900mhz ram showing up as ddr2 800 on boot up?


Recommended Posts

Does it say 800MHz or PC6400?

When I'm OCing i need to tune "down" the speed since the memory speed follows the FSB. This results in that PC5300 or PC4300 shows up at startup, eventhough the RAM is running at say 800MHz.

Regarding another matter: I hope it also states Dual channel?

*edit*

I saw on Asus.com that your board only supports (original) speeds up to 800MHz.

  Quote
Dual channel memory architecture

4 x DIMM, max. 8GB, DDR2-800/667/533, ECC and non-ECC, un-buffered memory

I guess you have to "OC" the rest of the way.

What's your system specs'?

I know because of my OC the system shows mine running at 266Mhz even though it's actually at 400Mhz. But is is probably also the fact that the board only supports up to 800Mhz on the board. You aren't goinmg to get 900Mhz out of it without overclocking.

The system specs are:

550w PSU

AMD Athlon X2 5000+

2GB (2x 1gb) OCZ 900mhz ddr2 ram

asus m2n32 sli deluxe

320gb sata2 hard drive

How would I even go about overclocking the ram? Will it cause the temps to shoot up? Will it cause the ram any harm?

cheers

unlink the ram and push it to 450MHz (900MHz effective outcome) your board won't set 900MHz itself as it will only accept 533 667 800 and 1066 to get 900 1000 or similar speeds from these non-conforming dimms you need to set the parameters yourself.

You will most likely need to set the Voltage aswell as many 800MHz modules use 1.8v while the 900+ use 1.9v to 2.2v (Check which your RAM requires).

Temps will never shoot up... maybe 3 degrees hotter then before... if they already can go on 900 mhz why care with overclocking..

but then again maybe ur mobo wont allow it cuz of the processor

You don't need to OC your CPU if your multiplier is unlocked. Tune up the FSB and the RAM will follow, at the same time lower your multiplier so your core won't be OC. For example: [FSB]*[Multi], 250*12 = 3000MHz, "same as" 300*10 = 3000MHz but your bus has been OC 50MHz --> 100MHz OC of your memory. No need for changing the vcore, only vdimm. Make sure you lock you PCI-slots though (PCIE to 100MHz, PCI to 33,33MHz)

Hmmm i've set the dram voltage to 2.1v (the voltage it says on the OCZ site), i'm not sure about the FSB etc and don't want to balls it all up so i'll probably leave it at that (if just changing the voltage will make any difference?)

  randomnut said:

Hmmm i've set the dram voltage to 2.1v (the voltage it says on the OCZ site), i'm not sure about the FSB etc and don't want to balls it all up so i'll probably leave it at that (if just changing the voltage will make any difference?)

Altering the voltage won't make any performance difference. It may only help you overclock a bit further in terms of stability.

It's difficult for me to help you as I don't have an AMD system here and I've not used an AMD DDR2 system as yet.

on my Intel system I would unlink the DDR2 RAM from the FSB and set the RAM myself to 900MHz Effective, I would also set the voltage to 2.1V and set the timings to C2.

I don't know how it's done on AMD platforms as they don't even have a Front Side Bus due to the integrated memory controller. I think maybe you have to up your HT to overclock the RAM.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes while it's still a great browser it seems bloated more with each update by things I'm not the least interested in
    • We now know why Nvidia blocked yet another review, the new RTX 5050 is apparently terrible by Sayan Sen With its latest RTX 5000 series of GPUs, Nvidia has not been transparent with how its cards perform. The company did not ship review drivers for the RTX 5060 on launch day and has repeated the same deed with the new RTX 5050 as well. For those who may not have followed, Nvidia unveiled the GeForce RTX 5050 last month for $249 and released the Game Ready driver for the card this month with version 576.88. As such, the RTX 5050 has now been tested by Korean site Quasar Zone where the GPU has been compared against other cards that are priced around that same bracket. The site has found that Nvidia's new entry-level offering is worse than Intel's Arc B580, a card that launched around six months ago for the same price. As you can see in the image above, the Arc B580 was slightly faster on average. The biggest gap between the two was on Path of Exile 2. Another point in favor of the Arc GPU is that it has 12 Gigs of video memory whereas the RTX 5050 only has 8 GB. The 5050 was also pitted against Nvidia's last gen RTX 4060 as well as AMD's RX 7600, both of which are also 8 Gig cards. The 7600 is often found at around $250 these days while the RTX 4060 frequents around $275. The RTX 5050 is essentially neck and neck with the 4060 and is ever so slightly faster than the RX 7600. Once again this just highlights that Nvidia is essentially giving the same kind of performance that Intel and AMD GPUs have provided since last year or so. In fact, if we consider the Radeon RX 6600 and 6650 XT GPUs, which have been available for around $180 to $220 in the past, it becomes clearer just how bad of a value the RTX 5050 is as those 6000 series AMD cards probably get pretty close to the 5050 in rasterization throughput. Chances of something like "Fine Wine" are also slim given that the RTX 5050 just does not seem to have the hardware resources to pull off something like that later in this lifespan. If anything, we are more likely to see that happen from the Intel B580 GPU or AMD's $299 RX 9060 (there is already evidence of that). Source and images: Quasar Zone
    • A messaging network full of adult content. Ewww. 🤮
    • Why does Vivaldi feels slow to me than any other Chromium browsers? 😭 Anyone here like me?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      loose_observer earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      BeeJay_Balu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      filminutz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      SteveJaye earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      446
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      161
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      148
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      65
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!