Review: A week with Vista on a slower PC


Recommended Posts

My PC:

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ (Few times burned)

768 RAM 400Mhz (512MB) and other 256MB I can't remember, but it's lower.

40GB Maxtor SATA or ATA, can't remember.

And GF440SE 64MB

I could say boot for me is about 10-20 secs. After booting, ram usage is about ~300MB. After turning few services I think you would be able to be in rage of 200MB to 300MB.

But I installed Windows XP, because work with Vista it's just terrible. I should buy new hardware. And I am willing to get Core 2 Duo 2+Ghz with L2 4MB and 2GB DDR2 RAM in coming months.

One more thing, for Vista I would advice wide-screen monitor.

I don't think we're all talking about the same thing when we say "It runs great" or "It's slow". As I said in my post, if you have a decent video card, the interface runs very fast. The windows open and minimize very fast. Transparency effects are beautiful and have no speed disadvantage. That's because they run solely on the video card and have very little to do with the rest of the system.

However, anything that involves RAM and long hard disk access is much slower than XP.

I've turned almost every service and security system off. I'm using a bare bones Vista now. I don't think it can go any leaner. Even so, my RAM usage right after boot is 480MB! That's physical RAM usage, not cache. You can see these on the task manager. So on a 512MB PC, you'd have around 30MB physical RAM left for programs. On XP, you'd have around 300MB left.

I'm not talking out of my ass here. I'm giving numbers and statistics. I'm telling you exactly how I setup my system and how I got the numbers that I'm getting. So please do the same instead of posting "No, Vista runs great on my Pentium 100Mhz."

As I said in my post, I can run many CPU/Memory intensive programs and it doesn't effect the responsiveness of the operating system at all.

After logon I am running all the default services, along with: TightVNC Server, Apache2.2, mysqld, Avast Antivirus, ATI Catalyst control centre Daemon tools and the memory usage is 460mb.

Right now i'm running all of the above + uTorrent (with 4 torrents going), Visual C# 2005 and Firefox. The memory usage is 562mb.

However, despite the much larger memory usage, I can run Oblivion as well as it does on XP. Oblivion is a very memory heavy game and I expected it to be slower, but it's not.

In XP with similar programs running I got about 320mb usage on boot, yet opening programs is quicker on Vista. XP took over a minute to become responsive after logging in. Vista takes less than 10 seconds. I can launch Firefox as soon as the taskbar loads and it'll be launched within 10-15 seconds. On XP it was much much longer.

One more thing, for Vista I would advice wide-screen monitor.

Why? I'm using a 19" CRT at 1600x1200 and vista is fine. I guess a larger resolution is better for vista, but it really doesn't matter that much.

My computer:

Athlon XP 2400+

768 MB DDR333 RAM

Radeon 9700 PRO Video Card (256MB)

:no:

your review is bad, because I have a computer older than your and Vista RTM runs very fast. It's faster than XP

P4 1.7GHz

768 MB RAM

I use the basic interface, because I have an old graphics card.

i have run Vista on a:

3700+ @ 2.5GHz

2GB DDR500

74GB raptor

nVidia 7600GS 256MB

20.1in widescreen lcd

runs amazingly

I have also run vista and it ran VERY WELL on:

(laptop)

1.7ghz P4m

512mb DDR266

30GB HDD

integrated vid card

(laptop)

1.6GHz Pentium M

1GB DDR333

integrated vid card

80GB 4200RPM

(laptop)

3200+

1GB DDR400

80GB 5400rpm

ATi XPRESS200M 128MB video card (runs aero)

aside from some not running Aero....i have had NO problems on any of them speed wise.

I have Windows Vista Ultimate running on the following configurations:

- Intel Pentium 4 CPU, 3.0GHz with HyperThreading

- 1.50 GB of RAM

- ATI Radeon 9600 PRO 256MB (with Aero and transparency turned on)

- 250 GB Western Digital HDD (ATA)

- 80 GB Maxtor HDD (ATA)

How does it run on this machine? - Better than Windows XP. And, if I were to turn Aero off, it SMOKES Windows XP.

- Intel Pentium 4 CPU, 2.80GHz with HyperThreading

- 512 MB of RAM

- Intel Onboard GMA 915 (No Aero)

- 160 GB Western Digital HDD (SATA)

How does it run on this machine? - A little slower than Windows XP, but not enough to classify it as unusable.

I also have Windows Vista Home Basic running on an Intel Celeron 2.40GHz CPU, 512MB of RAM, 40 GB Western Digital HDD (ATA), and onboard graphics (No Aero) - it runs about the same as Windows XP, and that's with all the stuff turned on.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!