NFS Carbon or NFS Most Wanted?

By BryanChung
in PC Gaming

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

+shift. MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

I would get Most Wanted first THEN get Carbon, because the story in NFS Carbon is a continuation of the one in NFS Most Wanted. And you would want to know what's going on before jumping right into the middle of the story.

Gameplay wise, in my opinion, Most Wanted is more interesting. While Carbon just has nice graphics (sorta)

Grand Master

NeoXY

Posted
Posted (edited)

Carbon is really more of the same. They added "drifting" big woop. It was in fact a terrible game. I beat it in 2 or 3 days. You get maybe 20 - 30 races out of it and you can beat pretty much every race on your first try. The only mode at one point allow you to race as a cop if you finish last. (forgot what its called. Look it up, its advertised as a feature), but there is MUCH more playing time in Most Wanted and is actually considerably difficult when you mess around with the cops from the third blacklist member and up...plus Most wanted looked better...

Get Most Wanted. Carbon reminds me too much of that underground crap :/

p.s...if you REALLY want to play as a cop in the NFS world, I think Hot Pursuit 2 offered you to play as a police officer. But the game is like...6 years old and do not run on Windows XP :laugh:

Grand Master

ANova

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have both and I would definitely recommend Most Wanted. It's a much deeper and more detailed game, has much better replay value, more options, much better graphics, is more challenging, the list goes on.

The only better aspects of carbon are the atmosphere and music.

Grand Master

Fourjays Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted (edited)

I'd also recommend NFS:MW. Although I haven't tried Carbon yet, Most Wanted is amazing compared to the Underground games. From screenshots, I think it looks graphically better than Carbon too - in all the in-game screens of Carbon I have found, the car doesn't look like it is part of the scene. As if it has been cut and pasted into the image.

Has anyone tried Driv3r? I've been thinking of getting it, as I had Driver and Driver 2 on the playstation and loved them. What is it like compared to 1 and 2? I've read player reviews that say the poor reviews are just GTA Fanboys (which is believable considering some of the "bad points" raised against Driv3r are quite applicable to GTA too) .

Edited by Fourjays
Mentor

_dandy_

Posted
Posted
p.s...if you REALLY want to play as a cop in the NFS world, I think Hot Pursuit 2 offered you to play as a police officer. But the game is like...6 years old and do not run on Windows XP :laugh:

I beg to differ. Not only have I played it on XP, I've also played it on XP 64-bit. I fired it up again during the holidays.

Grand Master

Denis W. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted (edited)

While for some reason I hated Underground 2, Carbon was alright - but only if you're willing to adapt to some changes over Most Wanted. The graphics in Carbon are better, but only if you disable the God awful motion blur. I still prefer the breathtaking scenes in Most Wanted. You can't beat driving with the sun glaring in your eyes :cool:

What Carbon has that MW does not (most on this list don't count as positives for me):

- Canyon duels. Definitely not my favourite.

- Drifting. Quite a hell of a lot harder than the Underground series.

- Autosculpt. Who uses that? :huh:

- A crew that is useful to you in the beginning, but a pain in the ass afterwards.

- Speaking of your crew: EXTREMELY CHEESY FMV BIO VIDEOS OF YOUR CREW.

- Reward cards. Good for boasting e-ego, and unlocks extra stuff.

- The whole concept of controlling territory. Meh.

- Muscle cars.

- One of the most mixed up and underused EA TRAX soundtracks ever. There's hip hop, grime, and techno that are rarely heard in game - instead you hear EA's own in-house composed soundtrack. It's always the same damn 4 songs playing in circuit races. Should I mention they took in Most Wanted's chase music that sounds completely out of place given Carbon's atmosphere- and there's no option to shut it off?

- Tweaking your car's performance is illogical: you'd have to "rebuy" a part to tune it. I prefer Most Wanted's simple performance tweaking menu. Play Underground 2 if you're that obsessed with performance tweaking.

What MW has that EA axed from Carbon:

- Junkman parts. Your maxxed out Carrera GT in Most Wanted will outrun a maxxed out Carrera GT in Carbon.

- Drag racing. Actually, it's more like "let's play dodgeball with traffic" compared to drag racing in the Underground games.

- Helicopters in cop chases.

- A simpler performance upgrades system. They are unlocked sequentially after beating Blacklist members. In Carbon it's completely random and sometimes confusing.

- Oh yeah, and the Blacklist itself. The Blacklist members (bosses) are worth racing against. Carbon's crew leaders are just... meh.

- LAN mode! Why was it removed from Carbon? (even though getting LAN to work in MW is a real PITA)

- One of the most polished game UIs. It fits the game well.

- And of course, the soundtrack. Also fits the game.

Both have checkpoints/tollbooth racing, cop chases (Carbon seriously dumbed down the importance of cops; in Most Wanted you must purposely tick off the cops to advance in career mode), and funky cutscenes. Carbon's video work is a bit more indepth and enjoyable than MW.

Oh, and both games have crash to desktop problems. For Most Wanted, sometimes the game likes to crash with a Visual C++ error when there's too many cops chasing after you. And that's with the latest 1.3 patch. :/

Generally speaking, Carbon is more about controlling your car. Most Wanted is more about speed. I'd take MW over Carbon. There is one challenge in MW where you flee from cops in a cop cruiser. :p

p.s...if you REALLY want to play as a cop in the NFS world, I think Hot Pursuit 2 offered you to play as a police officer. But the game is like...6 years old and do not run on Windows XP :laugh:

I have HP2 on my machine. It runs pretty well.

Edited by rm20010
Grand Master

Razorwing

Posted
Posted
While for some reason I hated Underground 2, Carbon was alright - but only if you're willing to adapt to some changes over Most Wanted. The graphics in Carbon are better, but only if you disable the God awful motion blur. I still prefer the breathtaking scenes in Most Wanted. You can't beat driving with the sun glaring in your eyes :cool:

What Carbon has that MW does not (most on this list don't count as positives for me):

- Canyon duels. Definitely not my favourite.

- Drifting. Quite a hell of a lot harder than the Underground series.

- Autosculpt. Who uses that? :huh:

- A crew that is useful to you in the beginning, but a pain in the ass afterwards.

- Speaking of your crew: EXTREMELY CHEESY FMV BIO VIDEOS OF YOUR CREW.

- Reward cards. Good for boasting e-ego, and unlocks extra stuff.

- The whole concept of controlling territory. Meh.

- Muscle cars.

- One of the most mixed up and underused EA TRAX soundtracks ever. There's hip hop, grime, and techno that are rarely heard in game - instead you hear EA's own in-house composed soundtrack. It's always the same damn 4 songs playing in circuit races. Should I mention they took in Most Wanted's chase music that sounds completely out of place given Carbon's atmosphere- and there's no option to shut it off?

- Tweaking your car's performance is illogical: you'd have to "rebuy" a part to tune it. I prefer Most Wanted's simple performance tweaking menu. Play Underground 2 if you're that obsessed with performance tweaking.

What MW has that EA axed from Carbon:

- Junkman parts. Your maxxed out Carrera GT in Most Wanted will outrun a maxxed out Carrera GT in Carbon.

- Drag racing. Actually, it's more like "let's play dodgeball with traffic" compared to drag racing in the Underground games.

- Helicopters in cop chases.

- A simpler performance upgrades system. They are unlocked sequentially after beating Blacklist members. In Carbon it's completely random and sometimes confusing.

- Oh yeah, and the Blacklist itself. The Blacklist members (bosses) are worth racing against. Carbon's crew leaders are just... meh.

- LAN mode! Why was it removed from Carbon? (even though getting LAN to work in MW is a real PITA)

- One of the most polished game UIs. It fits the game well.

- And of course, the soundtrack. Also fits the game.

Both have checkpoints/tollbooth racing, cop chases (Carbon seriously dumbed down the importance of cops; in Most Wanted you must purposely tick off the cops to advance in career mode), and funky cutscenes. Carbon's video work is a bit more indepth and enjoyable than MW.

Oh, and both games have crash to desktop problems. For Most Wanted, sometimes the game likes to crash with a Visual C++ error when there's too many cops chasing after you. And that's with the latest 1.3 patch. :/

Generally speaking, Carbon is more about controlling your car. Most Wanted is more about speed. I'd take MW over Carbon. There is one challenge in MW where you flee from cops in a cop cruiser. :p

I have HP2 on my machine. It runs pretty well.

I agree with you . But one thing I don't is Drag Racing. I'm glad that they took it out. For me, I'd rather Drift instead of Drag. In UG2, you could actually drift along side someone else. I thought this was in Carbon. Nope. Another thing is that EA intended Carbon to have it's own 'style'. Same with every Underground after games has.

As I said before, the game has tons of potential. EA just screwed it up. It was said that they would include a ton of cars. Yes, but to the fact you cannot use them in career. like WTF. I was soo ****ed off once I found that out. There were like 15 cars you can use in career and the rest ( total of around 50 cars) is only for online, and ontop of that tons are custom tuned and some are stock. Those cars you cannot I repeat you cannot modify at all, even outside of the Career mode. As what I learned from my gaming class, you do not, absolutely do not take away something you already gave the player, or when the player achieves something and they cannot use it. The more I type about Carbon the more now I hate it. Yes, the game is also stupidly unstable and has EA made a patch out for it to fix it? Nope. The 1.3 patch was for online features. I am not even going to start with the online part.

Hopefully when Crysis, or Interstellar Marines comes out I will get rid of this junk.

Grand Master

NienorGT

Posted
Posted

Sorry, but, both sucks online. People are just cheating, high ping make the race unrealistic...

I have both and I regret that EA didn't even protect it's online system like other games.

My "friend" as pirated the game and his fun is to cheat online... :no:

I liked both in career mode but it's too fast finished...

Grand Master

Fourjays Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Most Wanted + Carbon's Drifting = WIN

Most Wanted - Drag + No Drifting = WIN :p

I hate both of them. Drifting always feels like it comes down to luck. Drag is simply a case of learning where and when the traffic cars will be so you can follow a certain line.

Experienced

fmxer

Posted
Posted
Most Wanted - Drag + No Drifting = WIN :p

I hate both of them. Drifting always feels like it comes down to luck. Drag is simply a case of learning where and when the traffic cars will be so you can follow a certain line.

Haha i'll pay that drag comment, but I feel carbon's drifting offers more control and therefor I enjoy it more. Although the split scoring is abit weak. :\

  • 2 weeks later...
Veteran

Bei337

Posted
Posted

I beat MW and I'm about to beat Carbon. Both are good games and I would recommend getting MW first (it's only $20) and then after you beat MW (it'll take some time) THEN you can buy Carbon to continue the story line, etc.

While they are the same series they offer different game plays. I loved MW and I'm enjoying Carbon as much as I did with MW.

Oh and make sure to pick up a controller because keyboard=not for racing at all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By PsYcHoKiLLa · Posted

    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices

      By morpheus6969 · Posted

      38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices

      By Fiza Ali · Posted

      1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!