Windows Vista: Disabling Services


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
I can no longer choose to have a program open with administrator priviledges, anyone know how to fix that? :no:

If you have the secondary log service disabled, enable it. That SHOULD fix it.

One other thing I've noticed is that disabling the 'SL UI Notification service' breaks the control panel on home premium at least. So I'd advise people to set that to automatic if you need the CP for anything. :)

Why set services to disabled at all, unless they're set to automatic, that is? :unsure:

Services set to "Manual" will just start if the OS needs them anyway, so if it didn't they won't start anyway, and won't consume any resources.

"Disabled" makes it so Vista can't start them even if it needs to, but would that really be a smart thing to do? Hmm...

Anyway, SuperFetch, the Windows Search Indexer, and NTFS Defrag seems to be by far the most resource demanding ones. However, disabling SuperFetch may impact application launch times, disabling Search Indexing wouldn't let Vista update for "instant searches", and no NTFS defrag would make your drive more defragmented over time unless you use an alternative.

after a couple hours of troubleshooting trying to find out why there was a 30-45 second lag during my boot time I noticed it was caused by the "workstation" service. When I disabled that the problem was solved. I'm on a wireless network so it was the last service I thought of disabling.

Why set services to disabled at all, unless they're set to automatic, that is? :unsure:

Services set to "Manual" will just start if the OS needs them anyway, so if it didn't they won't start anyway, and won't consume any resources.

"Disabled" makes it so Vista can't start them even if it needs to, but would that really be a smart thing to do? Hmm...

Anyway, SuperFetch, the Windows Search Indexer, and NTFS Defrag seems to be by far the most resource demanding ones. However, disabling SuperFetch may impact application launch times, disabling Search Indexing wouldn't let Vista update for "instant searches", and no NTFS defrag would make your drive more defragmented over time unless you use an alternative.

SuperFetch doesn't do a **** because almost no user have same pattern of using computer, unless you're a grandmother who opens Solitaire, favorite web site, and email everyday. Hard drives nowdays are so fast, especially if you own raid or single WD 10000RPM HDD. Also similar for ReadyBoost. It's totally useless from my point of view unless you run system with 512MB of RAM. If you have 2GB or more, just force damn paging to memory, and disable readyBoost, or at least set like only 256MB for paging on hard drive.

Windows Search is the most horrible i have seen in my life. It's crap, and based on wrong idea...As I said before Windows Search is an outcome of the attempt to fix poor Windows folder organization and its File System.

Why set services to disabled at all, unless they're set to automatic, that is? :unsure:

Services set to "Manual" will just start if the OS needs them anyway, so if it didn't they won't start anyway, and won't consume any resources.

"Disabled" makes it so Vista can't start them even if it needs to, but would that really be a smart thing to do? Hmm...

Anyway, SuperFetch, the Windows Search Indexer, and NTFS Defrag seems to be by far the most resource demanding ones. However, disabling SuperFetch may impact application launch times, disabling Search Indexing wouldn't let Vista update for "instant searches", and no NTFS defrag would make your drive more defragmented over time unless you use an alternative.

there are some services that start running that aren't needed even on manual ... a few I can think off the top of my head are the ones that deal with dial up or phone connections, like telephony and remote access connection manager; others include SSDP discovery service and shell hardware detection. There are a few others too.

Hi,

after tweaking my services I had the problem that vista did show only an empty list in the 'previous versions' tab of the file object properties. The shadow copies itself were existent and working ok. The restore point functionality was there. To solve the problem I had to enable (and start) the 'TCP/IP NetBIOS Helper' service . So be careful when turning of this service

klaus

Hi,

after tweaking my services I had the problem that vista did show only an empty list in the 'previous versions' tab of the file object properties. The shadow copies itself were existent and working ok. The restore point functionality was there. To solve the problem I had to enable (and start) the 'TCP/IP NetBIOS Helper' service . So be careful when turning of this service

klaus

That's odd - the NetBios helper shouldn't have anything to do with Shadow Copies.

I'll check back this.

  • 2 weeks later...
How do I disable the remote control sensor on the front of my laptop? My brother always messes with my computer with his control while I'm using it. I looked at all of the active services and none of them say anything about a control or infrared.

Disable the infrared device in device manager, or put tape over the sensor, or tell your brother to grow the **** up.

Disable the infrared device in device manager, or put tape over the sensor, or tell your brother to grow the **** up.

There is no infrared device. What other device could it be under? It goes right through my finger so I'm guessing it goes through tape.

  • 1 month later...

Well, don't wanna add you more pain as I can feel digging those infos up from knowledge allready is quite an job, but adding those disabled you suggest will damage and crash multible windows functions quite well. I know some are liberately down as this is service tweaking, but that will also bring down other system which there isn't clue in here.

First probably comes in mind is router connections and IP Helper is not only for IPv6 as of my knowledge. Might be wrong, but shutting it down will not do much good to detecting. Also 'Function Discovery Provider Host - Default: Manual (Started)' definedly ain't safe to turn off and Event log? uhh don't much no when you do that you cannot even turn it back on again. after 1 reboot it hits access denied in your screen. Although current system it does it anyway after some period unless microsoft fixes it.

I'll bet none of those you mentioned there were took to real test, but simply copied from Windows XP style what there could be turned on this is not same in Vista as many of those controls alot of more things than in XP. Even while yes some are simply renamed hehe..

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...

Thanks of great list, although someone doesn't like disable services, not me.

I diasable as many as 30 services, (I don't use that computer to surf internet)

NOW, boot up time of my computer (HP M2006AP, pentium-M 725 1.6G, 1GB RAM, 4200rpm/60G) is as fast as 37 second. and ram useage is about 310MB after 3 minutes of startup.

I haven't met any problems. and I will keep on disable as many as services.

Thanks of your attention

There are plenty of guides that discuss disabling "unnecessary" services, some of which are right here on Neowin. I'm not going to bother linking them here, as I'm sure you're adept enough to manipulate Google. But if you are curious enough, I suggest setting them to Manual rather than Disabled. Works for me.

SuperFetch doesn't do a **** because almost no user have same pattern of using computer, unless you're a grandmother who opens Solitaire, favorite web site, and email everyday. Hard drives nowdays are so fast, especially if you own raid or single WD 10000RPM HDD. Also similar for ReadyBoost. It's totally useless from my point of view unless you run system with 512MB of RAM. If you have 2GB or more, just force damn paging to memory, and disable readyBoost, or at least set like only 256MB for paging on hard drive.

Windows Search is the most horrible i have seen in my life. It's crap, and based on wrong idea...As I said before Windows Search is an outcome of the attempt to fix poor Windows folder organization and its File System.

How is windows search a bad idea???? It's isntant search similar to spotlight on OSX, very useful to many people regardless of file system structure.

And most people probably do have somewhat of a pattern, the first thing I usually do it open a web browser/im/media player. and superfetch constantly adapts and it does more than just preload certain programs, it is much better than the old style memory management iif you have a lot of ram regardless of "pattern"

I game heavily on my vista pc and I have only disabled tablet PC and windows Defender, and I have no real difference in fps going from xp to vista so it doesn't really make much of a difference at all for me, my pc usually idles at 0-1% cpu usage.

and lastly, do not disable the Readyboost service, because it also controls the readyboot function which speeds up boot time.

SuperFetch doesn't do a **** because almost no user have same pattern of using computer, unless you're a grandmother who opens Solitaire, favorite web site, and email everyday. Hard drives nowdays are so fast, especially if you own raid or single WD 10000RPM HDD.

You obviously don't even know what SuperFetch does, as that has nothing to do with its value. Further, you're completely wrong about hard drives. The difference in random I/O between a 10,000RPM hard drive and RAM is several orders of magnitude.

Also similar for ReadyBoost. It's totally useless from my point of view unless you run system with 512MB of RAM. If you have 2GB or more, just force damn paging to memory, and disable readyBoost, or at least set like only 256MB for paging on hard drive.

I doubt many people with lots of RAM are using ReadyBoost, but it is helpful for 512MB systems as you say. "force paging to memory" makes no sense, the very notion of paging requires a disk.

Windows Search is the most horrible i have seen in my life. It's crap, and based on wrong idea...As I said before Windows Search is an outcome of the attempt to fix poor Windows folder organization and its File System.

You're welcome to your opinion, even if it's wrong.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts by Paul Hill The founder of the Linux kernel has just announced the availability of Linux 7.1. This is a stable version of the kernel that will now be tested by various Linux distributions before it is shipped to users through update managers. Some users, like those on Debian, for example, might not get it for a long time, if at all, while Fedora users can expect it in the near future. With Linux 7.1 out on time, the merge window for Linux 7.2 is now open, giving contributors the opportunity to send in major new features that have been waiting for the last two months. Torvalds warned that he is currently travelling and will be in another timezone, so timing for the merge window may be irregular due to timezone differences and limited internet access. Torvalds said that he has already fetched early pull requests to allow him to do some offline work, but the travel could still cause disruption. Right now, he is not planning to extend the release, but did consider it. He said he might later regret not extending, though. In terms of this last week of development for Linux 7.1, Torvalds said there were no major or alarming changes. This week consisted mostly of smaller driver updates to GPU, networking, and sound, networking fixes, trace tooling fixes, and misc minor fixes. The shortlog this week lists fixes for driver bugs, memory leaks, I/O and USB fixes, networking and RDMA fixes, DRM/graphics fixes, and tooling and verification improvements. Specific fixes include USB series heap-overflow and buffer overflow fixes, and multiple use-after-free, memory-leak, and refcount corrections across subsystems such as i2c, zram, gpio, and net. There are fixes for graphics drivers, including amdgpu, i915, and virtio, as well as hypervisor and virtualization tweaks affecting mshv, vmbus, and hyperv. According to Phoronix, anyone running Linux 7.1 should look out for the new NTFS driver, Intel FRED for improved performance on Panther Lake and future CPUs, faster graphics with Intel Arc Battlemage, and improvements for older AMD Radeon GPUs. If you are running Linux on your computer and everything is fine, then you don’t need to worry about updating to Linux 7.1 as a priority; just wait for it to be pushed to you. If you have tried Linux on hardware but it didn’t work properly, trying again with a distro that uses Linux 7.1 could cause Linux to work on your machine, thanks to the new hardware support.
    • you can also do this with this tool: PowerSettingsExplorer made by mbk1969 at 3dguru forum.. I found it by accident researching on modern standby and annoying quirks of it in 2022
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.1 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.1 changelog: Added An option to customize notification sounds (#1259) Fixed Ongoing notification was laggy on Samsung One UI devices (#1269) Improved Updated Translations Minor UI/UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.1 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • watching him because of the Mr Klinton cat
    • yup dude, ADS on this website are terrible
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!