WMP11 running on 2003 Server


Recommended Posts

Hi

I wish to start this thread to discuss the actual running of Windows Media Player 11 on Windows 2003 Server.

At present WMP11 is not supported by Microsoft on 2003 Server, and possibly may never be.

But it can be installed using the WindowsXP setup files :- see https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=461539

I have had a working WMP11 for the last week on a demo machine. It seems to work fine. But who knows what will happen in the near future (post sp2)

I want to use WMP11 purely as a media library player.

I have a large mp3 collection already correctly tagged, and with album art working in WMP10.

WMP11 offers a much prettier graphical interface, has a better database for very large collections, and irons out a few of the WMP10 bugs.

I don't use drm, on-line stores or synced devices.

I don't use WMP11 for video playback. I prefer MediaPlayerClassic,

At the moment I am cautious of allowing WMP11 to access the Internet, or to retag any of my files.

WMP11 has upgraded my WMP10 Library correctly and is working well as an audio player. The graphical interface is a great improvement over WMP10.

Am interested to hear of other experiences users are having with WMP11 on 2003 Server.

Kevin

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/513670-wmp11-running-on-2003-server/
Share on other sites

This has been discussed before in this forum.

"At present WMP11 is not supported by Microsoft on 2003 Server, and possibly may never be." - for a reason. 99.999% of legit W2K3 installs are on servers and thus don't need any media player.

And before it all starts, if you have a license from your educational institution or a 180day trial license, those are for educational and testing purposes only and, according to the EULA (that you agree to at install), may not be used as a live OS. I have yet to come across a situation where testing a media player in Server was of any business use.

For the 0.001% of legit installs that have W2K3 as a workstation - tough luck. Use WM10. It is in there already and works.

Guess that why it is called "Windows Media Player 11 for Windows XP".

Hi

Thanks MazX for the quick reply and the download link for WMP11.

Just a couple of points to add

1. See here for a list of bugs in WMP10 http://msmvps.com/blogs/thinice/articles/16084.aspx

2. Server 2003 shipped with WMP9. For the 0.001% of legit installs that have W2K3 as a workstation and wish to use a media player Microsoft kindly added WMP10 as part of service pack 1.

3. Service pack 2 for Server 2003 is due to be released in the New Year.

Kevin

  • 2 weeks later...

are you guys forgetting that 2003 SP1 came with WMP10 by default (unlike XP SP2).

so Microsoft must think there is a place for their media player in the server environment.

I guess Microsoft will wait til SP2 and/or the encoder/server components go final before WMP11 is supported officially.

Hi

Have now been running wmp11 for a couple of weeks without problem.

It's slow on loading as wmp builds the icon cache, but after that runs well.

Search on wmp11 is a lot better than on wmp10.

Here's some screen caps.

post-187790-1165222054_thumb.jpg

post-187790-1165222076_thumb.jpg

I installed WMPTagSupportExtender.1.1.1.msi just to get .ape support in wmp.

I don't intend to use this to edit the tags.

Kevin

How many of you have a legal copy

that's not the point of this thread. please don't derail it. (fact is, if they hadn't an illegal copy of server 2003, they'd prolly be using an illegal copy of XP SP2 anyway)

anyways

i had beta2 installed on a 2003 test machine. worked fine. never really got the chance to test the final. the wmp team said that WMP updates would come with the Service Packs....

i cant install wmp11 on my win2k3...tried batchfiles and all

well..i dont use english verions on wp11 or the os

BUT..when i try to install now it says that the servicepack is lower that the expexted..i have sp1 on ny machine

is there any way to trick wmp11 or edit the sp info so it says sp2?

hi there,

it may look weird, but windows server 2003 is the best workstation ever.... solid as a rock, flawless and very fast.................

Thought i might add to this but what version of windows server 2003 are you running? there is no such version as Server 2003.

There is only:

Small Business Server

Web Edition

Standard Edition

Enterprise Edition

Datacenter Edition

Compute Cluster Server

Storage Server

And all those edition carry the Edition Mark in the logo soooo....you can see why im curious lol and i seriously don't think you would had paid for it :| at the price id would have died.

Thought i might add to this but what version of windows server 2003 are you running? there is no such version as Server 2003.

There is only:

Small Business Server

Web Edition

Standard Edition

Enterprise Edition

Datacenter Edition

Compute Cluster Server

Storage Server

And all those edition carry the Edition Mark in the logo soooo....you can see why im curious lol and i seriously don't think you would had paid for it :| at the price id would have died.

A lot of students have the option to purchase Microsoft Server software and other microsoft software for ?100 odd, and with that you get Windows 2003 enterprise.

There's a change people are right in saying that Server OSs make "excellent workstations" in terms of robustness stability etc. But given the extremely limited driver support with comparison to XP, I wouldn't bother. If everything works perfectly with your hardware and software, then you just got lucky. Typically you would expect a 2K3 server to create scores of problems with drivers, new motherboards, etc etc.

Besides, XP isn't too bad after SP2 was introduced. Unless you overload it with stuff, it's reasonably stable. I have yet to see the stability of good ol' Win2000, but I can't complain. Uptimes as long as 2 months with a single restart or an "end task" were common in 2K. With XP you might not get that lucky, but I think they're reasonably ok.

There is definately an appeal, for two reasons I can think of:

1) Some businesses, schools, ect just setup all the pc's as a terminal to the server, so only the server ever needs updating, and therefore the users would be stuck with WMP10 when they might want 11.

2) In my situation, I have a (legal copy) of Win Server 03 in a domain situation with the user accounts for my family (so they get same stuff on all pcs, and so I can filter the net and pc settings which they tend to screw up to the younguns). However due to the lack of pc's the server doubles up as a workstation, and my family use WMP11 a lot, which means the server needs WMP11 as I tend to leave them with that and then I use the better XP PC.

Had WMP11 on since it came out (changed the SP number in reg and ran the installer in xp compat mode) and its been solid, and btw since using 2003 as a workstation (past 9 months now) i ONLY restart when i have to usually have uptimes of about 5-6 weeks of 24/7 usage games/video encoding, with xp after a few days uptime i'd get slowdowns, odd errors, programs crashing etc, NONE of that with 2003, tried vista and i think i'll be staying with 2003 till they end support!! its just a solid os.

Edit:just remembered from the chat on the 7th with MS on SP2 RC

Sarah - MS (Expert):

Q: is there any plan to add Media player 11 for windows 2k3 from SP2... just like in SP1 there was a upgrade to media player 10

A: No - WMP 11 will be supported on SP2 but not in it.

Edited by Lemonzest
  • 3 weeks later...
Thought i might add to this but what version of windows server 2003 are you running? there is no such version as Server 2003.

There is only:

Small Business Server

Web Edition

Standard Edition

Enterprise Edition

Datacenter Edition

Compute Cluster Server

Storage Server

And all those edition carry the Edition Mark in the logo soooo....you can see why im curious lol and i seriously don't think you would had paid for it :| at the price id would have died.

actually I had a trial evaluation version of 2003 enterprise, which I've stripped and customized a little bit.... unfortunately the trial period is now over and I'm back to XP...

Firstly, there are legitimate reasons for wanting the latest media player on a server. Thos who say otherwise are talking rubbish. What about the hundreds of thousands of people (if not millions) that use terminal services and/or Citrix. Essentially they are all using Server 2003 as a workstation.

...snip...

But given the extremely limited driver support with comparison to XP, I wouldn't bother. If everything works perfectly with your hardware and software, then you just got lucky. Typically you would expect a 2K3 server to create scores of problems with drivers, new motherboards, etc etc.

...snip...

What are you talking about? 2003 is based on XP and 95%+ of all XP drivers work just fine on Server 2003. For the vast majority of hardware, you don't need Server 2003 specific drivers.

that's not the point of this thread. please don't derail it. (fact is, if they hadn't an illegal copy of server 2003, they'd prolly be using an illegal copy of XP SP2 anyway)

...snip...

Rubbish. Firstly, you're forgetting the fact that server costs 3-4x the cost of XP. Just because a home user cannot justify the cost of purchasing Server 2003 just as a workstation, does not mean they could not justify the cost of purchasing XP. Secondly, the vast majority of XP installations out there are a result of OEMs. Sure some people will never pay for an OS and always go down the pirate route, but your statement that if they are using pirate 2003 means they would probably use pirate xp is just plain false.

my server 2003 box stores all my music files, does this "workaround" allow upnp devices to access the media via media player 11 IE the xbox 360 ?

No. uPnP is a function of the operating system, not the media player. 2003 does not support uPnP and according to a Microsoft employee I spoke to in the beta newsgroups, never will.

Well to be honest, at this moment in time, there isnt really a need for WMP11 on server 2003 (any of the editions).

The windows media streaming engine works the same for all versions 9 through 11 so there isnt really any difference server-side. Also, why the hell you'd wanna use a server as a workstation is beyond me ;)

Firstly, there are legitimate reasons for wanting the latest media player on a server. Thos who say otherwise are talking rubbish. What about the hundreds of thousands of people (if not millions) that use terminal services and/or Citrix. Essentially they are all using Server 2003 as a workstation.

Who's talking rubbish???

Using terminal services or Citrix is nothing like the same thing as using 2003 server as a desktop OS because you "believe" :rolleyes: that it is faster and more reliable than xp. Citrix is unlikely to be ever used with wmp as it is unsuitable for intensive graphics, the sound sync would suffer and the utilisation of both the server and the network link would be heavy. A terminal services server is still acting as a server in that it is still serving a service to multiple network attached users. If you follow your logic mainframe users are all using a server OS as a workstation...

I don't doubt that there are a few legitimate reasons for wanting the latest wmp on a 2003 server however I suspect that this this is not the case for most if not all who have been posting on this and similar topics here.

Who's talking rubbish???

Using terminal services or Citrix is nothing like the same thing as using 2003 server as a desktop OS because you "believe" :rolleyes: that it is faster and more reliable than xp. Citrix is unlikely to be ever used with wmp as it is unsuitable for intensive graphics, the sound sync would suffer and the utilisation of both the server and the network link would be heavy. A terminal services server is still acting as a server in that it is still serving a service to multiple network attached users. If you follow your logic mainframe users are all using a server OS as a workstation...

I don't doubt that there are a few legitimate reasons for wanting the latest wmp on a 2003 server however I suspect that this this is not the case for most if not all who have been posting on this and similar topics here.

I agree that terminal services/citrix is not suitable for video, however I can tell you that it works flawlessly for sound such as music, although not quite as high quality as if you were playing it locally.

Firstly, there are legitimate reasons for wanting the latest media player on a server. Thos who say otherwise are talking rubbish. What about the hundreds of thousands of people (if not millions) that use terminal services and/or Citrix. Essentially they are all using Server 2003 as a workstation.

What are you talking about? 2003 is based on XP and 95%+ of all XP drivers work just fine on Server 2003. For the vast majority of hardware, you don't need Server 2003 specific drivers.

Rubbish. Firstly, you're forgetting the fact that server costs 3-4x the cost of XP. Just because a home user cannot justify the cost of purchasing Server 2003 just as a workstation, does not mean they could not justify the cost of purchasing XP. Secondly, the vast majority of XP installations out there are a result of OEMs. Sure some people will never pay for an OS and always go down the pirate route, but your statement that if they are using pirate 2003 means they would probably use pirate xp is just plain false.

No. uPnP is a function of the operating system, not the media player. 2003 does not support uPnP and according to a Microsoft employee I spoke to in the beta newsgroups, never will.

I am in the same boat i would like to use the file server part of it ( I hate all the comments on the forum as to why dontcha run xp)

some of us have reasons heres one i have HP proliant hardware drivers for raid cards etc dont exist for xp. you have to run server for all drivers to work. now i have a dsm-520 media lounge to watch movies, music, photos over the network wired/wireless what better place to serve these files from then a server (go figure). I also have wmp 11 installed okay on it the check box will not work on share media libary because im guessing no upnp . upnp would alow it to identfy clients etc... that is a new reason at least for me to get upnp working on w2k3 (I believe Ms will see this need and fix it in the future while keeping it secure enough for server. If i could put xp on this thing i would but no drivers out there. this is a ML350 g3 incase anyone knows a way to make it work. any help would be apprecated or is there another way that can do this that im not looking at.

thanks

Edited by genebo
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!