. It's not hard to drift using a Camaro SS, just different. The drifting in NFS:Carbon is also much forgiving in that if you hit the wall, you won't lose points for it. However, you will lose extra points if you hit the wall so it's best that you stay close but not to close to the kerb :D .

Canyon races was another that was a fun addition EA put in. Racing with Kenji, I could see that the different car classes are even more prominent here. I found that the Camaro SS speed and accelaration was better but handling in corners woeful. The Lamborghini Gallardo however enjoyed better cornering but still suffered handling issues. The Mitsubishi Evolution IX was in a way better suited for canyon races but in a way was also not, as I couldn't pass Kenji while driving it whereas I could pass him using the other two car classes.

Autosculpt is another feature that I think would be a big hit. I already found myself finding those nice parts where I could make the rims look just nice, though I did fine that they over compensated on the widening of the tires, if you get my meaning. Try raising the sliders on Number 8 and see what I mean :laugh: . I'm sure we could come up with parts that would make our ride even more original :yes: .

I am a bit disappointed that there were no milestones in it. The NFS:MW demo had a milestone challenge so it's a bit sad it's not in there though it could be in the full game. Other than that, this Demo is quite solid, despite the notable flaws. I give it an 8/10.

Scirwode

I've finished the demo, the drifting is interesting, harder but easier to score points once you get the gist of it, the canyon race is weird, I won it with a muscle car even though it has lots of turns and a tuner is the best for canyon?

Autosculpt feature is good :)

Graphics, not as impressive as Most Wanted, and I agree with other people how it's too much blur, like you can't even admire the city because of all the blur let alone know where you're going without looking at the minimap.

The steering is weird on these cars, I can't go around the corners etc like I can in Most Wanted and the handbrake is really sensitive so I can't drift around it. The HUB is weird, I liked NFSU and NFS MW hubs better. Otherwise darker atmosphere, less traffic? and yeah not really worth the 650 MB download IMO.

Otherwise overall I'd give this a 6 - 7 / 10, it don't live up to it's name.

i hate the blur on this game, its crap, quite frankly, too much of it and disabling it game me a good 10-15fps back.. :|

Installed the game. Chose the Lambo for the race. Crashed after loading the map. Reloaded it again. Tryed to drift with the Lambo. Succeeded. Raced with the Lambo/Evo. Succeeded. The Lambo's steering sucks so much. It really is hard to control. The Evo drifts really nice IMO (Y) (my favorite car too). The graphics I couldn't get a good idea of because I am using a X300SE but it ran pretty smoothly with ALOT of chrome lmao. Man I really need to upgrade my graphics card especially for this game alone.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!