NFS Carbon or NFS Most Wanted?


Recommended Posts

I would get Most Wanted first THEN get Carbon, because the story in NFS Carbon is a continuation of the one in NFS Most Wanted. And you would want to know what's going on before jumping right into the middle of the story.

Gameplay wise, in my opinion, Most Wanted is more interesting. While Carbon just has nice graphics (sorta)

Carbon is really more of the same. They added "drifting" big woop. It was in fact a terrible game. I beat it in 2 or 3 days. You get maybe 20 - 30 races out of it and you can beat pretty much every race on your first try. The only mode at one point allow you to race as a cop if you finish last. (forgot what its called. Look it up, its advertised as a feature), but there is MUCH more playing time in Most Wanted and is actually considerably difficult when you mess around with the cops from the third blacklist member and up...plus Most wanted looked better...

Get Most Wanted. Carbon reminds me too much of that underground crap :/

p.s...if you REALLY want to play as a cop in the NFS world, I think Hot Pursuit 2 offered you to play as a police officer. But the game is like...6 years old and do not run on Windows XP :laugh:

I have both and I would definitely recommend Most Wanted. It's a much deeper and more detailed game, has much better replay value, more options, much better graphics, is more challenging, the list goes on.

The only better aspects of carbon are the atmosphere and music.

I'd also recommend NFS:MW. Although I haven't tried Carbon yet, Most Wanted is amazing compared to the Underground games. From screenshots, I think it looks graphically better than Carbon too - in all the in-game screens of Carbon I have found, the car doesn't look like it is part of the scene. As if it has been cut and pasted into the image.

Has anyone tried Driv3r? I've been thinking of getting it, as I had Driver and Driver 2 on the playstation and loved them. What is it like compared to 1 and 2? I've read player reviews that say the poor reviews are just GTA Fanboys (which is believable considering some of the "bad points" raised against Driv3r are quite applicable to GTA too) .

Edited by Fourjays
p.s...if you REALLY want to play as a cop in the NFS world, I think Hot Pursuit 2 offered you to play as a police officer. But the game is like...6 years old and do not run on Windows XP :laugh:

I beg to differ. Not only have I played it on XP, I've also played it on XP 64-bit. I fired it up again during the holidays.

While for some reason I hated Underground 2, Carbon was alright - but only if you're willing to adapt to some changes over Most Wanted. The graphics in Carbon are better, but only if you disable the God awful motion blur. I still prefer the breathtaking scenes in Most Wanted. You can't beat driving with the sun glaring in your eyes :cool:

What Carbon has that MW does not (most on this list don't count as positives for me):

- Canyon duels. Definitely not my favourite.

- Drifting. Quite a hell of a lot harder than the Underground series.

- Autosculpt. Who uses that? :huh:

- A crew that is useful to you in the beginning, but a pain in the ass afterwards.

- Speaking of your crew: EXTREMELY CHEESY FMV BIO VIDEOS OF YOUR CREW.

- Reward cards. Good for boasting e-ego, and unlocks extra stuff.

- The whole concept of controlling territory. Meh.

- Muscle cars.

- One of the most mixed up and underused EA TRAX soundtracks ever. There's hip hop, grime, and techno that are rarely heard in game - instead you hear EA's own in-house composed soundtrack. It's always the same damn 4 songs playing in circuit races. Should I mention they took in Most Wanted's chase music that sounds completely out of place given Carbon's atmosphere- and there's no option to shut it off?

- Tweaking your car's performance is illogical: you'd have to "rebuy" a part to tune it. I prefer Most Wanted's simple performance tweaking menu. Play Underground 2 if you're that obsessed with performance tweaking.

What MW has that EA axed from Carbon:

- Junkman parts. Your maxxed out Carrera GT in Most Wanted will outrun a maxxed out Carrera GT in Carbon.

- Drag racing. Actually, it's more like "let's play dodgeball with traffic" compared to drag racing in the Underground games.

- Helicopters in cop chases.

- A simpler performance upgrades system. They are unlocked sequentially after beating Blacklist members. In Carbon it's completely random and sometimes confusing.

- Oh yeah, and the Blacklist itself. The Blacklist members (bosses) are worth racing against. Carbon's crew leaders are just... meh.

- LAN mode! Why was it removed from Carbon? (even though getting LAN to work in MW is a real PITA)

- One of the most polished game UIs. It fits the game well.

- And of course, the soundtrack. Also fits the game.

Both have checkpoints/tollbooth racing, cop chases (Carbon seriously dumbed down the importance of cops; in Most Wanted you must purposely tick off the cops to advance in career mode), and funky cutscenes. Carbon's video work is a bit more indepth and enjoyable than MW.

Oh, and both games have crash to desktop problems. For Most Wanted, sometimes the game likes to crash with a Visual C++ error when there's too many cops chasing after you. And that's with the latest 1.3 patch. :/

Generally speaking, Carbon is more about controlling your car. Most Wanted is more about speed. I'd take MW over Carbon. There is one challenge in MW where you flee from cops in a cop cruiser. :p

p.s...if you REALLY want to play as a cop in the NFS world, I think Hot Pursuit 2 offered you to play as a police officer. But the game is like...6 years old and do not run on Windows XP :laugh:

I have HP2 on my machine. It runs pretty well.

Edited by rm20010
While for some reason I hated Underground 2, Carbon was alright - but only if you're willing to adapt to some changes over Most Wanted. The graphics in Carbon are better, but only if you disable the God awful motion blur. I still prefer the breathtaking scenes in Most Wanted. You can't beat driving with the sun glaring in your eyes :cool:

What Carbon has that MW does not (most on this list don't count as positives for me):

- Canyon duels. Definitely not my favourite.

- Drifting. Quite a hell of a lot harder than the Underground series.

- Autosculpt. Who uses that? :huh:

- A crew that is useful to you in the beginning, but a pain in the ass afterwards.

- Speaking of your crew: EXTREMELY CHEESY FMV BIO VIDEOS OF YOUR CREW.

- Reward cards. Good for boasting e-ego, and unlocks extra stuff.

- The whole concept of controlling territory. Meh.

- Muscle cars.

- One of the most mixed up and underused EA TRAX soundtracks ever. There's hip hop, grime, and techno that are rarely heard in game - instead you hear EA's own in-house composed soundtrack. It's always the same damn 4 songs playing in circuit races. Should I mention they took in Most Wanted's chase music that sounds completely out of place given Carbon's atmosphere- and there's no option to shut it off?

- Tweaking your car's performance is illogical: you'd have to "rebuy" a part to tune it. I prefer Most Wanted's simple performance tweaking menu. Play Underground 2 if you're that obsessed with performance tweaking.

What MW has that EA axed from Carbon:

- Junkman parts. Your maxxed out Carrera GT in Most Wanted will outrun a maxxed out Carrera GT in Carbon.

- Drag racing. Actually, it's more like "let's play dodgeball with traffic" compared to drag racing in the Underground games.

- Helicopters in cop chases.

- A simpler performance upgrades system. They are unlocked sequentially after beating Blacklist members. In Carbon it's completely random and sometimes confusing.

- Oh yeah, and the Blacklist itself. The Blacklist members (bosses) are worth racing against. Carbon's crew leaders are just... meh.

- LAN mode! Why was it removed from Carbon? (even though getting LAN to work in MW is a real PITA)

- One of the most polished game UIs. It fits the game well.

- And of course, the soundtrack. Also fits the game.

Both have checkpoints/tollbooth racing, cop chases (Carbon seriously dumbed down the importance of cops; in Most Wanted you must purposely tick off the cops to advance in career mode), and funky cutscenes. Carbon's video work is a bit more indepth and enjoyable than MW.

Oh, and both games have crash to desktop problems. For Most Wanted, sometimes the game likes to crash with a Visual C++ error when there's too many cops chasing after you. And that's with the latest 1.3 patch. :/

Generally speaking, Carbon is more about controlling your car. Most Wanted is more about speed. I'd take MW over Carbon. There is one challenge in MW where you flee from cops in a cop cruiser. :p

I have HP2 on my machine. It runs pretty well.

I agree with you . But one thing I don't is Drag Racing. I'm glad that they took it out. For me, I'd rather Drift instead of Drag. In UG2, you could actually drift along side someone else. I thought this was in Carbon. Nope. Another thing is that EA intended Carbon to have it's own 'style'. Same with every Underground after games has.

As I said before, the game has tons of potential. EA just screwed it up. It was said that they would include a ton of cars. Yes, but to the fact you cannot use them in career. like WTF. I was soo ****ed off once I found that out. There were like 15 cars you can use in career and the rest ( total of around 50 cars) is only for online, and ontop of that tons are custom tuned and some are stock. Those cars you cannot I repeat you cannot modify at all, even outside of the Career mode. As what I learned from my gaming class, you do not, absolutely do not take away something you already gave the player, or when the player achieves something and they cannot use it. The more I type about Carbon the more now I hate it. Yes, the game is also stupidly unstable and has EA made a patch out for it to fix it? Nope. The 1.3 patch was for online features. I am not even going to start with the online part.

Hopefully when Crysis, or Interstellar Marines comes out I will get rid of this junk.

Sorry, but, both sucks online. People are just cheating, high ping make the race unrealistic...

I have both and I regret that EA didn't even protect it's online system like other games.

My "friend" as pirated the game and his fun is to cheat online... :no:

I liked both in career mode but it's too fast finished...

Most Wanted + Carbon's Drifting = WIN

Most Wanted - Drag + No Drifting = WIN :p

I hate both of them. Drifting always feels like it comes down to luck. Drag is simply a case of learning where and when the traffic cars will be so you can follow a certain line.

Most Wanted - Drag + No Drifting = WIN :p

I hate both of them. Drifting always feels like it comes down to luck. Drag is simply a case of learning where and when the traffic cars will be so you can follow a certain line.

Haha i'll pay that drag comment, but I feel carbon's drifting offers more control and therefor I enjoy it more. Although the split scoring is abit weak. :\

  • 2 weeks later...

I beat MW and I'm about to beat Carbon. Both are good games and I would recommend getting MW first (it's only $20) and then after you beat MW (it'll take some time) THEN you can buy Carbon to continue the story line, etc.

While they are the same series they offer different game plays. I loved MW and I'm enjoying Carbon as much as I did with MW.

Oh and make sure to pick up a controller because keyboard=not for racing at all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!