PS3 Controller Interface and Game Load Times


Recommended Posts

You're always going to have load times if you are using discs, Only way to stop that is to use flash memory.

Then that's what they should do....have a massive cache so it can be streaming data instead.

Hooboy at everyone saying "Blue-Ray has an incredibly slow transfer rate compared to the 360". That's bull. If you actually bothered to research it they are pretty damn close.

The problem however is as another person mentioned, with BlueRay developers are being lazy and not compressing enough. Thus it takes longer to load the files. That's definitely going to cause issues.

apart from the lack of wires and the new button in the middle, has the controller changed AT ALL?

they've altered the L2 and R2 buttons to be a bit more like triggers, and made the analogue sticks more sensitive.

But tbh, do you blame them for not changing the design? When the showed a new design, which looked very comfortable to hold, people moaned. So they go back to the tried and trusted design, and people still moan. Sometimes you just can't win as a company

Hooboy at everyone saying "Blue-Ray has an incredibly slow transfer rate compared to the 360". That's bull. If you actually bothered to research it they are pretty damn close.

Its not bull at all, 2x Blu-Ray maximum read rate is 9MB/s, 12x DVD-ROM read rate is 16.2MB/s. Blu-Ray max transfer rate is about same speed as 8x DVD-ROM, maybe a bit less.

The difference between 9mb and 16mb a second is quite a lot considering it has to read 25gb at 9mb/s, DVD9 are only 9gb max so 16mb/s at 9gb is a hell of a lot faster than 9mb/s at 25gb.

I dread to think how long a 50gb game would take to load.

they've altered the L2 and R2 buttons to be a bit more like triggers, and made the analogue sticks more sensitive.

But tbh, do you blame them for not changing the design? When the showed a new design, which looked very comfortable to hold, people moaned. So they go back to the tried and trusted design, and people still moan. Sometimes you just can't win as a company

The thing is, the current design was adequate when the analog sticks were secondary controls. MS and Nintendo have it right in switching the dpad and analog stick positions. I tried playing FSX with my ps2 pad and it hurt after a while.

It slows down because the game is using all the threads, you try and run windows when your game is using all the resources and it will possibly slow down and crash.

Ive never had my 360 crash or lockup and ive had it since launch.

Many, many folks have reported hangs on their 360's. I know 5-6 other folks where I work that have 360's, and all of us have experienced hangs at one time or another.

My console loves to lock up after playing GRAW for a hour or two. It either hangs outright, or complains about not being able to read the disc (and the disc has zero scratches).

It happens.

Many, many folks have reported hangs on their 360's. I know 5-6 other folks where I work that have 360's, and all of us have experienced hangs at one time or another.

My console loves to lock up after playing GRAW for a hour or two. It either hangs outright, or complains about not being able to read the disc (and the disc has zero scratches).

It happens.

The problem with the 360 is heat related, in most cases. It's a major problem, but a different one, nonetheless.

The thing is, the current design was adequate when the analog sticks were secondary controls. MS and Nintendo have it right in switching the dpad and analog stick positions. I tried playing FSX with my ps2 pad and it hurt after a while.

I do agree with that, playing fifa 07 online with on my PS2 can get a little annoying after a while because of the controller, but I just wished sony had ignored the reaction from the boomerang controller, as at least it looked like a huge improvement over the dualshock.

What's so difficult about a menu that requires users to navigate up, down, left, right? Seems pretty straight forward to me. As far as load time goes, that's just that one game. It doesn't represent loading times for all PS3 games.

That was disgusting.

Horrible load times, incredibly dumb user interface, and the controller? lol. Sony ripped off both Nintendo and Microsoft. It's funny.

I totally agree. Sony has ripped off their rivals, but I'm suprised that Sony hasn't been sued yet.

The xbox one is actually easier to navigate and things are more logical. The xbox interface is simply much more intuitive, and I think that's undeniable.

Again, I agree. Sony just ran out of ideas to steal, so they used the PSP interface.

Sony just ran out of ideas to steal, so they used the PSP interface.

Maybe they're actually trying to standardize the UI for their gaming devices. What's wrong with that?

Oh and I still can't quite figure out what's wrong with the system UI in the first place? I've used the PSP and it looks good and works quite well.

Again, I agree. Sony just ran out of ideas to steal, so they used the PSP interface.

Holy ****! You hit the nail! Thats why Microsoft has been using the same style of desktop over all these years! They too ran out of ideas! Oh noehs!!!111!!

Please...

I totally agree. Sony has ripped off their rivals, but I'm suprised that Sony hasn't been sued yet.

Again, I agree. Sony just ran out of ideas to steal, so they used the PSP interface.

:blink: :blink: god...

Horrible load times. I hope it's just that game. It took about 1:40 just to get to the game menu. I wonder how long it takes to load up the actual basketball court and get to the gameplay.

I could live with the interface, though. It's not that bad. I just hope the font size automatically adjusts for SDTV users.

that load time was horrendous, one of the worst ive ever seen! all it was doing was loading the ****in game menu, cant wait to see how long it takes when you want to start a game! menu is boring too, i would have liked to see something different, and more visually appealing. ah well. im not impressed.

Bad loading time on that game. I'll reserve judgement unlike most people on this forum to see other games in action.

The menu is great, nice and simple - Important its simple for me since you know I plan on spending most time actually playing a game rather than navigating a menu :rolleyes:

That controller button is excellent! Like the fact the controller connects to the ps3 quickly and its only one button you need to push. The idea of the middle button being able to turn off/on the ps3 is great as well - Very handy!

I love the PS3 menu, I honestly don't see the problem with it personally.

Ahhell -- To be honest, Streaming has been used in loads of Nintendo games, even in the N64 days. Instead of loading the whole level, the just loaded a bit of the level, and replaced far away objects with textures, making it seem like it's all there when it really isn't. Nevertheless, it's still an awesome thing to implement in games.

Oh, and practically no loading times ARE possible, even with optical discs. Remember that Tony Hawks game for XBOX and GCN? or Wind Waker? Or Metroid Prime? Those all had very small to no loading times. Apparently, the Wii also improves loading times, to the point where some games don't actually have loading times...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!