Vista failed to recognize any hardware


Recommended Posts

After intalling Vista through the DVD by booting the PC, Vista failed to recognize any of my hardware such as, NIC, SoundBlaster sound card, video card, monitor, RAID drive, and so on. Is this typical of Vista? How do I resolve this problem? I tried to install the driver and Vista kept saying there is no hardware on my computer that matches the driver.

I'm taking your using the RTM bulid. Drivers will come out with in the next few months.It just hit RTM and this is the time when they start making and shipping out drivers. Did you use Windows update or go to the hardwares manufactor? It seems prety bad when that amny drivers faild to pop up? whats your system specs?

My PC is an old Dell 4500 Demension. It has the hardware specs for Vista. I have another PC that I used to go to the manufacture's site and download all the drivers and try to update the hardware in the dell PC but Vista kept saying there is no such hardware. It's not that Vista don't have the driver, I got the driver but Vista just not recognize the hardware that associated with the driver.

Many thanks for the responses. This is only for testing that's why I use an old Dell PC. And yes, I'm pretty sure that once it is released I hope it will not have these kind of problems.

Now, back to the issue. I re-install Vista and load the RAID drivers in fine. I now see my other RAID drives. As for my other hardware, well, I found out that, at least in my case, supporting for old hardware is much worst than Windows XP. Vista will not allow me to install any driver that is not Vista compatible or signed. I finally downloaded a beta driver from SoundBlaster and now my sound card does work. Here is the error mesage when I tried to install an old driver that works perfectly fine under Windows XP Pro.

Setup could not detect any Sound Blaster Audigy 2 on your system.

However, as I mentioned above when I install the new Vista comptible driver from Sound Blaster it works fine. Vista's error message makes it sounds like there is not such hardware in my computer. So in my case, the conclusion is that unless you're planning to buy all new hardware, Vista RTM is pretty much useless with old hardware that works very well under Windows XP Pro. Unless other people in here find a tweak somewhere that I'm not aware of.

Buy a new computer and buy Vista Legally. Pls don't buy Dell and you might actually have a decent computer.

PS: Please stop whining, Vista isn't even released to the public.

Gee that was a lot of help Mike!

How do you know his Vista isn't legal?? Why aren't Dell machines decent??

From another forum, I found that if I right click on the .exe file and choose the compatibility tab and choose Windows XP (SP2) on the drop down list, apparently this should work since the drivers installed fine under Windows XP Pro...but this option doesn't work either. Vista comes back saying "The best driver software for the device is already installed" and wouldn't go any further. It seemed, again, that Vista is having issues working with older drivers. It just won't accept old drivers. I'll try to find an answer this since I don't believe that Vista will do worst than XP when it comes to compatibility issues.

Drivers for old computer were in the older builds but were removed in the later builds to reduce size to fit 1 dvd and accomdate more common newer hardware drivers.

As long as you have a internet connection (with the netword driver installed) Vista will download the drivers for old hardware from Microsoft Update.

I have a Dell Dimension 4600. All drivers including sound were downloaded automatically.

Drivers for old computer were in the older builds but were removed in the later builds to reduce size to fit 1 dvd and accomdate more common newer hardware drivers.

As long as you have a internet connection (with the netword driver installed) Vista will download the drivers for old hardware from Microsoft Update.

I have a Dell Dimension 4600. All drivers including sound were downloaded automatically.

That is a bit of good news. The problem right now is my NIC doesn't work. Vista won't recognize the driver I downloaded from Dell nor from the original CD.

Thanks! I'll give Intel a try. My PC's specs are as followed:

System Type: Dimension 4500

Ship Date: 9/24/2002

Dell IBU: Americas

Quantity Parts # Part Description

1 4P615 ASSEMBLY, CARD (CIRCUIT), PLANAR (MOTHERBOARD), DIM4500, AUDIO

1 9K792 PROCESSOR, 80532, 2.4G, 512K, 533FSB, SOCKET N

1 7N242 KEYBOARD, 104, UNITED STATES, SILITEK, LOW COST, MIDNIGHT GRAY

1 6U220 KIT, MOUSE, PERSONAL SYSTEM 2, S69, LOGITECH

1 8N275 COMPACT DISK DRIVE, 128K, I, 5.25" FORM FACTOR, 48X, LENGTH/LONG, 8481B, CHASSIS 2001

1 9K099 CARD (CIRCUIT), GRAPHICS, 32MB, ATI TECHNOLOGIES INC, FULL HEIGHT, SECOND

1 7T281 FLOPPY DRIVE, 1.44M, 3.5" FORM FACTOR, 3MD, NO BEZEL, TEAC, V4, CHASSIS 2001

1 1T320 HARD DRIVE, 20G, I, 3.5" FORM FACTOR, 1N, 7.2K, WD-XL40S

1 6K223 KIT, SOFTWARE, WKS-STE2K2, 5.25" FORM FACTOR, ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MFGR., ENGLAND/ENGLISH

1 3U669 KIT, SOFTWARE, OVERPACK, WINDOWS XP HOME, COMPACT DISKETTE W/DOCUMENTATION, ENGLAND/ENGLISH, A03

1 7C712 CARD (CIRCUIT), NETWORK, ETHERNET, 10/100, CNET TECHNOLOGY INC, REVISION

1 1K696 DUAL IN-LINE MEMORY MODULE, 512, 266M, 64X64, 8K, 184

Okay, I finally managed to get all my hardware recognized with drivers that worked on XP. The problem now is everytime when I reboot the PC, the refresh rate will default back to Vista's default refresh rate and not the refresh rate that I specified in the video card's driver. Any idea how the resolution and refresh rate to stay in Vista?

Okay, I finallly got the refrest reate settings to stay...the problem now is that some of my applications are not runnning uncder Vista. Two example are Symantec Antivirus and Livestate Recovery are two so far that are havin problem with Vista. So my suggestion is that if you're not planning to upgrade most of your hardware and software, don't plan on installing Vista.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!