Recommended Posts

Ok... now I'm curious. Is eVGA any good? I've read a lot of good things about eVGA and (as I've posted recently) I'm building a new super computer. As it stands now, I trust only Intel. Intel has a good chipset. My problem with Intel is that it doesn't support SLI. I want SLI for future upgrades.

Any good info?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/511133-is-evga-any-good/
Share on other sites

Ok... now I'm curious. Is eVGA any good? I've read a lot of good things about eVGA and (as I've posted recently) I'm building a new super computer. As it stands now, I trust only Intel. Intel has a good chipset. My problem with Intel is that it doesn't support SLI. I want SLI for future upgrades.

Any good info?

Most people will put it in the top three, many call it the best because of their lifetime warranty and upgrade program.

eVGA here! Nice, Warenty is gold, they have personally helped users at the release of the 7900GT and they was the first to release a GFX card without the issue. I think you can even change your cooler without void it. Not sure though.

My issue is always the warranty. I want a good product, but I want proof of the good warranty. What it says it rarely what is means. I know, I used to work for Best Buy!

Intel will replace defective boards. eVGA leaves the option open. Asus chose to fix my defective board. It took them 6 months. Lil things like that bother me, when I need a computer now.

IMO, I would rank eVGA high in my choices. I had a geforce 2 way back in the day, the memory on the card went bad, getting random artifacts and what not. Called up eVGA and even though they don't officially do so, they cross-shipped me a new card, so I had no down time.

Dude... you are soooo mush skeptical... Noting will apend to you if you broke a Mirror. nothing appends to you the 13th Friday... nothing will apends to you with eVGA...

Dude, I don't know what you do to collect trouble here and here, but damn... The store where I passed my training 2 years ago as always sold Asus motherboards and we have got almost never negative comeback. I talk about a store, not a single person. Seriously, stop to paranoid :|

Dude... you are soooo mush skeptical... Noting will apend to you if you broke a Mirror. nothing appends to you the 13th Friday... nothing will apends to you with eVGA...

Dude, I don't know what you do to collect trouble here and here, but damn... The store where I passed my training 2 years ago as always sold Asus motherboards and we have got almost never negative comeback. I talk about a store, not a single person. Seriously, stop to paranoid :|

First of all, it's "happens" and second of all, he's not being paranoid. Where do you see such behavior? Give me a break. If you have no experience with the company in question, leave it be.

As for my experience with EVGA: I actually bought a card from them before they became the behemoth they are today. I was impressed with the quality. I never needed their support or warranty, but the company is definitely trust worthy.

I'm seeing a bit of confusion (or lack of clarity on my part) about the discussion.

I'm asking more about the motherboards than the video cards. As it stands now, I have a BFG card for the system. The motherboard has yet to be selected. The current top runner, an Intel board that will be released in a few weeks, is very good. But not SLI. And I want SLI optional in the future.

I'm seeing a bit of confusion (or lack of clarity on my part) about the discussion.

I'm asking more about the motherboards than the video cards. As it stands now, I have a BFG card for the system. The motherboard has yet to be selected. The current top runner, an Intel board that will be released in a few weeks, is very good. But not SLI. And I want SLI optional in the future.

As far as I know, SLI is only suportted on nVidia chipsets, I think some Intel chipsets support crossfire. So you will have to get an nVidia solution if you want SLI which means getting something other than an Intel branded motherboard.

As far as I know, SLI is only suportted on nVidia chipsets, I think some Intel chipsets support crossfire. So you will have to get an nVidia solution if you want SLI which means getting something other than an Intel branded motherboard.

I figured as much. It's a matter of finding a reliable board with good service. People are saying good things about eVGA video cards but I'm not hearing so much about their motherboards.

Most importantly - I want to know about the eVGA quality and support. Stories, dammit, good and bad. Like I said; with intel, the board fails and you get a new one. Is it the same with eVGA? I will not stand for my computer to be out of commission for longer than 2 weeks. With Asus it was 6 months... thankfull I plunked down 500$ to buy all new material.

Edited by deck

I figured as much. It's a matter of finding a reliable board with good service. People are saying good things about eVGA video cards but I'm not hearing so much about their motherboards.

And if you want something about bad service, I guess I should say about the Intel Network adapter I have the sits in a box not working. I called Intel, their diagnosis, it was a counterfit card and if I sent it in and it was truely counterfit, I would be out the money for good, no mention of them saying "Hey, good job at getting us a counterfit that we can check out, we'll send you a genunie Intel card for your troubles." So I decided to keep the card because I sent in closeup's and they think it is counterfit (I bought from Newegg..) so I rather just keep it in its box. If I was Intel, I would've sent a replacement card no matter what because either way, I was doing them a service by helping them with counterfits, or I was getting a replacement for a faulty genunie Intel adapter.

First of all, it's "happens"

Sure, you talk to a guy that have saw some great products like WD HDD of LG DVD drives arrives at the store not working. Even a Maxtor drive as fail in the initial format... Bad stuff happens to all brands.
and second of all, he's not being paranoid. Where do you see such behavior?
He wanted to pay allot more for less before when he wanted a DELL, the reason given to pay more is the warranty.

But tell me why he will trust more Intel that give 3 years Warranty on his board and be skeptical on the eVGA that give lifetime warranty

If you have no experience with the company in question, leave it be.
I own a eVGA Card and it work very well, I have saw what they had did in the 7900GT troubled first times. I also owned 5 Asus Mtb, no one as got trouble. As for Dell in other posts, I have worked with over 300 used Dell system and to have proprietary parts is a ******* to replace one the warranty is over.

Also about eVGA mainboards, this wasn't the sector of eVGA before, but now they are starting to consider it. Think also that the eVGA board is the reference board from nVIDIA as same that the Bad Axe (2) is the reference from Intel. You just can't go wrong with this, it's the motherboard that nVIDIA use to promote the GF8.

I hope it will help you Deck to understand my point of view.

  • 5 years later...

Sure, you talk to a guy that have saw some great products like WD HDD of LG DVD drives arrives at the store not working. Even a Maxtor drive as fail in the initial format... Bad stuff happens to all brands.

Maxtor is NOT a great product. I don't know what you have available where you are from but those two names I have had nothing but issues with since the early 90's. And also, if you've never had issues with a Video Card, you don't use it as much as the next guy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!