Full October 2002 Game Sales Data (console-only)


Recommended Posts

Oh great yet another person trying to compare PC hardware to game console hardware. Ok here we go...

(1) Of course PC's are gonna have more powerful hardware. They are MULTI-TASKING machines. So it's gonna need to have some powerful to do e-mail, internet, word processing, 3D design, graphic design, games, etc. Consoles on the other hands are DEDICATED gaming machines and need alot of power to run the games. You are comparing apples and oranges.

(2) Like in #1, PC's need enough RAM to adequetly run all games, e-mail, internet, word processing, 3D design, graphic design, etc. So of course it is going to have more RAM then consoles. Deciding the amount of RAM needed for a system is a tricky issue. Sony, unfortuantely, decided wrong by putting too little RAM. That is why the textures in some games don't look as good as they do on Gamecube & Xbox. Again, you're comparing apples and oranges.

(3) Again like in #1 & #2, video cards on computers aren't used for just games. A game consoles main purpose, incase you haven't picked up yet, is to play games. A video cards performance varies on the quality of the drivers, while a game consoles video performance is always the same.

Oateater's statement of:

pc > xbox > ps2 > gba > gc
Is based on a matter of opinion. One machine is not better then the other. It all depends on your taste and what makes you happy.
I mean how many times can Mario face Bowser or save a princess??

Well considering that Mario has been around for what? 15 years? And the games are still critically acclaimed by people smart enough to figure out that GAMEPLAY is KING, not GRAPHICS. What does it matter how a game looks? If you were to take away great graphics from a game and it has no gameplay value, then the game obviously sucks. I dought you have ever given the Gamecube a chance and sat down and actually played a few of the games for it.

It wouldn't make sense to make a game console out of the G4 or a current x86 CPU b/c they would be too expensive to mass produce. It makes a little more sense to either make a custom CPU or do what M$ did and use an older chip (i.e. the Pentium III 733Mhz).

As a former employee of Best Buy...

Gee makes me wonder why you are a "former" employee. You need to do more research on stuff before you try to sound like you know what you are talking about.

Man, this kind of debate never ends. It all depends on the person, if you love Nintendo and their history in the gaming industry you'll stick with GameCube. If you like the name Sony cause you have a Sony TV or DVD player and that it was the first company to release a high performance console than you'll by PS2. If you are a beta addict and like PCs with windows and products from microsoft, you'll by XBOX.

All in all, there is no winner. Who cares about sales, most people by PS2 probably cause parents buy em for the kids and ask the sales person for advice and their respone maybe bias. Since it's selling more than the others, people assume its better and buy it and that adds to its image.

Hardware wise it goes - XBOX, GameCube, PS2

Game wise it goes - PS2, XBOX, GameCube

History/Experience wise - GameCube, PS2, XBOX

You have too look at exclusives too. Nintendo has CAPCOM, XBOX now has RARE

I decided on a GameCube cause I like Games like Resident Evil and Metroid. Also because I already have a DVD Player dedicated to DVDs so why need it in a console. Why not buy a console dedicated to gaming only.

Anyway that's my two cents

if you think the n64 (which they stopped even making games for) is good for the history side of nintendo there's something wrong, i think nintendo should just stop selling hardware like sega did. they need to realize they can't compete anymore.

As a former employee of Best Buy...

Gee makes me wonder why you are a "former" employee. You need to do more research on stuff before you try to sound like you know what you are talking about.

Yes in respond to your questioning why I was a former employee, it was because I moved on to bigger and better things...IE....working for a computer company.

Secondly, I agree Nintendo should stop selling hardware, true they may have been around longer than the others, but that doesnt really mean that they are a better system.

if you think the n64 (which they stopped even making games for) is good for the history side of nintendo there's something wrong, i think nintendo should just stop selling hardware like sega did. they need to realize they can't compete anymore.

yah, nintendo is gonna go outta bussiness real soon... if anyone is gonna drop outta the concole market anytime soon it'll be M$

Okay, refering to your huh??? What he was saying was The PC is a better system than an Xbox which is better than ps2 which is better than game cube.

Well I would have to say that yeah no kidding that a PC is a better system for games, there are millions of reasons, but I'll be nice and name just a few.

Number 1: Processor, lets look at todays current processors, they are all about in the 2.0 Ghz range where what XBox is only 700 or 750mhz?? :huh:

Number 2: You can jam pack a PC full of RAM up to say 2 Gig of RAM, now what gaming system can touch that? :huh:

Number 3: Lets not forget video card, how can you compare a 128 MB card to any video game systems graphics.

So basically what I am saying is that you cannot even put a PC against any other system, really it isnt fair because it is no match.

- = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - =

Jago.... to say that you have to be smart to look past the design of the console and for the "treat" of the games, well I have one thing to say.......We have.

The actual console for PS2 is much better than Game Cube, plus the fact there are more games, plus you can run your PS1 games on a PS2. Now if you have a Game Cube that can play N64 Games, then I'll give you props but until then, I as well as the millions......... :woot: AND MILLIONS :woot: .....of PS2 gamers will agree that sony very well has the better platform. I mean how many times can Mario face Bowser or save a princess?? After a while the basics behind Nintendos games have lost touch, and I will say that Nintendo started out as a gaming system for kids, and today it still is a gaming system for kids. Nintendo has been out of the gaming race for a long time, and it will take them a while before they can have a system that can match up to the par of Sony or even Microsoft (Blah).

Hmm...heres a thought? What if apple took a G4 Processor and made their own gaming system? It def. would be a match up for Xbox, considering that the G4 will blow by the Xboxs processor. Anyway....I can't believe how far off base this thread got from the start......Ha, well that goes to show how one person can change the way a thread goes..........

Ha, thanks StevoFC. :laugh:

biggest poopoo i've heard all day. great effort jmbosi to show your ignorance. ;)

if you think the n64 (which they stopped even making games for) is good for the history side of nintendo there's something wrong, i think nintendo should just stop selling hardware like sega did. they need to realize they can't compete anymore.

Every company is going to have products that fail. Sony hasn't been around long enough to have systems fail on them. M$ hasn't been around long enough a console to fail, but it has had plenty of software fail. No company is immune to bad products.

It is important to note that SEGA has had more failings then Nintendo.

32x

Sega CD

Saturn

Nintendo:

N64

I won't include Dreamcast b/c it was a great system and died much sooner then it should have. Nintendo isn't going anywhere people, they already stated that they are in this business to stay and are already working on the GBA & Gamecube follow-ups.

This something that "SPYDER" (Neowin Mod) stated in another thread that is part of my sig now:

can i ask a quick question? what does it matter how many games there are? will you ever own all of them? no. forget quantity of games..look at the system that has the games YOU like. make that your deciding factor. --SPYDER--

All the systems are good and what makes happy, makes you happy. So let's not start on borderline insults **cough**twist**cough**

I guess some people can have a mature discussions and others can't. :unsure:

I will say that my two all time games for Nintendo will be Tetris, and Duck Hunt.

i got 3 words for ya...

Super Mario 3

(then it was all downhill) :yes:

I got 3 more words for ya...

Turtles in Time ---------- scratch that, how about i say

Super Mario Brothers All-Starts, more like 5 but its a collection of all the worst games put into one giant game. I think they did that so you didnt have to lug tons of games when you where heading to your buddies houses.

don't forget virtual boy in the list of nintendo screw ups...gotta love red lines on a beefed up pair of goggles...

Oops, I guess I forgot one.

i got 3 words for ya...

Super Mario 3

(then it was all downhill)

Did you even play Super Mario 64, Super Mario World, Yoshi's Island, Super Mario Sunshine?

If you had then you wouldn't be saying that...

buddy seriously, i feel embarassing to own a ps2 after seeing your poopoo argument. please don't act like you speak for millions of ps2 owners out there. i feel ashamed.

AMEN to that brotha!!! It's nice to know that you and I always seem to agree on some things. :D

I will say that my two all time games for Nintendo will be Tetris, and Duck Hunt.

i got 3 words for ya...

Super Mario 3

(then it was all downhill) :yes:

I got 3 more words for ya...

Turtles in Time ---------- scratch that, how about i say

Super Mario Brothers All-Starts, more like 5 but its a collection of all the worst games put into one giant game. I think they did that so you didnt have to lug tons of games when you where heading to your buddies houses.

I get the feeling you have something against Nintendo...

Not sure why tho...

Did you even play Super Mario 64, Super Mario World, Yoshi's Island, Super Mario Sunshine?

If you had then you wouldn't be saying that...

yes actually i have played all of them...super mario 3 is easily as good as super mario world and SM3 was for the regular nintendo

as for super mario 64 i think i hate that more than any game i've ever played

what about luigi's mansion? haha you left that one out because even you know it is horrible.

I'm not sure why you guys are ragging on the N64. It was far from a failure. I own a ps2 and an N64 and I still find myself playing Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, and other n64 games as much as ps2. N64 is by far the best multiplayer system ever. You can have your online gaming crap. but it will never be the same as hearing and seeing your buddy's reaction next to you.

Long live N64!!!

I'm not sure why you guys are ragging on the N64. It was far from a failure. I own a ps2 and an N64 and I still find myself playing Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, and other n64 games as much as ps2. N64 is by far the best multiplayer system ever. You can have your online gaming crap. but it will never be the same as hearing and seeing your buddy's reaction next to you.

Long live N64!!!

umm it's called a multi tap, connect two and have 8 players

I'm not sure why you guys are ragging on the N64.  It was far from a failure.  I own a ps2 and an N64 and I still find myself playing Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, and other n64 games as much as ps2.  N64 is by far the best multiplayer system ever.  You can have your online gaming crap.  but it will never be the same as hearing and seeing your buddy's reaction next to you.

Long live N64!!!

umm it's called a multi tap, connect two and have 8 players

Do you have any idea how many good games support 4 players on the ps2? Not very many. I can think of a couple. PS2(and xbox) will never compare to the N64 for multiplayer gaming.

HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

you've never played Halo have you?? or Time splitters 2, let's not forget perfect dark when it comes out. unreal, mech assault, ghost recon, there will be Halo 2, all the sports games....i can't think of any else right now.

yes the thing i have against nintendo is its terrible

Wow, thats a great argument you got there...

what about luigi's mansion? haha you left that one out because even you know it is horrible.

I didn't mention it b/c I don't think it is on par with other Mario games. It's not terrible, but it is still an enjoyable game tho.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!