Need for Speed Carbon demo!


Recommended Posts

6800gt, amd64 here, similar rez. Runs like crap. EA never has had good game engines.

I just tried this and must have gained a good 10fps from this little tweak..

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Electronic Arts\Need for Speed Carbon Demo

Change CacheSize and SwapSize to values of which are more than double there originals and wait for the speed increase. :)

Thank me later, :p

Didn't like the demo one bit. Bear in mind I played it on my laptop at full settings with decent framerates, but it still looked crap. This is a no no for me ;)

Oh no it looked crap. Must be a bad game. Sorry!

Runs well on my AMD2600+ 1GB DDR 256MB 9600XT. In fact it runs maxed out... cept I cant use motion blur :( but I hear thats mince anyways

The way I figure it ... I hated Most Wanted when I first played it, but it grew on me. I suspect this will be the same. Just looking forward to actually having a nice new racing game to play, since Test Drive Unlimited isn't coming out for the PC for a while (well where I say anyway.)

The motion blur for Most Wanted could be turned off with a registry tweak, so this should be the same too. Most Wanted looked better without the blur anyway.

The motion blur for Most Wanted could be turned off with a registry tweak, so this should be the same too. Most Wanted looked better without the blur anyway.

for some reason motion doesnt work for me :( and i have radeon9800 pro. damn thing.

for some reason motion doesnt work for me :( and i have radeon9800 pro. damn thing.

That's a pretty dated card. Whilst still good, it probably doesn't support the pixel shaders that the game uses for it's motion blur effect(s).

For those concerned about the sluggish feeling of the game, check this link out over at EA

http://www.ea.com/nfs/carbon/us/news.jsp?id=23

They supposedly optimized the game for better performance after the demo was released. I just hope that they toned down the motion blur! I like having SOME motion blur, but I don't want it so bad that it makes me sick to have it turned on!

edit: If the link doesn't work, I'm talking about the Q&A Part II on http://www.needforspeed.com

Here's the text from the Q&A that gives us the info we want.

Community Team: In the demo, the frame rate felt slow and the game lacked a sense of speed. Will this change when the game is released?
The framerate issues that some users have commented on have been addressed for the final product. Typically our optimization only takes place once all the content is in place and locked. At that point we target both the code and the environments for optimizations. The tricky part about demos is that we are usually about half way through the optimizations by the time we release them. Early reports from all the review code that has gone out to the press is that there are no framerate concerns to report.

Certainly for sense of speed the same holds true. We tuned the visuals right up until the final moment we could before we stopped.

Edited by Arckon

LMAO in that post the answer to every Q is

SA: The drifting physics and handling have been totally revamped for Carbon. Our number one goal throughout development was to focus on the speed of drift. In the past, drifting in racing games has felt quite sluggish and didn't capture the insane speeds which you see in some of the pro drift competitions. We've focused on speed so much that we've tied point scoring to it. Keeping up a consistently high speed is the key to getting huge drift scores.

In addition to the regular drift tracks which take place on closed circuits, players will also have a chance to try their skill at the challenging Canyon Drifts. These drifts take place on narrow mountain roads and have the added risk of being able to break through the barriers and fall off the track. The handling on these roads is pretty similar to regular drifts but you'll have to really learn how to control your car to avoid hitting the walls or going off the road. These are by far my favorite drifts in the game. It's a very satisfying feeling when you can make it to the bottom of the track without having touched a single wall.

Need for Speed Carbon will have a selection of premium unlockable and exclusively unlockable content available at launch and more content will be made available in the weeks and months following launch.

I don't have the worse of gaming systems (A64 3200+, 2 GB RAM, 7800 GT) and this game doesn't run well at all (FPS-wise) in 1280x1024 and at maximum detail (with no AA)

That makes me a bit worried how well it will run on my system (A64 3200+, 1GB, X1950PRO) :/

I don't get it... X700 Pro is only a little over two years old now and it's too outdated to handle motion blur? HAH! This is ridiculous, unlike everybody else I LOVE motion blur, it looks so cool. EA just stripped one of my favorite effects away from me.

Now i'm seriously debating whether or not to get this... Payday is Wednesday, but I'm unsure if I should spend a large fraction of it on this game...

For those concerned about the sluggish feeling of the game, check this link out over at EA

http://www.ea.com/nfs/carbon/us/news.jsp?id=23

They supposedly optimized the game for better performance after the demo was released. I just hope that they toned down the motion blur! I like having SOME motion blur, but I don't want it so bad that it makes me sick to have it turned on!

edit: If the link doesn't work, I'm talking about the Q&A Part II on http://www.needforspeed.com

Here's the text from the Q&A that gives us the info we want.

Alright. Hopefully it will improve for the final game.

Seriously though, that was some horrible PR crap up there: each sentence starts with "The drifting physics and handling have been totally revamped for Carbon. Our number one goal throughout development was to focus on the speed of drift..." I guess the community team didn't ask enough questions. :whistle:

Here's the thing when you optimize the game after a released demo, RELEASE ANOTHER DEMO!

I'm so sick when companies do that; "The Retail version has improved so much, blabla" and when you buy the game NOTHING has happened.

indeed, but if you tweak the reg settings there is a good 10fps just to be had from that.. also knocking the detail from max down to high yielded a v.nice increase.

Maybe its true, i'll probs be buying this game so i'll report back. :)

Yeah, i don't doubt for a second you can improve the FPS by doing some mild tweaking.

But I'm one of those people who'd like an optimized and working product out of the box :)

But i really hope the performance was improved, then i might actually consider buying the game!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!